 One of the legitimate worries about AI is the ability of people to use it, to do bad things. And some of the stuff that you've seen, bad things, oh, you know, we've got a Taylor Swift example of a bad thing that was done where AI has been used to put as Taylor Swift, I think it was Taylor Swift, on, you know, a porn star's body, put her face on a porn star's body, as she commits sexual acts, as she stars in a porn video, and it looks like Taylor Swift is on there, and of course that is horrible. It's a violation of somebody's rights. But the laws, the laws are not, we don't get half, proper laws to protect ourselves in these cases. We know that AI now can mimic a voice. AI can probably take my crazy accent, and it can actually create videos of me speaking that sound like me, or videos, audio of me speaking, and you wouldn't be able to tell. So if you see audio of your unbrooked advocating for communism, it's AI. It's an AI fake. But one example of this was in Slovakia, Slovakia, Slovenia, I think it was Slovakia, Slovakia, yes, Slovakia, where a fake recording of a political candidate, like two days before the election, went viral. The recording sounded exactly like him, and he was talking about how they'd rigged the election. He was also talking about how he wanted to raise taxes on beer, making beer much more expensive. You don't do that in Slovakia. I mean, one can't tell how much of an effect it had on the election, but he lost. He lost the pro-Russia, anti-Ukraine candidate won, and the pro-EU, pro-NATO one lost. And Russia's very good at using AI for these kind of things. And it's definitely possible, right? It's definitely possible that AI could swing an election by creating newsworthy audio or video that has a candidate saying stuff that they don't believe in, but that could have a real impact on an election. So yeah, I mean, and it's interesting because you can deny it, but it's very difficult to identify and prove that a particular video or particular audio is fake. So it's going to be interesting to see how this is dealt with in the legal system over time. And whether anybody is prepared for this, and I expect to see a bunch of this kind of stuff going into the US 2024 election, I wouldn't be surprised if the Russians and the Chinese do all kinds of things to kind of screw with our minds in terms of creating these AI-generated audio or video. And how do you know? I mean, you have to assess whether something is reasonable or not. But we know, you look at Taylor Swift being a Psycox operation of the Pentagon, people will believe pretty much anything. So the reason and common sense has gone out the window when it comes to elections. And lots of players are going to utilize that for all kinds of weird effects. By the way, that video that that Fox host, Jesse Waters showed of the woman presenting and he said it's a Pentagon presentation in front of NATO. She doesn't work for the Pentagon. She is an academic. The conference was not a NATO conference. I mean, nothing about his reporting. Nothing that he said there was true. Blatant lies, right? She's some academic. She was using this as an example. Had nothing to do with the Pentagon. It had nothing to do with NATO. It's all made up. And yet it created this firestorm in right wing circles that is still convinced the Super Bowl is rigged.