 When we move on to management, and again, management is nothing more than an organized approach of people, resources, relationships, any number of things to have a desired objective. Going into a relationship, it is fundamental to know what is your objective. Ultimately, if you don't have a relationship objective, do not commit to one. Why are you committing to one if you don't have an objective? Most likely, it's going to be because of dependency need. You're exchanging sex for commitment, and you're not strong enough willed as an individual to stand on your own and live on your own in an autonomous way. And that is underlined a weak psychological structure. You're a weak individual. We need to be far apart ourselves. We need to be willing to really differentiate. We really need to look and say no. We're not willing to exchange that. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Start controlling that gate. Another part of relationships management is opening the lines of communication early. It's not just communication. It's going to be communication in the critical realms of what does it mean to be in a committed relationship? What does it mean to be your sexual involvement and your intimacy level? Finances, friends, both mutual and shared. All the common relationship elements are going to be there. And we're going to need to be looking at those as well. And there are a tremendous number of other drivers we need to evaluate and discuss openly. And we need to take a healthy approach to this. Unfortunately, I've run a little bit long on it. The last thing I want to talk about is we need to be able to protect ourselves as men. I'm going to jump way ahead of my talk. And part of this is if we're looking at marriage, we need to look and realize that marriage as an institution is primarily an economic one. And based on that, we need to have an economic response to it, not a moral, not a cultural one. Part of that is preparing yourself for it. Absolutely without a doubt. The critics and pundits will sit down and say marriage is for the poor. Marriage is for men who can't afford the rent. Marriage is for men who can't afford the mortgage. Marriage is for men who need to share the financial burden of housekeeping. Marriage is for people who can't afford retirement benefits or insurance benefits or child rent capabilities. Men that can't afford either through cost or by intellectual decree the ability to outsource. The wealthy do for cause. Based on all that, and I don't necessarily agree with it, but there's a strong argument for it. We need to protect ourselves. The first is going to be a prenup. Your old agreement is going to be a must, absolute must if you're going to protect yourself. And it's not just a security thing. It's framing a discussion of relationship. The problem with prenups is the fact that it only directs towards assets and property division and spousal support. Under no circumstances does it involve children or child custody because it's up to, at the time, the child's best interest. You cannot have a legal element in family law governing that. Not only that, lawyers and primarily judges are actually playing loose with some of the standards and actually waving some of that off based on outlandish lifestyle agreements. The second thing I would entertain would be something that we're not seeing today is that we actually formulate a partnership agreement, a legal structural element that you would see in case civil law of why you're being in the relationship. What's the point of this merit? If it's child-rearing family development, state so. What are your obligations? What are the things you're going to be able to do? What are the things that you're providing and why? Treat it as such. For example, when we look at alimony, does it make sense that it's a two-for-one relationship as far as payment goes? For every two days you're with her, she gets a paid alimony. So you imagine going to an employer working five years with a foreign employer and getting two and a half year severance pay. That doesn't happen out in the economy, but it happens in family law. Setting the tone against an economic standard would dramatically transform that. The third one is I would look at putting incentives back into the marriage. And these are going to be kind of subtle ones. I would sit down and say self-perform marriage insurance, where you both mutually add into the marriage based on a certain amount to actually augment the insurance on the damages that are included. The second one is under civil law, have civil penalties assigned to breaches of failure. We do it in business models. We should do it there. That would up-serve the family law elements. And this goes for either sex. It needs to be mutual, mutually compatible. I'm not just talking from a man's side. The third one, which I find entertaining as hell, is actually put out of a co-signing parental performance bond. Is her friends and family, particularly family, willing to co-sign the marriage agreement, willing to put good money, not as a dowry, but as a risk. People are willing to put co-sign car loans for their child, co-sign mortgages for a loan, but we don't co-sign marriages. Why? Yet the first time the marriage is in trouble when there's conflict, what happens? The social support network is saying, get out of that marriage, take the kids to get the money and get out. Rather than having a vested interest in making that marriage work, having people work through the issue, not destructing the bonds. The bottom line is when we look at things, and I'm sorry to cut it short, is we need to actually look at a number of issues. We need to understand the age in which we live in, the cultural, political, social economic situations. We need to actually protect ourselves in a number of ways. And that is going by looking at relationship management, relationship maintenance. And I know I skip maintenance, we'll talk about it later. And we need to actually actually take solid concrete steps in actually protecting ourselves in the relationships we want. Ultimately, we need to put the incentives back in. And the best way to put the incentives back in is only to commit to women who are prepared, willing, able, and are able to actually foster the relationships we want. And that is by being very, very, very selective, by being discriminating, by taking it seriously and making sure she does as well.