 It is now time for question period. The member from Lampkin, Kansas, Minnesota. Thank you very much, Speaker. My question this morning is to the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade. Minister, yesterday we talked about how in the last 15 months the Fairness Commissioner has expensed over $3,400 in limousine rides, $3.41 for airplane headphones and even $43.35 for a sightseeing tour in Finland. All to Ontario's taxpayers. Yesterday, you also refused to answer a simple question, and that was if you agreed with these types of expenses and entitlements. So Minister, I'm going to ask you again, has your office ordered the Fairness Commissioner to repay these unfair expenses, and if so, how much has a Fairness Commissioner paid back? Thank you. Minister? Thank you. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you, Speaker, and I want to thank the member-opsis for his question. Speaker, our government has expensed guidelines in place. They are very clear. We expect them to be respected by all public officials at all levels of government. The Fairness Commissioner is required to follow the guidelines of the OPS Travel Mew and Hospitality Expenses Directive. I understand that the documents disclosed to the PC include expenses submitted to ministry officials, not necessarily approved expenses. It is also my understanding that while expenses will pay and are withdrawn, the Ministry of Citizens Immigration is currently reviewing all the Ontario Fairness Commission's expenses. Speaker, when this review is complete, I plan to release all expenses online to the public. Thank you, Speaker. Well, Minister, yesterday your office stated that the Fairness Commissioner had withdrawn or paid back the unfair expenses, but according to an email dated January 2014 your deputy had approved all expenses submitted except for $800.92 worth of meal claims. That means the limo rides were approved and the sightseeing tour was approved. Minister, I believe taxpayers have right to know that your ministry paid over $20,000 in expenses in the last 15 months for what is described as a part-time job that already pays $1,700 per week. Minister, there is a simple solution. Will you immediately order the Fairness Commissioner to begin posting her expenses online for all people in the province of Ontario to see? Thank you, Minister. Thank you, not here. Thank you very much for the question. I wish the member opposite kind of like listening to my responses. Speaker, I have said I have instructed my ministry to start examining all the Ontario Fairness Commissioner's expenses. When the review is completed, I really plan to release it publicly and it will be posted online. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you. Final supplementary. Well, thank you, Speaker, and back to the Minister. Minister, Ontario's current Fairness Commissioner is the first and only Fairness Commissioner that Ontario has ever had. She was appointed by your predecessor, the MPP from Eglinton, Lawrence, in exchange for giving up her federal seat to failed Liberal Leader Michael Ignadia. And Minister, according to her website, the Fairness Commissioner presides over 13 senior staffers, one of whom is a close relative of the person who appointed her. Minister, do you think it is fair for government appointees like the Fairness Commissioner to hire and employ relatives of the very person who appointed them? Minister. Speaker, again, thank you very much for the question. Speaker, our government has always and will always be committed to openness and transparency and accountability. This is why we have brought forward Bill No. 8. The Accountability Act, which is currently before the House. The Act will require all MPPs and senior executives in all agencies to post their expenses online, including the Fairness Commissioner. Bill No. 8 proposes to amend the Public Sector Expenses Review Act to provide the Integrity Commissioner with the ability to review executive expenses. Speaker, the scope of the Integrity's Commissions Review will expand to all 197 classified agencies, including the OFC. Speaker, I am sure that the member opposite will urge his office to pass the Act. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Yesterday, we showed that despite your Deputy Premier's denial that she had any knowledge of the problems at Orange prior to December 2011, an email from officials in her own office indicated otherwise. A document entitled, and I quote, confidential to the Minister, dated April 7, 2010 reads, and again, I quote, Orange has advised the Ministry that they have embarked upon a number of initiatives that were not contemplated in the original performance agreement. That's another one of the red flags that the Committee was referring to in their report. Premier, are you personally satisfied that your Deputy Premier knew nothing about the problems at Orange before December 2011? Thank you. Premier. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Well, I know that the member opposite is aware that there were many changes made at Orange because the former Minister of Health knew that there were changes that needed to be made, and she made those changes, Mr. Speaker, a new CEO, a new board of directors, a new senior management team, and in fact, as I have said, it was exactly the Deputy Premier in her role then as Minister of Health and Long-Term Care who made those changes, Mr. Speaker. So, when our government learned of the issues at Orange, action was taken, Mr. Speaker. The fact is that there is now a piece of legislation before this House that would further make changes at Orange and would improve the oversight, Mr. Speaker, and so I hope that the member's opposite will support us and will work to get that information in order. Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Supplementary. Thank you, Speaker. Back to the Premier. Your dogged defense of your Deputy Premier in the face of damage and evidence against her tells in terms that you would rather take one of your own than take responsibility for at least four deaths caused by your government's negligence. Another document the committee reviewed is a confidential ministry briefing dated October 27, 2010 detailing the freedom of information request from 2009 both by the Ministry of Health and Management Board of Cabinet. The freedom of information asked about Dr. Mazza's salary, procurement policies at Orange and their purchase of speedboats. Premier, are you still prepared to stand by your Deputy Premier's position that she knew nothing of the troubles at Orange in 2010? Mr. Speaker, what I'm standing behind is the fact that our government took action led by the Deputy Premier in Golden as Minister of Health and Long-Term Care. We took action, Mr. Speaker, and we made changes at Orange and we put in place a piece of legislation that is before the House and actually has been before the House since February 2013 when Bill 11 was first introduced, Mr. Speaker, has been before the House. We hope that the opposition will work with us to get that passed so that increased oversight will be in place for Orange, Mr. Speaker. The fact is that the committee has now got the report. The report has been released and I understand that it was a liberal motion that got that report tabled. That's a good thing. We're glad that the report is now available, Mr. Speaker. And as I say, we want to make sure that there is as much oversight and as stringent oversight as possible. That's why we need the help of the opposition to get that legislation passed. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Premier, your persistent denial would be comical, but for the fact that your Deputy Premier has seen no evil, hear no evil, straddle you in Orange, contributed to the deaths of four Orange employees. Your Deputy Premier either didn't read these documents or she read them and chose to ignore them. Either way, Patience and Ontario died because of the negligence of this Deputy Premier and your government. Premier, I ask you again, how much more proof do you need before you will demand your Deputy Premier's resignation? You know, Mr. Speaker, I understand when a member is given a set of questions to read that there's a huge temptation to just read those questions and not actually think about the answers and not actually think about the issue at hand. The fact is we have worked very hard to restore confidence of the people of Ontario in the Air Ambulance Service, Mr. Speaker. This is a very serious issue. I think the member knows full well that we took action when we learned that there were problems at Orange. We took immediate action to change the leadership and we have continued by putting in place a piece of legislation that would further increase the oversight of Orange. So I really believe that the member opposite should pay attention to the changes that have been made. The member from the Leeds Grand Rule will withdraw. Thank you. Should listen to the changes that have been made and if there are substantive issues around the legislation that he's got a comment on, let's hear those as opposed to just a mindless recitation of rhetoric that actually is out there. The side comments we can do without. New question. The leader of the third party. