 are either NATO or Russia justified in their expansion efforts. Russia is not doing an expansion effort. This is one thing I would say. Russia stepped in to prevent genocide. There is no other way to look at this. Western Ukraine, after the coup in 2014, they turned to Eastern Ukrainians and said, no more speaking Russian. No more Russian being taught. It's equivalent. What Western Ukraine did to... Eastern Ukraine is equivalent to this. Is Canada turning to Quebec and saying, no more speaking French. French will not be taught. No more French signs. And I'm massing Western Canada and the Atlantic, massing their troops along the Quebec border and bombing Montreal and Quebec. That's what Ukraine did here. For eight FN years. Signed two treaties, a Minsk agreement, saying they're not going to do it anymore. They're going to give partial autonomy to Western Ukraine and Crimea. And they kept on doing it. That's the equivalent. That's the analogy you can use. English speaking Canada telling French speaking Canada to go fuck itself and start burning French speaking citizens French speaking Canadians alive in buildings because that's exactly what Eastern Ukrainians did in Odessa. They burned Russian speaking Ukrainians alive in a building. Do you think France or even the United States, the United States would be the best analogy if there was French speaking Americans here. But if all of the United States was French speaking, and English speaking Canada did this to Quebec, would French speaking United States be justified in going into Quebec and protecting the French speaking Canadians from being genocided? Would Quebec be justified in holding a referendum and 90% of Quebec voting to join the United States? Should the world recognize that? Or should the world, Western world, send weapons to English speaking Canadians to keep on killing French speaking Canadians? That's really the analogy we have to use. Okay.