 Alright, so first of all, it is the responsibility of you wearing the fabric and the one who is selling the fabric to you to be able to like educate you on what you want to wear, like what the guy was saying at the police car store. Sometimes he advises people on which one to buy. Of course that is how it's supposed to be. But if someone come with a particular design and say, this is what I want, I like the colors, I like the design someone was wearing and I want this, do you have it? Yes of course he's going to sell it and make his money. So at that time it becomes a responsibility of who is wearing it. If you are going to wear it for an occasion, you have to try and know the meaning of the fabric that you are wearing. You just don't wear it because your friend is wearing it or you like the colors or you like the design. So if in some instances the queen or a prominent figure in the society named the fabric like he was citing one example when the queen named like Obama. Obama bad. Obama bad, Michelle Obama bad. So in situations like that, it's just the name. That is what also brings about the abuse in design. That it's been so commercialized that the aesthetics were like the original way of naming this fabric if it were to be from the queen, she would name it out of maybe an incident that happened and say, oh here I'm referring to Mami Freyi or something that would talk about unity, something which based on an incident that happened they can use like that to also name the fabric but it is a responsibility.