 If there's anything I'm missing, please let me know. Oh, Jason, I'm going to read your comment. Hey, Chichou, regarding YouTube, don't you think it's their right to censor what they want? At the end of the day, it's their company and their business that the only thing we can do is choose not to use them, but we can't force them to stop doing certain practices. This is the thing, Jason. They keep on changing their terms of service, their contracts. A lot of people have built up their businesses surrounding the original terms of contract whenever they hopped on to YouTube. I hopped on to YouTube. I think my first video I uploaded was 15 years ago, way at the beginning, the first couple of years I was on there. Terms of contract, back then, if I'm building a business model based on this platform, surrounded by this platform, focused on this platform, they've kept on changing the term of service where my business model is no longer valid, but wait a second, aren't they contractually obligated to abide by their original terms of service, grandfathered in? Many places do. Many places do. The other thing, a sensitive is right now, or less so now to a certain degree, how to monopoly. So it was a speaker's corner, really, a public forum. The other thing is Google's censored to, they've gotten a certain amount of huge amounts of government tax breaks, if not direct funding. So society has the right to have a say in what's taking place. The other business, the other thing is, according to in the United States and many Western countries, we have the freedom to speak our mind. We have free speech laws. We have free speech laws, the right not to be discriminated. So for example, in the United States, one of the biggest who has in the last 10 years, one of the blips in the people are offended part of the information mechanism, the control mechanism, was that there was a company in the United States, I forget where it was, maybe it was California, that was refusing to make wedding cakes, cakes for gay marriages, LGBTQ marriages, right? They were religious on their religious laws or whatever laws or their own private business laws. They said, we refuse to make wedding cakes for LGBT community weddings. Now you can decide if that's right or wrong, it's your choice. But the government stepped in and said they have to make wedding cakes for LGBT communities because they cannot discriminate. So discrimination laws kicked in, forcing this private business to make wedding cakes for the LGBT community. So wait a second, if these laws, these rules, okay, these freedoms that we have as human beings in the society, apply to a bakery making wedding cakes, why do they not apply to these monopolies that control the flow of information that have constantly changed their terms of service to f over their user base or their creator base? Something's not right here. Something's not right here. So unless we apply the rules, the laws, our rights equally everywhere, then yeah, we have a right to demand equal rights on all platforms in all aspects of our lives.