 Week number one is in the books, which means it is time to fill out waivers for week number two for your season long fantasy football leagues. We are here to answer your questions, get you set for those waivers and try to get those pickups you need to make a run this year. This is the Waver Wire Q&A right here on the Fandill YouTube Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com. Joined here once again by JJ Zacharias. And he of course is the editor-in-chief of numberfire and Fandill. JJ, week one is wrapped up and unfortunately kind of on a bummer note where he most turned out to today, he is done for the year having surgery to repair that knee. So kind of a down note to open things up here. But overall, how did things go for you in week number one? It was fine enough, I'd say. You know, there's a lot of surprises. It was draining, that's for sure. I mean, I do the live stream noon every Sunday on the Fandill YouTube channel. And that was right after we saw the sermon news of him being inactive. And that was kind of a shock, it was surprising. And so, you know, I'm scrambling, going to all my Waver Wires and adding Elijah Mitchell as fast as I can before I have to get on that live stream. And then fortunately on the live stream, I talked up Elijah Mitchell and said to Jim and Michael Hacy, we'll talk about that a little bit and why my brain was going towards Mitchell as opposed to Hacy. And then obviously, you know, results were results and it ended up the way that it did. Let's just put it out there that Elijah Mitchell would not be in this position and we wouldn't be talking about him for probably 15 minutes of the show, if not for that Raheem Mostert injury. I think that's really important to get out there because Raheem Mostert was going to play in front of a lot. I mean, we saw that at the beginning of the game and Mostert was already looking like he was going to have a very efficient day. But you know, it's just a situation where we see a split backfield a lot with San Francisco. But yeah, I mean, it was a very interesting week. I think we learned a lot in week one and hopefully we get some good questions here for the show. Absolutely. And we'll start things off here by talking about a couple of guys who are pretty popular right now by talking to Julian on YouTube, asking about Tyson Williams and Elijah Mitchell both available in his PPR league. And I think this one's interesting because like Mitchell himself is kind of a no-brainer. You know, we'll talk about free agent auction budgets or free agent budget and stuff like that. But like if you got the number one waiver you're burning it on Elijah Mitchell but Tyson Williams being there as well makes it a bit more interesting. So JJ, who are you prioritizing here? I mean, obviously you'd want to add bull assuming you've got the spots to do so. But who would you rank higher between Tyson Williams and Elijah Mitchell? It's really, really tough. Like this is a very, very tough question because here's where my brain is at right now with this is with Tyson Williams, I sort of feel like there's a better floor there than Elijah Mitchell. And I mean that from the standpoint of we know that Baltimore is going to have a lot of running back rushes. We know they're going to be run heavy not that San Francisco is not, but we know that Baltimore is definitely going to be from a competition standpoint. I'm not that, I mean, I do think that we're going to see basically like a 50-50 type split more than likely or maybe we get some other guys sprinkled in like maybe Levy on Bell ends up being better than we expect or something like that. But Latavius Murray looks like he's going to see a decent workload in that, in that backfill as well. But regardless, I would say that Tyson Williams has a better floor. The worry that I have with Williams is like I just said they're going to be that split but also Lamar Jackson takes away some of that touchdown equity as well close to the goal line. With Elijah Mitchell, the risk is that they do what they do and that's just rotate these running backs around and they're very unpredictable each week. Jeff Wilson eventually comes back and he gets involved. Trace Sermon, maybe he's active next week and he just blows up and he's awesome. So there's more volatility with Elijah Mitchell. I think that if Tyson Williams is available in your league right now, that probably means that it's a shallow league. And if it's a shallow league, you probably want to chase ceiling a little bit more than floor. And I would argue that Mitchell is probably the ceiling play just because there's a little bit more ambiguity. But I'll say overall that it's close. It just depends on what your team really needs. Neither guy's going to probably catch a ton of passes either, although Tyson Williams had a good, a decent target share this past week. But that's kind of where I'm at. I mean, I don't think there's like obvious choice between these two guys right now. But I do think Mitchell has a little bit more intriguing upside because you have that potential that what if, what if Elijah Mitchell, you know, is this workhorse, right? I think in most cases and most leagues like 12 plus teams, probably want to just go Tyson Williams is a safer bet. But if you're in like a 10 team league and if he's on your waiver wire right now, I mean, Elijah Mitchell is probably like your RB six anyway. So you might as well just chase that ceiling. I think the other good thing with Tyson Williams, I agree where the upside favors Mitchell, but the floor favors Williams. The other thing that works for Williams though, is that his competition is guys who've been cut recently. Whereas with Mitchell, it is, he's looking at Michael Haste, he's a guy that carried the entire preseason. They brought in carry on Johnson, but also Trey Sermon is there. So I feel like the competition for touches is tougher for Mitchell, which goes to what you said of, the floor is better for Williams, but I do think that the path upside, potentially more clear for Mitchell as well. Let's talk about some free agent budget here because I had a lot of questions. One of which came from Ben, Ben on YouTube saying, hey, JJ and Jim, I had Sermon, but thinking of picking up Mitchell, how much of your free agent budget would you spend out of a hundred? We also have a question out of $200. So to make percentage perspective, JJ, in a vacuum, obviously this is very elite dependent, elite size dependent, situation dependent, but like, what's your like baseline number for Elijah Mitchell from a percentage perspective? Yeah, you know, this question has been everywhere in the fantasy football world today. And it makes a lot of sense as to why, I mean, people are using free agent budgets and they want answers and I understand that. You alluded to this, Jim, every league is gonna be different in terms of how you spend on these guys. Number one, you have to worry about how your league typically spends. If it's a shire league, then you don't have to go as hard on these guys, but if you know that there's some pretty aggressive players in your league, then you might have to go a little bit harder in terms of trying to get a guy like Elijah Mitchell. But then you also mentioned, how big your league is that matters too, because if it's a league that has a lot of players that are rostered already, that means the waiver wire is thin, which means you need to spend more to get these players. So if it's like a 14 plus team league, then you should go a lot harder than if it's a non 14 plus team league. You know, if it's a 10 team league or something, like the question that we got earlier from Julian, I would assume that in a league like that, you know, you don't, you could probably go like 20, 25% on Elijah Mitchell and that's reasonable. Whereas if it's a 14 team league, I think that you can go 50 to 60% on Elijah Mitchell and it's very reasonable to do that too. So if we sort of meet in the middle in a 12 team league, I think the sweet spot is like, and this