 Well, thank you, Richa. So we are on time. That's fantastic. So excited to see the workshop comes to the end in the last three half days. I actually was able to sit in and nearly all the sessions, except missing a small part of that. So I learned a lot. I'd like to thank everybody's participation. I'm going to use my few minutes to also share with you some of my thoughts right here. Very simple words right here. Course is, you know, certainly is the determining factor right there is with or without the carbon price, carbon tax, certain carbon price right there. Course is important. We keep talking about scare, why the unit gigaton tell what our is this is the unit we need to use all the time. I'm so glad Steve mentioned efficiency. That's something we need to pay attention to energy efficiency. Every step also Shafi mentioned that also every time you touch, you're going to have a course associated with that also efficiency loss. I myself work on batteries as well as catalysis. I look at lithium mine, I say my God 90%, 95% efficiency, energy efficiency. Well, once I split water to generate hydrogen, my efficiency job a lot and then I use hydrogen for fuel so I get a heat again. This is all building to your cost and also throughput is important. For the reason we talk about scare throughput is important. And particularly if you look into this a lot of discussion about electrochemical type of process right there, indeed electrochemical processes to scare to the to the level we want. We still need to figure that out. Reliability is important or say, you know, intermittency or for solar and wind, you know, that's what we keep talking about. Well, you cannot just do this process during the day. You also need to run it during the night. Do you want to have medium and long duration storage to couple in or not? Maybe you need to do that. So circular nature of discussion is there, whether it's from the resources availability, the waste generation right there. This sounds important. System bill. I put it something right here, whether you can see the electron, the electricity, the grid or you hydrogen, the methane, the ammonia, the fuel, the CO2 and the heat. And it's not a single technologies answer. Each of these were right there. There's a large number of technologies associated with it. How do we repeat this whole system together? And then at last is the partnership between academia, industry, and government. That is to saying from the fundamental research concept demonstration to pilot, right. Amy mentioned that in her talk and to pilot scale to scale up to utilize the policy to, you know, to help scaling up to build infrastructure, whether it's a new electric grid infrastructure or is the hydrogen pipeline and the whole infrastructure need to get government involved to do it. So these are some of the key takeaway using keywords for me to summarize. And that has also been very important this workshop to me to build up a whole Stanford ecosystem. Some of you have seen me showing you this fabric of Stanford energy research ecosystem. Verticals, columns are those signs engineering technology initiative. We are building a political institute and the whole Stanford energy ecosystem. Horizontals are those skills that we still need. Let me emphasize data AI for energy system. We really need to take the system bill. And each of these line is fabric line fabric right there in the fiber right there. It's not a stone piping. It's highly interactive. So I think it's workshop, the learning, the problems, your brain power contribution will help us to plan for our sustainable manufacturing initiative down the road. I mean, this sustainable manufacturing initiative will be interacting with hydrogen, carbon removal, bits and bar storage and data AI energy system a lot. With that short summary, let me end my conclusion remark by thanking all of you, thanking the speakers, panelists and moderators. It is your hard work to make this happen. This is a long list of people. I won't name you individually. I want to speak out some people I would like to thank. Certainly it's our faculty organizing committee, Mattel, please, Leora and the managing director, Liang Ming. And also our external sponsor advisory committee, Drew, Christian and Amit. And during this planning, I think your hard work we are the reason to be able to put a program like this together. And our student note takers, Erin, Melissa, Sabeta, our video staff, Justin and Eric. Last but not least, these three people are otherwise spending day and night to make sure this workshop can happen. Maxine, Richard, and Jenny. And our long-term sponsor, ExxonMobil, Total and Shell. With that, I will end my concluding remark. Let me pass these to Amy. All right. Thanks, E. I think we had a lot of discussions on scale. And of course, the gigaton scale, the CO2 emissions, the industrial scale. And by the way, I have to say, being in the oil and gas chemicals industry, it's still eye-opening for me to hear about the scale in steel and cement, which of course we use in the oil and gas industry. But just, again, to realize the scale of these heavy industries is really eye-opening. And then, of course, the scale up going from lab to field. But I was thinking, you know, over the last couple of days, and especially during the, you know, talks today, that there's another scale issue, which I think people have brought up, which is the amount of R&D we're going to need to solve these industrial decarbonization problems. So yet a third use of the word scale. And Amy, we have a thousand students here at Stanford looking for an energy. We need to go even bigger. Exactly. Yes. So anyway, so multiple uses of the word scale and, you know, which is, you know, can sometimes be daunting. But on the other hand, I think it's really exciting. And I think what, again, I learned that I love hearing all the talks over the last three days. You know, there's a lot of fun to be had in long-term R&D in the spaces. And the heavy industry, I mean, there's a big need and there's a lot of fun to be had, I think, in these spaces. And I think the other thing I was thinking about over the last couple of days is the interconnectedness of all of these different challenges that we talk about. And, Yi, in some ways, your beautiful basket weave of, you know, pre-court and all of the themes that you mentioned, I think, highlights that. And that, you know, many of these, you know, there are some processes that are specific to one industry and so on. And maybe heat, I used to think of heat well, maybe process heat is something that's kind of an industrial specific process, but not really because, you