 Would you consider stories like Harry Potter and other stories that are set in imagined metaphysical reality as having the potential to be odd? Yeah, I think Harry Potter's art. It's definitely odd It's it's definitely a recreation of reality based on artist metaphysical Metaphysical value judgment, which is I know as definition of art and I encourage you in this 50th year anniversary of Romantic manifesto to go read a romantic manifesto, but yeah, I mean, I really enjoyed Harry Potter. It's a good story It has certain things. I don't like about it like the final book is very Christian and the final scenes are very Christian, but it's It's dramatic. It's got heroes. It's it's fleshed out characters. You get to like certain characters You get a hate certain characters because they're fleshed out. They have identities the magic stuff is distracting and and silly and The boundaries on it are not clear. So it's hard to exactly understand. What are the rules of The magic why can't Harry just go like that and have all the evil guys disappear The same as true of any fantasy book. What are the boundaries of the magic? What are the rules of the magic is always a challenge for the writer to establish and yet allow them enough Things to do at the same time But I loved Harry Potter and it definitely think it's odd and I think it's it's it's suddenly for a Teenage audience. It's it's good art. I think it's good. It's all it's romantic Harry makes choices All of them make choices good choices bad choices that people who flip the people who are evil and become good and good And become evil and yeah, it's it's it's definitely definitely good good stuff, right? So I Encourage people to read every part if they haven't read Harry Potter just because it's fantasy doesn't mean it's bad And a lot of fantasy is good