 Move on to our next participant, Adis, please join us. This grand strategy, I think we could call this a grand strategy, the one belt and one road. To develop corridors westward from China is obviously crossing the central Asian areas. And how could this come to effect an already very fragile region? Are there positive and negative here? I have to have a talk first with the person who turned off the clicker. Yes, and as we've seen, China has been seeking to increase its fear of interest and has established several initiatives, both economic and security-based initiatives to work together with its neighbours. But China is not the only major superpower with interest in the region, and the other one is Russia. And the central Asian countries, all being part of the former Soviet Empire, are part of the Russian interest sphere. And as well as seeking economic influence, there are also security implications from Russia. So, in another way, Russia is involved is through migration. So, for example, a country like Tajikistan, more than half of the country's economy is based on remittances from migrant workers in Russia. So, the region is highly interlinked to both China and Russia, and usually it's being at the crossroads between Europe and Asia. It's seen as analysing in terms of its attractiveness or strategic interest to external powers, particularly having a lot of oil and gas. But this can be reversed as well, so developments within the region can have a profound impact on countries around it, on its neighbours and even the European Union in the second sense. And particularly in the light of climate change and even extreme impacts from climate change, there are some considerable linkages to it. You just elaborate on that, how exactly the climate will change or play a role connecting those Central Asia, Russia and China? Well, the region, as you can see here, is highly unsustainable, both environmentally and socially and politically. And currently the countries are locked in into various unsustainable practices in, for example, water, energy, agriculture and security. And there are major challenges for the region as they are continuing to compete for scarce and unpredictable resources as inputs to various economic sectors. And one example perhaps that shows this particularly well is the development of the arrow sea over the past few decades. Once being one of the five largest seas in the world, it has more or less become completely devastated. And this is even without climate change, so climate change will add an additional layer to this. This development is mainly due to irrigation practices, unsustainable irrigation practices, mainly related to cotton. So looking at climate change and through, for example, changing patterns in glaciers and changing patterns in rainfall, the risks and impacts will be added, there will be an additional risk. But moreover there is the key links and flows that are vulnerable to climate change are highly interlinked. But this interlinkage between risks puts not only a negative aspect to it, but also potential to collaborate. As the countries, they're not simply sharing borders, but also post-Soviet institutional structures, as well as similar topography. There is, looking at it from a system perspective, there is potential for collaboration. And to tell you, this is a simplified figure. So that's a grand strategy for collaboration. And looking at the region itself, at the heart of it is the trans-boundary water governance, which has impacts on every country in the region, as well as the neighboring countries. And following on from the trans-boundary water governance in terms of the potential shocks and collapse, hydropower is one such key link. And a potential for hydropower is massive in the region. It can power the whole region, as well as provide export credits. But to dealing with hydropower, there needs to be dealt with the downstream issue of irrigation, as well as the potential shocks in cotton and wheat. The central area is the bread basket of the world. And Kazakhstan is one of the major wheat producers and exports. All the other countries are depending on the exports from Kazakhstan. So what happens to water will in the end have effects on these different links, as well as looking at the other side in terms of supply risk and insecurity. And the huge oil and gas sector will be impacted on the availability of water. And all these links are traded, not only nationally, but internationally. And as well looking at the further step, as I mentioned before, both migration and security will have high implications on how water is in the sense that water is dealt with. So looking to summarize it simply that success or failure of trans-boundary water governance will have a major influence on future availability for energy and for agriculture, and as well as for livelihoods for the entire region, this irrespective of climate change. But as an additional layer, climate change can help speed up this both in terms of impacts and in terms of collaboration. Thanks a lot, Adis. Come and join us here.