 Siadית y dynulliad yr yllogau, hwnnw, y Delegated Powers and Law Reform Cymru. The first item that we have was a decision in private. As we propose, we take item 7 on the supplementary Delegated Powers memorandum for the planning bill in private. Are we agreed? Agenda item 2 is consideration of SSI's laid under the European Union Withdrawal ac we are considering these instruments in terms of the SSI protocol. We are looking at the scrutiny procedure under which they have been laid and the categorisation applied by the Scottish Government. The first one is the draft public procurement etc. Scotland amendment EU exit amendment regulations 2019, a bit of a mouthful, a bit of a history to the regulations as well. The ones that we are looking at today amend regulations that we previously considered are meetings on January 29 and 5 February. The Scottish Government has laid this instrument under the affirmative procedure and has categorised it as of high significance. Our advisers indicate that the scrutiny procedure and categorisation could be appropriate. Any comments from members? Are we content that the appropriate scrutiny procedure has been applied? Are we also content that the instrument is appropriately categorised as of high significance? Then we have some instruments that have been laid under the negative procedure. These have been categorised by the Government as of low significance. They are SSIs 24 to 26 and 34. In each case, our advisers indicate that the scrutiny procedure and categorisation could be appropriate. Are we content that the appropriate scrutiny procedure has been applied? Similarly, it is appropriate to categorise it as of low significance. Gender item 3, consideration of an instrument that has been laid under the European Union Withdrawal Act 2018. We are not required to consider the choice procedure because the act requires it to be laid under the affirmative procedure. The instrument is the draft fishery products official controls charges EU exit Scotland amendment regulations 2019. It has been categorised by the Government as of low significance. Our advisers have not raised any issues with the categorisation on the grounds that the instrument makes only minor and technical changes that ensure continuity of law without any policy change. Any comments from members? Is the committee content that the instrument is appropriately categorised as of low significance? Gender item 4, consideration of an instrument subject to affirmative procedure. We have just considered the fisheries products instrument under the previous agenda item and we are now considering the technical aspects of this SSI to ensure that it is fit for purpose. Is the committee content with the instrument? The remaining four draft affirmative instruments cover a variety of topics. Number one, the jurisdiction and judgments family civil partnership and marriage same sex couples EU exit Scotland amendment etc regulations 2019. The second one, the carers allowance operating Scotland order 2019. The local government finance Scotland order 2019 and the freedom of information Scotland act 2002 designation of persons as Scottish public authorities order 2019. We have no points raised by our advisers on these instruments. Is the committee content with them? Gender item 5, consideration of an instrument subject to the negative procedure. Our legal advisers have not raised any points on the remaining instruments. These are SSIs 2019, 21, 23 to 25, 27 to 29 and 33 to 35. Is the committee content with these? In relation to the council tax reduction Scotland amendment regulations, members will note that we have received a letter from the minister regarding our concerns about the need to consolidate these regulations. The minister states that they have not been consolidated because further amendments are likely in response to further changes to universal credit. However, versions of the principal regulations have been attached to the policy note for the instrument that shows the source and effect of changes made to the original text. Before we make a decision on that, any comments from members? The letter that we have received from the minister is helpful and indicates the work that our committee has undertaken in this particular area. I welcome the progress that has been made in this area. I agree with that. It is useful in a step forward. Does the committee wish to welcome the Scottish Government that has provided versions of the principal regulations detailing changes made? Agender item 6, instrument not subject to any parliamentary procedure. Our legal advisers have not raised any points on SSI 2019-22. Is the committee content with this? I will now move the meeting into private session.