 The week three fantasy football waiver wire, not quite as intense as what we had for week number two, but still some fun names out there. This is an interesting discussion points for sure. We are here to let you know the top pickups this week and get you set for week number three in your season long weeks. This is the waiver wire Q and A right here on the Fandall YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com. Joined here once again by JJ Zachary, editor-in-chief of numberfire and Fandall find them on Twitter at late round QB and check out the late round podcast. JJ week number two in the books. How did things go for you there? Pretty good. Pretty good for me this week. It seems like it was one of, I mean, this is what happens every year. It's like my bad teams, you know, week one end up doing well week two and vice versa. You and I had a nice close matchup in our numberfire. Nice is not the word I'd use. That's not where I lost to and our super flex league ended up winning by like half a point because of Lamar Jackson just going absolutely berserk in that Sunday night game. So thank you Lamar. Appreciate it buddy. I can now brag and talk about that win over Jim because of you. The site redacted summary of that one said, JJ's team wasn't very good, but you still lost. Basically is what it said. So I felt really good of myself today when I was going to fill out waivers. And then I looked at the waivers and I felt even worse because there weren't a lot of big helpers along the waiver wire as far as guys who can help our teams immediately. So let's start things off here by taking the questions from Daniel on YouTube. He says, JJ, I know Van Jefferson was mentioned on your podcast today, but he wants to know your thoughts on some similar wide receivers. Mark has now the scantling. How dare you mention that name, Daniel, after what happened last night? Just very rude to bring him up after the Ofer last night. Darius Slaton and Anthony Schwartz. KJ Osborne for the Vikings Quintessifus. Do you like any of those options more than Van Jefferson? What are your thoughts on Van relative to that group there? Yeah, so the 15 transactions column and podcast are tough to do from the standpoint of just like narrowing things down to 15. So I try to build off of previous weeks. And so MVS was an ad the previous week. Clearly, he didn't do anything. He's getting a lot of air yards. He's getting a lot of exercise out there. He's just talking a lot of production. So, yeah, I mean, I think that this list in general is a lot of guy, maybe Osborne aside is a lot of players who have decent enough peripherals, but maybe haven't just like elevated themselves. You know, the Van Jefferson recommendation, you were on Van especially, you were on him even after week one because of the splits with like him and Robert Woods. And then that continued for the most part in week two. That's why, you know, after seeing it one week, I was like, yeah, maybe, you know, I didn't like Van that much as a prospect. You know, let's see what happens. And then week two, it's like, oh, he's literally running almost as many routes as Robert Woods is. So, you know, that's what that's all about. And Van is one of those stashes where if something were to happen to a Cooper Cup of Robert Woods, you would see him elevated from a fantasy perspective. But of this list, you know, I just, I try to find players who I think could be elevated to at least the number two passing option in their offense. You know, KJ Osborne would need an injury for that. I know his target share has been fine, you know, and he's, you know, there's some allure there. And this week's matchup is good too. I mean, there's going to be a lot of points scored. So it's fine if you want to go that direction. And I'll probably talk about him on my sleeper show this week. But I think I'm still going with MVS of this group. Because I still think that he has the highest chance of these guys to be a potential, you know, weekend and week out starter flex play type. And again, you know, obviously, something happens in Devonte Adams and he would get elevated a little bit more. But he's the one guy on this list who is honestly the number two option or could be the number two option in his offense. Whereas the other guys need absolute injuries for that to happen. I know like Anthony Schwartz, probably going to see a little bit more work, especially if OBJ can't go or is implying again this week. But, you know, I think MVS will be my pick among this group. And I think tying your receivers to Aaron Rodgers is generally good. Obviously, Van Jefferson has Matthew Stafford, but like fewer guys in the way when it comes to MVS, lot of high leverage work. It wasn't just the deep balls. I also had one in the end zone, which was just a weird looking target. But like, hey, you know, they were throwing the ball, trying to throw the ball towards him in the end zone, which is good. Sinking along the same subjects here with these wide receivers and talking about Van Jefferson, Tanantha is asking, are Terrace Marshall and Mark Ingram drop both for Van Jefferson, KJ Osborne, Michael Carter, Cordero Patterson? Would you drop Marshall or Ingram for one of those guys? I think of those guys, the most attractive to me is Cordero Patterson as crazy as that sounds. The Falcons running back one. Yeah. I mean, look, he dug into- And wide receiver too, apparently. Yeah, right. He dug into Mike Davis' work even more in week two. Week one, it was like a two-thirds split in Mike Davis' favor. Week two, it was honestly pretty close to 50-50 in terms of usage itself. Snaps were still in favor of Mike Davis, but the usage is there. And I think that when you see players perform well, which Patterson has over the first two weeks, I think in week one, our friend Rich Rebar sent out a tweet saying that Cordero Patterson had the most 10-plus-yard runs in week one. And then in week two, he has a good game and he plays well. Those are the instances where you just start to see a guy dig more and more into the player in front of him and that guy's workload. And so you can feel fairly good about a guy like Patterson. I would probably right now, I mean, I love Terrace Marshall. He's, I stand Terrace Marshall, but we have to be realistic about year one. And, you know, Robbie Anderson moved into the slot a little bit more this past week. They had some funky formations going on there for Carolina. I just don't know if Terrace Marshall, unless DJ Morrigan gets hurt, is gonna be a reliable option week in and week out. I mean, we've had two pretty strong offensive performances for the Panthers over the first two weeks. And, you know, we haven't necessarily seen it from Marshall, just from a usability standpoint. I mean, I think he's gonna be great. And then Mark Engerham is their positive game script back. And we can't assume that Houston's gonna be in a lot of positive game scripts. So I think Patterson is my, yeah, definitely not anymore with the quarterback change. I think Patterson is probably my favorite on that list. Yeah. So with Patterson, there are two things that I like a lot. It's the combination of the rushing and the receiving, but also they are actively getting him the ball in the red zone. He played all nine snaps. The Falcons ran inside the red zone. Yes, man, this is not like, it's like, oh, it could be like, oh, you know, they just happened to use him there. We've seen teams do this with speed players in the past. Curtis Daniel got a lot of rush attempts in the red zone last year for