is gonna be a fairly wide range, so I apologize, but I think the sweet spot is probably the 30 to 50% range for Mitchell. But again, you know, it's just gonna vary a lot. The way that I'm also looking at this, Elijah Mitchell, the reason why I went after him when the news broke about Trey Sermon is because during the evaluation process, during the draft, Mitchell, when he landed in San Francisco, he popped to someone who literally, he's like a Rahim Moster clone, right? He's like the same guy. I mean, they're the same size. They're both really, really fast. He ran like a four, three, five, 40 at his pro day and it's very similar to what Rahim Moster did at the combine. They're both very fast. They're both leaner. They're not necessarily these like bigger bodied players, but they fit what Kyle Shanahan likes and they fit that offense really well. So think of it this way. I mean, Rahim Moster was like a seventh round pick for the most part in most 12 team leagues. That's probably what you're most likely getting out of Elijah Mitchell to sort of play it that way. I think that he's going to be involved. I think he could be the one A in that offense. And as a result of that, I wouldn't fault anyone for going even higher than the 50% market. They really believe in the talent. One other thing to consider with your waiver budget is who you're dropping to pick up Mitchell because that matters too, because you're paying not just to add him, but also to drop the opposing the other person. Like if you're dropping a valuable player, maybe you want to lower that free agent budget number because there is a larger cost tied to there as well. One more question here on Mitchell from Jeremy, asking, would you rather have Mitchell than Sermon Rest of the Way? Now this could go one of two ways because like the 49ers have made their choice very clear who they prefer here, but also Sermon, we saw him get some pass catching in the preseason. He does have that draft capital tie to him. The one thing that I would say is that draft capital doesn't seem to matter too much when it comes to 49ers, both with like Brandon Ayuk, Dante Pettis back in the day, Devo, Samuel, Religion, Williams. Yeah, Joe Williams, I think third round pick they traded up for, stuff like that. So I think that we, for me, I care a lot about draft capital. I think I care a bit less with this specific team. Would you rather Mitchell Rest of the Way than Sermon? This is such a hard one to answer. It's such a hard one to answer. I think, because there's two lines of thought here. Okay, I think that in one hand, you could make the argument that the reason that they had Sermon as a healthy scratch was because of the special teams issue and they would be fine with the other running backs they would have for that day, right? But the reason that they, you could also on the other hand say they went with Elijah Mitchell because they like Mitchell more. And I do think that Mitchell plays that Raheem Mostert and can play that Raheem Mostert role well. And because we already have evidence of them literally choosing Elijah Mitchell over Trey Sermon here in week one, I would probably rather go Mitchell than Sermon. And I just think it's logical to think that way right now. The way that I'm thinking about that though is more like a 55 to 45 split as opposed to like I'm all in on Elijah Mitchell. It's a very, very close. I can make an argument either way, but I'd probably lean Mitchell just because we've seen them make a decision. We've seen an action and usually when we see those actions that's when we should take action. And Jeremy, one thing I would say is if you're deciding to drop Sermon for Mitchell I would try to hold both. I would try to hold on to Sermon if you can, try to find someone else, see how it shakes out and react based on that. Once we have more information. Let's move now to some other questions here. Not Elijah Mitchell related one from Kevin. Should I pick up the Browns defense against the elite Tyrod Taylor Texans offense or stick with the Packers for another week? Any of the streamers to consider? I will mention it is a Tyrod Taylor revenge game. And I feel like that's going overlooked this week. So are you willing to risk it with the Browns against the Tyrod Taylor revenge game or are you going Packers versus number one quarterback of football, Jared Goff? I can't remember. Are the Browns at home this week? Yeah. Okay. They are 12 and a half players. Yeah, yeah, okay. So it's a really similar situation because Green Bay is at home too. I'm going to go Cleveland here though because I just trust the defense more. It's a better defense throughout and they played better. I mean, I understand that they still weren't flawless but they also played against arguably the best offense in the league in week one. And I don't really think that the Texans offense is necessarily significantly better or any different than what, from an opponent's standpoint versus what we're going to get from Detroit. And Jared Goff, I mean, I know he played in the negative game script. He was playing in a lot of garbage time. Your boy did not look bad in that. I mean, he was not terrible against San Francisco. He did throw that pick six though which kind of ruined things. And the Detroit offensive line, I mean, on paper can be good too. Vanessa well played really well. Shocker, but a good tackle. Moved back to left tackle played well. Who could have guessed that? Yeah, exactly. So I would go with Cleveland over Green Bay. Only base is a very good streaming option too. Those are two top five options this week. Absolutely for sure. Let's talk to a shaken bake one, four, five over on YouTube. Rank these waiver receivers. Got a manual Sanders who was overthrown a big deep ball by Josh Allen by 15 yards. Tim Patrick, KJ Hamler with the injury to Jerry Judy or Marquez Valdes Schindler. I would say all these guys are very interesting JJ and I have no objections to any of them. Who would you rank highest from that group? I'm gonna rank these guys a manual Sanders first because I think that he's just, I mean, I liked them going into week one. He was a 15 transactions guy going into week one. You know, Gabe Davis was banged up a little bit in that game. That's why the snaps were looked the way that they looked but even still, you know, manual Sanders was slotted to be the number two guy or the top perimeter guy outside of Stefan Diggs on that team entering the season. And, you know, they're gonna bounce back. They're gonna be a better passing offense than they were against Pittsburgh. They struggled a little bit against Pittsburgh last year too, offensively. So I'm not like that shocked at the outcome. So I'm gonna go manual Sanders first. I'm actually gonna go. So obviously Jerry Judy is gonna be back eventually, right? So it's a four to six week injury. I'm not gonna go with one of the Green Bay or not one of the Denver wide receivers. I'm gonna go to the Green Bay guy. MVS really, really awesome low key waiver ad this week because Green Bay was awful offensively. Didn't score a single touchdown in that game against New Orleans, but MVS had like a 22% target share. He had a lot of air yards in that game. And there's a lot of talk at a camp, at a Packers camp before the season that MVS, that this could be like a big year for him. And so just given the peripherals that we saw on week one, I mean, we know that there's gonna be a bounce back with that offense. They're gonna put up three points every week. I'm gonna go MVS number two. You know, I wrote up Tim Patrick over Hamler but then there's reports that Hamler was playing with the ones and I can go either direction there. I'd probably go Patrick as sort of the safer play of the two, but I think that Emmanuel Sanders and MVS are better options off the wire this week. Yeah, with MVS, the Saints basically said like, no, no, no, you're not gonna be as deep and not every team's gonna be smarter to play MVS that way. So I think that he's gonna have those pop weeks he had last