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. This government's austerity budget shows that almost every ministry will be facing average cuts of 6% this year, next year, and the year after that. Can the Premier tell Ontarians how many people she's planning to fire? Premier? So, Mr. Speaker, what's interesting about this question from the leader of the third party is that we introduced a budget last May and she then decided that it was time to go to an election. We went to an election. We ran on the budget. We ran on the budget as a cornerstone of our plan, Mr. Speaker. And so did the leader of the third party. She ran on the same fiscal plan, Mr. Speaker, except she said she was going to find $600 million more in savings, Mr. Speaker. So the re-acing a challenging fiscal situation. We understand that. We also know that we have to make investments in infrastructure, in people's talent and skills. We have to work in partnership with business if our economy is going to grow. So that's the plan we ran on, Mr. Speaker. That's the plan she ran on and that's the plan that we're implementing, Mr. Speaker. We've sent an FOI to the Treasury Board asking who they plan to cut and what services they plan to cut. Instead of giving an answer, they refuse to provide anything at all, Speaker. So I did ask the Premier a question. I think Ontarians would like to know where she is going to cut. The bottom line is will this Premier be straight with Ontarians about who it is that's going to be getting a pink slip from this government? So Mr. Speaker, this is an interesting question from a number of perspectives. So yesterday, Mr. Speaker, the leader of the third party was on at us about our plan to optimize assets, Mr. Speaker, to actually find a way to make those assets work for the people of Ontario, so that work better for the people of Ontario, so that we could make investments in transportation infrastructure that's needed, Mr. Speaker, across the province. So now today, she doesn't want to talk about that, because she doesn't want to talk about where there might be money coming in, Mr. Speaker, in order for us to make the investments that we need. Today, she wants to just isolate one piece of our plan, which is, yes, to transform our services, to make sure that we deliver healthcare in a way that is the most cost defender and for the best benefit of the people of Ontario. So I think she's trying to have it both ways, Mr. Speaker. It would be good if she looked at the whole plan, which she ran on, which we're implementing. Well, Mr. Speaker, the Premier's fairytale doesn't wash on this side of the house. She obviously didn't look at the details of our plan, but that's fine. Finish, please. Mr. Speaker, whether it's a dad who relies on a speech therapist for his daughter, or a doctor who relies on a highway being plowed so she can go to work, or an employee who relies on inspectors to make sure their workplace is safe, Ontarians rely on public services, Speaker, and all I would like is for the Premier to tell Ontarians, to come clean with Ontarians, about what services she's going to be cutting. Well, Mr. Speaker, I just want to, I just want to reassure the leader of the third party. I did look at the nine page plan that they put forward, Mr. Speaker, but I did look at it very closely, and what I saw, Mr. Speaker, was a plan that was based on our plan. It was a plan that made all the assumptions that we made about what this economy needed in order to grow, Mr. Speaker, with the exception, for example, of any investment in the Ring of Fire. There was nothing in the NDP's plan about Ring of Fire, Mr. Speaker. There were huge gaps in terms of how they were going to find, for example, $600 million more dollars than we said we needed to find, Mr. Speaker. So the reality is we are confronting a challenging fiscal situation. We have appointed a president of the Treasury Board to make sure that we look across government and we make the changes that are necessary to preserve services and, at the same time, make government work as efficiently as possible, Mr. Speaker. A new question for leaders of third party. My next question is also to the Premier, Speaker, and coincidentally it's about making government work more efficiently. A study by experts at the University of Toronto has shown that P3 projects cost on average 16% more than publicly financed projects. But for some reason the Premier said she was proud that a quarter of Ontario's infrastructure projects were being done with P3s. Now can the Premier tell Ontarians why she thinks it's good to pay 16% more for projects on a quarter of our projects actually and costing Ontarians more money? So Mr. Speaker, what I think is good and responsible and absolutely necessary is that government work with the private sector, that we find a way for those kinds of partnerships to bring benefit to the people of Ontario. And the fact is that you look across the globe right now and there is no jurisdiction that is not struggling with how to build infrastructure including China where there is a really important move to find ways to cooperate with the private sector in order to get the amount of infrastructure built that they know that they need. So yes, Mr. Speaker, we're working with the private sector and because we're working with the private sector we have dozens of projects across this province that are being built that would not be built otherwise. Thank you. Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Premier spoke to the Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships to pat them on the back and promised to hand them more money. That same study that I just mentioned, Speaker, caught the attention of media and one reporter, Minister of Economic Development, come to order. One reporter who said and I quote, P3s become vehicles for governments to subsidize inflated profits of powerful and well-connected contractors and financial institutions. So when the Premier was telling the P3 Association just how much she loved P3s, can she tell us whose profits she was actually inflating? So Mr. Speaker, let's look at what the alternative financing and procurement model has accomplished here in Ontario. Infrastructure Ontario is currently managing over 80 major AFP infrastructure projects, 37 of which have reached the end of construction. Of these 37 projects, 36 or 97% were completed under budget. Were completed on time. And AFP projects, as the member has said, represent approximately 25% of capital investments in the year 2014-2015. So the fact is, Mr. Speaker, that there are roads and bridges and transit projects that are being built across this province in Ottawa, in Kitchener Waterloo, in all parts of the province that would not be being built if it were not for the partnership with the private sector. And the fact is, we have no ideological bent that says, we cannot work with the private sector as they do, Mr. Speaker. Final supplementary. Speaker, when the government signs P3s, they're helping out powerful and well-connected contractors and financial institutions. That's the fact. Our own Auditor General has said the exact same thing, Speaker. And yesterday, the Premier visited those contractors and financial institutions to tell them what a great job they were doing in charging Ontarians more for something the government can do itself for 16% cheaper. New Democrats asked the Minister of Economic Development, Employment, and Infrastructure to table any evidence, any evidence at all, that P3s made any financial sense. And we got nothing, Speaker. Nothing back. Now, does the Premier have any evidence at all to justify paying these well-connected contractors and