Carolina, funny enough over Mike Davis. And then also we've seen Isaiah McKenzie get a lot of work like that with the Bills in the past. It seems as if teams value speed down there, Patterson probably has more of that right now than Mike Davis. So I think he's probably gonna get a lot of work where it matters and he'll get a lot of targets to. I think that Patterson, although the two touchdowns were pretty fluky, the usage where it matters may not have been. Do you wanna ask you Michael Carterquick? Costanta asked about him as well. Carter in week two played 46% of the snaps he had. Let's see here. He had three out of six red zone chances. He had 88 total yards. They were talking positively of him in the post game press conference, but also it's a bad offense. And that matters a lot. Still splitting work with Ty Johnson. It seems like he may have taken a step above Kevin Coleman, but what are your thoughts on Michael Carter based on what we saw in week two, but also the fact this offense is suboptimal? Yeah, that's the thing. I mean, he's a stash. He's fine. I just like Patterson more because the usage between the two of those guys, I mean, Patterson has better usage right now, technically, and he's in an offense. It's a little bit more attractive. For a guy like Michael Carter really emerged, you can stash him totally. Go ahead and stash him. But for a guy like Carter to really emerge, he's gonna have to see probably like a 65, 70% backfield share in terms of volume just because the offense isn't good. And so when the offense isn't good, you need to compensate that for workload. And that's a good example of that is Najee Harris because the Pittsburgh offense has been trash. Ben Rothesberger doesn't look good. The offensive line doesn't look good, but Harris has been okay enough because the volume is there and he's playing 100% of the team snaps or at least a lot of the team snaps. So yeah, I mean, I think Carter's fine as a stash and you hope that Zach Wilson gets better. The offense gets a little bit better. Hopefully the offensive line gets healthier and better. But I would still probably lean a guy like Patterson over someone like Michael Carter right now. Yeah, Patterson's pretty fun. I'm into it for sure. Let's talk to Daniel once again on YouTube. The Raiders are the Panthers defense. We got the Raiders facing the Dolphins, Panthers facing Davis Mills and the Texans. That game is on the road whereas Raiders are at home. I feel like to me if I can get exposure to Davis Mills with Brian Burns and guys like that going against him, I'm probably gonna take that. What are your thoughts on these two options here? Yeah, I'm gonna go Panthers. I didn't have the Panthers in my 15 transactions article because there wasn't as much known about every situation that was going on with the quarterbacks and stuff. So I mentioned the Raiders because they were just a safer pick at the time. But yeah, I mean, I think the Panthers are a very, very good play this week. I would go Carolina. All right, let's talk to Joseph. He's talking about AJ Brown, this Titans offense. Would you drop Ryan Tannehill for Daniel Jones? You were also high on Tannehill this all season. He also has Justin Fields. They've got Justin Fields. Are you dropping Ryan Tannehill for Daniel Jones? Are you dropping Tannehill for a scale guy? How are you handling that quarterback situation given Fields is on the roster and may start in week number three? Yeah, so let's think about what's gone on with Ryan Tannehill so far. Week one, there's only been two games played. So let's not overreact number one. Week one, it was a crazy, crazy game. We talked about this on this show last week where Ryan Tannehill, only like 11% of his drop backs were on play action. And that's just not acceptable for a player who's been one of the most efficient passers in the league over the last couple of years, especially on play action in an offense that's run play action more than any other offense in the league over the last couple of years. At least last season. So with Tannehill yesterday, or two days ago, man, it's Tuesday, two days ago, the Titans offense ran play action back at their similar rate that they did last year. And you mentioned this, Jim, when we talked about this, the offensive line played so poorly against Arizona that it was almost like you can't, we mentioned the Madden thing and stuff and how like when you run a play in Madden, how when you run play action in Madden, you sometimes can't even get the ball off because the edge rusher's already there. That's basically what was going on with that game against Arizona. This past week, the offense looked good. I mean, for the most part, Ryan Tannehill was fine. It's just that right now you're looking at variants in a small sample size where a team like Tennessee, they've had five total offensive touchdowns and four of them have come on the ground. So you have a 0.25 pass to rush touchdown ratio, which is not gonna sustain. That's not how this works. We generally see that ratio across the league closer to one and a half to two. And the Titans with Ryan Tannehill over the last couple of years have been at 1.33. They've thrown more touchdowns than they've run for because it's how NFL teams generally operate. And then on top of that, you should feel even more bullish about that because Tennessee has been more pass heavy so far this year than what we've seen over the last couple of years or few seasons with Mike Rabel because the defense is so bad. So the defense playing worse means a more, a pass heavy script for this Titans offense, which means those touchdowns should skew more towards the pass moving forward. And that's really all that was missing from Ryan Tannehill's game and his stat line in week two. Similar to like a Dak Prescott where it's just like, okay, like they played fine. Dak didn't play horribly bad. It's just that he didn't find the end zone. He didn't have any passing touchdowns. So I liked Daniel Jones this week a lot as a streamer. I think he's a really good play and he's getting the rushing yards that we like. I mean, only two quarterbacks, Lamar Jackson and Jaylen Hertz have more rushing yards than Daniel Jones right now. And that's great and fun. He gets Atlanta and it wouldn't shock me at all if Daniel Jones outscores Ryan Tannehill this week just because he's in such a good matchup. But I would rather have Ryan Tannehill season long and I would rather as a backup and as an upside play and a flyer still keep Justin Fields. One thing I think about with Tannehill is we often want to quarter or target quarterbacks both for season long and DFS in games with high totals. And the Titans are gonna be in a lot of games with high totals given the way their defense is gonna play Titans offense showed enough on Sunday to show they can keep pace. I think that bodes well for Tannehill going forward. Got some questions on Ron Dale Moore here. One coming from DJ on Facebook. Thoughts on picking up Ron Dale Moore. So I want to get your broad thoughts first, JJ. Then we'll get into some specific should I drop more or drop this guy for more, get some tiered thoughts on Moore going forward. I love Ron Dale Moore. Great prospect, one of the best prospects in my model from this draft class. It was just a good draft class in general. So he was sort of like in the wide receiver seven range from a fantasy perspective and projected fantasy perspective. But he was still in like the same tier as an Elijah Moore or like a terrorist marshal or what have you. So yeah, I like Ron