 The interesting twist in the story came when an organisation outside federal avionics or military sensors, in this case Exxon Mobile, heard about what was going on with the Face Consultium. They understood the business problem that was trying to be solved and very quickly identified it as a very similar problem to the one that they have. In the oil and gas world a very similar thing happens in that typically a system is developed by one of a small number of major suppliers with maintenance obligations going on for 25, 30 years in some cases, with the consequence that customers are tied into that vendor and that system for a very long period of time. One of the key drivers in the oil and gas world was that their systems are currently reaching an end of life situation in the next 5 to 10 years and they don't want the next generation of systems to be done exactly the same way as they had before. So they want essentially for oil and gas what the US government wanted for federal avionics and that is an open architecture, open systems based approach to the new systems. They came to us and asked if we could help them create an industry grouping around this to tackle it, not just for Exxon Mobile, but to tackle it for the oil and gas industry as a whole. So we checked with other oil and gas operators that they had a similar problem and of course they did. What we found in the open group over the years is there's very rarely a unique problem that somebody has there more often than not shared. So given that we then had a critical mass of oil and gas operators we started having some open days to industry days to describe what it was that we were planning on doing and gauging the level of interest. That's when it got really interesting because at that point we realised this wasn't actually just an oil and gas situation, this was a multi-industry problem. Basically any industry that uses large scale process automation systems has the same problem. So utilities industry, pharmaceutical, petrochemical as well as oil and gas and pulp and paper, for example, food and beverage, another example, they all have the same problem. And very quickly we found that organisations from those industries were joining to create a common approach to process automation systems in the first place. The benefits are considerable for the customers and also for the vendors because you get situations, for example, where the vendors find it difficult to fulfil 25 to 30 year maintenance obligations. The technology gets old, they even struggle with parts sometimes. What the open process automation forum, which is what this group turned into inside the open group, what they are working on is, like the previous examples, both technical standard and business guidance and business case documents for helping the uptake and accelerating the uptake of the standard in practice. They have published an initial standard down through certain levels, they're working to evolve that standard and now they're working on the certification programme.