financial institutions a 16% bonus for something that we can do ourselves? Mr. Speaker, I think what's really important is that the people of Ontario understand that what the leader of the third party is asking is whether we will put the brakes on projects like the mental health facility that is being built at St. Joe's in Hamilton, Mr. Speaker, that those projects that are benefiting people in all parts of this province, that we will put the brakes on those. And the answer is no, Mr. Speaker. We will not put the brakes on those. We will continue to make responsible investment. And we are investing billions of dollars as government of public money into these projects, Mr. Speaker. And yes, we are working with the private sector who is taking risks, Mr. Speaker, and delivering these projects on time and on budget. So will we stop that? No, we will not. We know that this building is needed for the economic growth of this province and the well-being of the people of Ontario. Thank you. New question? The member from Hullabert is going to ask a question. Premier, I stand again today to ask you to strike the all party committee, select committee to study sexual harassment in the workplace. We owe it to the victims of sexual harassment to have this discussion. They need us to better understand the challenges victims face in determining when and how to come forward after an incident and how institutions can better support and protect victims from further harm. So Premier, will you support this important dialogue by allowing all three parties in the legislature to work together on a select committee as sexual harassment? So it's the final of the Ministry of Labor is going to want to comment on the supplementary, but I just want to let the member opposite know what I have done in the last 24 hours. So, and I also know that the select committee issue is going to be discussed by House leaders. They're going to have that conversation, but I want the leader of the, or I want the member of the opposition to know that I've had a conversation with the head of the Ontario Public Service and he has already informed me that comprehensive review is happening of the OPS policies on discrimination and harassment and violence. That review is happening and it's very important, I think that we understand that that kind of review is critical, that the kind of training that needs to happen on an annual basis is happening within the OPS, within the broader public service and quite frankly within our own legislative world, Mr. Speaker, we need to make sure that all of that is in place. And so I will continue to do what is necessary, the discussion around what further we may do, we'll take place at the House leaders meeting. Thank you, supplementary. Thank you. Well, I appreciate the Premier's comments and we have the workplace discrimination harassment prevention policy here was given to us, but all of that is well and good if the victims are not coming forward or the policies are being ignored, we owe it to the victims to listen and to do better. I bring up the case again of the assistant crown attorney being given a golden handshake of $180,000 by the government. The women were never heard. Clearly someone in the government had to sign off on that and did not follow these policies. So, you know, the conversation, yeah, the conversation does need to happen. That's why we asked for the select committee. The work does need to be done. It's not just here at the public service, we've seen it in the CBC, but we've also seen it from brave people like former Toronto Star reporter, Antonio Cervicius, who said she'd been raped more than once, but never came forward, has started a worldwide discussion through the social media hashtag, been raped, never reported. So again, Premier, we owe it as a government to be a good force for people's lives. Allow the whole party. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Labour. Thank you. Premier. Thank you, Speaker. And let me thank the member officer for what is a very, very important question that we all have a role to play in ensuring that violence and harassment in Ontario workplaces is simply not tolerated. It's something we will not put up with everybody in this province, regardless of their gender, should be able to work in a safe and a healthy workplace. Our government was the very first government in Ontario, this house, in 2009 passed Bill 168. What it does is it very specifically requires employers in this province to have plans in place to prevent this from happening in the workplace and to deal with it as it happens in the workplace. What employees need to know, what men and women in this province need to know, that if they are suffering or they feel they're suffering violence or harassment in the workplace, they have the right to refuse that work. You stop right now. If you think you're in imminent danger, you contact the police. If you think it's an ongoing issue, you can't solve, you contact us. Order of the police. No question, the member from Timmings, James Gray. My question is to the Premier. Premier, you profess to be a progressive politician. You profess to say that you want to govern in a way that's open and transparent to the people of Ontario. But when we look at your record so far in this majority, you're doing exactly what Dalton McGinty did and you're time allocating everything under the sun. So I'm asking you as a fellow member of this assembly, why is it that you're choosing not to allow the public to have their say on these very important bills such as daycare and not allowing the committees to be able to travel outside of Toronto to hear what they have to say about this very important issue. Why are you like Dalton McGinty and why don't you stop time allocating? Cabinet House Leader. Good House Leader. Thank you very much, Speaker. And I thank the member from the third party for the question. Speaker, I think all members recognizing the House that we received a very strong mandate from the people of Ontario on June the 12th. They've asked us... I'm trying to hear. Please. Speaker, the Ontarians have asked us to move forward with a progressive agenda that was put forward in a budget that was passed in this House in a platform that really clearly speaks, spoke to the priorities of Ontario. And they really have asked us to make sure that we stop having stalling tactics and gamemanship that goes on in this House and pass important pieces of legislation that will make Ontarians' life better. And that's why, Speaker, we're making sure that those priority bills that were not passed in the previous parliament are passed in this session as quickly as possible. Thank you. Pimentry. Premier, I would prefer that you answer the question because you stood through the last election. You said you were progressive. You said you were going to govern different. And you said you were going to engage the public in the decisions that face this legislature. How can you say that at the same time, not allowing people outside of the city to have their say on very important bills? So I'll ask you the question again. Member for the House, Grant, you're talking about... At a time where the opposition is not even holding up the legislation. We've said to your House Leader, we have no interest in slowing this down. All we want to do is to give the public an opportunity to have their say. So this opposition, nor the Conservatives, are holding it up. Why are you shutting down the public's ability to have their say? Speaker, we are moving ahead with the progressive agenda of this government. Speaker, we are moving ahead with bills like... Bill 8, enhancing transparency for public sector and MPPs. We are moving ahead with a bill that ensures that we have fair minimum wage in our province. We are moving ahead with a bill, that ensures that we modernize our childcare so that our children are protected when parents drop them off at the childcare. And, Speaker, we are doing so in a responsible way. Let's just take Bill 10 as an example, the Child Care Modernization Act. There will be hearings, Speaker, that will take place. There will be two days of hearings that will take place. And they will both go late in the evening so that parents and childcare providers can have access to those hearings, and they are heard. But in the end of the day, Speaker, our number one priority is the well-being of Ontarians, especially our children. Thank you. New question, the member from Burlington. Thank you, Speaker. My question today is for the Minister of Finance. Minister, I hear from my constituents in Burlington and from people across our province that growing the economy and job creation is their top priority. They are encouraged that Ontario's economy is growing faster than the national economy, and they feel secure that our path to balance is as responsible as it is compassionate. But people continue to read stories and they are concerned about the lasting effects of the global economic recession. As the world becomes increasingly globalized and new markets continue to emerge, the people of Ontario want to know how our province plans to compete with economies around the world. Minister, can you please update this House on the steps the government is taking to compete with those emerging economies and how you plan to ensure that Ontario's economy continues to grow despite the challenging global economic environment? Thank you. Minister of Finance. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you to the wonderful member from Burlington for her question. Ontario is indeed operating in a competitive and challenging global environment. And so Mr. Speaker, I'd like to thank and take this opportunity to congratulate the Premier, the Minister of Economic Development and Employment and Infrastructure, as well as the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade for the successful trade mission to China. Already this mission has attracted nearly $1 billion to Ontario in new deals. And it's creating more than 1,800 new jobs. Our government understands the importance of Ontario being recognized as globally innovative as a jurisdiction. And this successful trade mission is just part of our plan to grow our economy. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Minister, it's great to hear that our government is continuously working to attract new jobs and investments on behalf of the people of Ontario. It is clear that Ontario is emerging from the global recession with strong fundamentals, which will ensure we can continue to provide the programs and services that Ontarians expect and rely on. As we reflect back on the accomplishments of their government and plan for the future, Mr. Speaker, can the minister tell us more about our efforts our government is making here at home to grow our economy and eliminate the deficit? Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you again to the member from Burlington. Our purpose is clear, Mr. Speaker. It's to create opportunity and security for people, to build Ontario up well at the same time eliminating the deficit in a responsible and balanced way. Our prudent path to balance is working. However, global uncertainty still remains, and that's why we have a four-point plan for stimulating the economy, including maintaining a competitive tax environment that encourages business to invest and grow, building strategic partnerships with business to stimulate innovation and productivity, moving forward with the government's going global trade strategy to tap into emerging markets like China and helping businesses manage electricity and other costs to ensure our prosperity and competitiveness. And Mr. Speaker, in fact, I look forward to updating the House further on our progress and our broad economic plan on November 17th, when I table the fall economic statement. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Good question. The member from Perry, Southern, Skolka. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Premier, yesterday, the town of Fort Francis, an area of First Nations, chartered a plane at great expense to fly 1,800 kilometers to Toronto to try to get your government's attention. The paper mill is shut down, and if they don't get some help soon, in a matter of weeks, it could be lost forever. Xperia, a specialty paper company, was interested in reopening the plant, but they could not get a reasonably priced supply of wood fiber essential to make the project viable. That price is controlled by the past owners of the mill. Premier, Xperia was willing to invest $100 million to create hundreds of jobs in Northwestern Ontario. So my question, will you call the CEO of Xperia and do what you can to close a deal that will create jobs and bring investment opportunities to Fort Francis? Thank you. We're going to send natural resources and forestry. Send natural resources and forestry. Mr. Speaker, thank you very much. I want to thank the member for the question. I would start by saying that the community of Fort Francis flew to Toronto with their supportive team for a good reason, but I would say to the member they didn't have to fly to Toronto to get our attention because they've had their attention on this issue going back weeks ago when the deal fell apart, they had her attention, and since the deal fell apart, they've continued to have our attention. I mentioned yesterday in response to several questions, we will continue to work as closely as we can with the community of Fort Francis and with both of the parties to see what is possible. The member knows at the end of the day that this was a B2B arrangement that was trying to be consummated between hopefully a willing seller and hopefully a willing buyer. To this point, the deal has not been consummated. We continue to be in contact with them and work as diligently as we can to see what is possible to try and breathe some life back into that deal. Thank you. Is that my message? And again to the Premier. I don't think the Premier heard the question there and that was that they asked for her to make a phone call to the CEO of Xperia. So I hope she will do that though she passed the question on. Premier, the sustainable forest license in the Fort Francis area is controlled by the past operator of the paper mill. They're no longer interested in running the mill but continue to control the crown forest, the cross-root forest. Premier, don't you think the license to harvest wood or at a minimum an economic supply of fiber from nearby forests should go to the company willing to locate operations and reopen the mill in Fort Francis? Thank you, minister. The speaker, thank you very much. Two to the members point and I said this in response to the similar questions yesterday. Last week when the deal fell apart I did reach out to the CEO of Xperia and I talked to him last week. I talked to the CEO of Xperia again just this morning. We are still working within our ministry, within government to see exactly what is possible, if anything. I had a good conversation with him this morning. There were no commitments made from him back to me or from me back to him. Only for him to be aware that as a government and as a ministry we're still very interested in seeing something positive for Fort Francis. The member should also know that it is not with a stroke of a pen that an ESFL is created. And in fact, if we were to do it that way there would obviously be impacts for the current flow of that wood fiber to other operations in the province of Ontario. I would think that the member knows that. And as a result of that speaker, his suggestion would be that we wouldn't be consulting with First Nations or with the community or with industry on what that ESFL should look like. That work would not have guaranteed anything. We're willing to look at all options to breathe life back into this deal. And we continue to do that speaker. Thank you. Good question to the member from Hamilton and Stony Creek. Thank you speaker. My question is to the ministry's responsible pan-parapan games. Speaker, the minister needs now to take responsibility for the missed deadlines, the mushrooming budgets of the 2015 pan-parapan games. I've asked him about the first few games of the Tigercat season that had to be relocated because the Hamilton Stadium was not done when the government said it would be and it is still, I repeat, still not done. And now a significant soccer match that would have acted as a test run for the Hamilton Stadium pan-am readiness had to be moved to McMaster. The minister, as is the liberal way, didn't answer these questions and never has. And now the city of Hamilton openly concerned that the latest completion date won't be met. And a member of the local pan-parapan committee doesn't think the completion date will be met. Speaker, does this minister think that the people of this province finally deserve an honest and full answer about the ongoing delays to significant pan-parapan games, venues, and the costs? Thank you. The minister's chosen culture sport and is responsible for the 2015 pan-parapan games. A long title. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. The member was here in the legislature, I believe, on Monday when I answered the exact same question in regards to the Hamilton Stadium. He knows fully well that this is a $146 million investment into the city of Hamilton. The people of Hamilton are quite excited with this venue. The Hamilton Tigercats are undefeated in the stadium. And in fact, Mr. Speaker, in fact, Mr. Speaker, if you talk to the people of Hamilton, you'll realize that that region alone has brought in the most volunteers out of all of Ontario. So they're buying into the games. They've bought into the fact that they're gonna have a brand new stadium. And he knows fully where it's, there's not gonna... Excuse me. The bantering back and forth has got to stop. And the member knows, Mr. Speaker, that this is the largest investment in the stadium. And you have a structure here in the province of Ontario when it comes to our sport facilities, probably in the history of this province. And we're gonna go from a jurisdiction that was doing pretty well to exceptionally well, not only here in North America, not only here in Canada, but throughout North America. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well, thank you, Speaker. Thanks for the travel log again. Speaker, the people of Hamilton, the people of Milton where the cycling velodrome is also not ready and where they also missed a staging test event, deserve better than a smiling, happy minister who says everything's great. No answers coming from the other side, as usual. We're not talking about a Pee Wee hockey game here, Minister. We're talking about a $260 million and rising multi-site international games for the people of Ontario who could be on the hook for a lot more. Speaker, the minister's reputation is also on the hook. Will he take responsibility for the mess and the rhetoric take the lead with his cabinet colleagues? Make sure that these venues are going to be ready on time and on budget, which I don't think they will be. In fact, I know they won't be. Thank you, Minister. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. You know, Mr. Speaker, we've had three technical briefings on the issue in regards to Pan Am and Para Pan Am games. We've gone through the venues, we've gone through the costs, and I don't think the member opposite has showed up to any of those briefings. Number two, Mr. Speaker, if you look at the actual infrastructure projects that we have in operation on turn in regards to the Pan Am and Para Pan Am games, the Scarborough Aquatic Center, which is fully operational, if you go in there, it's a big hub of activity. It's $43.8 million under budget. Number one, number two, the Pan Am, Para Pan Am field, $2.9 million under budget. The Markham, Pan Am, and Para Pan Am Center, 7.3. Let's not talk. The member from Hamilton, East Tony Creek, come to order. Wrap up, please. So the simple fact is, Mr. Speaker, this government has made the largest investment to athletic infrastructure in the history of this province. We're proud of our records. We're doing this not only for the athletes who are today, but the athletes in the future, and we're very proud of our record. Thank you. Any questions? The member from Futurener Center. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the minister responsible for women's issues. Minister, the Premier has just noted that sexual harassment will not be tolerated in Ontario, and that we must remain vigilant when it comes to addressing this very serious issue. She told us that whether it's at work or whether it's at home, that women in Ontario have a right to feel safe. I know that this government is committed to taking action and working collectively as we move forward. Minister, can you please share with us what steps your ministry has taken to ensure that we are safe? Thank you, minister, for children and youth services and women's issues. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And thank you to the member for Kitchener Center for this very important and serious question. As we know, the Premier has taken a very active role on this issue. And in fact, I want to share with the House that later this evening, the Premier will be delivering opening remarks at the official opening of the He or She campaign. This is a movement of over 119,000 men across the world, Speaker, who have committed to take a stand for gender equality. And over 12,200 people in Canada have done the very same thing. I would strongly encourage everyone in this legislature to join this movement. Initiatives like He or She are critical because they raise awareness on this issue. Mon ministère appris de actions concrètes... And the government wants to support concrete actions about sexual harassment. Dollars over a four-year plan and $3 million for sexual assault centres in our province. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you. A couple of minutes. Thank you, minister. It's very encouraging to hear about a campaign like He or She. And I think I speak for the entire caucus when I say that we are very proud of the Premier for taking action on this very serious matter. Just last week, I had a meeting with some stakeholders at the Waterloo Region Sexual Assault Centre. And most of the conversation was about events at the CBC. And I tell you, as a former broadcaster, I get it, having witnessed and experienced sexual harassment in the workplace. Minister, can you please tell us what other policies are in place in the workplace to ensure that we all feel safe at work? Thank you, minister. Can I please? Minister of Labor. Thank you, Speaker. And thank you to the member for that very, very important question. As I said in response to her previous question, we simply do not tolerate violence and harassment in Ontario's workplaces. It's that clear. Everybody in this province should be able to work in a workplace that is both safe and healthy. To answer the question specifically, what we did in 2009 as a government is we made amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act in Bill 168. What that said is that all employers in this province have to have workplace violence and workplace harassment policies in place, and they also have to have programs that implement those policies in a serious way, Speaker. There's a variety of information that we can provide from the Minister of Labor. If there's any employer out there that's watching today that wants to do better, that thinks he or she wants to review those policies, and we also give the right to refuse work. Anybody that feels that they're under duress in this regard should simply refuse to do the job, contact the police, or contact us. Thank you, Speaker. Thank you. No question. The Leader of the Magic is all up. Thank you. My question is to the Minister of Community and Social Services. Minister Shane Burt is a 21-year-old man with spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy, who due to his age has been told he is no longer allowed to attend school. In a matter of months, he has gone from having access to a walker, a standard, a bike, lifts, an exercise table, and an integrated computer system allowing him to communicate in a school setting, to having none of those things now. His family explains that no programming exists for his type of disability in the entire region outside of a school setting. Minister of the All-Party Select Committee on Developmental Services released its final report in July. The 46th recommendation was for the Interministerial Committee to work with families and community agencies to develop more day programming, tailored to a wider range of needs. Will you commit to provide day programming to meet the needs of Shane Burt? Thank you, Minister of Community and Social Services. Well, thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the member for the question. Certainly, I cannot comment on any specific case, but I can say in general that we on the side of the House took the Select Committee's report extremely seriously. I did say in my ministerial statement, in some detail, that we were looking at very closely at all 46 recommendations in that report, and certainly we'll be taking the advice very, very seriously. In terms of individuals transitioning specifically from one situation, an educational situation in particular, and moving through to adulthood, this is an area that I've asked my parliamentary assistant to focus on in terms of ensuring that these types of transitions are as smooth as possible, that a plan is in place as an earlier date possible. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Well, Minister, again to the minister, the Burt family explains that no programming is available in our area, and we have been in contact with your ministry, but I'd be happy to provide you with Shane's particulars again. As the family describes, Shane is like a six-month-old baby that understands everything. He can't walk, he can't talk, but when the proper programming is in place, he thrives. At school, he learned to float and roll over in a pool by himself. He helps serve food and dusted furniture at the local brick store with his classmates. He had daily exercise and interaction with his peers. The Burt's want Shane back in school until programming in the community is available, and I don't think that's an unreasonable suggestion. In fact, the regulation under section 16 of the Education Act states, quote, the committee may recommend that an exceptional pupil who is 21 years of age or older remain in a secondary school program. Question? My question is simple. Will you undertake to ensure that everything is done to see if Shane can't stay in the secondary program that he was thriving? Thank you. Thank you. Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. And of course, this is precisely the type of situation that caused us to invest some $810 million over three years, particularly into the sector. And I do recall that the two opposition parties voted against that budget, which is most unfortunate. I do want to reassure the member opposite that in September 2014, my ministry, the Ministry of Children and Youth Services, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and the Ministry of Education implemented integrated transition planning for young people with developmental disabilities who are preparing for adulthood. So I want to certainly be very, I'm very open to hearing more about this particular case, but this is precisely the work that we are committed to doing and we took the good advice of the select committee in this regard. And we will be moving forward. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Thank you to the Minister of Natural Resources. Minister, I believe first and foremost that forests in Rainy River District should serve to create jobs in the Rainy River District as it has for the better part of 100 years. Now the people in this town are left watching as their livelihood is being trucked away. I believe that the Cross Route Forest should be providing fiber to the local Fort Francis Mill so that we can create 1,000 jobs so that 1,000 people can pay their bills. But the Minister seems content with the status quo. My question is, Minister, is the reason why you're refusing to resolve this situation in Fort Francis because the wood is going to your riding to be processed instead? I'm going to ask for order, and then I'm going to make an observation that we have to be very careful in the house when we make comments that are coming close and I'll only offer a warning that impugning motive is not what we do in this place. Minister, the member from the AP in Carleton will come to order. It doesn't matter if you're looking at me or not. And that includes anyone that wants to add anything else. Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry. Thank you. You know, a week ago I asked my staff, I asked my staff a week ago, who do you think will ask this question? I predicted it would be the NDP and so I was right. This kind of question is so predictable from that particular party. And I will demonstrate to you by way of example for the member opposite why she is so misplaced in... Stop the clock. Start the clock. Order. I'm still standing. Come to order. And the Minister of Agriculture, come to order as well. Carry on. Speaker, in 2011, three months before the provincial election, a mill in my riding in Atacocan called the Sapaue Mill that was owned by Buchanan had 640,000 cubic meters of wood attached to it. And three months before a provincial election, our government took that wood away from the mill in my riding. And very shortly after that, that mill was torn down. And do you know where that wood went? It went to Fort Francis, the resolute mill that was owned in Fort Francis. And how did you feel? How did you feel about the road at that time? Were you standing up before... Minister of Aboriginal Affairs will withdraw. At this time, I will also remind you once again, in this place, we raise the level of debate. Supplementary. I will tell the minister who the NDP is. We are the party in this parliament who are standing up for the people of this province feeling betrayed by your government's unwillingness to act. 1,000 jobs will have a major impact on our community. Sustainably managing the cross-route forest in order to create jobs at the Fort Francis Mill would bring stability and prosperity back to the Northwest. In fact, in 2011, New Democrats proposed changes to the wood tenure system that would ensure that when a mill closes its doors that the wood allocations would revert back to the local community. Right now, the minister seems content with the status quo that is only benefiting his community, the community that he represents. Instead of listening to the priorities of the people who live in the area, does this sound like good, solid, sound governmental policy? Thank you. Minister. This particular member was so concerned about the Fort Francis Mill that never once since it's been closed for the last two years or so has she written to this minister or this ministry in regard to the closure of that mill? I'm so concerned she's been about that particular mill. Speaker, at the core of this is the tenure modernization piece. We introduced it in 2011. The members opposite in both parties apparently want you to think that if an ESFL process was in place for this mill and if that process had started a year ago it would not have been concluded by now in all likelihood. Even if it had been, as I've said before, it's only one component of the deal that was required, hopefully between a willing seller and between a potential buyer. It was only one phase. There were other components of the deal that were on the table that were being negotiated between the two parties. This was only one part of it. And as I've said repeatedly and will say again, even if the ESFL had been in place, it would not have guaranteed any deal. We continue to work with both parties and with the community to see what we can do. Thank you. My question is to the minister of government and consumer services. In my writing at Brampton Springdale, one of the most frequent things I hear about is the constituents and their experiences at Service Ontario locations. My constituents depend on Service Ontario for many important services, such as license plate sticker renewals, health card and driver's license renewals, and obtaining birth certificates. Service Ontario is not just important to my constituents, but to all Ontarians. The services that they provide are essential and important to Ontarians, that they have proper documentation to see a doctor and a business. However, I've had constituents comment on the occasional longer than normal wait times. My constituents understand the delays are a part of life and that they do happen. They want to know what can be done to try to minimize these instances. Can the minister please update the House on what his ministry is doing to alleviate wait times at Service Ontario locations, not only in my writing at Brampton Province. Thank you. Minister of government and consumer services. Thank you, Speaker. I think that's a very important issue in your writing. Low wait times are one of the keys to customer satisfaction, and we have many initiatives to shorten wait times that we're proud of. In 2013, the average customer wait time at Service Ontario centres was roughly nine minutes. And of our over 280 Service Ontario locations, 97% of them had a wait time of less than 15 minutes. Recognizing that Service Ontario centre in Brampton has an above average wait time, we recently launched a pilot project helping to improve the wait times in Brampton. Part of the strategy involved in forming the public of the necessary documentation