Dale Moore, the player. And what I like even more, no pun intended is the fact that Arizona is using him just like Purdue used him which is get him the ball close to the line of scrimmage immediately, let him show off his athleticism which is out of control good and let him do work after the catch. And so that's what they did against Minnesota. That's what they've been doing among qualified wide receivers who have, I think it's 10 or more targets. There's more than 60 of them so far this season. He has the third lowest average at the target. That's fine. Like that's what we want from a guy like Ron Dale Moore because he's not developed yet as a perimeter guy and a down the field guy necessarily. He's a, this is what he does. He's like their Debo Samuel but he's a little bit more athletic. And so, and it's an offense. It's a lot more electric than what you're gonna get in San Francisco. The thing is obviously that he's running behind the three other wide receivers there right now but this is just a classic case of he's a younger guy who is, he's a rookie and he will get more and more playing time as the season goes on. So if you're sitting there saying, oh, I don't want, he had a great game but I don't want Ron Dale Moore because he's still playing behind Christian Kirk. You can't assume he's gonna play behind Christian Kirk by like week seven, right? I mean, you might not even want to assume that he's gonna play behind AJ Green by week seven which would be amazing. But it's just one of those situations where a rookie having these big performances and doing so well with the ball in his hands, you got to assume that's just gonna continue and they're gonna want to use him more and more. So I would definitely be spending a decent chunk of fob on Ron Dale Moore this week. I think the good thing for Moore too is that with the way he's playing his role will not get worse. Like it could stay the same. Like if Cliff Kingsbury is like he's not ready yet to expand this role maybe they keep him running half the routes. It's not gonna get worse. He's too good for that. I think that that's good. There's nowhere to go but up here which is a good thing for Ron Dale Moore. So Michael is asking, would you drop Darnell Mooney for Ron Dale Moore? Darnell Mooney getting a quarterback potential this week who is willing to throw down a field which is new and can potentially hit him on those downfield passes which is new from last year. So would you drop Darnell Mooney for Ron Dale Moore? How have you been those two relative to each other? Do you have a strong feeling here? I have a strong feeling towards, not I have a feeling towards Ron Dale. I don't have like a, I like Mooney this year. I was pretty against Mooney last year. I like him this year. I like Ron Dale Moore though. Yes, Ron Dale Moore Moore. I wanted to make sure that my brain was thinking right here because I agree. Like the main reason too, this is what I think that people don't fully grasp or have in grasp with the Justin Fields change is that when you get these mobile quarter, I mean Justin Fields ran the ball 10 times in less than a game. I mean he played three, not even three quarters the other day and he ran the ball 10 times. When that happens, there's only so many plays that an offense is gonna run in a game. And when a quarterback is taking up a larger chunk of those plays, that means that other players in that offense are not going to be taking on those plays. So I did a study on both rookie quarterbacks and how they affect offensive personnel and fantasy this off season, as well as what happens with mobile quarterbacks. And what I found was number one, rookie quarterbacks very, very rarely support more than one pass catcher in fantasy football. They rarely support even one pass catcher. Let's be honest, but they rarely support more than one. And we should assume that Allen Robinson would be that one, right? And then from a mobile perspective, mobile quarterbacks generally are in more run heavy offenses naturally. And so there's less volume in those offenses and that hurts the pass catchers in those offenses. It actually hurts the running backs in those offenses too. The running backs might be more efficient, but efficiency isn't what's scoring fantasy points. Volume is what's scoring fantasy points. So you could technically bump down David Montgomery slightly too. I wouldn't be as concerned about Montgomery as I would for like a guy like Mooney. And look, Andy Dalton's been atrocious. I mean, he's thrown the ball deep once this season. That's 15 plus area. I don't think he has a single 20 plus area throw this season. So, you know, Mooney probably gets like an upgrade just inherently because he's going from Andy Dalton to Justin Fields, but don't overstate what that upgrade is. This is basically what I'm saying. And then if it's as a standard league, then you're going to skew touchdowns a little bit more. And I just feel a lot better about Arizona's offense generating those scores and I do Chicago's. Yeah, I think the reason that it's an upgrade for Mooney is because where he wins is where Justin Fields wins. That's down the field. And I think that that's good. But like you said, there will be things that will counteract the gains there and make it may make it more neutral than it may seem. So, Rhonda over Mooney, what about DJ Chark? Cause Joseph was wondering about that. Chark got volume on Sunday. What he did with that volume is not as fun. What would you do here, Chark versus Rondale? I mean, I should preface this by saying that I've never been a DJ Chark guy. And, you know, it's burned me. It's also helped me. I mean, he's just been so inconsistent so far throughout his career that it's tough to know what he really is. I would still probably stick with DJ Chark in this case just because Jacksonville, I mean, Trevor Lawrence right now is throwing a deep at a higher rate than any other quarterback because they're seeing these negative game scripts and they're airing it out in those negative game scripts. And Chark is at least seeing, you know, a portion, a decent portion of that, of the targets in that off, especially week one, week one, he like looked like more of the alpha than week two, but I'd probably stick with Chark. But I mean, look, I think that it's gonna be a headache having DJ Chark week in a week out this year. Yep, that is, it's been true for a bit now, which is very frustrating. Well, let's talk to HK. One more question about Rondale Moore. They've got a loaded wide receiver room. They've got some good dudes here for sure. Would you still put in 10 to 15% of your free agent budgets to get Rondale Moore if your receiver room is already looking pretty good? Yeah, I mean, I would still try because if other teams aren't doing it and you get them for cheap, then sure. Yeah, I would still try, you know, you can never have too many valuable players in fantasy football. And I think Rondale Moore can be valuable and you can use them as a trade chip if you end up getting one. Alrighty, let's get one more here. Would you drop Chase Claypool for Rondale Moore? Now, this is very different because Chase Claypool just got five downfield targets. They're not projecting volume for Chase Claypool. It's already there. Yeah, exactly. I would stick with Chase Claypool and just look, here's the thing with the Steelers offense. If the offensive line meshes a little bit better and plays a little bit better as the season goes on, it's really gonna help the down the field game for this offense, which is what we saw at