 Hello everybody, I'm Jane Williams. I'm a Water Beach Parish Councillor and Vice-Chair of Planning. Going through basically what we do as a parish council, I'd just like to explain that briefly. Is voluntary role being a parish councillor, we don't just deal with planning matters, it's actually the basic running of the council. It might down to the grass cutting, managing the cemetery, and the library. There's so many very very just basic village functions that we actually are involved with. You see if we can start my video. Okay, I'll try that. No, oh yeah, oh hi everybody. Yeah, thank you. So, Water Beach Parish Council is very unusual now for the fact that we do have a strategic site that is approved in the local South Cams, a doctor plan in 2018. So, from going to being a quiet parochial rural village, we are now faced with dealing with a strategic site which we do know has been given approval. With this site comes a lot of responsibility. I feel as a councillor because not only do we want to manage the pressures on the services to speak in the existing village, but also it's making sure that the new term comes forward and that the facilities are there for the people that will come after us really. When the new town gets plenty of enough residents, then they will have their own town council, but at the moment it sits within the parish. So, you can imagine we've had literally thousands of pages of planning material to look at planning. I mean my job stopped two years ago, quite frankly, has become a full-time job managing some of the planning stuff and it is a voluntary role as a parish councillor. So, with that, it's actually increased the pressure on our parish staff. So, responding to the consultations, we spend hours not just speaking about the new town consultations, but consultations that will actually affect like the Greater Cambridge Partnership, like the Greater Cambridge Combined Authority, which are all dealing with providing facilities, transport, et cetera. The population of the new town, a rough estimate will be around five times the size of the existing mort of each population. So, there is a lot to be going on. The money that actually goes out in extra stuffing at the moment comes from the preset. We haven't been able to be involved with them. Section 106 has been discussed earlier because there is no extra funding to help the extra work in the village. The developers over in Civic and RLW have provided us with a planning consultant, but then it's sort of as and when to do with the new town. So, we really could do with some support, either whether it's done physically or on a monetary basis from the developers or and with our camps just to help us bring this forward properly. Robin, do you want to move that one to the next one, please? Okay. So, as I said before, we've had lots of planning applications through and what is in the planning application should actually transfer onto the ground. One of the things that we ask all the time is how is it being managed and monitored because we can't actually physically get onto the site to see what's happening. So, you know, our thing is coming forward. This is a general question. Our thing is coming forward in accordance with the decision notice that was issued that Mike referred to earlier that gave content for this. So, I think this isn't trying to get at anybody, but this is just actually I mean, Kate Grant and myself went to speak at a parish council, a district council meeting regarding the innovation park because there's going to be development there near the urban and civic sites. Now, if you could just bear with me because it's so hard to get this across in a few minutes. So, Kate and I went and spoke at the meeting and it came up with the fact that we would like the innovation park, which is at Stirling House, if anybody listening doesn't know, to the rice of Donald Road, the big Denny Endroad, the big building to the right. And now it was discussed that we would like a footway and some lighting because there's a gym up that way and the access to the urban and civic site. And we asked if we could have these facilities and this is taken from the Southcams minutes and it says that the Southcams Planning Committee, the matter of a shared pedestrian cycle path was discussed as WPC representatives requested there with the footway linking the village to the innovation park. It was stated that it was not necessary under planning application, I won't read that out, as this was part of urban and civic obligations to provide this facility. Now, we've never had any feedback, we don't know if that's going to happen. So, this is basically actually going back to how is Southcams, how is the new development actually being monitored and managed that's in the planning application transverse to the land. So, that's a for instance there. We've heard that there's S1 and six moneys, but also a lot of the agreement to them by condition, which it is done on budget, I would say, and please do correct me if I'm wrong, whereas S106 is actually more of a legally binding agreement. So, again, it's just making sure because of the impact of a huge settlement, the fact that it's not going to be too much of a burden and that what goes forward is actually provided for within the surrounding villages, not just Water Beach. Just move on then please Robin. So, from there, managing and monitoring. Now, I am a bit of a monkey for going through and looking at agreements or things and people who know me will know that. Now, I've been going through the S106 agreements and I've noticed that there should be monitoring groups, there should be a transport group. At the moment, I'd like to ask a question really, have these groups been set up? Is the development, as it's starting to come forward now, being monitored and managed? Here in the transport one, it says that there's a meeting of stakeholders and it lists a lot of people that should be attending these meetings now within these groups. So, adjacent landowner, local bus operators, network rail, parish councils. Now, I would like to suggest, and if there's any councillors here for Water Beach on the call at the moment, I personally, we are personally not actually aware of these groups or parties to it. And so, again, it's how is this coming forward? How are the people that are coming and the people that are individually already going to be protected? Just one moment. I just wanted to ask you to come to a close. So, if you want to put your questions and then I'll direct your questions. Okay, Jenda, you're absolutely fine. Thank you, Anna. So, that comes down into the enforcement part. Is it being monitored, managed, and how? I do believe, I would like to say this, for the A10 upgrade, there was supposed to be traffic monitoring when the commencement of the settlement, which started in 2020, so we've lost two years monitoring figures. And it's really important if we've got going on to sustainability, we've got the British Cambridge partnership, we've got the combined authority, and we've got stations, we've got all sorts of things going on. I think we need to know what is being said, what is being monitored, and what best sustainable transport system and village is going to come forward. So, I will leave it there. Thanks very much, Jane. That's great. You've asked lots of questions. So, I just want to direct that question. Robin, could you stop sharing the screen so that we can thank you? So, what we wanted to direct to Mike Huntington was Jane's question about how monitoring and management is done and who is on bodies which look at that. Sorry, that's not a very good paraphrase of what Jane asked, but you understood what you heard, what she asked. Thank you, Anna. Yes, well, I can answer that question quite clearly. It's my full-time job to monitor and manage the development of the new town. I have weekly project meetings with a developer, and as far as the project delivery group is concerned, we have had meetings about oh, actually, sorry, it's done my video. I was going to say, can we see your video? Do my face. Sorry, it's done my face. I've moved into the main part of the office. Yes, and obviously, as the development progresses, at the moment, what I've got is lots of infrastructure being built, but we haven't got any residents there yet, so we've not got anyone to use the buses yet, or anyone to use the schools yet, or anything like that. Whereas the development progresses, and it gets busier and busier, because it's just going to get busier and busier, then the monitoring of the trigger points, for example, that I mentioned in my earlier discussion, they become critical because, as I said earlier, trigger points for occupations is about the deliverable of lots of the infrastructure. Yes, and obviously, Jane, as Jane knows, I speak to Tim as well, your planning adviser regularly about issues. Okay, thank you. Jane, did you want to come back on just one point? Yes, please. Am I still on mute? No, I can do it. Yeah, I've got to say, I've been looking through the S106 and some of the groups look like they should be there at commencement, and as I say, I would come back to the A10 monitoring, and again, this is, we cannot access the site. Tim Slater says he hasn't been on there since 2019, and I will say, I will speak for myself as a parish councillor, but I think perhaps my fellow councillors might say it is a voluntary role, and we have been elected to do the best that we can. So any knowledge and any sharing, any explaining what is happening, then can only be to everybody's advantage. I mean, can I just use it, for instance, like the de-watering of Northstone? There are huge issues. Can I just sort of say though, there were issues raised by community right at the beginning of this, and we need the reassurances. OK, thank you. So I'm just going to move on now into, thank you very much indeed, to both Brian and Jane.