year. I agree the camp buzz is positive and interesting for him. KJ Hamler, the drop touchdown, big bummer there. Teddy put it right in the money but Hamler couldn't quite hold in but I think all those guys are viable pickups this week. Let's talk to Alvin and get a temperature check for you on Najee Harris. He's asking, would you trade Miles Sanders for Najee Harris? And I feel like this one is an obvious yes. So I wanna use it as like a jumping off point for you, JJ. Talk about Najee based on what you saw from in week number one. Yeah, look, you know, there's obvious concern about the Pittsburgh offensive line and it sort of came to fruition and we saw it all with our eyes in week one. Not only like sort of a makeshift offensive line but it's an offensive line that hasn't played the other very long. And so, you know, I think that we see that improve as the season goes on. You know, Najee Harris wasn't efficient but he did see all of the running back touches in that backfield because he played 100% of the team snaps in week one. You know, you're not gonna get that kind of bell cow workload in those peripherals very easily whereas Miles Sanders, we've only seen Sanders and he was fine. Like Miles Sanders is a good running back but we've not seen Miles Sanders which I think is a concern or could be a concern eventually in a negative game script, right? Because we saw in that game they use Kenneth Gainwell a decent bit as a receiver. And I think when Philly- And in the two minute drill they went to Gainwell over Miles Sanders. Exactly. And if and when we see this Philadelphia team which didn't have a high wind total entering the season because they're not that great if and when this Philadelphia team is in these negative game scripts we might see a lot more Kenneth Gainwell. So to me it's obviously Najee just given the workload. You know, I know people are gonna say oh he's inefficient the Steelers offense doesn't look very good. I mean, they get Vegas this week. This could be a get right game for this offense. You know, they're at home, Vegas, short week traveling across to the East Coast for a one-off game. Emotional game on Monday? Yeah. Yeah, there's just so much working in the Steelers offense's favor that I think that this would be the get right game for Najee in the offense. So this is the time to buy them. Yeah, Alvin, I would be broadly looking to see what you can get for Sanders right now because I was very concerned about his workload. I liked Miles Andrew going to the year very concerned personally right now. So after Joshua, one quick Elijah Mitchell question here he'd have to drop Will Fuller or Loviska Chanel to pick up Mitchell. Would you drop one of those two guys? And if so who? Cause like that's those are pretty good dudes who I'd like to have in my team if I could have the choice. Yeah. I mean, it sounds like it's a pretty shallow league. Yeah, 10 man, half PPR. I mean, of the two I dropped Fuller over Chanel but you know, it just depends on, you know, this is, I talk about this on the late round podcast a lot but the way that you manage your bench should be a reflection on your starting lineup. If your starting lineup is weak at running back then you probably need to add Elijah Mitchell and drop Will Fuller. If your starting lineup is not weak at running back then you don't need Elijah Mitchell and you can just keep those wide receivers. Yep. Let's go to Jamar here, two part question. He is heavy at wide receiver, lost Ryan Fitzpatrick. Would you trade Corey Davis from Matthew Stafford or his other question was would you pick up Teddy? So would you trade Corey Davis a high usage wide receiver for a team willing to sling it down field a bit last week for Matthew Stafford or would you stream with Teddy Bridgewater versus the Jaguars this week? Yeah, I mean, look, Stafford's gonna have a good year but he's still in that bucket of pocket passers who likely won't have a top five ceiling in fantasy football. It's just the way that it is. I mean, Tom Brady and Matthew Stafford both lit it up on the football field this past week and they were still not top five options in fantasy football and has everything to do with the rushing component and what we see with the rushing component. And so I'm not gonna be aggressive in getting one of those players. I would rather just embrace streaming for a little bit and then if things just get really, really tough then sure, pull the trigger and make a move like that but Corey Davis is gonna see a high target share this year, he could be in store for a decent season and Teddy Bridgewater this week is in a really good spot and so I just don't think that is necessary to do that right now. Yeah, I would go to Teddy this week, see what happens from there. Dust Prove is saying, is Michael Hasty worth stashing? We thought about him passing with that 49er situation. It seems like he may be the preferred guy on passing downs in this current setup here over Elijah Mitchell, Mitchell ran 10 routes on Sunday didn't get any targets whereas Hasty got a couple. So would you also add Mitchell? Obviously you're not dumping like free agent budget out there for him relative to the other guys would you take Hasty and kind of see how things sort out? Yeah, if I'm able to, if I have a bench where the last guy on my bench isn't someone like Latavius Murray or something like that if it's someone like D'Ammie Brown who you just threw a flyer at last week just to see what would happen who didn't have terrible usage, don't get me wrong but it's just not the best situation anymore without Ryan Fitzpatrick. If it's someone like D'Ammie Brown, sure go ahead and stash the running back we know that San Francisco and Kyle Shanahan rotate their running backs a good bit. Elijah Mitchell by the way this past week had an 86% to 87% running back rush share. That was the fourth highest that we've seen from a San Francisco running backs since Kyle Shanahan became head coach there. So there's something to that but it also tells you that they never give their one running back all the touches which means a guy like Hasty could step in and see more work than we're projecting. So yeah, I think that he's a everyone's gonna be spending a lot for Elijah Mitchell which they should but if you can get Hasty for like a dollar then go ahead. Yeah, let's get a temperature check here on Aaron Jones after that rough week last week Milo is asking should they trade Aaron Jones and for Robert Woods? Other receivers are Terry McClourn and Brandon Iuk making them feel like they need to make a move. I think one factor weighing in here is that the receivers on waivers are not too bad this week. If we have guys like MVS kind of lingering out there I think that's pretty intriguing. Robert Woods also did not run as many routes as Van Jefferson kind of a concern for me. I also like Aaron Jones. So I think you know where I stand here. JJ, where do you sit? Aaron Jones versus Robert Woods. Yeah, easily Aaron Jones. You know, I understand it was a rough day for Green Bay players, but don't sell low right now. And as you noted, Robert Woods was not utilized the way that we would want him to be utilized. And because they have Stafford, sometimes we see this where teams upgrade their quarterback position. Sorry, Jim, I know you're a golf truzor. You know, they upgrade their quarterback position and we see a lot more players involved in that. This is why Tom Brady is so good at playing football is because he knows how to go through his progressions and get the ball out to open players. And sometimes that's the fifth option, you know, on a certain play. And we saw that distribution happen with the Rams in week ones. There's gonna be some, probably a little bit more volatility maybe outside of Cooper Cup within the, just because him and Matthew Stafford are clearly besties, you know, they're eating breakfast together every day, evidently. So, you know, aside from Cooper Cup, I just don't know, there's might be more volatility than we expect from some of