times last year. Like, remember the Colts game last year where they made that comeback and like the offensive line was clicking and they were just throwing the ball down the field a lot. And like that's what this offense should be doing. It's just that, you know, the line's not really allowing for it yet again as we saw last year as well. But if it, you know, if it improves, I mean, this is the baseline, right? For a guy like Claypool and he's still seeing a decent amount of looks better days are ahead for him. Okay, let's go to Alvin talking about a non-ad drop talking about sentiment around players. Alvin's asking how we should view Mark Andrews and Clyde Edwards-Elair given some rough starts. Andrews obviously kind of running as the third fiddle behind Marquis Brown and Sandy Watkins, CEH not only failing to contribute so far but also having a fumble, a critical fumble. He doesn't fumble ever, but did so this past week. What's your thoughts on Andrews and CEH going forward? Kind of hard to sell either of them at this point, I would say. I'm probably less concerned about Mark Andrews just because, you know, it's not like he's playing poorly or, you know, it's a two game sample. We can see them attack the field in different ways against these defenses, depending on what they're giving them. And so, you know, I'm so cool with Mark Andrews and I also don't think that you can really get much for him right now. When it comes to CEH, there's some good and bad news. The bad news that, well, there's more bad news than good news. The bad news is that, you know, he hasn't done very well. He had that fumble. He didn't see goal line, all the goal line work and he wasn't targeted last week. The thing though with that target share that I think is at least a little bit encouraging is that right now Kansas City across the league has the lowest running back target share. It's like 7.5% or something like that. And if you look historically, since 2011, the lowest target share by a team in a single season was Indianapolis in 2012 where they had an 8.3% running back target share. And last year, Kansas City was like at 18% or something like that, 18, 19%. So that number is gonna go up. I mean, we shouldn't just assume that, you know, they're just not gonna target their running backs this year. And that's obviously gonna naturally help Clyde Edwards-Alair. So again, you can't sell him right now. I mean, you'd be selling him so low that it's just not worth it. You just gotta hope that, you know, the matchups haven't been that great either. I mean, let's throw that out there. They played Cleveland in week one, that's a good front. They played Baltimore in week two where they clearly had a particular game plan. And so I wouldn't look like so far into this and say, you know, he's completely done. He's gonna be an RB three. I think he can still be an RB two this season, maybe on the lower end, but you just gotta hope that they start to target their running backs a little bit more. Yeah, there are paths to both those guys still being good. It's not the best outlook right now, but there are paths to them being good. And I don't know if people, if you try to move them, we'll account for that. So I think that holding on makes sense. And CHI would say, they're facing the charts this week, their philosophy is you're not gonna be this deep because they're gonna run that staley defense. I think that is conducive to what we saw in Tony Power to Zeke Elliott this past week. Could help CEH, I'm not sure if we'll keep that role given the fumble, but that is at least something you can hold your hat on and try to, you know, make yourself feel better until Sunday rolls around. Sock to Pat, talking about some quarterbacks this week, Justin Fields and Daniel Jones were in 15 transactions. Who do you prioritize between the two if we're talking about rest of the season upside? Yeah, so I would say if you're talking about rest of the season upside, I'm gonna go with Justin Fields over Daniel Jones just because we know less about Justin Fields and his ceiling. You know, the Daniel Jones stuff has been great and he's seen good rushing numbers. He hasn't been a terrible, terrible passer, but I'm, you know, we have a fairly large sample size of Daniel Jones not being great in fantasy football. And I know that this Jason Garrett offense is allowing him to run the ball a little bit more. And that's great to see. I mean, like I don't think Daniel Jones is like a horrible pickup or anything. I'm just saying that Justin Fields just has that potential, right? Like if I'm looking rest of season, I'm looking, I'm shooting for upside, especially in a single quarterback league. I want that upside. If you were talking this week specifically, I think it's fine if you want to stream Daniel Jones over Justin Fields, but that also means that you're adding Daniel Jones instead of Justin Fields and et cetera, et cetera. So Justin Fields, I think is the better pickup right now. He would be the priority, but I think Daniel Jones straight up is the better play in week three. Yeah, with Daniel Jones like season long upside, he needed 95 yards and a rushing touchdown to get over 22 Fandal points the first time since December of 2019. He's probably not going to get 95 yards and a tutty every time. So keep that in mind for sure. Joe's asking is Evan Ingram worth an ad? Logan Thomas is their tight end right now. Would you add Evan Ingram this week given that he's potentially getting healthier now and in a good matchup this week? I'd probably just stick with Logan Thomas. I'm not really like Revenge game against the Bills for Logan Thomas. True, true, true. Yeah, I mean like I don't, I'm not like encouraged by Logan Thomas. I mean, I like him, but you know, I don't think that he's like this like slam dunk obvious top five tight end. Like some people might have viewed him going into the season or close to a top five tight end, but I would still prefer Logan Thomas to Evan Ingram. Okay, let's go to Joseph here. Would you rather have Lockett or DK Metcalfe rest of the way? The answer is yes, Joseph. I'd rather have them both. Considering trying to get DK using Lockett. That's a one to one trade. We often talk about how in a one to one trade you're going to have a winner and a loser and we want to try to avoid that. I'm guessing we can take this more broadly though. Thoughts on Lockett versus DK rest of the way? I mean, I think that the logical answer here just based on what we've seen so far would be Lockett over Metcalfe. And I'm only saying that because he's seeing more down the field targets than Metcalfe is all while seeing a very similar target share. Now, do I think that they're going to meet in the middle a little bit more in terms of production? Absolutely. Right now, I've mentioned this on my podcast today, but Tyler Lockett has like 250 yards and three touchdowns or something on his four deep balls that he's caught this season. It's just, it's not sustainable production, but even still, I mean, I don't really have like a strong lean here. I think that I would probably just like lean Lockett just given what we've seen weeks one and two that I like Lockett a lot as a player. But if you want to just go with the alpha and just go with someone like Metcalfe who has the exact same target share, they've had the same number of targets both weeks. It's just that and the production is just vastly, vastly different. That's not going to keep up, it's not going to continue. But am I trading one for the other in some way? No, because I think that