needed, as well as highlighting the option to use various online services for renewal functions. We have moved over 40 of our services offered at Service Ontario to online services, making transactions easily accessible. This past year, we made it possible to renew your driver's licence online, a first of its kind in Canada. Thank you, Speaker. My thanks for the Minister for his response and for informing myself in the House of the important steps that the Ministry has taken. These are all great initiatives towards reducing wait times at Service Ontario, both in my writing and across the province. Speaker, there have been many other steps taken by Service Ontario to ensure that wait times remain reasonable. As the Minister said, many services are now offered online, and some of them for the first time in Canada. These online services not only decrease wait times, but increase the convenience of renewing documents for Ontarians. Would the Minister please update the House on what other services are offered online and the benefits of completing transactions online? Thank you, Minister. Thank you, Speaker. Again, thanks to the members of Brampton Springdale for the question. By offering more services online, Service Ontario is ensuring that Ontarians can access the services they need when they need them. One of the options is certainly the 15-day money-back guarantee when you order your birth certificate online. There are four in one bundle available where parents can apply for a birth certificate, a social insurance number, and both federal and provincial child tax benefit credits in one easy transaction. This year, we're encouraging people to renew their license plate stickers online. This will decrease wait times not only at the Brampton Service Ontario location, but at Service Ontario locations across Ontario. Another important service is one source for business, an online service portal that provides businesses with a single window to view and manage their relationship with different levels of government. At Service Ontario's we're focused on innovation and customer service excellence so that Ontarians will spend less time standing in line, more time online. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. Premier, during a Liberal fundraiser in Stratford in November of last year, before the last election, you were asked about Go Train service to Stratford. You were quoted as saying full-day, two-way Go service is a priority and expanding Go service is a priority. I then asked you to clarify your plans for Go Transit in Perth, Wellington. It's now a year later and you still haven't answered. I twice written to the Minister of Transportation and he still hasn't answered. I asked the Premier, can we conclude from your silence that you were just telling people before an election? Premier? Minister of Transportation. Thank you very much, Speaker. I want to thank the member opposite for that question. I had the opportunity a number of weeks ago, a number of months ago, actually, Speaker, while at the AMO conference to have a face-to-face conversation with the Mayor from the community that he referenced, the Mayor of Stratford. It was a great conversation. As I've spoken to many mayors and council members and others from communities right across the province of Ontario, there should be about our government's very ambitious plan to invest significantly in transit and transportation infrastructure over the next decade. I look forward to having continued dialogue and conversations with the Mayor of Stratford and mayors and regional chairs from communities in York Region and Durham and Peel and Toronto and Niagara and elsewhere, while Metrolinx and the Ministry of Transportation continues to do its work because all of our decisions going forward as to how we invest that money we're going to go, Speaker, will be based on business case analysis so that we can provide positive results for communities right across the region of the province. Thanks, Speaker. That was an interesting answer. Speaker, it looks like the government is leaving out even the possibility that GO trains could serve Stratford in the future. It sounds like the Minister isn't giving us something aspirational in nature. I wrote to the Premier in November of 2013. She sent my letter to the Minister of Transportation. On April 15th of this year after months of silence I wrote to the Minister's predecessor. I wrote again to this Minister on September 23rd. My letters remain unanswered. Speaker, the government's silence is deafening. When will this government start planning for the future and acknowledge the need for future GO service expansion to Stratford? And, Speaker, when will it start answering its mail? Well, thank you very much. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I have to admit to the legislature Speaker, I find this truly fascinating. Not only the question that I hear from this member today, but the questions that were raised last week while I was at Estimates Committee from some of his colleagues. Since my time in this legislature, since the first being elected in 2012 Speaker, at every instance I've heard nothing from members of that particular coalition party about anything with respect to building Ontario up. Anything with respect, Speaker, to making more investments in crucial infrastructure. What I've heard, Speaker, time and time again is about their fascination with the need to slash and burn at every turn. And yet, while at Estimates Committee last week, while I stand in my place at this moment, while I did last week as well, whether we're talking about that community or others I hear repeatedly about their somewhat belated desire to support and to invest in crucial infrastructure. It's peculiar to me that I hear this repeatedly. What I can tell that member is that over the next decade, this government, under the leadership of this Premier, will invest $29 billion up to $15 billion for the up to $14 billion for the rest of Ontario to deliver. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Yesterday, media and ministerial staff were invited to tour Windsor jail in my writing, yet I was explicitly denied access. It's ironic a government toting transparency denies elected officials access to government facilities. Perhaps the minister didn't want me to point out that, like the old jail, our new Southwest Detention Center is overcrowded and understaffed. Offenders making up 80% of the maximum capacity are crammed into 60% of the facility's space. Also, Windsor's male intermittent offenders are being shipped to London. While the minister thinks his misstatements on file is limited to only four to six male intermittent offenders, I want to remind him that the problems in our correctional system impact correctional officers, staff, families, and the general public. When will the minister be proactive, not reactive when addressing the problems of our correctional system? Thank you very much Speaker. First of all, I want to thank the member for yesterday for reaching out to me to get more information about the Windsor jail and the tours that we are hosting as we open the Southwest Detention Center. I want the member to know this, and I'm sure she's received an invite, that on Friday, November the 14th, she's getting a VIP tour of the jail along with the judiciary, the mayor, the council MPPs, MPs, the police chief, the fire chief, and the former superintendent, so I hope she will be able to attend a special tour that has already been planned along with all the elected representatives on Friday, November the 14th. Speaker, I am very excited with the challenge and the mandate that the premier has given to me, and that is to transform our correctional system. And Speaker, I look forward to working with all members of the House and get their ideas as to how do we have a correctional system that focuses on rehabilitation of our inmates. Do you remember from Lannark, Lannark, Lannings and Addington? Thank you, Speaker, on a point of order. Earlier during question period, you ruled to dismiss my notice of privilege, and you made reference to standing order 121 that at first must be raised in committee. If I may, Speaker, I attempted to raise this matter in committee on Monday evening, however the chair refused to consider the matter due to the time allocated. I've made my ruling and that's the end of it, and in terms of anything else you need to bring that back to committee. Point of order from the