 Hello everybody! So we are here to talk about providing alternative and cluttered text version of article, context and overview. I'm Mathieu Levatou-Stouff-Gounes from the Wikimedia Accessibility User Group. And by the end of this session we should have more information about what is it, what it matters, how to make things go forward. And first we will look at the global context. Of course within our movement we want to be able to provide everybody with an access to the sum of our knowledge. But more specifically within the 2030 strategy we have more narrow topics including that we want people that are left out by structure of power and privilege are no longer in this situation. We want to empower diverse communities. We want to break down social, political and technical barriers that prevent people from accessing and contributing to free knowledge. On the other hand we have computer accessibility or more generally accessibility. So on this point we want to especially focus that the aim is to provide solutions that works regardless of disability type and severity of impairment of people who are using computer that might need some special hardware or software or not. But the main and most important things is that it must provide direct positive effect on people with disabilities. So we hold that in mind and I want to jump into something more concrete. And about that this session came to life thanks to the first test we made with Irina. You can see a photo of Irina here. She is not completely blind but she can use her computer without using text-to-speech software. So we made a test in March 2010 of this year and we tried to see together what already works well or what might be improved regarding the usability of Wikipedia. And following this session we were able to come with some positive outcomes including a report which was published in May. It led to the acquisition in May and more focused on what we are talking right now. I won't go into details about the statements you can see here. But the conclusion was it might be very interesting to have unclarified text version of articles. We will see more details later why. And I just want to before that make a little focus on the Wikimedia Accessibility User Group which also is a different consequence of the previous session test. So has said it's also a consequence of creation of session during the Wikimedia Accident in May. We have some statistics that you can see on that slide right now. So including that now we have more than 15 people in our telegram group. We exchanged more than 1,000 messages and we identified 8 main scopes and 6 currently highlighted topics. So you can see these topics here and I won't go into detail of each items. But as you can see the last one that I highlighted was the theme we are currently focused on. So to go into really something concrete I took an example of an extract. It's an article, it's taken from an article on the French Wikipedia. It's not important to be able to understand what is it about but it's more important to focus on. As you can see here there are some dates or numbers with also some references which are next to them. And at least with ORCA which is the software which was used during our test sessions with Irina. It was very confused the software with the way to pronounce that. So for example here you have a date 1984 and just after that there is a reference in the French version of Wikipedia. You don't have any other elements like a square bracket that separate the number of the reference from the date like here. So the software will pronounce something like 222 here, it will be 19,000, well anyway it wouldn't pronounce the right number. Even here we don't have necessarily a date but it can be rather confusing at the moment. So to be perfectly clear on the left you have the text it is more or less on Wikipedia right now. And on the right what we would like to have to be able to provide as input for text-to-speech or any other situation where more raw text is more useful. So basically it means simply withdraw all the links and the references. For that we have several possibilities of implementations. It might be through some module gadgets or extension. So it might be some Lua code, JavaScript or PHP. Here you have a possible mock-up with a link which was added to the section print and export. Before I finish I wanted to add some thanks especially to people that made the session possible like the Wikimedia staff, members of the Wikimedia Accessibility and User Group, the Wikimedia community at large. Thank you to you for your attention. And if you want to join us you'll be more than welcome. We have said Telegram Group here is a link and you can be sure to be more than welcome. We also will have a session in an unconferent just after that. We have some credits for the images and so if you have some questions please come at our unconference.