 I think a lot of developers today are weighing their options in terms of monetizing and remodeling their attributes. And it primarily comes down to, do I monetize my projects through the carbon markets, or do I do this REC instrument? The tricky part with carbon markets is that there's a lot of upfront investment that's required. It's not unexpected to see a upfront cost of $25,000 or $30,000. So the transaction costs on the REC side are significantly lower. So we say that when it comes to large, large renewable projects, and by large, basically anything above a kilowatt or two, it makes sense to go the REC route. For very small projects, the mechanisms that are used to convert from electricity to carbon potential are favorable for very small projects. So if you have a 200 watt solar panel, going the route of what Solstrom offers is probably more appealing because the carbon equivalent is much higher for the initial amount of electricity. But as you start getting to a kilowatt, two kilowatts and beyond that, the value of the REC becomes much higher.