know, people were talking about maybe, for example, using, you know, heat integration into cities and sharing process heat for residential commercial use, for example. So what really struck me is the interconnectedness of all of these different sources of energy and the different sectors, not just industry, but how it couples to power generation, of course, you know, transportation, and also residential commercial and, you know, including in addition to all the different energy sources also demand and changes in demand reduction. And so it just got me thinking that it's hard to put a box around what is industrial decarbonization and what goes into one of the other buckets. And I think that's okay. But I think there's an increasing need to think about the sector coupling between all of the different sectors and the interplay. So again, the systems view, but not just an industrial systems view, but really thinking about the global energy systems view is going to be important because I think that interconnectedness will just bring more opportunities. So really striking. I just want to say thank you all. Thank you to Stanford and the whole list of folks, but especially to, you know, Richard Maxine and Jennifer for organizing all this and for the team of people that put it together. And thanks in advance for all the faculty and postdocs and students who are thinking about this space. And I really look forward to hearing about your ideas and seeing what research proposals come out of this. Thank you, Amy. Next, Shafiq. Thanks, Yi. It's been very interesting three days. I'd say maybe seven years ago, six years ago, when I was talking about the word systems and the faculty and academia was speaking into, let's say an echo chamber, just speaking to myself, it was very difficult for people to understand why we needed to think from end to end. And this is wonderful to see the dialogue between the academic and the industry really starting to become much more common in its themes and its way of speaking about things, looking at the analysis, etc., which is wonderful. I do think there's still a lot to be done there. There's still a lot of challenges left still in the systems thinking, especially in integrating different systems together. We can't just think of the petrochemical industry alone or the oil industry alone. We need to think about how other industries are going to tie into it. Things like cement steel infrastructure, as we've mentioned, play heavily into this. And then our scope three emissions of our customers and how they use a lot of these products has to be thought into the systems level thinking. We've spoken primarily in the last three days, I would say on scope one type of emission control, but really when we talk about scope two and scope three, how you think about at the systems level what the optimal solution is going to change dramatically. The second one that reemphasize where our markets are going to be tomorrow in 10 years and 20 years, 30 years is going to be very different. And we need to be thinking about solutions that are not just forfeit what we see today. We need to be thinking much more broadly. We need to be thinking much more widely. And I think Arun mentioned this in his opening talk quite well, but I would like to emphasize this is a key area that we cannot get lost in our own little bubbles of looking to solve our own problems alone. We need to be thinking about scalability of the solutions, not just scalability of the size of the challenge. And we've talked about scale a lot in the three days, but the challenge ahead for the next three and a half billion people to come onto the face of the earth is going to be tremendous to live a very different lifestyle than what we've lived. So I think this is a big challenge facing us. And the last one that I put aside and didn't really hear a lot about, but I think is a major challenge we face, which is the pace at which and the urgency at which we have to get these solutions and technology out the door. And industry is guilty just like anybody else, which is about how do you do durability stability and eventually, bankability on any new process. And risk taking is not in the nature of the oil and gas industry. It's a very risk averse and they want to have everything really well buttoned up before you're going to run. And I think this is going to be a major cultural shift as we think about carbon management going forward, how to accelerate kind of reduction of emissions and bringing technology in line. And I think this is going to be quite a challenge for management to get their heads wrapped around in terms of what risk profiles they're going to take. So I think this is another area where uncertainty analysis risk analysis from the academics is going to be extremely helpful. What is the value of that next data point or what is the value of that next experiment to be done or the next pilot scale? Is that really going to change the decision or is that really going to give us an answer that makes us think about things in a very different way than running faster and moving faster? So I think this is another point that I walked away thinking we left a bit of a hole in the discussion, but perhaps for the next workshops we can be thinking about this as well in terms of carbon management. So with that, I would just like to say thank you to all the speakers. It's been stimulating three days of hearing different perspectives and trying to weave it together and kind of coalesce some ideas together here at the end. And I really appreciate the interaction and the time we've had together. Thank you. With that, Richard, do you have a few final words to say? Really just to say thank you to everyone who participated. I think there's a lot of work putting this workshop together and I think it's paid off. And I really appreciate the work from the industry, from faculty who've helped out and also everyone who participated. It was, as I counted all those pictures on that slide, there were like 36 pictures there, 36 people who participated in panels and so on. So it's been a good three days. I think it's been a helpful discussion and it will help us as we move forward in deciding what our research directions are going to be as well. I think the dialogue, if we can continue this dialogue between industry and academia, we can really come up with some, we can really move the needle is what I would say. So thank you to everyone. And I think we can close now. And if anyone wants to do any networking, I'll put that slide up. And if anyone wants to have any private conversations, we can do that. So thank you again and take care and goodbye.