 I think it's been an excellent exercise in raising the awareness of the communities which somehow work on these issues, but not necessarily understand that there are different perspectives, different angles. I think it was also very useful to deepen the understanding and the knowledge of the various communities that are associated one way or another with IEDs and countering the threat of IEDs. We have gone one step further here to say multi-dimensional complex, we need a multi-dimensional response, we need a collective response, how do we make that happen? We have already outlined the various avenues of action, this is already tremendous in a few days. Now we need to make sure that we capitalize on these statements, that the participants are taking that back to their capitals at the right level and that it's followed by action and that resources are attached to these actions by national governments and with the assistance of the others. But everybody needs to buy into it, everybody has to show their commitment into action in dedicating the level of resources that is possible at respective levels. It's a first step. Now it was good to put together in the same room law enforcement and military from various countries when they go back home, they have to maintain this dialogue and a dialogue take place in my view when there is a common objective. This common objective is of vital interest for nations, that should be a good motivation for them to work together, but we must not forget that the police military dialogue has to be complemented by the political side of the house, the diplomats who ultimately give the foreign policy and security orders to their communities and which will be able to convey the position of a country and the strategy of a country. So I would say today in this room we really have the three sides.