 Milo Bailey, but it has a good base to be a good social media platform. I don't have Twitter anymore, but for me it's amazing in a medium-sized part I would say. It's amazing in a medium size. Yeah, I think Twitter is rotten to the core in a big way. What are you gonna do? Fire everybody and hire brand new personnel because if you're taking over Twitter, 90% of the employees of Twitter were pro censorship, otherwise there would have been way more whistleblowers leaking in and way more people resisting the censorship. And there wasn't. Maybe those technocrats working in Silicon Valley were too comfortable collecting paychecks and sitting on their comfy seats. Too bad. If I was gonna take over Twitter, I would fire everyone. You have to hire brand new people and blacklist everyone that participated in censorship. They're done as far as I'm concerned. Bad, fired because of censorship. And then what do you got to do? And then you got to bring in coders that have to go through Twitter's code and take out all the code that's been censoring everybody, right? Damn, damn, damn, damn, right? That's a lot of work. That's tremendous amount of work. Why would you do that? Just get rid of it. Go to platforms that already have people with integrity working for them, code that does not censor, and they're already established and growing. Why go with Twitter, right? That's my take as a business person to a certain degree. I wouldn't take on that load. That's the liability of the yin yang. Why do you want to take on that liability, right? No, point made, the world knows that Twitter censors put the final nail in the coffin, take that money, 10% of it, put it in a new tech, platforms that don't censor, short the shit out of Twitter, make it go out of existence, and Jack Dorsey, if he ever wants to get a job on a new tech platform or opens up a company, everyone should go tell him you're a fucking poison. I wouldn't go into business with you, right?