these pass catchers in the Rams offense. So, yeah, I mean, this one's still easily Aaron Jones free. Aaron Jones is gonna go ballistic this week. The whole Green Bay offense is just gonna go absolutely nuts this week. I hope so, as someone who needs them to pick things up here. Let's talk to Ryan. He's asking for deeper leagues. Is Zach Moss still worth a bench spot? Zach Moss, a healthy scratch this past week, the bills opened up in a five receiver set. So who needs a running back? And you can just do that or have Isaiah McKenzie as your running back, apparently. Would you keep Zach Moss in a deeper league specifically? Yeah, in a deeper league, I would. I mean, here's the other thing too, is that when you see coaches make a decision and then the outcome of that, because they're results based. I mean, it's just the way that humans think and it's definitely the way that NFL coaches think. When the result of that decision that they made is not a good one, which for the bills it was not because the offense didn't look very good and they lost the game, you have to imagine that something changes. And so, yeah, I mean, I think that they need a bruiser in that backfield, even though I'm not like this, like get all good running backs and running backs matter a whole lot and football and blah, blah, blah. They still probably need some sort of bruiser because they're really just Devon Singletary and Matt Berita back there and Josh Allen. But he's obviously, you know, you can't rely on him to just run the football 15 times a game. So yeah, I think that Moss is still worth a bench spot. Yeah, I do too, because there's still a lot to be decided with the way that backfield shakes out. Let's talk to Raymond saying, JJ mentioned in your podcast that there are quite a few tight end pickup options. Thoughts on Cole Comet. They already have Alan Robbins. But I think the good thing here is Robinson and Comet don't really cannibalize each other too much. So I wouldn't worry too much about that personally. But thoughts on Cole Comet broadly, entering week number two. He's fine. He's a streamer this week, I think. You know, yeah, I mean, I could have thrown him in the bucket that I mentioned on that show. You know, I mentioned Tyler Conklin was even one of the guys that I mentioned. So yeah, he's probably like in the Tyler Conklin tier where they're going to run a decent amount of routes. He's probably going to be utilized a little bit more, but the situation offensively isn't as good as long as Andy Dalton's under center. And I would argue that even when Justin Fields is under center, it's not going to be, like I think that people, I mean, hopefully it does because I love Justin Fields. But I think people assume that all the pass catchers are going to get significantly better and it's going to be amazing. And they will probably have a higher ceiling week to week, but there's going to be some growing pains. And we, we historically have seen pass catchers not do nearly as well with rookie quarterbacks than with veterans. And I'm not saying that he's not not, he's absolutely an upgrade over Andy Dalton. He should be starting for the Bears. I'm just saying that Cole Comet is not going to be this automatic plug and play tight end. You know, if you're on your waiver wire, I still would be looking at a guy like Dalton Schultz or something, you know, just in an offense, no more Michael Gallup for a little bit. And he should just be peppered in general. Both tight ends honestly are viable because they both had pretty similar peripherals. But you know, like a Dalton Schultz or like an Adam Troutman who saw a 30% target share. I think those guys are just a little bit more attractive to me right now than Cole Comet. And I think that we saw the Cowboys run some more two tight end sets after Gallup got hurt too. So I think that helps both Schultz and Jarwin with that regard. Sockfield-Louise, he's asking, should I drop Latavius Murray for Sonya Michelle? They have Daryl Henderson on their team. Latavius obviously got some work, especially late in that game on Sunday or Monday. And now as an extra, you've got the team, Sonya Michelle, three snaps, I believe, in week number one. So would you drop Latavius for Sonya Michelle? No, I wouldn't. And I'm not a big handcuffer either because here's the thing, if Sonya Michelle starts to dig into Daryl Henderson's workload, you're not gonna start both of those players. You're still gonna just start one of those guys. You're really just saying, I don't know if Daryl Henderson's gonna stay healthy which is fair. But right now I'm trying to get, this part of the season, I'm not trying to play for safety. I'm trying to play for a ceiling. I'm trying to get guys who could be true RB2s and plug and play guys each week. And that's still in the range of outcomes for Latavius Murray. And if it is in the range of outcomes for Sonya Michelle, that means that Daryl Henderson is not gonna do well which means that your team doesn't look as favorable. You know, it's a floor play. That's what handcuffing is. And I want more of a ceiling play. So no, keep Latavius Murray, especially after the week one usage. Like you said, Sonya Michelle has had one touch, I think, in that game. Yeah. And it's not like Michelle's trade was recent. That was a while ago now. So it's not a situation where they're like ramping up by a wooden thing. It's not to Jake, he's asking, he's decided between dropping Tony Pollard, Sonya Michelle, Devin Singletary or Jane's wife for Elijah Mitchell. Between those guys, who would you drop, Vijay? Probably Sonya Michelle, who we just talked about. I mean, you can make the case maybe for Singletary only because the upside probably just isn't... You could play 90% of the snaps and not get double digit points. Like that's the rule for Devin Singletary. There is a hard cap no matter how much he plays. Yeah. And you know, James White got pretty good usage in week one, all things considered. And the Damian Harris fumble, who knows how that changes things in that backfield. So I would go Michelle, drop him first, but then, you know, next would probably be Singletary, honestly. Okay, let's go to Johnny. He's asking, should I trade Damian Harris for Mike Evans and Shellnut? I assume that's just an alt. I love it. I wanted to ask it mostly because of that, maybe laugh. Thoughts on this trade, but also Damian Harris, who had really good usage, but also fumbled late. I wanna hear your thoughts on Damian Harris, but also this trade. Yeah, so I was down on Harris entering the season versus consensus. He was still top 30 running back in my eyes. I'm not saying like a completely void. I mean, he's gonna be trash, but people were like really, really high on Damian Harris. And my hesitation was, if you look at New England's running back history with Bill Belichick over the last 10 years, it's been, hey, if you're a 200 plus attempt rusher, you're not seeing any volume through the air. And then vice versa. You know, they've had James White, they've had Danny Woodhead. They've had these guys, Shane Vereen, these guys catching passes out of the backfield and playing that role. The good news is Damian Harris got some work through the air in that game. He didn't look bad in his passing game reps either. I'll say that. Did not look bad. Did not look bad. And there's not many, there's not like alphas in that offense to throw to, to take away a giant target share either. So I don't mind, I mean, Damian Harris stock to me, despite that fumble, who knows what happens after that fumble, but despite that fumble, Damian Harris stock is up for me. And I'm someone who's been down on Harris as I noted. Would I trade him though, for Mike Evans and Shellnut? Yeah, I would train him assuming, assuming Shellnut is actually Chennault. No, no, no, no, Shellnut over Chennault. Definitely for me. Some random tight end that we've never heard of. Yeah, I would, I would still do that try. I think I would, I would take Mike Evans for Damian Harris like period right