 So this is the question I have received. Since that day everybody saw that you were using a lot of palm tops for citation judgments or to maintain that diary whether you would like that it should be year wise, subject wise, references wise. How do you put it across? You have to put it in the form of a different say article 14. In article 14 there are different headings. It could be article 14 unreasonable list of the cases. Article 14 arbitrariness list of the case. Keep it in one place. It may need not be no palm top is out of work since the last 2005 they have stopped manufacturing it. You have to keep a maintain a diary or keep it in your mobile phone itself. There are notes. There are ever note. There are several apps where you can store them. It becomes easy from there. It's like leapfrogging from there. You need not reinvent the wheel. As they say, you need not reinvent the wheel every time. If you keep all this articles, no, I was giving you the example article 14 arbitrariness article 14 unreasonableness article 14 equals being treated equally. Unequals being treated unequally. If equals are treated unequally, it is arbitrariness or it is violated article 14. If unequals are treated equally again and it's arbitrariness. Different things you keep setting out and maintaining the diary. There is no hard and fast rule. But why I am using the palm top or why I would want you to use the apps? Search becomes easy. And when a judge asks a question, you must be able to immediately give him the citation. He'll go gaga over you. That is how you develop your skills. That is how you start endearing yourself to the judge. That is how the judge will always be more attentive to you. In fact, let me give you an illustration. Years back, there was one judge, very stentorian. This was hardly and I was hardly about seven years in the bar, seven or eight years. I had some three juniors. And they were telling me that this judge never smiles. And I said, doesn't matter. And ultimately, you know, from my decision, he became the high court judge also. I said, all right, one day I'll come. I will argue a matter. So I went there. I was prepared well. And for the first time they said, we see him smiling. Why? Because every question that he asked, I had an answer. And I presented it so well that he appreciated it. He was one of those persons who wanted the lawyer to be fully prepared. Any laxity, he would do not frown upon you. So that is what every lawyer must do. Be prepared, read well, know the law completely, read the facts. You are better off in the judge will, you know, appreciate you very, very much.