there's going to be a clear loser in a trade like that. I just don't think that it's necessarily worth it. So, you know, I don't have a strong feel for one versus the other. I like Lockett's usage better right now just because he's getting down the field looks, but that can change in an instant, just given the sample size of what we're working on. So no clear winner loser here. Jason is asking, should he trade Mark Andrews and Nick Chubb for Noah Phant, Zeke Elliott and AJ Brown where they need help at wide receiver? AJ Brown, I think is a good person to, as you mentioned, try to acquire at this point. Noah Phant may get a usage bump with no Jerry Judy. I think he was second in the team. I think he had six targets this past week. Zeke is Zeke, you know, whatever, what are your thoughts on that one there? I might do this. Would you do this? I think I would do this. I don't know, because like it's tough because I do think there's a pretty decent downgrade from Andrews to Phant. Like that's the hangup that I have. I think that Zeke and Chubb are pretty comfortable, but I'm also lower on Chubb than most people. So maybe I don't know. It's a full PPR league, so yeah. Right, and I think the good thing is AJ Brown is going to help a lot. So I feel like I would say yes, but it's close. Yeah, I think I would because of the AJ Brown piece. You know, I would probably prefer Chubb to Zeke rest of season at this point, even in full PPR. And yes, the Andrews drop is there for sure, especially when Jerry Judy gets back. Noah Phant's not going to be able to even be very consistent, but AJ Brown guys, he's about to blow up. I mean, the peripherals are there. I mean, it's AJ Brown. I want AJ Brown and my fantasy teams. You really need a wide receiver, Jason. I think this is a fair trade. Go for it. OK, let's talk to David about Leviska Chinalt. Leviska Ruffroll so far. He's had 16 targets. That's good. He has not done much with those 16 targets because it's very difficult to get a lot of yardage when they're throwing you the ball behind the line of scrimmage. Thoughts on Leviska Chinalt the rest of the way. I mean, he's fine. He's like, it's like Jacobi Meyers in a more pass-heavy offense, right? Like, are you really, are you going to wake up in the morning and get excited for that? Probably not. Is he droppable? It depends who you'd be picking him up for. I think in most like 12 team leagues, no. You should still keep Leviska Chinalt on your team, especially if it's a PPR league. But, you know, the comparisons that we've seen all week of like, he has all this volume and look at this guy who also has all this volume, but everyone's saying bad things about Leviska. We're saying bad things about Leviska because he's not getting good usage. I mean, he's just not, he's basically an extension, like a running back extension for that team, which honestly, this is probably what they envision with Travis Etn. That's what they wanted from Kaderius Tony. Yeah, Kaderius Tony to be good with, yeah, exactly. So like, it's just a boring PPR play that's going to give you something every week, but likely not going to give you a huge, huge ceiling. I think he's, I don't think he's droppable though. No, if a guy's getting that volume, he's not droppable. Is he startable? That's a different question. Okay, two more questions really fast here. First one from Paul. Someone dropped Kyle Pitts. They have TJ Hawkinson, but Pitts is probably a guy you could flex, I think in a lot of spots. How much would you dump in free agent budget to get Pitts if you have Hawkinson already on your team? I mean, I feel like if a league is dropping Kyle Pitts, then the league has to be fairly shallow. So, you know, this is one of those questions where like, in a 12 team league, how much fob would I drop? Probably all of it to get Kyle Pitts. At least a lot of it. You know, if it's an eight team league, then I'm probably dropping like half of it because, you know, clearly there's other options out there. But I would do my best to spend a lot to get Kyle Pitts. Okay, final one here from DJ Thoughts on KJ Osborne. We referenced him in passing before, but he's gotten good volume for the Vikings. That defense also not great, which could lead to a lot of shootout similar to what we discussed with Tennessee before. Is that enough to overcome the fact that he is fighting with Adam Thielen for Red Zone targets and Justin Jefferson for everything else? Yeah, I mean, I still like, like I don't mind him. I just think that he's more of like a deeper, you know, 12 plus team league, probably a bench guy, you know, not someone that you're gonna like easily start week in and week out, because he's going to be the number three option on that team that's like locked in until an injury hopefully never happens. But if an injury happens, then he would get elevated. So I think he's fine. He should probably be rostered in a 12 plus team league. If you're in a 10 team league, even though his target share has been good, I probably still wouldn't roster him. And they've been throwing a lot because they've been in weird scripts. And I think we should keep that in mind of them too. Once things are more normal from Minnesota, will they be throwing this much? Most likely not if Mike Zimmer gets his way. That's all we got for today with JJ. Got to send him out on his way. Make sure you check out the late round podcast or if you get your podcast, check out JJ on Twitter at late round QB JJ. Thank you for joining us and good luck to you with waivers running tonight in a week number three. Thanks, Jim. Alrighty, that is JJ Zacharyson again. Check out the late round podcast wherever you get your podcast. Let's move now into our MLB DFS Q&A for today as always. No matter where you are watching, you can get your questions in. We'll take them via Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, or Twitter, send those questions in now and we will get set for you today for MLB DFS. We did have a couple of changes from this morning in the solo shot. I thought that Chris Ellis was starting for the Orioles. Apparently it was not his last night that he is not gonna go, pushed back a couple of days due to arm fatigue. So the Orioles are throwing a bullpen game which could change our thoughts in the Phillies, but it doesn't because the Orioles bullpen is not great Bob. So the Phillies, despite facing a different pitcher than I thought they would face this morning, are still going to be the number one stack for today and still going to be a pretty key focal point I would say for this slate because there are some higher salary teams I want to stack and I think that if I want the flexibility to get to them, it does help to have the Phillies that are disposed. You see the line up here, we've got our old Reliables when it comes to the value plays in the Phillies, Odubo Herrera, we got Brad Miller, we got Didi Gregorius, all three of those guys in the lineup that makes it pretty easy to get to Bryce Harbors. Let's go over here and check out a lineup with the Phillies stack in here. Let's put Woodruff in there first and then let's put Miller, let's put Didi and let's put Odubo and let's put the focal point, Mr. Bryce Harper, potentially future NL MVP, 32-25 left, that does give us flexibility to go pretty big with our other stacks there. So I think the Phillies, despite a change at pitcher, a focal point for today. Let's talk to Eric over on YouTube saying, hey Jim, who do you like as a less chalky stack? Great question, Eric. I think that for today, we can go with the