now. Right? Like just, just that. But the fact that you're getting Shellnut on top of that, yeah, I do it. The good thing too with Harris is that Remond received Stevenson also fumbled right away in that game. And like, I'm not sure he's played after that. So it could be JJ Taylor could get run at some point, but like, I think that does give Harris a bigger cushion for that job. Well, something Michael Gallup here, obviously gonna be out for, I think three to five weeks there. Would you drop Gallup for Sterling Shepard, JJ? I mean, if you don't have an IR spot, I, you know, if you need immediate, here's how you approach this. If your team needs immediate production, sure. If you're just stashing Sterling Shepard and you might not use him for like three or four weeks, then I would just wait for Michael Gallup to come back because he's probably gonna be a better fantasy asset. But I mean, to me, Sterling Shepard, if he's available, probably the best wide receiver option on the waiver wire. He's not very sexy. You know, MVS is a little bit more interesting and fun and might have more upside, but Sterling Shepard's just the better play. And he's a good player too. He's just not as sexy of an ad. So I would probably, you know, if you need the production, sure. If you don't need the production, I'd probably just hold tight and hope for Gallup to heal and get back on the field. Yeah, cause Gallup had pretty good usage before he got hurt. So if you can hold him, I would try to do that. Big bad Bosco, talking about a couple of guys we had not discussed yet. Remandry Stevenson, would you drop in for Tony Jones? Tony Jones, I know it was like a lot of garbage time, but again, looked good, good offensive line. Alvin Camara may have played every snap in the first quarter of that game. I think I remember reading that somewhere. So not sure what his usage will be in like a more neutral script, but hey, looked fine attached to that Saints offense. Would you drop Stevenson for Tony Jones? Yeah, by the way, Tony Jones is one of those guys where you can't say his name without saying his full name. It's Tony Jones all the time. But yeah, I would take Jones over Stevenson just because, you know, he's already seeing more work in his backfield. The offense is just as attractive, if not more. And then he has the upside, the handcuff plus flex appeal, if something ends up happening to Alvin Camara. So yeah, I would take Tony Jones over Remandry Stevenson. All right, quick one here. Sorry to bring it up, JJ. What do you do about Brandon Iuk? We were in a dynasty league facing each other. And I only won because of Iuk. And if Tyson Williams scored again last night, I'd have been toast. So sorry, I'll let you answer this one and I'll crawl back in my shell. I think honestly, and I didn't put this in my 15 transactions column or podcast today, but I think Iuk is kind of a buy. You know, I don't like buying injured players. And you know, I think that the hammy had something to do with what happened in week one. And you know, there's all these reports coming out now that Iuk isn't like ready to be an end of like, get out of here. We saw him last year be the alpha on that team. He was dominant whenever he got a chance. So I'm going to buy that. I want to buy what I saw, you know, last season, what the number said last season, you know, he is good draft capital. He was a good prospect. All of the above really fits this Kyle Shanahan offense too, and his yak ability. I just have a hard time assuming that Trent Scherfield is going to play above Brandon Iuk in the year of our Lord 2021. It just does not seem like a very reasonable thing to assume. So I'm going to say buy Iuk, you know, maybe don't start him this week and not feel as confident in him this week. But I think Iuk is still someone that I want rostered on my fantasy teams. I do have Trent Scherfield in that dynasty league though. So I wouldn't mind if we, if we let Trent Scherfield eat free Trent Scherfield in the 49ers offense. That's all we got for JJ for today because we're going to send him off we're in transition now to MLB. But JJ, obviously your podcast is already posted for the 15 transactions this week up on number fire as well. Where people find all that? Yeah, so just search for the late round podcast. Any more podcasts can be found. I'll have a 10 trend show dropping tomorrow morning then a sleeper show, then a mail bag show. And then on the Fandall YouTube channel, Sunday at noon, I will be answering start sit questions. And, you know, just a little teaser. I mean, I got to do this just to promote it a little bit, but I did tell people to add Elijah Mitchell on that show. Could have been ahead of it. And so you could have been ahead of it if you tuned in. So definitely check that out noon Eastern on Sunday. All right, find JJ on Twitter at late round QB and check out the late round podcast wherever you get your podcast. Big thank you to JJ back with it. Once again, next week to get you set for week number two, but let's transition now into today's daily fantasy baseball Q and A right here on the Fandall YouTube Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. Get those questions in no matter where you are watching and we'll answer them live here in there to get you set for Wednesday or Tuesday night Slate of MLB DFS. Let's take a look at the slate over here on Fandall.com. I think that for me, the question is do you trust Garrett Cole's hamstring? And I do to an extent. I would put Garrett Cole number two on my list at pitcher for today. Number one though is this guy, the smiling guy, Nathan E. Evaldi. I think that he is number one on this list for today. E. Evaldi facing the Mariners who aren't really that bad of an offense, but they strike out a lot. And that's a good thing for E. Evaldi. He strike out right for the Mariners against righties 25%, 90 WRC plus it is on the road which is a downgrade for almost every pitcher. But still, I think E. Evaldi is the number one pitcher for today. Cole number two, I will go with Marcus Strowman three followed by Frankie Montas number four. All four of those guys to me are viable for tonight. Let's start things off here by talking to Salvatore. Salvatore saying Byron Buxton is a replacement level player. Salvatore, I'm pretty sure I won our bet last week which was DJ Stewart versus Randall Gritchick. Gritchick went deep. So I think you owe me a Byron Buxton 2022 MVP thing in the chat here, Salvatore. Thank you, owe me. DJ says, Jim, a fan doing though with a heads up that you can play a ticket Tuesday free play every Tuesday in the top 5,000 winners get a free entry to the NFL Sunday Million and the top 10 winners get more prizes. Okay, I like that DJ. So it's a free contest it sounds like. So check that out in the fan dual lobby to get an entry into the Sunday Million for this week. Thank you, DJ for letting us know about that cool promotion. DJ says Boston got rocked by the Mariners last night. They did and I used it to order Rodriguez in my picture. So that didn't go too great. And that's why again, I respect Seattle. I think they're a decent offense. They can get things done. But I like the upside of Ivaldi personally with the strikeouts he can get in that matchup. So although we did see the Mariners do well last night and they're not a bad offense, I do still think that Ivaldi grades out pretty well for today. Let's talk to Jerry, favorite sacks for tonight, Houston, New York, Philadelphia. How would you take these? Jerry, I love all of them. Awesome job. I think they are the top three stacks for today. For me, it is the Yankees number one facing off with Alexander Wells. And Wells is kind of the prototype of what you wanna stack against. Low strikeout rate and the contact profile against him is superb in terms of the opposing stacks. And the Yankees been better this year versus lefties and righties. So I think the Yankees have to be number one. Checking out the lineup here. We have Kyle Higashioka batting ninth. I'll take that. Luke Voight batting