Upload

Loading...

Male Circumcision: a Raw Deal At Many Levels

1,024

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Uploaded on Jul 4, 2010

A gentle guy holds forth on why male circumcision is bad for so many reasons. It's genital mutilation which, while nowhere near as bad as female circumcision, certainly shouldn't be done to an unsuspecting and non-consenting newborne. He explains how circumcision greatly interferes with later sexual pleasure, both for the male and female, and even how its linked to the Middle East's warriors: Jews, Muslims, and Americans! He maintains that allowing male circumcision is a gateway to the religious justification for female circumcision. He also covers, so to speak, AIDS, masturbation, the foreskin industry, and Oprah. At the end, he shares his view that circumcision is x-rated: no one under 18 should be allowed to do this, and certainly shouldn't have it done to them while a minor. I came upon this display at a spot on the US Capitol lawn usually occupied by opponents of legal abortion. I started out skeptical of the guy, David Wilson, whose mother is Bahaman and father US Navy. In his Uncle Sam/Dr Zuess hat, he initially appears to be a complete eccentric. But by the end I found him charming and compelling. It made me glad that back in the day my wife convinced me to leave our newborn son whole. In my opinion, religious dogma and/or a father's egotistic view that his son should "look like dada" are not excuses to cut a baby!

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up Next


Sign in to add this to Watch Later

Add to