 Mr. Speaker, I rise just to make a very brief contribution to this motion. There are people with the school of thought that when you're in opposition, you should always oppose. Mr. Speaker, however, it's commendable when the government tries to spool the payment of outstanding monies due to government. There is one element I thought that the Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister should have included to encourage economic activity, and particularly to protect the employees. This is directed at the employers, Mr. Speaker, but I thought that he should have included either a sort of a benefit when they're filing the tax returns that if they could retain some of the employees, that they could have even gotten further discounts because what we have seen, Mr. Speaker, is quite a few of the employers releasing employees and there's no recourse. So in terms of protecting employees, I thought that we'd have an additional caveat in terms of encouraging the employers to settle their balances with the discounts that the governments are given, but on condition that they can retain some of the employees that they have seen sent up. So, Mr. Speaker, it is a good initiative to encourage employers to pay outstanding monies to the government, but I just thought we should go a step further to also protect employees who may be at the other end of being sent home without similar benefits. Thank you.