 So we have a history of adopting forward thinking election methods. And one of those locally in Seattle is called democracy vouchers. For people not in Seattle, democracy vouchers are going to seem like an alien invention. Every voter in Seattle receives from the city four $425 vouchers that they can give to any candidate citywide. So you can give your candidate your favorite candidate $100 or spread it out for candidates to $25 a piece. And what that does is create a much more representative slate of candidates. It's now feasible for a serious candidate to be entirely supported by the voters and not need to depend on PAC money or outside interests. What that does though is leave us with a very crowded slate of candidates. You could say we have a fantastic problem. Our city council races now, they have seven, eight, 10 candidates, like 10 serious candidates, is not uncommon in our city council races. And what that means, especially because Seattle is a fairly left leading city. So our set of opinions in the continuum, if you looked at it nationally, would be maybe 30% or 40% of the continuum. A right leaning candidate would not be elected in Seattle. So we end up with eight or 10 candidates sharing about 30% of that election opinion continuum. And as a result, almost every voter can find some alignment with more than one candidate. And that's why approval of voting stands out to me. If you thought of a traditional race as four candidates spread across the entire continuum, we're eight or 10 candidates in a pretty narrow, dense space. And most people can find more than one candidate that they support. And approval voting is what will let them cast that ballot.