 Tengenčno je, da se biti, kaj smo tukaj, v digitalnih soličnih marketu, ali tukaj, da ima tukaj pravda za interakcije, zvukovanih zvukovanih, da se pošli, da se pošli, kaj smo pošli. Znamo se, da smo pošli, da se pošli, da se pošli, da se pošli, a več komplegačnja moment v mnohom spetih v težke včč. Spomulto zelo, da je to zelo komplegačno, da je neko je v tem neko geopolitični razliz. Zato, da je to več zelo, da bi smo tudi iz veči očeljni, je inovo zelo, inostavna revolucija, inostavna revolucija, robovi, dužnosti, količe, težko v težke. Protožujem, da pristap thalije, izpravdu, in izpravdu, in izpravdu v svoj domovih, in svoj začelju, in všeč v sužibnih viške, totalnico perspectives and the change.) These digital barriers, more or less, happen at the speed of light which if you are an Internet savi person does not really surprise you. But still, I must say, I am always surprised to see how quickly these things happen. And, of course, for institutions na Snake for people that have to deliver stability in terms of the message, is a problem to cope with all this. For one side you are tempted to react, maybe to overreact, on the other side maybe direction, responses to let it go, but in the meantime there are efforts in the society and the economy. prej ne boo milijončov v ICT, ki je ne da se nabaj cez. Zato je vso zemljenija, kaj je izgleda, in v tem, če je, nače se povolječna, ova zanjavno je in več nekaj kompanist pristaj in spetno željni človek, začin da je to najščasno začin, pa najščasno začin. Zato sej na kvališnje sektor. Zato je še povaj, da z personalizem medicinem,Not only the de-type of responses to help your personal health management. It all your health problems will be absolutely personalized in terms of drugs, in terms of what to do. But also the savings that will be associated are enormous? Because there is not any more than medicine trial in error, there's is not any more of side effects. Of course I'm speaking about maybe Kukulend. Ome, tudiči, v čem dobro v prišličenih medici, ko se prišli na sezno odcišnjeva. Zvom, sem prosenil zelo včetku, v ljudi projekti z Avru. Kaj prišljen, investiment. V svoj temo, časno gdje, superkomputerva, nekaj nekaj nebijeg nebo taj nekaj nebo nebo nebo nekaj nebaj nebaj nebaj nebaj nebaj nebaj ne. in proč v tem neko čustkih vsobih, da je zelo active in blizdaj, neko pomembnosti, in neko vsobi našli in se zač smelledite, bo ne odlišel na svoj človek, nišliga ljudna, da je na svoj čal, Bo našli neki ljudnimi, squaredo povodnih evočnih. Imamo nekaj pravnih, neki s spiritsm, neki in televizig, z prejigovama, boš je krične izloga od prejigovama, degrašno in neku se nekud, in najbolj v res všeč tudi, da je delaj izgledSpak, zato se snh je tudi nr.ovalo v jed flowerna, in o kateri je v demokratizacji, ali izgledne oportovjenje. Sonoj z doubledntba, zelo s ktuvačev, ustvarujske na vso začin, tako časno jaz approximately tudi ima ga si mači in prik Blood and Human environment. many of the tasks today done by humans can be automated. So, less accidents in the workplace A much more interesting job. in što ba se nekaj imelo, nekaj ima se državu do LO. Tako šlič nekaj naprejvajo do nuestrasje jebazje. Automatične držve odvelijo viši imenje, tudi skupilje, tilič, kjer je tečnog v povrbašku automatični države z električnem prohibirajnem. Ti je četko cil občast, This, in terms of the quality of the air, much less traffic, much less accidents, so an impressive change in our quality of life. But again there are challenges, because I mean with automatic drive, maybe some people have to change their job from driving, trucks or cars to actually being software engineers. And this is the job of a generation to change in this respect. In z vsem zelo bolj našeho, zažitkosti rač, je vsozivка najrejvča v Avrukojo. Ta nešto je pozivnje o Avrukojo. No je to vsak, kaj se zelo v Avrukoju bojte, nešto prizibna, čim neko šiem u Avrukojo. En zelo, da jim osi se ministlim, google so da je naj nešta cherry la, Popravum je pa veliko vsodujneeli ob mediocre svojje. Često je to pohray, ki je nukaj nešto sezica, in itselfo, zato moja jezna. Tako, ki tezdevam, in igram to da se tezde, kaj smo imeli otvar s vsehoj. 30% iz Avropanji populacija neč in internet, tko smo naredali dole, tako in svoj skon vžeg. Protožino, sezaj, in prejstventi, na naši zloženje neko če boš sem odlišat, da bi se odložili u autonomo, boče, da se odložili, da se odložili u autonomo in je našli najkošnji vizivno možno odlišat, ker je več vse odlišala kovir, zato tako je začal. Zato ne kako se početil, da potom ne boši vzvedati odlištje delov, tega ne je vzvednji netos, ki se vsožite. V Evu naj, da se je najmajša življena na Evu, vsim v invesimete. the bottom of the value chain, which is the connectivity. A digital society is a connected society. No connectivity, no services. We have estimated, we have presented our plan for connectivity. adding either bedsp coupe, one day, we lost in they said look our estimate, and if you have a better one I am happy to discuss it, it is more than 500 billion euros to realize what we call a gigabit society was Note which is a IPer conneted society vse či vse, ne kaj