 The Chiefs are not a good run defense. They're 28th and Number Fire's opponent adjusted efficiency. They're 23rd in yards before contact allowed. 31st in rushing success rate allowed to running backs. So look, the game script doesn't set up for Derek Henry. But we know that Derek Henry is going to get, again, probably 30 carries unless they get blown out. But I mean, he's going to be involved early. He should be able to do some damage against this front. The thing that we talk about a lot on these smaller slates is making assumptions. It's cliche to say, tell a story, but you should tell a story with your lineup. Do you think that the Chiefs are going to run away and hide? In that scenario, you can omit Derek Henry from your lineups. But if we're looking at this from like a range of outcomes perspective, in what percentage of games do the Chiefs run away and hide? It's a non-negligible number because they're really freaking good and this Titans past defense is not. They're ranked 14th for the full season. And I think Mahomes is going to be able to move the ball at will against this past defense. But it's still not going to be a huge percentage, a huge chunk of the pie where the Chiefs run away and hide. If you look at Number Fire, they give the Titans 32% odds of winning this game outright, which means that Derek Henry is going to be a hyper relevant play 32% of the time. And he'll be a hyper relevant play in close games that they lose to. So the way I want to view him is, how often do you see the Chiefs running away and hiding? In those lineups omit Derek Henry. If it's not that lineup, you should use Derek Henry. Even if they lose, like he's been running a route on like 50% of the drop backs during the playoffs at 16 to 31 per pro football focus, which is nuts. But like, I think that even if they get behind, my baseline assumption would still be that he'll be on the field because there are better passing offense with him out there too. So I think that even in a game that they lose, as long as they don't get totally destroyed, Derek Henry is still a good play for DFS. Yeah, it just seems like the path for Derek Henry, aside from injury, which you know, is just always something that we have to watch for the path for him to be completely phased out is the Chiefs put up like 28 points in the first quarter and they could do. But like that's even with that, you know that Derek Henry is going to get the ball and the Chiefs are really gonna have to sell out to limit Derek Henry. So I just look, he's $9,800 on a two game slate. And that is crazy for a back who does not get a lot of targets and receiving work receiving work correlates really well to a running backs floor. But this offense has just been Derek Henry. And I think that that's also going to kind of keep the game closer because I just don't anticipate Derek Henry getting stuffed. And I think that one thing that's noteworthy from a salary perspective is that last week in the divisional round, Derek Henry ran for 198 yards. But he still was not in the perfect Fandal lineup because he's so expensive. And when you use Derek Henry, that means you're not getting to Patrick Mahomes potentially, potentially not getting to Devonta Adams, Tyreek Hill, George Kittle, Travis Kelsey. There is a pretty massive opportunity cost. So what I was saying, you should omit Derek Henry in lineups where they get totally wiped. That's not the only scenario in which you can omit him because he can go off and still not be in the perfect lineup for this weekend. So I think that there are scenarios in which you omit him, even when you think it's a closer game. But the only time where I'm going to absolutely omit him is where I assume that she's absolutely torched things.