Toronto Blue Jays. If we go over here to the number fire heat map, you'll see that the Toronto Blue Jays have a very low implied total for today, which they should because you're facing Jarasperson. Jarasperson has been a good pitcher this year. He's had good results, whether it be in the bullpen earlier on this year or as a starter this year, he's been very good. The Blue Jays total has increased since we talked this morning. So it does seem like there is some positive sentiment around them, but it's still 4.21. So I don't see really a situation where the Blue Jays wanted it being super popular. And again, they shouldn't. Jarasperson is a good pitcher, but if you look at Jarasperson and you check out his peripheral numbers, if I can find the right tab, isn't getting a ton of strikeouts, is letting up hard contact, is letting up a lot of balls in play, and just saw Toronto last week. There are paths to Jarasperson letting up runs to this Blue Jays team. So Eric, I think that if you want to be a little bit different today, check out the Toronto Blue Jays from a stacking perspective. Let's talk to Mr. Montay. Would you stack Seattle? Okay, so the Mariners facing Paul Blackburn for today. Blackburn, low strikeout guy. Let's have a lot of hard contact. That is enough where we can consider Seattle. It also does help that Oakland is warmer today than usual, warmer relative to the rest of the slate too. 76 degrees there. So the park factor in Oakland, not as bad as it usually is. So that's a good thing as well. So I think that you have leeway to stack Seattle. I might not get there just because they're not like the most powerful offense. I do think there are a healthy number of good stacks for today, but what I would say, Mr. Montay, is that they're in a similar mold to a lot of other stacks. They're facing a guy who gets some ground balls, but isn't great elsewhere. So it's similar. And I think that does give us leeway to stack the Mariners. I just don't think there are priorities are not quite as good as the other teams. So good question there. I think that they're in play at least. Jerry says, favorite stacks are Philadelphia, Toronto, Baltimore. What are your thoughts? I like those first two a lot, Jerry. I think that Baltimore is interesting because the Phillies bullpen is not a shutdown unit by any means. Their active roster bullpen is 3.99 ERA. That's not too bad by any means. So I think you could go with the Orioles. The reason I probably won't get there myself is because they do lose a DH for today, go into a National League Park. They're not the world's best offense and the bullpen not advantageous to target as advantageous to target is the one we get with the Orioles. So are with the Phillies. I think they're okay. Jerry, not my favorite stack though. I might not get there, but I would not talk you out of them. Jerry says, for a Philly stack, we got Harper, Segura, Real Muto and Galvis. Let's see where Freddie Galvis is. Is he betting eighth? Yes, he is. Totally fine. I think if you want to save this, that would get to Galvis. Again, I'm not a big fan of guys betting eighth in National League Parks. I think Galvis is an exception though because he has some upside himself. So I think that's totally okay. That's totally fine. You can see based on the ads here that I'm searching for Rashawn Slater jerseys or Justin Jackson jerseys because of my Northwestern buys. Apparently it thinks that I want to buy Chargers jerseys. So go bolts, bolt up. Matt, I have a Philly stack and a Dodgers mini stack. I also have Eduardo Escobar and a VCL Garcia. I could roster Justin Turner instead of Escobar to combine it with Will Smith and Chris Taylor. Kind of like having the pair of Escobar and Garcia though. I would go with Justin Turner. If you have like a two player Dodger stack and it sounds like you do with Smith and Taylor, I would get Turner in there. I think the way to view this Matt is I always want to have the most number of players on my top two stacks as possible. So let's say you've got a four player stack and a three player stack. The top two stack number there is seven. If you go four and four, there's eight. So that would be the way that that works. Let's say you've got a three and three. That means you've got six. I want that number to be at least seven if I can get there. It's really tough for me to go like a four, two, two, go with like a three, three, stuff like that. So to me, Matt, I want those top two stacks to take up as large a portion of my roster as I can. If that means going Turner and taking out Eduardo Escobar who is great. I love Eduardo Escobar. Pretty good matching for today too. I would go Turner in that spot. DJ, Jim, I tweeted you that link of the free ticket Tuesday to get into the NFL contest. I talked about last week. So if you want to find a ticket I believe you can probably find it in the lobby as well. If you go to the fan to a lobby, I'm pretty sure they're probably linked to it there. Otherwise, if you search at Jim Sonos on Twitter, find DJ's tweet there to get a link to that. Kyle, any interest in using Jordan Montgomery tonight? Yes, I had him as my number three pitcher on the solo shot this morning for a couple of reasons. The matchup's good, facing the Rangers, not a great team against lefties as you can see here. Second reason is Montgomery's been okay recently. He's had more changes as past six darts, 26% strikeout rate. Most of those came and that started against Baltimore. But Baltimore's a tougher team against lefties than the Rangers are. That's a good thing for Montgomery. The reason I couldn't put him higher than third is the walks are rough. That makes him less efficient. That means he doesn't go as deep into games. And that's basically it. So I would say the walks are concerning because it makes him less efficient, doesn't let him go as deep in games. Still on play though. So he's my number three pitcher for tonight. Kyle, I have him behind. Brandon Woodruff, despite the volume concerns and Eduardo Rodriguez, as you can probably tell, I'm not as old on Woodruff as I typically am just because the Brewers really worry me when it comes to how much they'll use their starters. They've said that they're going to like limit their guys on the stretch and they should. Again, this is totally a fine strategy. Just does worry me a bit. So I'm gonna have him number one but it's gonna be pretty flat exposure levels between him and the rest. Jerry says he likes it. Milwaukee Atlanta and some Dodgers bats, lefty bats. I like Milwaukee a pretty good amount. Atlanta is facing off with Luke Weaver. Weaver's been okay since he came off the IL. He's made three starts, 18% strikeout rates low but the bad at ball data has not been bad. The results have been pretty good. Kind of shut down the Dodgers last week. So I think Atlanta's fine but I don't think they're like a priority for me. Do the Dodgers do like a Milwaukee though? Matteo says, Hey, I'm on a tamp at home. Houston offense, what do you think? I don't like the raise at all actually because they're facing out like Minoa. Minoa is really good. He had 10 strikeouts against this same team last week. I'm not using Minoa because it's a repeat matchup. You know, he hadn't shown that much juice before then and it's a really good team he's facing but don't want to stack against him. Great bad at ball data, good strikeout numbers. That worries me a lot. So I don't want to have a bay. Houston facing Paki Norton again, great name. Pretty good fly ball rates in terms of keeping stuff on the ground. So