 You say that this letter was long overdue. You were expecting it. So does this mean that you do accept the reasons given for this dismissal, looking at the 10 working days that you missed as a doctor, also including the legality around this whole ghost law and the procedures that were expected of you that weren't met? So does this mean that you do understand, or your understanding of the reasons given for this dismissal? Firstly, the reasons given are false. We all know that the reasons which are real are just to try and silence me and all the cause we are fighting for for the doctors. Those days written there, they are all false. And we need to make mention here that everything that's going on, apart from the letter, today I'm supposed to report that police. Are you telling me that all of a sudden I've become a criminal, I've been dismissed, my license has been suspended, everything happening at once. This is not a coincidence. Ever since we started fighting for the plight of... So what you're saying, Dr. Sampa, is that you are denying that you've not missed 10 working days. You are denying that you did not follow the legal procedure that the Minister of Labour has been advocating for and consistently and persistently talking about. Have you ever missed work? I don't have a history of missing work. Neither do I have any disciplinary cases involving missing work. So whatever is happening right now, all these are just cooked up things trying to find faults. As we speak, even today, we don't know what they have cooked up the police because I'm supposed to report that false headquarters at nine hours. On top of the issue of you saying you didn't miss those 10 working days, you didn't miss work. On top of that is the issue of the illegality around it because according to the Minister of Labour, the expectation is that at least since you are not unionized as doctors, what you've done is followed the legal procedure, called to the courts of law, and then let the courts of law decide what the fate should be for the doctors and if that is not met, then now you can go on and find other means, other legal means as well. But with that procedure not being followed, what is the issue of you going ahead with this illegally and inciting fellow doctors? Well, what we have to understand is that when I'm talking like this, I'm not talking as someone. I'm talking as a resident doctor, as a Syrian president and that means I'm speaking for the office and every decision that is made doesn't directly have a bearing on me. There are so many times when you are a leader of an association, organization, when even your personal, your personal bearings don't matter. What matters is what the people want. We just speak for the doctors and even the decisions that were made, we are not decisions made by an individual. Everyone understands that. But the issue of trying to target the leaders so as to silence just like what happened to our city was arrested. It's something which is unacceptable, but we shall continue fighting as we are not going to. Speaking of fighting, are you doing this diplomatically? In other words, how has the dialogue with government started? Because as of last week, you put your ghost law on hold and you did mention that after two weeks as the resident doctors association, you will review the two weeks and see whether or not you go ahead with the ghost law or not. How has this been going so far? Have you managed to have any dialogue or engage the government so far? So on Monday, we wrote a letter which was sent to the Minister of Health. And in that letter, we notified them of our decision and now we wanted to be back on the, you know, the negotiation table. Because if you remember, the reasons we gave were not because our needs were met but it was because of the rising COVID cases. So we decided, okay, let's put it on hold for two weeks. But instead of the government responding by answering to our call for negotiation, they have continued with this intimidation, you know, involving the police, the dismissals and we don't know what else they have in stock, which is not a good thing because how do we negotiate with other people being victimized? As we speak right now, there's nothing really going on in terms of negotiation. We haven't received anything. The only news we are getting is the news of dismissal and other things. The court route was going to be very long and we are talking about emergency issues here. There is COVID-19 third wave, which is already here and these doctors haven't been given anything. Remember last year, they were promised there would be incentives which were not given, so many other things. But here they're just asking for things which they have worked for already. They felt if we are going to use the route of going to the courts, it may take forever and some people may not have to live to realize the benefits of that. With that said, as Dr. Bransampa with a dismissal that we have a copy of the letter in this case, you being dismissed, if the government decides to have at least the needs being met significantly for the doctors, you still remaining dismissed, what would be the way forward for Dr. Bransampa as an individual if doctors are catered for in this case? At this point, I want to make one thing clear that our fight is not supposed to be about personal gains and losing a job can be compared to many people getting paid, doctors getting employed. If the government is able to meet all those demands, the job is okay, let it go. But what we need is not just attacks without fulfilling what they are supposed to do.