 We're OK. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as you know, I'm Ian Stewart. I'm the Acting Commissioner of Police. And this is Stephen Golcheski, the Assistant Commissioner for Southern Region. Earlier today, we became aware of a claim by Mr. Danny McGuire, who tragically lost his wife and children in the events in the Lockheed Valley earlier this year, that he believed that he was about to be charged by police in relation to the deaths of his wife and children. This has been, obviously, a significant statement by him. But we are at a loss to understand why he has made this statement. I have earlier today told the media and, as reported on radio, that the Queensland Police Service has not had and does not have any information which would cause us to take action against Mr. McGuire in relation to those deaths. And I say that categorically. As I said, the claims by Mr. McGuire that he has been contacted by senior police officers are also confusing for us. And I have taken the extraordinary action of asking Mr. Golcheski to be here today to also back up our story that no contact has been made with Mr. McGuire in relation to this or any other matter that we're aware of in recent times. We're happy to answer questions about this matter, but I can only repeat my earlier request. I would be grateful if Mr. McGuire is concerned about this matter, that he can contact my office, in other words, the commissioner and police's office, and provide information which will back up and validate his claim, or if he feels so inclined and he is concerned about any actions by any police officer in Queensland, that I encourage him to go to the CMC and to provide that same information. We're happy to answer any questions that you may have. Is there any potential agreement? I am not aware of all of the facts. I have never been briefed on all of the facts in relation to the passing of Mrs. McGuire and the children. I don't know whether he was even driving the vehicle at the time. What I'm saying to you is that there is no evidence that would make Mr. McGuire complicit in those deaths. That is the best of my knowledge. Now, as you are well aware, Operation Galaxy has been operating with Queensland Police Services on behalf of the coroner, and they have been investigating all deaths in the Locker Valley and in Tuumber as a result of the flooding events earlier this year. I have taken the extraordinary event of speaking to the coroner and also, or contacting the coroner this morning, but also speaking to the head of that task force to ensure that they haven't had any other information that would change my view. And they have categorically told me that at this stage, we do not have any information which would make Mr. McGuire a person of interest, even, in the investigation of those deaths. Well, that depends if he was driving. I don't know that. He was? Could be something to be tough with a voice to come out. Well, okay. You're going down hypotheticals now. What I'm saying to you very, very clearly is that we are not aware of any police officer, even contacting Mr. McGuire about this or any other issue of recent times. And we do not know where this information's come from. I can categorically tell you as well that my senior officers have not spoken to Mr. McGuire. No, there are two police officers who are working in concert with the community and the local council down there. They are not undertaking any police investigations at all. That's a matter that perhaps is best left to conversations with Mr. McGuire. I personally have not tried to contact him, but I understand that reporters have tried to contact him today, and it appears that he's uncontactable, and that's why I'm appealing through the media for him to come forward and clear this matter up. He's the one who's made this claim, allegedly, to media either last night or this morning. It is confusing, to say the least. Is he or has he been investigated over anything or any sort of incidents prior to the flight? I think that's a matter that is best taken up with Mr. McGuire. Could his allegations relate to possible charges from some of the tips he's been investigating before prior to the flight? Again, that's a matter that I think that you should quite properly put to him. Well, I mean, I wasn't there. I don't know what he has said. I don't know whether he has confused some comment from someone else, or whether there has been confusion about the words that he has said. But I can categorically tell you that no senior police have spoken to him of recent times that we are aware of, that there is no evidence that would make him complicit or even cause us to even consider any action in relation to the death of his wife and children. So we are as confused as you are in that regard. And I would be very grateful, as I said, to Mr. McGuire to come forward and explain what he is talking about. Are you concerned for his welfare that he's not responding to any calls? Look, we have great sympathy for Mr. McGuire and the other victims of the flood events down there. I mean, who knows what's working on his mind? And that's the sad part about this. It is unfortunate that his claims, though, have been raised to this level, and of course, such angst even within our own agency. You're surprised by the media traction of this story, sir? I have made very clear statements about this today on behalf of our service. I am surprised that even with one media outlet saying that we have now decided we're not going to charge him, I'm making it very clear to you, that is not the case. There is no evidence that we have that would even cause us to think that way. And that's why the nub of this is for someone to speak to Mr. McGuire and find out his reasons for making this claim. And it might be just that he is confused. Has he been asked to meet with the police this week? Not to my knowledge, no. For a licence, he admits he didn't have a licence and he was driving a truck. He would then, he could then be charged with that. Our test for any prosecution is one of sufficiency of evidence and then there is an overriding public interest test. If we were looking at any matters like that, obviously both arms of that would come into play, whether there was the evidence for the first thing and secondly, whether there's a public interest. And I think that under all of these tragic circumstances, the public interest, whilst again, this is hypothetical, I couldn't see how the public interest would be served. Thank you. Thanks everyone for coming.