biti, pa je tudi 5G, sima moboj, nekaj je super USB na zelo, zgleda in dužitva infrastratu, in fiber na zelo, zelo, da smo spetimo dvega giga bita. Zato, da 500 mln euro prišli, in da dobrah je zelo, in ko ona je zelo stavila, naživno je zelo, da je vsega naživna in vsega vsega kaj pa je vročnja nerega vsega. Pomega, zelo je nekaj zelo, da je tudi smelje občutno tudi, da je tudi zelo začal. Zato, nekaj samo povedilih publika vsega, da tudi 500-600 milijonov, ko se bolj ima, zelo 10% zelo. So most of this money has to come from private capital. So when looking at connectivity, clearly rules are very important to convince private investors that Europe is a land of opportunity, Ireland is a land of opportunity, Spain is a land of opportunity, Germany is a land of opportunity. So country factors matter, availability of the regulatory system matters. That's why we have proposed a brand new European electronic communication code. So also symbolically the same code all over Europe with having the core idea that of course one size fits all is not the answer, the answer that is good for fostering more broadband in Ireland is not necessarily the same answer that should be in the south of Spain, but at the same time the basic ground rules, basic ground reflex should be the same. At the same time, I mean, regulators have to work together to make sure that the result is the right one. And I think listening also to private investors, Europe stands a real chance to attract capital. And of course, our aim is to say by 2025 the gigabit society must be a reliability. Because our main road should be 100% connected with very high speed connectivity because we want to get there. We want to have the low carbon economy. We want to have autonomous drive. So that's the ground rule. I mean, the thing had to work. It's connectivity, and that's what we have done. Of course, scrolling up in the value chain you have the issues about how data changes are organized. In this respect we have been working for the same rule when it comes to privacy protection, the general data protection rule which is now adopted in its implementation and it's nice to say the same rules that are in Poland are in Portugal. Because then again companies can establish their data centers not based with the Polish rule Portuguese rule be different or when and where location gives the best result. So allows for consolidation of data centers. And Ireland is a big beneficiary of this kind of single market vision about rules. We have worked on the new privacy directive which is about communication channel privacy. I mean we will present the new rules in January and also we will present a much larger reflection on data. So who owns the data? Who has the access to access the data? Again, let's take a connected car in autonomous car. Is the car manufacturer the owner of the data what is the right of third parties or OEMs or third parties developer developers to have access to those data? What is the right of government agencies to have part of access in part in aggregate form of those data? The same for health sensor, like my watch who owns the data? You are inclined to say I own the data, you own the data. Is it really so? Look the fine prints you tell me. Who has the again the possibility to use the data? This is a very crucial issue for all the businesses for all the startups. So you don't expect us that we are legislating at the speed of light. On the contrary expect us to be very prudent about all this. Expect us to ask a lot of questions to all you all what do you think? Do we have a problem about the ownership of the data? Do we have a problem about liability of the data? If my autopilot gets some sort of truck as the sky and just crashes that's something that happened it crashes into the car into the truck, sorry who's liable? The data sensor that may be misread the software company maybe the driver that should not have watched the movie but should have been a bit more vigilant so these are the challenges of the future and the same with robots in surgery rooms or robots in factories who has the responsibility for something that goes wrong. It should be not the society the control society of the things that should go wrong but at the same time these are questions that we should ask and should start to give us collectively answers on how we want to do things in Europe one thing that's important we must do things together in Europe because again imagine if Ireland would have its own definition of this autonomous drive and its own rules about access to data then the software for the car would be customized for the Irish market the app developers will have to do things for the Irish market and maybe the same app developer will not be able to sell the same apps in Germany if Germany would have its national law about autopilots or use of software and the rest so these are things where absolutely there's no other possibility that work together and I'm not saying this as a passionate European of course I am a passionate European I'm saying this out of necessity take something I will discuss this evening supercomputers Europe is nowhere in supercomputing the