fifth at around $32, Joey Gallo batting sixth. I know it's been really rough recently, but I still think that Gallo worth some swipes here just because we know he has a double-dong upside. We know that he can still go deep even though the strikeout rate is like 97%. That 3% is still pretty good. So I think that Gallo, Voight, Higashioka, all those guys in play for tonight. Number two for me, Jerry would be the Philadelphia Phillies in part because their salaries are awesome. Let's pull out the Phillies here over on Fanduel. I scrolled past them because of course I did. And the lineup is out. Okay, let's put Duba Herrera in there. Let's put Didi in there. Let's get Brad Miller in there. All right, we're cooking with gas. We're gonna go back over here. We're gonna put Ivaldi a pitcher and see what we have left. We have 35, 20, baby. All right, let's go. Put Harper in there, 33 under the left. That means we can stack the Astros. We can stack the Yankees. We can go nuts. So I think to me, Jerry, the Phillies are number two and I'd put the Astros number three, but all three tremendous stacks. So good job by you, Jerry, in your stacking selection for today. Defuse's Jose Ciri hero, yes. Ciri is a guy we looked into on yesterday's stream. I forgot that he was so good in Triple A because they called him up. It feels like two weeks ago and they just sat him. And I was annoyed because I wanted to check him out eventually. And for some reason, that two-week gap, I'd forgotten how good he was. And he was awesome. Two homers last night. If he plays again today, I'm in on it. I will say though that, oh, he's actually the line of his own, Jose Ciri back in there, as is our guy, Jazz McCormick. Oh, baby. We can go nuts on the Astros here. So let's go Tinker. Put Ciri in there. Let's put Mr. McCormick in there. And we're at 34.67, which means, probably do whatever he wants. I want to get Jordan Alvarez in there. I just like the power he's been showing recently. And also the salary is lower than it should be. Then we're choosing between Altuve, Bregman and Correa. Talked this morning about how Bregman has been hitting the ball a lot better since he came off the IL, had a home run last night. I do like what he's been doing, but the problem is I've got the salary here, which means I can kind of pick whoever I like most between that group. So Correa, 226 ISO versus Reides. Altuve is at 233. Bregman hitting the ball better recently. This number is misleading. She was pretty rough before he went on the IL. So I would say you can choose any of those guys and put them number one. If I'm choosing one, it's probably gonna be Altuve because I tend to have a pretty rough time filling out second base in general. So I feel like I'd go Altuve. And honestly, you could put Correa or Bregman over Alvarez as well. You need to fill out feel, but I think all those guys are great. So the Astros, very easy to stack for tonight. Thanks to our hero, Jose Ciri. Salvatore says Byron Buxton, 2022 MVP. Awesome. Salvatore, your debt's been paid. You're free to comment as you please. DJ Gibson against the Cubs. It's a good matchup, DJ. So I understand the inclination to give them a look here, but Gibson just doesn't get enough strikeouts. This is over, he has eight starts with the filler, eight outings with the Phillies. 15% strikeout rate. I want to get more strikeouts elsewhere. Julia says, I am taking the Reds over the Pirates. Okay, the Reds here, let's see. Are they the main Slates? I don't think they are. So I haven't studied this game because I haven't had time to study non-main Slates recently because of MLB. That's Wade Miley versus Dylan Peters. Thumbs up, Julia. I agree. Let's talk to Salvatore. Do we like the Nats today? I don't dislike them, but I will say Salvatore. I think there's a lot of volatility here. And the reason there's volatility is because Hazel Zezardo has had a couple of good starts recently, he's had eight strikeouts in two minutes past three starts. So he's been getting better. And I still potentially foolishly believe in the talent of Hazel Zezardo. So I'm hesitant to believe he's fully broken and can't be repaired. That's why I don't want to go all in the Nationals. But in between those two starts did have one that was kind of a clunker still. So Lane Thomas is in play. You mentioned, or some mentioned Ryan Zimmerman. Was it? Yeah, Salvatore mentioned Ryan Zimmerman. I think Hikio Deep, Carter Keiboom's an option. Josh Bell's an option. Juan Soto can hit lefties as well. So I do think the Nationals are a play for stacking today's Salvatore because Lazardo has shown some life recently. Not going to put them as high. Let's talk to Alvin. How do you rank the Giants as a stack? Didn't get to them in the top five or the top couple for today on the show, but I do think they're the pretty solid option facing Jake Arietta. The reason it wasn't as high is because the park is always underwhelming. They blasted a boy U-Darvish last night. So they can still do well despite that. Arietta has been getting some ground balls still. Another reason to be a little bit lower on the Giants, but like they're a great offense. They're facing guys really struggled. So I still think they're pretty high up there Alvin. I just ranked them beneath the Yankees, behind the Astros, behind the Phillies. But then they're kind of in that discussion with the Nationals as being in consideration there as well and with the A's as being a potential option to go to there. Sivan, thoughts on a Boston stack. Boston facing Tyler Anderson. Anderson keeps the ball in the ground pretty well. Not a big strikeout guy. Does let up, sorry, he suppresses hard contact. Doesn't keep the ball in the ground. I don't think it's out of play. Sivan, I think you could definitely go there. Not as high for me just because I do think that Anderson does a good job of contact suppression and I want other high-sourced stacks more, but I think they're an option, just not one I'm as high on. Sivan, favorite value hitter. Jose Ciri is up there. Minimum salary. I like Brad Miller a lot. I like D.D. Gregorius a lot. I go to the Herrera a lot. If you made me pick one, I'd probably go, where's Brad Miller hitting? Is he hitting fifth or seven? He is fifth. Brad Miller, number one for tonight for you. Sivan. DJ, would you stack the Angels against Geolito? He's been slumping. So he's coming out the IL. I think he just got activated literally today. Didn't have a rehab start. You could play that angle and go with the Angels, but there aren't just aren't a lot of guys I want to use on the Angels. Geolito's pretty good, so I would be not going there personally. Sivan asking for thoughts on an Atlanta stack and the White Sox. Let's go over here and check out the matchups. Bray is facing John Gray. Don't really want to stack that. White Sox facing Paki Norton. Great name. Gets a lot of ground balls. This is over his two starts in the majors. Really low fly ball rate at 16%. He did get a lot of ground balls in the minors as well. So I think they're okay. Very good team versus lefties obviously, but I'm not going to prioritize them because Norton does a good job of getting ground balls. Sivan is asking for my favorite value starting pitcher. Don't really have one. I would say the lowest I want to go for today is Marcus Strowman at $9,000 because the drop off after that is pretty steep. So to me, I would say Marcus Strowman at $9,000. I want that to be my floor. I think the good thing here, Sivan, is that we've got good value options, both of the Phillies. And now with the Astros, we can use both McCormick and Ciri. So I actually think we can pretty comfortably spend up for today. So not really into the lower salary guys. Jerry, anybody the Mets bad as you like and do you think Barrios will do well? So Barrios, he's facing the Rays. They're a high strikeout team, but they also have a lot of lefties. Barrios has struggled with lefties. They're a good team overall. Barrios not a massive priority for me. So I'm not going to be super