 Nid yw am shallon hi fydd openingu Governmentary Plans, ni fydda digon ni maen nhw y pladd ym ni, nad eich gäniad tra wedi gwybod.. neu mae gyda ni'n gwybod y gwybod i osreddydd o'r mwyaf eich gwa either newydd yma, ac erig ar mewn w perdod y bobl yn patheticol tonu i wybodaeth yma o wedi arna y munter han quicklynt. Eddweud y cyfnod y gallwn y cyfgrifeth sylwg ar ei gweithio mewn cywroffon o'r gweithio cyfrifio. Yn mynd i'n cwestiynau, rydw i rwy'n cael ei ddweud yn ei wneud o ddweud y gweithio cyfrifio mewn cyfrifio i'r gweithio cyfrifio mewn cyfrifio. Rydyn ni'n cwestiynau, rydyn ni'n gweithio ar hyn o fynd Maelod Ddorrach? Rydyn ni, mae'n meddwl ychydig. Pan sefydlu ymydd yma yng Nghymru a'r Ymhwyro Ffyrnasol yn gwybod i ddod i'r Llywodraeth Ffyrnasol 3, Honehill fel Ysgolau'r swerd, rydych chi'n dechrau, rydw i chi'n dechrau i chi'n ddod i'n ddod i'r cymdeithas ystafell, yn rhoi ei fod yn ymdeg? Rydw i'n ddod i'r ymdeg, rydw i'n ddod i'r eitaf. Mae'n rydw i'n ddod i'r eitaf, rydw i'n ddod i'r eitaf. iddynt yn llys Artsor peth, yn ydych chi allon yn yng nghael? Rwy'n meddwl ar y cwrsiau, pen nhw wedi yn ei ddweud? Rydyn ni'n hoffi yn gallu, Rydyn ni'n hoffi yn cwrsiau? At yw'r pwys dominion ddraenol, rydyn ni wedi'n peth yn ei ddweud wrth gwyllagon, o fe'i drwydd ysbrydol? Fel rydych chi'n atun o'r Henry o'r rhadell. Rydyn ni'n hasi Aberlydd, rydyn ni'n hoffi yma, a'r polem wrth gwyf yn rhoi ddweud. mae'r cwysyllt neu yn yma. Mae'n oes y gweithio bod maen nhw ymateb yn elfennyddol i yma. Mae'n meddylai gyda'u dros yr oed, yn yr ymd возв. Dwi'n dechrau i waspeth i wych. Dwy'n dechrau i waspeth i'w progymu'r troff, mae'n amser ymddur reich. Dwi'n dechrau i waspeth i'w troff, mae'n dechrau i waspeth i wneud. Mae'n dechrau i waspeth i'w troff, mae'n dechrau i waspeth i wneud. Rydyn ni'n gweithio'r cyngorau o'r cyffredinol am y cyflwyno sy'n gweithio'r gwaith i'r Ffóir. Felly mae'n gweithio'n gweithio, ond rwy'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio, ond mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Yn rhai bod ymwneud o'ch chi'n bachio'n gweithio i yn cyntaf i'w iawn ac nid i'w'n gweithio'r cyffredinol. Rydyn ni'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'r cyffredinol! Rydych chi'n gweithio gweithio'r cyffredinol. Rydych chi'n gweithio'n gweithio'r gweithio gan yr argyferig o ddechreu wahanol... ..ar cy профессion o'n withr sy'n gweithio'n gweithio. Zedwch chi'n gweithio'r cyffredinol ar gwaith i syniadau gweithio... i ni gynnalodd am gweithio ychydig sy'n oed gyfliwnol eich cyfnod a mynd i ymweld â yw a chael y hallucinoedd a chael gwiaith i'r gyda'r pethau ac mae'n joyn i nadolu'n ddiolog a ni'n siaradau yn fawr yn bwysigau â'r pwysig sy'n gweithio poeplogau yma, ac mae'n bwysig amser oedd yn oed yn ddim o bod y bendwydol. Mae'r modd yn ym Crawfwyr yn ymddangod sydd rhoi'r gwaith iawn ar y bwysig – yn yfacedig, plant yng Nghymru. Thank you, Karen. I know we have another question about the water treatment plant, but I think my colleagues from GCP and from County Transport wanted to respond to, I think it was Claire, the cycle path, the cycle path by David Lloyd. I think that was Claire, Claire Castle's question. Is that David Allard or Joe Baker? Hi, it's Joe Baker here. Happy to pick up that question. This was dealing with the cycle path, and I think it was connected with the railway bridge, as I understand it. So as hopefully you're aware, the full-born greenway project is intending to replace the existing railway bridge, and our aspiration is to put in a new bridge, which will be wider, and also to widen the approaches and reduce the incline to make it more accessible and easier to be used by cyclists and other road users. We've done a feasibility study, and there has been preliminary discussions with Network Rail, who obviously own the existing bridge, and they were positive. In terms of delivery, we are about to move forward, as I think people will be aware with this greenway and a number of the other greenway projects. We will be then working more closely with Network Rail in terms of looking at timing and details. Obviously, it is a bridge across a live railway, so we'll need to think about how works are undertaken in a way that Network Rail are happy with, but certainly we'll be very happy to come back to this forum again with a bit more detail once we've got further information, and it's worth noting there are other greenway projects heading into the eastern part of Cambridge, and again we'd be happy to provide more information about them as a subsequent meeting of this grouping. Jo, Jo, if I can just add to that as well, obviously our land and application proposals to the northern bit of the lakes interacts with that bridge element probably quite closely, and so as part of our TA, we're obviously envisaging as part of the four-gone greenway that those works coming forward, and if there's land that's required for that and or some kind of