I think that to me, I'd be okay avoiding the raise. I'm okay going at Houston, not as high at Medlisa because Norton does get ground balls. Jerry says Baltimore stack, Mount Castle, Mullins and Mancini. Mancini's been banged up recently. I know he's had like some soreness. So I'm not entirely sure I'll play given that there is no, yep, he's in there. Just kidding, disregard that. So yeah, I think that if you're stacking the Orioles Jerry in a situation where I think they're just kind of like, okay, I would say get Mullins in there. I would say get Mancini in there. They're kind of like the really, they're really good players in that team. The high upside guys you want. You know, they're the Bryce Harper's of their team because especially Mullins, like he's the high upside guy. So I'd say if you're gonna stack Baltimore, get Mullins in there for sure as a priority. Darren, what about a Braestack I chose? Albies and Riley along with a Philly stack. So again, I think that they're fine. I'm not as high on them as others seem to be because I do think that Weaver is good. One thing that is positive for the Braest that the roof is open in Arizona today. So it's 96 degrees by far the warmest on the slate. It's a very good park factor for them for tonight. But again, Weaver's been pretty good. It does downgrade them, not against them, but I'm also not super on them compared to some other stacks. E-Money, thoughts on Haces Sanchez and then Autofill. So basically taking the Sanchez and log out route. I like it. Marlins are not in the main slate though, it doesn't look like. So I can't get to them there unfortunately, but he's great. So all aboard the Haces Sanchez train. DJ, can you show me how you would stack the Cubs, Astros and Red Sox using Montgomery or Minoa as my pitcher? Okay, so let's go with Montgomery here. I'm not sure how high I'll be on the Cubs, DJ, just because the wind is pretty bad. You could go outside and stick your finger out to check the wind there. It seems like it's actually pretty strong. Blowing in, you know, fresh dark sky weather. Just make sure that has not changed from this morning. Doot, doot, doot. Yeah, still in from left at 15 miles per hour. That's a pretty big downgrade to bats. Total in that game has gone down a half run from this morning. So I'm not super into the Cubs, I think they're fine. If you're gonna stack the Cubs, I would say you wanna stick with these top five guys. I think all five are solid. You know, Wisdom, Contreras, Hap, Schwindel and Ortega. All those guys are totally fine. So if you're gonna stack the Cubs, stick to those top five guys. But again, a little bit lower on them just because the wind, or a lot lower on them because the wind is rough for today. As far as stacking the Astros, if we're gonna go with Montgomery, that means we've got a lot of salary to burn. Not sure what the lineup will look like for today because there was no Atube last night. We'll see if that was a one game thing. Obviously no Bregman as well. The heat could be a shorter stint on the aisle, it sounds like. But with nodding starting, I'd assume we get two out of Ciri, McCormick and Myers. I would just use those two. Let's see what Ciri salary is now. Still $2,500, that's awesome. So I would say whether it's Ciri, McCormick, use one of those value guys to get in there and then Bregman, Atube, Correa, Guriel. Let's rank those four guys. Obviously Tucker and Jordan Alvarez work too. Might actually wanna break it and bust some of these righties. Let's just go through here and check out what we should do with the Astros against a lefty. Sort there. Okay, Jordan's awesome. That's great, good to know. Tucker's also awesome, very weird. Okay, so there are lefties that lefties very well. Not surprised, because I've used those guys plenty against lefties, but it's good to know. I would say you get the two value guys, whether it's McCormick, maybe, I guess. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Whether it's Diaz if he plays at $2,100, he could be an option as well. Yeah, so I'd say Diaz, McCormick. I don't really wanna use Marwan again. I know he had the Grand Slam last night, but I'm still, maybe I should be convinced on Marwan based on the recent bad of all stuff, but I would rank the studs on this team. Probably, I think I like Tucker more than Alvarez. That's stupid, probably stupid, but I kinda think I do. So let's go with Bregman, Altube, Correa, Tucker, Alvarez, Greal. I know Greal gets bumped up against the leftie, but still, I don't know, I kinda like the upside of the other guys more, so I'd rank them, but I think the value plays there are definitely okay. Jeria, I'm spending now for pitchers tonight, Montgomery, maybe I like Nils Matchup with Minnesota, even though I know they get popped a couple times, Buxton and Polanco. Good job, Jeri. Thank you for recognizing the immense talent that is Byron Buxton. Just checking out his bad of ball data this morning, he's gonna blow up pretty soon. So the good thing for you, Jeri, is that the win is blowing in. The bad thing is that Alec Mills is not a high strikeout guy. This is over his past seven stars with more forcing fastballs. Kinda weird for him to do that, given that he, I think that his best route for being really solid is leaning into the good, bad of ball data. Seems like he wants more strikeouts. Not working yet though, 18% strikeout rate. I want that strikeout rate a bit higher. So if you're looking to go with a lower salary guy, Jeri, I would say Montgomery for sure. The preferred option between those two guys. Let's talk to Frank over on YouTube. Would you put Frank Schwindel as a one-off, seeing the way he's playing lately? I know the win is blowing in, but he's been lights out. I think that if you're gonna look at like one-offs in the Cubs, Schwindel might be the top guy. Let me like double check this, because that seems like super hot takey to say that. But I think that the power he's shown, Frank, is legit. I'm not opposed to buying into that because he backs up a lot of it. He has a 39% fly ball rate, good hard hit rate. 250 ISO, so maybe it is him being number one. I know Wizards been good too, Ortega's been solid. I might wind up going Schwindel one. Although honestly Ortega's not bad. He'd actually go Ortega one as opposed to Schwindel. Ortega does have some stolen base juice too, so I'm not opposed to going Ortega over Schwindel as far as a one-off on that team. I would say they're both above wisdom, they're both above have, they're both above contrast me versus a righty. So Frank, I think if you wanna go there, either Ortega or Schwindel would be my preferred options. Matt Green is asking, Myers or McCormick, the answer there is yes, Matt, I like both. So if they're both in there, I would just say use both. If it's only one of them, like a series playing, a series above all of them. So series number one among the value plays. Number two for me is McCormick. I feel better about the power sticking from McCormick than I do about from Myers. So it'd be ranking the value options there. It's series one, McCormick two, Myers number three. Let me as Diaz would be four in that ranking. DJ, Francisco Lindore has been struggling lately. Should I still play him? Let's check out what the Mets are up to. They are facing at Rodriguez. Nope, don't like that matchup, would not use him. I think Rodriguez is a good pitcher, so I would not. Jerry says, give us two value players under $3,000. Okay, let's go over to here. I think the Astros dudes do work there. I think, whoops, I