high on him because the struggles with lefties and just thinking they're better options elsewhere. And do I like any of the Mets badders? So they're facing Jake Woodford. Woodford is not a dude we've seen a whole lot. We've seen him mostly in the bullpen, but he got some ground balls when he was in the minors. He had some ground balls in the bullpen as well. Let's pull up the larger sampling on Woodford because the sample I have on the sheet is just four starts. Let's check out and filter in the minor league numbers and the bullpen numbers. See a 23% fly ball right allowed in triple A. 32% of the majors you include is time in the bullpen. So I'm okay being lower on them, not a super great offense to begin with, but then also facing a guy who can get some ground balls. So I think they're more not really on my map for today. He's asking about the Dodgers. Dodgers facing Luke Weaver. Weaver has made two starts back. He's gone 79-78 pitches, hasn't been like amazing by any means. So the Dodgers I would say are consideration diffused because they're very good. So I think that's a positive here, but I'm not going to prioritize them over the Yankees, over the Astros, over the Phillies. So they're kind of like a stack after that. I would say the Nationals probably above them too because of the upsided versus the Lazardo. But yeah, they think they're a consideration. So Vaughn, how would you stack the Oakland A's? Let's see if there's a lineup out yet for them. I was worried about the weather this morning. It doesn't look as bad now. I would as always recommend you check out the forecast by Kevin Roth or Roto Grinders once he updates that later on today because he is much smarter than I am. And he would have a better read on the weather situation. There, as of right now, not super concerned about that, but check back what he says later on. Okay, so Matt Chapman, bang depths. He's not in line for today. We do have Matt Olsen in there. So he's going to be the first guy we add on. It's really hard to stack the A's without using Olsen just because he's so good. So I want to get him in there. Seth Brown is batting sixth. I find that very interesting because Seth Brown, not a bad hitter and doesn't always play. When he does play, he tends to produce. Seth Brown versus Righties, a 260 ISO, 52% fly ball rate can steal some bags as well. So to me, I'd say Seth Brown's actually the first or the second guy put in here. Is he minimum? He's minimum, how is that true? Okay, why'd I put him in utility? That was stupid. See, oh yeah, he's first base slash outfields. Let's put Seth Brown in the outfield. Minimum salary. Oh my goodness, what am I doing here? I can put him in the outfield. Let's put him in the outfield. Let's do this. Bang, all right. Matt Olsen, Seth Brown, I think those are the first two guys you start with in terms of stacking the A's for today. Other guys, my boy Jed, not a big power guy. Sean Murphy, tends to be kind of interesting. He's got two 13 ISO versus Righties. Good, bad at ball data. Kind of don't hate that. It does lock up your utility because I'm assuming you have Olsen in there as well, but like, hey, you know, it can kind of get you flexibility. Like if you want to go Al Tube, Bregman, Correa, you put Siri in there. It's a pretty fun lineup. So I think Brown and Murphy, both really good value options for today on that team. Never choose between Canna. We could go with Starly Marte. Probably those two guys, Canna or Marte. So we want the Marte-Parte, but we want to go with Canna. I'm going to go with Marte just because I got the sour to get there. If we do that, spelled it wrong. Good job. That works. I think this is your four player stack for the A's. Little stars and scrubs type action, but both Brown and Murphy to me are really viable value options for today. Dan says, I'm also looking at the Atlanta and the White Sox stacks. Yeah, I think that the White Sox are good. They're fine. Just not as high as the other ones. Rob, that's a Houston stack. Al Tube, Bregman, Tucker and Alvarez. If you can fit all four of those guys, do it. I don't think I can for today because I'm going to be spending a picture, but I like all of them. And again, then a Houston stack, Jose, Siri, and I'm also good with McCormick. So Rob, they kind of fit even if you can't get to those guys. I think that they're totally fine. I like Houston a lot for today. Jerry, do you think Atlanta and the Colorado game will be a slugfest last series against them? I think all gains one over 10 runs. I think that series might have been in Colorado. That would influence things because it's a much better run scoring environment. Atlanta's not bad, but Colorado's better than literally everything. See the John Gray versus Tukey. Tukey's pretty volatile. So I wouldn't mind some one-offs on the Rockies. The problem is it's hard to get a full stack in there because they're really bad. So I could see some one-offs on the Rockies, but that's kind of it for me for there. So I'm asking you about a Toronto stack for today. They're facing Drew Rasmussen, low strikeout guy, does get some ground balls. He's had good results. So I do want to note that because there are some guys just out from their peripherals. Rasmussen may wind up being one of those guys, but not the worst profile for stacking against. So Toronto's an option, Sovon, not out on them. Any under-the-radar stacks for today. Let's check out the implied totals here because that tends to be how you can identify which teams will be more under-the-radar. Try to look for teams with lower totals, not like the top, top, top end totals and see who's flying to the radar there. So the Yankees, Astros, White Sox, be pretty popular. Phillies probably will because of the value there. So the A's might actually be a pretty good under-the-radar stack for you, Sovon. The Giants, the Nationals. I would say for looking for teams I like enough and don't have super high implied totals. Washington, San Francisco, Oakland, the top ones there. Let's talk to Salvatore Rangers under-the-radar, I think. I think they're facing Grenki. Yeah, Grenki has not been great so far this year. He's also coming out the COVID-IL, so not sure what things may look like for him after missing some time. I just don't like that offense overall. That's the one concern, but I think the spot is okay. I'm not gonna stack them Salvatore because I just don't like their offense very much. I stacked them last night, it was very painful. Tried not to do that again, but there is some uncertainty around Grenki, which could help there. DJ's asking about a guy on that team, asking about Culberson, is he in the lineup for today? Yeah, batting eighth, probably not gonna try not to get there. And then with our boy, Yanni. Let's see where he's at. Batting ninth, he was staring right at his name. I'm not sure why he searched for it. I would try not to, DJ, personally. Alvin, are you locking in Phillies as a three-man stack for single entry? Potentially, potentially, because that means I can get to everyone. I would say though, Alvin, I might prefer a four-player stack from the Phillies because A, I can do it, and B, that means I get Harper. You could go with two of the value guys, like maybe you go, let's try this here. Let's go with just, whoopsies, didn't want the Orioles. Let's go with just Miller and just Didi, and go Harper without Odebel Herrera and see where we're at there. If we, I can't spell, I'm gonna play on the computer because my typing's not great. Okay, if we could go with just those three guys, 3140 left, if you go with Jose Ciri, that puts you up to 3425. Kind of don't mind that. So you could go with like three more Astros, get Althube, get Bregman in there, or get McCormick in there too. I think that a three-player stack, as long as it includes Harper, Alvin, I really don't want to do a three-player stack that omits Harper. I think that's kind of the stipulation for me for today. So if you get Harper in there, yes. I think that a three-player stack works, and you