contribution, then we've made allowance for that through our TA work, so no doubt we can speak about that as well. I think that would be very helpful. I noted the other question about the snaky path, and I think the same applies there. That's also linked in with the discussions on the four-gone greenway, so yes, an offline discussion on that indeed course, I'm sure, would be very helpful. Thank you. Chair, we do have a further question for Anderson, if I can read that one out. So, Cyd Anderson explained a little more clearly when the next consultations and discussions about lakes will take place. How will people be informed and are there any thoughts yet about how trespassing and anti-social behaviour might be reduced this year? It sounds as if long-term solutions will depend on the commercial development application, which will presumably take some time. Yeah, absolutely. I'm happy to answer that. So we are now moving into the submission of a planning application. Clearly, that comes with the public consultation. We remain open to discussion with residents at all times, really. I know that the person who's asked the question has got my details, so she won't have any sort of qualms about contacting me. The lakes this year are going to be managed by Anderson, so we had a management agreement in place with a contractor who was looking after the lakes. Given the severity of trespassing and anti-social behaviour last year, we've taken the decision to move that in-house, and so we will be dealing with it ourselves. That includes the regular fixing of perimeter fences to stop trespassers replacing lifeboys, picking up litter, and all of the usual stuff, but really ramping it up this year to make sure that we prevent it as much as we possibly can. OK, thank you. Chris, Chris Carter, could I just come in there? I understand that Prue Rayner would like to answer one of the questions. Is that correct? Prue, are you there? Hi, yes, I'm Prue. I'm from Anglain Learning. I just wanted to respond to the, it's not really my remit, Henry, from Hill, but I do know there is a significant amount of community development in the Mali that may well, and community buildings that are being provided around the market space that the school fronts on to, which I imagine may well include things like doctor surgeries, et cetera. OK, thank you. And we're almost going to a close now, but I just did want to mention that Laurie Wolffenden from Fendige and sent in a question about the Northeast Cambridge Area Action Plan and the move of the Water Treatment Plant. It's quite a long question. It was put down in the chat, I think, the first question of all. I don't know if we can go back to that, whether we can answer that now or take it away and give a written answer, Chris, could we? I think we'll need to take that away, Chair. Yes, I just wanted to reassure Laurie that it has been seen and heard and there will be an answer. Do we have any more questions? No more questions. A couple of comments from contributors, but no questions, Chair. Fine, thank you. So if there are no more questions, I think I'm going to draw this forum to a close with, I'm just seeing a comment from Angliaw Mortonys to involve communities. We're very, very well aware of that, and I'm sure that Karen Barclay, who is here on the call, is very well aware of that, aren't you, Karen? I am indeed, and thank you, Councillor Johnston. And just to say that we are, as well as all of our other community and communication channels that are open, we will be commencing our own community forum, inviting members of the parish councils in and around the proposed site to take part in that. So there'll be lots of opportunities going forward. Yeah, fine, thank you. So I'm going to draw this to a close now. But not before I thank all the presenters and all of those who've come along to ask questions and to listen and to contribute, but very specially to our officer colleagues here, Robin Kerrigan, Ryan Curtsy and Louise Lord, who've been keeping the show on the road and to my planning councillor colleague, Chris Carter, for helping to keep us on track. You'll, I hope that you will all receive information about the next forum, which, as I said earlier, we think we should hold in the not too distant future, probably sometime in June, early July. And if you want to attend that, you want to receive information about it, please do get in touch with us, go to the web page and email us. So you can keep up to date with everything that's going on. Thank you. Well, councillor Don, councillor Donton. Sorry, can I just button and say as councillor Donton mentioned at the beginning, this is the first time we've run the forum online. We will be popping up a very brief, very short, quick to answer survey at the end of the webinar. We'd be really grateful if you could send us any feedback. Any thanks. OK, thanks, Louise. So thank you to everyone and good night and hope to see you in the next forum.