didn't do that. Okay, I would say the Phillies guys are really good. So Didi, well, Miller first, then Odubel, and then Gagorious. I would say that's my ranking of those guys. They're gonna be towards the top of that list. Thinking about some other stacks here. Willie Adamus at $2,800 came off the IL last night. He's always really good. See if other, the Brewers lineup is out yet. Okay, Adamus is batting second. He'll be up there. Omar Narvaya is a really good play. Luisa Riaz is a good play. Jayce Peterson, I'm pretty sure is minimum salary. Let's double check that. Peterson's min salary. So that can do a lot for you. If you need it, I don't mind using him. Totally okay with that. Let's pull out the Brewers numbers here briefly just while we're on the subject of them. Let's actually just build out a stack of the Brewers. Let's put Woodruff in there to get a little wind juice with Woodruff. Let's do that. I'm gonna put Adamus in there first. I assume Narvaya is in there, is that correct? Yeah, Narvaya is in there. Let's put him in there. Love the power. Okay, so we're choosing between the rest with a good amount of flexibility. Eduardo Escobar, what's his salary? $3,700. That's not as easy with Woodruff. I think you can still make it work, but let's try to save a lot of salary here in order to spend up elsewhere. I wouldn't be opposed to going to Riaz and Peterson just taking the full value there, but I would say if we're going optimal-optimal, Peterson here versus Righties, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do. Why can't I find his name? He should be here. Is he not? Okay, there we go. 155 iso, whereas Uriaz has a, I just can't find these names today. I'm probably scrolling right past it. Oh, right there. Wow, he has way more players than I thought. 189, the four stolen bases. I'm gonna rank Uriaz above Peterson's. Let's go with Uriaz. And let's stick him at second base, because second base is generally bad. And let's put Eduardo Escobar at third base. 3325, that's pretty, that's quite a bit to work with there. So I think that's probably my favorite Brewer's stack for right now. I don't mind Garcia. I don't mind some of the other guys in there. I don't mind Peterson, but I think that's my optimal Brewer's stack for today. Matt's has followed up to Myers and McCormick. I could either use one of them and Max Muncie upgrade to Syrian Will Smith. I love Will Smith. I love Muncie too. It depends on where Siri hits, Matt. Like if he is batting lead off again, like he was last night, I would probably go Siri. And the talent's good too. And like, I love Will Smith. Maybe we'll get a situation here, Matt, where Smith doesn't play because he's a catcher and we can just avoid this to him all together. Cause I really don't want to choose between Muncie and Smith. I think they're both amazing. I would probably lean Siri and Smith. We'll see. Maybe one of them will sit and we can make this a dull discussion, but I think I'd go Siri and Smith, Matt. It's really tough to decide. Really tough, really tough. DJ, should I play Nico Horner at minimum salary? No, don't like the wind. And he's also not super powerful, so I'd avoid it. Looking for a minimum salary guy, Jason Peterson is my preferred option there. Jerry's is going real Muto, Corey Seger, Stanton and Big Bat Boe for the Dinger calls for today. Okay, I like those Jerry. Those are all pretty fun. No objections here. I think those sound great. DJ, what do you know about the Rockies, Ryan Velade? Don't know. Check it out. Okay. Pull up his fan graphs page. All right. So in AAA this year, had a 134 I. So it tends to be a pretty hitter friendly park there. 12 stolen bases. So it looks like he'll be a guy who can have a good batting average and get some steals, but not a big power guy. So not as high there. I think that we, you know, especially because the Rockies are not great, they're facing a Ria, so I'm fine. Not going there right now. Saboteur, which pitcher in stack will be in the winning lineup on FanDuel? Okay, so we're thinking upside here. I know I shouldn't say Eduardo Rodriguez. Like I feel very stupid whenever I talk about him because I feel like I've been burned by him a lot. And I always feel bad talking about guys who have burned me. So you're probably annoyed with me talking about them, but like maybe that keeps people away from Rodriguez. So I would say I like Eduardo Rodriguez. Let's go with him. And then I think he can fit a Blue Jays stack in there. I think the Blue Jays are really fun. Cause I don't think people will be on them. And I think that they're a pretty good play for today. So let's go with Eduardo Rodriguez, the Toronto Blue Jays. We'll see what happens there. Saboteur, I do still like the Phillies a lot though, so very in on them. I know they'll be popular, but I think they're fine. Jerry's asking for home run, or he gave his home run call before. So he gave his home run calls with real Muto, Seeger, et cetera, et cetera. Mine from this morning, if I'm trying to remember, I already erased the sheet, so I actually don't have. Oh, it was Brad Miller and Bryce Harper went all into the Phillies. I'll stick with that too. I think that works, given it's a rough Phillies, or a rough Orioles bullpen. I still think that those work. If you don't want to go all in on the Phillies for your home run calls, let's see. Let's find something else here we can feel good about in terms of dinger potential. Don't like that, don't like that, don't like that. Maybe I want to go at Eduardo Escobar? Like if we're just calling home runs, 48% fly ball rate, sick. Probably leaning at Eduardo Escobar. I would say, okay, so I'm going to go, my actual home run calls are Bryce Harper and Brad Miller. However, if you don't want to go all in on the Phillies, Eduardo Escobar going deep, El Caballo for the Brewers, going deep for tonight. DJ's home run calls are Arunato and Austin Reilly for his home run calls. Arunato, let's see here. He is facing Woodruff. Woodruff's pretty good, tough one there. Austin Reilly is facing off with Luke Weaver. Reilly's a really good hitter against Reides. Like he's got great numbers. So I think that one works. Weaver, a low strikeout guy. So DJ's going bold with Nolan Arunato against Brandon Woodruff for his home run calls for tonight. That is all the time that we have here for today on this FanDual Live Q&A. As always, tomorrow is a different schedule because there is no NFL Q&A on Wednesdays. The baseball Q&A is at four. So if you've gotten used to the pattern of coming here at 4.30, make sure you come in early tomorrow, four o'clock for the MLB Q&A. On Thursday, we're back to 4.30 because we have our Thursday football preview. Brandon can do less than we do in that one. He does all of these crazy simulations for single game slates. So check out Brandon on Thursday, breaking down the single game slate and talking about Texans versus Panthers. Oh boy, good luck, Brandon. Enjoy that one. Davis Mills at MVP, question mark? Don't do it. Don't do it. Back here tomorrow, four o'clock to talk about that and the solo shot at nine as well. Big thank you to JJ Zacharyston for joining me earlier on. He is on Twitter at late round QB and make sure you check out the late round podcast. Big thank you to Joy Affleck, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Joy, as always. I'm on Twitter at Jim Sonos, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. We'll talk to you once again tomorrow, four p.m. Good luck tonight. We'll talk to you all later. This has been the FanDuel Live Q&A.