member from Hamilton, East Creek. I want to clarify the record that the minister claimed that I didn't attend any and I did. That's not a point of order. We have a deferred vote on the amendment to the amendment to the motion of allocation of time on bill 10, calling the members. This will be a five-minute bill. Members, please take their seats. Members, take your seats, please. On November 4th, Mr. Bradley moved government notice of motion number 7. Mr. Bisson then moved the motion to the amendment by deleting all the words after the second paragraph and submitting the following that the committee shall travel up to five days outside of Toronto for the purpose of public hearings as determined by the committee. The amendment be amended as follows that the number 5 be deleted and replaced with the number 7 and that the words as determined by the committee be deleted and replaced within the following locations. Hamilton, Guelph, Ottawa, Lourdes, Dixie County, Farrow Como Lourdes and Movement to the amendment by Ms. McLeod will rise one at time be recognized by the clerk. Ms. McLeod, Mr. Clark, Mr. Arnott, Mr. Hartman, Mr. Haredaman, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Fidele, Mr. Fidele, Mr. Yakobuster, Mr. Huda, Mr. Miller, Parisown, Nascoka, Mr. Miller, Parisown, Nascoka, Mr. Mcnaughton, Mr. Mcnaughton, Mr. Mr. Smith, Mr. Harris, Mr. Nicholas, Mr. Nichols, Ms. Marteau, Mr. McDonnell, Mr. Pettipies, Mr. Hillier, Mr. Hillier, Ms. Hervat, Mr. Miller Hamilton, Mr. Hamilton East Stony Creek, Ms. Soutler, Ms. Taylor, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Natascha, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Sange, Ms. Feig, Ms. Forrester, Mr. Mantha, Mr. Hatfield, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Gates, Ms. Gretzky, Ms. Gretzky, Mr. Chimino, Ms. French, Ms. French, all those opposed, please rise one at a time, be recognized by the court. Mr. Naqvi, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Shirelli, Ms. Shirelli, Ms. Susa, Ms. Mance, Ms. Matthews, Mr. Hosskes, Ms. Sander, Mr. Dugas, Ms. McCharles, Mr. Quinter, Mr. Pohl, Mr. Bernardinetti, Mr. Dillon, Mr. Quadri, Mr. Zorzetti, Mr. Gravel, Mr. McMeakin, Mr. Murray, Mr. Chan, Mr. Morini, Mr. Coteau, Mr. Leo, Mr. Flynn, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Bocasso, Mr. Albanese, Mr. Dexon, Mr. Dexon, Mr. Manga, Mr. Crack, Mr. Wong, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Sergio, Mr. Moro, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Del Ducat, Mr. Del Ducat, Ms. Dahmerla, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Frasier, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Baker, Mr. Baker, Mr. Baller, Mr. Baller, Mr. Dahm, Ms. Hogarth, Ms. Hogarth, Ms. Kuala, Ms. Kuala, Ms. Amla Long, Ms. Mollie, Ms. Mollie, Mrs. Martin, Mrs. Miguero, Mrs. Miguero, Mrs. Miguero, Mr. Mann, Mr. 56. The ayes being 44 and the nays being 56. I declare the amendment to the amendment lost. Is the House ready to vote on the amendment by Mr. Bisson? Mr. Bisson has moved that the motion be amended by deleting all of the words after the second paragraph and substituting the following, that the committee shall travel up to five days outside of Toronto for the purpose of public hearings as determined by the committee. Is it the pleasure of the House that the amendment carry? I heard or no. All those in favor, say aye. All those opposed, say nay. In my opinion, the nays have it. Calling the members, this is a five minute vote. Same vote. I have to wait until all are seated. All those in favor of the amendment to the motion will rise one at a time to be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Bisson, Ms. Horvath, Mr. Vanton, Ms. Jelina, Mr. Miller, Mr. Hamilton, East Stony Creek, Ms. Sattler, Ms. Taylor, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Nadashak, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Singh, Ms. Fife, Ms. Forster, Ms. Forster, Mr. Mantha, Mr. Hatfield, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Gates, Ms. Gretzky, Mr. Chimino, Ms. French, Mr. Clark, Mr. Clark, Mr. Arnott, Mr. Hardiman, Ms. McLeod, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Fidelli, Mr. Fidelli, Mr. Yakibusky, Mr. Hudak, Mr. Miller, Perry Sound, Mascoka, Mr. McNaught, Mr. McNaught, Ms. Jones, Ms. Thompson, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Monroe, Ms. Scott, Ms. Scott, Mr. Yura, Mr. Bailey, Mr. Bailey, Mr. Walker, Mr. Walker, Mr. Smith, Mr. Smith, Mr. Harris, Mr. Harris, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Martin, Mr. McDonnell, Mr. Pettipis, Mr. Hillyard, NDP said they won't be opposed. All those opposed to the amendment to the motion will rise one at a time be recognised by the clerk. Mr. Nackley, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Shurelli, Mr. Sousa, Mr. Sousa, Mr. Wends, Mr. Matthews, Mr. Hoskins, Mr. Hoskins, Mr. Sandals, Mr. Duga, Mr. Duga, Mr. McCharles, Mr. Quinter, Mr. Quinter, Mr. Mr. Gordnetti, Mr. Dillon, Mr. Quadrie, Mr. Bravel, Mr. McMeakin, Mr. Murray, Mr. Chan, Mr. Moreedy, Mr. Coteau, Mr. Coteau, Mr. Leal, Mr. Flynn, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Balkasar, Mr. Albanese, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Manga, Mr. Crack, Mr. Wong, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Sergio, Mr. Morrow, Mr. Jassett, Mr. Del Ducat, Mr. Donnerlock, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Baker, Mr. Balor, Mr. Don, Mr. Hogarth, Mr. Koala, Mr. Mollie, Mr. Martin, Mr. McGarry, Mr. McMahon, Mr. Milchin, Mr. Nadeau Harris, Mr. Potts, Mr. Rinaldi, Mr. Rinaldi, Mr. Renil, Mr. four, the nays are 56. The ayes being 44 and the nays being 56. I declare the amendment lost. Is the House ready for the vote on the main motion? Mr. Bradley has moved government notice of motion number seven for the allocation of time on bill 10, an act to enact the Child Care and Early Years Act 2014 to repeal the day Nurseries Act and to amend the Early Childhood Educators Act 2007, the Education Act and the Ministry of Training, College and Universities Act, and to make consequential and related amendments to other acts. Is it the pleasure or the pleasure of the motion carried? I heard a no. All those in favor say aye. Aye. All those opposed say nay. Aye. I believe the ayes have it. Calling the members, this will be a five minute bill. All those in favor of the motion will rise. One at a time be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Bradley. Mr. Bradley. Mr. Bradley. Mr. Shoran. Mr. readings. Theutzhould.áis ihre. Mr. Schirri. Mr. Schirri. Mr. Schirri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ferri. Mr. Ella. Mr. eing Hub Jie. Mr. bons How Shproduct Mr. Albanese, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Manga, Mr. Crack, Mr. Wong, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Sergio, Mr. Surgio, Mr. Moro, Mr. Jassits, Mr. Del Ducat, Mr. Domela, Mr. Fraser, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Baker, Mr. Ballard, Mr. Don, Mr. Hogarth, Mr. Cawalla, Mr. Amlalon, Mr. Mollie, Mr. Martin, Mr. McGarry, Mr. McMann, Mr. Miltjen, Mr. Miltjen, Mr. Nadoo Harris, Mr. Pot, Mr. Rinaldi, Mr. Rinaldi, Mr. Reneal. All those opposed, please stand one at a time and be recognized by the... Mr. Harnam, Mr. Harnam, Mr. McLeod, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Fidelli, Mr. Fidelli, Mr. Yacobusky, Mr. Yacobusky, Mr. Hudak, Mr. Houdak, Mr. Miller, Perry Sound & Skoka, Mr. Miller, Perry Sound & Skoka, Mr. McNaughton, Mr. McNaughton, Mr. Jones, Mr. Jones, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Monroe, Mr. Monroe, Mr. Scott, Mr. Scott, Mr. Yura, Mr. Bailey, Mr. Walker, Mr. Smith, Mr. Harris, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Nichols, Mr. Marteau, Mr. McDonnell, Mr. McDonnell, Mr. Pettipis, Mr. Pettipis, Mr. Hillier, Mr. Hillier, Mr. Bisson, Mr. Horvath, Mr. Vantah, Mr. Vantah, Madame Jelena, Mr. Miller Hamilton, East Coney Creek, Mr. Miller Hamilton, East Coney Creek, Ms. Sattler, Ms. Sattler, Ms. Taylor, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Nadoschak, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Singh, Ms. Fight, Ms. Forrester, Mr. Vantah, Mr. Hatfield, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Gates, Ms. Gretzky, Mr. Chimino, Ms. French. The ayes are 56th and the nays are 44th. The ayes being 56th and the nays being 44th, I declare the motion carried. There are no further deferred votes. This house stands recessed until 3 p.m. this afternoon.