can go with like a one-off on the Yankees or something like that, but I think that four, very viable for the Phillies for today. DJ says, rain all day for the Royals, A's game, don't play that game. I would check again with the forecast because he is a meteorologist, I am not. As of right now, dark sky weather says, yeah, it's gonna be raining there again. So see what he says, but that would ruin the A's into the radar thing. DJ, do you like Max Stasi? I like him in general, think he's a good player. Today, he is facing Geolito. So no, don't want to go there against Geolito. Jared, do you think pitching tonight will be at a minimum and big bats probably will get off tonight just to get feeling? I think that because Coal is not a lock, there is a route for that happening. The good thing I would say though, Jared, is you can use it at big bats and use Ivaldi and use Strowman and use Montas guys like that because of the value guys. So I would say like the big stacks can still pay off while you use a higher salary pitcher. That's what I would say there. So yeah, I think that it's very real because I love the Astros, love the Yankees. That could very well happen, but I would try to get in both, fork in all those notes. DJ, can you do a Philly stack, Blue Jays, Padre stack with Coal as a pitcher? Probably not Blue Jays, just because I feel like the Sours would be a bit prohibitive there, that'd be my concern there. As far as the Padres go, they're facing Anthony DiScafani. Really good at expressing our contact, tough park for tonight. So I would say a Philly stack with like McCormick and Siri, that might be the way I want to play things here because if you go with Coal, Siri, McCormick and then those three value Phillies, you're kind of cooking pretty fun there. So I would check that out for me personally. Alvin, how do you rank the stacks for single entry? So for single entry, I'm going to Yivaldi, I know that. Guaranteed because I don't think he'll be all that popular. I think I tend to be hiring Yivaldi than most do. So I can go Yivaldi, feel good about that. Under the assumption I go Yivaldi, I still want to go Phillies I think, just because I get so much value there. And I think probably the Astros, I know that's might be a little bit chalky given the Astros and the Phillies, both have pretty high implied totals, but I do like them if you want to go a bit more contrarian there Alvin, which is totally fine. I think that I would consider the A's if we get the all clear on that weather. Salvatore says it seems like the wind is always 10 plus mile per hours out in San Francisco, it is. I would say that the stadium is built to counteract that. Like they, I think that they knew when they were building it that it would constantly be blowing out and they kind of built it to counteract the wind intentionally. So I don't tend to care about wind in San Francisco because it's kind of negated by the park. So I would keep that in mind there. Jerry says Cole may be on a pitch count due to that injury. Yes, he, it's not just a pitch count, Jerry. It's also that he might get, he might re-injure himself. He threw a bullpen. And the reason that like, if he were healthy I wouldn't care about pitch count was because he went 70 pitches seven days ago, which to me says he's probably gonna have a pretty close to a full leash. When Cole came off the COVID IL, he came right back and just went nuts. So if you could guarantee me Jerry that his hamstring were fully healthy right now I would say no concerns, be good with him, but I can't guarantee that. So it is concern that maybe they roll him out in short order, maybe he re-injures. Those are the two concerns. Those are the reasons why I am okay putting you of all the above him, but I do still think he's worth exposure for tonight because the upside is still very good. Sivan, what stacks pair well with each other for upside and for more fangirl points? Pairing well together is a good question because a lot of times stacks don't mesh. Like the white socks don't mesh really well with the Royals because the white socks have a lot of catcher slash first baseman you want to use between Grandal, Abrayu, et cetera, et cetera. And then with the Royals you want to use Salvador Perez every time. So I think it's more about positional mesh than other stuff. Specifically, looking at things that have a lot of overlapping positions. So I think that for today, I think that the Astros and the Phillies mesh really well because with the Astros, you're trying to get to Al-Tube, Bregman and other guys. With the Phillies using catcher slash first base, I don't only care about guerrilla against Seriety, so that's fine. Shortstop, I'm okay using Gregorius over Correa and there's not a ton of alveos I want to use. So I think that the Phillies and the Astros mesh really well positionally. I think that's a fun thing for today. Okay, homerun calls from Jerry and DJ. I'll start with DJ. He says homerun calls are Alfonso Rivas, Josh Rojas, Jonathan Villar and Yadir Molina. DJ going totally off the board. Jerry says Rizzo Homer, Gallo Homer, Soto Homer, Harper Homer and Thomas Homer. The theme for the first three is lefty on lefty. I think the Gallo one's pretty good Jerry because he's in a slump. I think that he could come out of it tonight. He does hit the ball well versus lefties. And then you also have the lefty on lefty with Soto there. I like Harper a lot. My homerun call this morning was, I think it was John-Carlo Stanton and the other one was, I don't recall. Was it Didi? I think it was Didi. So we'll stick with those for today. DJ asking about Stroman against St. Louis. Yes, I think he's the number three pitcher for today. Do you like him? Also that's about Bereos against Tampa Bay. A little bit wearier there because of the number of lefties they have. Salvatore says Eric Feddy had 10 strikeouts versus Miami last time with a quality start. Feddy's actually been better recently than I like to give him credit for. This is over his past 10 starters with more sliders. 23% strikeout rate. It's pretty good. So I don't think that's a bad thing to bring up Salvatore because he's been pretty good. He's been better than perception I would say. I'll put it that way. So good of you to point that out. Jerry says Segura home run and then Shane has his boring calls. Our stated in Harper, I love both those Shane. The fun ones Miller and Dahlbeck. Dahlbeck sat last night and it bothered me Shane. I'm very mad about that still. But facing a lefty, a low strikeout lefty specifically who lets them fly balls. Bobby Big flies. I dig it Shane. I'm on board with all four of those. I think they're great. Salvatore says Alderly's Garcia home run. Facing off with a granky low strikeout guy. Garcia can hit dingers. No objections here. Stick with mine with Giancarlo and Didi. We'll see how those go for tonight. That is all that we have here for today on the MLB DFS Q&A. But tomorrow, different schedule. It's the one day of the week we don't have NFL. So our MLB Q&A is at four as opposed to 430. So come by early tomorrow, 4 p.m. Eastern. Fandal YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. Swing by. We'll talk about tomorrow's main slate and get you set for that. Here are the pictures of that one. Couple undecideds. Probably going to be bullpen games, but there are your pictures for tomorrow in case you want to sneak peak at that. If you've got more questions for me, I am on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to JJ Zacharias, who was hosting me earlier on. Talk to taking your waiver wire questions. Check out JJ on Twitter at late round QB. And also on the late round podcast, wherever you get your podcasts. Big thank you to Joy Affleck, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you Joy once again, as always. And thank you to everyone for tuning in. Good luck to you tonight. Good luck with waivers. And also good luck with your MLB DFS lineups. We'll talk to you once again tomorrow at 4 p.m. This has been the FanDuel Live Q&A.