 Those of you who were once students here and are now back may not recognize the place, it looks very different. They have a huge new building under construction, the old building sparkle and have been renovated and look like they haven't looked for a very long time. There's an energy and a dynamism in the air that is really all due to Dean Caden. We're very, very lucky to have had her as our dean here the last five years and we're especially lucky to have her here today to welcome you and to kick us off. So with that, Dean Caden. Thank you Phil and welcome everyone, welcome to Harvard Law School and welcome to this USB Microsoft 10 years later conference which is going to be perfect I think. Thank you all for coming back. Those of you who came out of the case thinking of yourselves as winners, those of you who came out of the case thinking of yourselves as losers, we're especially grateful to you. It's great that this collection of people came together 10 years later to think about what USB Microsoft meant, what we learned from it, what questions are still to be resolved after it as far as I don't need to tell you one of the most important antitrust trials of the 20th century. It was possibly the first important case of the 21st century and this is an opportunity really to reflect on the learning and experience of the last 10 years to explore the meaning of the case from Microsoft for the software and technology industries generally and for antitrust law and enforcement. And to do that of course we have this quite really stunning array of panelists and participators, people who were very much a part of the case and making crucial decisions on the case as well as eating economic and economists and legal academics to provide a little bit of detachment and to add their voices as we consider what we learned from the case. Now I was just stunned I have to say on the dean of Harvard Law School so that means with respect to any issue I think about its relationship to Harvard Law School and sometimes you have to stretch a little bit to do that, you know? But it turns out that with respect to USB Microsoft you don't and I'm just going to bore you for just a few minutes while I tell you about the people who were involved in USB Microsoft that were connected to Harvard Law School mostly as our graduates in no particular order other than the order that this list was given to them. Joel Klein, 71, class of 71, was of course assistant AG in charge of the antitrust division at the time and launched the investigation of Microsoft that led to the case and oversaw the case through the trial and remedy. Today Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson who decided the case at the district's court level was a graduate of Harvard Law School class of 1964. Janet Reno, Attorney General, adoring the decision to sue within the trial and the remedy proceedings in the case, class of 1963. Doug Melamed, is Doug here yet? Not here, here. Okay. Charles Principal Deputy who was Assistant Attorney General during the investigation and trial of the case and then acting Assistant Attorney General after Joel left and widely seen as one of the key intellectual and legal architects of the government's case, class of 1970. Larry Messick who was appointed by Judge Jackson as special master in the consent decree enforcement contempt proceeding. Later that appointment was vacated but Larry Messick was a Harvard Law School professor at the time. Jonathan Zittran sitting right here next to me, class of 95 and the current Harvard Law School professor was Messick's assistant in his special master work. At the time he was founder of the Berkman Center. He still is founder of the Berkman Center. Can't you shut away from me? No, he can't. John Roberts since going on to bigger and better things are a few portions of the case on appeal to the DC Circuit while at Hogan and Hartson alongside DOJ on behalf of the Plaintiff States, class of 1979. Tom Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, one of the leaders of the working group of state AGs who coordinated the state's role in the litigation appeal and settlement, class of 1969. We're going to just go on a little bit. We're going to turn the page. I'm just going to tell you a few more years so I have to be able to say the names who are here. Jeff Blatner, class of 1980, was Joel's special counsel for information technology during the trial and acted as Joel's sort of point person and go-to guy for much of the trial. Is this Jeff around here? Supposed to be. Film alone, of course, was the lead DOJ lawyer in charge of the investigation leading up to the case and the consent decree enforcement and temp proceeding filed in 1997. The lead career and civil service DOJ lawyer on the trial team. He is now a clinical professor at Hart Blussel and of course the organizer of this conference. Steve Howe, Chief of the Antitrust Bureau of the New York AG's office during the investigation and trial who has returned to work on compliance monitoring of the final judgment for the state's as a special counsel class of 1972. Michael Lackabara, one of the Sullivan and Cromwell lawyers who spearheaded Microsoft's offensive trial class of 1988. Ted Edelman, another of the Sullivan and Cromwell team from Microsoft, class of 1983. David McIntosh was Judge Jackson's law clerk during the trial itself and largely responsible for drafting the findings effect class of 1998 and finally I've gotten to the end. Dear dear, it was Judge Jackson's law clerk during the conclusions of law and remedy phase of the case class of 1999. So was there anyone who wasn't from Martha Law School? Oh well, maybe a few, David Boyes or Bill Newcomb or a few others, but this is quite the list. So we own USV Microsoft. We should have sold it a while ago. And for that reason, I am especially particularly glad that here we are at this conference investigating and exploring its continuous significance and what it teaches us about a wide range of continuing, extremely important subjects. Before I hand this back to Phil, I do want to thank Phil for the great work that he's done not just at Harvard Law School generally and at the cyber law clinic of the Bergen Center in Engineering and Society, but really in organizing this wonderful collection of people to talk about this very important issue. So with that, Phil.