first supercomputing in the top 100 of the world of Europe is number 12 the rest is all Chinese or US supercomputers supercomputers are the factories of the future with big data you need supercomputers if you want to understand the human brain you need a supercomputer if you want to have a personalized drug you need a supercomputer you want to design a car you need a supercomputer so can Europe afford to do that to be the last no I don't think so but I mean of course like in aeronautics we have not the Irish planes the German planes the Italian planes we have I mean an effort to be competitive in the aeronautics market the same in supercomputing these are two big things even for large member states to think we can have our own solution and those member states that tried the supercomputing national road misily failed so take supercomputing take quantum technology take artificial intelligence take for a single member state so again whether you have your own ideas about Europe whether I have my own ideas it doesn't really matter this is an area where we need to work together so the other dimension of the digital single market is the competitiveness agenda so there is one dimension which are the rules the other dimension is the competitiveness so we have launched our competitive agenda about digitizing the European industry so trying to see what is the best route towards having especially traditional industries in the construction sector in the manufacturing sector embracing the digital revolution what it means what it means in terms of what they kind of skills in the workforce they have to acquire what kind of mindset what kind of technologies things about for instance IoT in the construction sector internet of things will be very relevant drone technology will be very relevant so we are now working with all the industrial platforms of Europe and trying to say let's work together, let's have a common agenda on things like artificial intelligence robotics and the rest we have launched a project that we call the Internet of the Humans which is the internet how we want to see it in 10 years from now we are in the internet of things we would like to test the ideas of everyone especially the ideas of small SMEs innovators in research centers how the internet should look like from a more human-centric point of view which means for instance integrating all things that now we see the augmented reality now your kids know Pokemon the Pokemon exercise Pokemon game think about the commercial possibilities with such a thing or also the social possibility with augmented reality the same goes for enhanced use of vision or enhanced use of the possibility in scanning the environment so there are many many things we can do and think also what kind of response a more human-centric internet can give to challenges such as privacy because of course if the internet is designed around you as a sphere and all application recognize what you want to do it's much easier to decide which is the level interaction you want it's a little bit like the physical society so next generation internet is another thing we have launched we have a strong partnership with industry on cyber security we have a strong partnership with industry on robotics next year we are going to launch a large reflection on artificial intelligence what it means what are the opportunities what are the ethical considerations about artificial intelligence and last not least by far the first is skills so there will be no digital society the functions without the skill workforce we said it so we need much more tomorrow we will launch our grand coalition for skills and jobs where industry universities other education institution will work together with us to create a group that really works seriously digital skill agenda digital skill agenda and we are also up for new ideas that could come today or whenever you like post ideas or now to really target directly people that are in need of every skills we are thinking for instance about European voucher scheme for skills where really we can get I mean especially young people in IT environment and maybe getting credits for this while starting so things like this we are now testing and hopefully we will launch quite quickly so skills is freely I mean probably the challenge number one looking at the next wave of what the digital signal market could mean so let me finish by saying I more believe that the digital signal market is the land of opportunity for Europe rather than the land of risks and uncertainty I think however we must be not just saying nice things but also discussing what are the challenges and how to take all the challenges but one thing I'm sure it's an area where probably we have not done enough for everyone that this is a real opportunity for all of us so I think debates as today I mean whatever we can do to push because these are all digital savvy people in the room so I'm not trying to convince you that this is important I'm just trying to stimulate the discussion what needs to be done and the priority so any idea, any debate would be really welcome and thank you very much for listening to me