 izgledajte in zelo možemo. So, dobliz vso prijatelj. Zato začeli smo pa zelo, da je tko vzil. Pozirili smo prijatelj v šenar. In bi smo ili ustavila 1.500 ml. It's a standard microsoft solution for impoljence of that. All of the infrastructures, the useful microsoft solutions, so we use those as well. We have still a few questions that we cannot answer, so what do we do without integration. Ja, kaj je vse vstupnico, kako je ovo na zelo, da je zelo včas, da je zelo vse, da je vse vse, da je zelo vse, da je vse vse vse, da je zelo vse. tako, da spodobno bil nam na zelo, zanim vojo klij, da vseš temo izredaj se na počke prošli, do zelo je to zelo, zelo je bitno drankilNo, bo kot tako zelo, tako, da kaj je, dopoče, dopoče, dopoče, do. Zato se je izredat vse, kaj, ... ... in umenjaj, da bi se prišli znišljane. Paj mi, da bi se prišli pošli, pošli, da bi se prišli pošli, bo jaz nami, da je to značilo. In, da ne bi se prišli, da bi se prišli pošli. Zdaj nekaj proveni vsaj proveni, so prišli vsi proveni. izvijem, da je efektuvaljno stavljavstv, ide malo... Oslo, tukaj ne lahko ima, da jih se mi prikost, nekaj se nekaj. Vjel stavljavstv, da ta šovilj, nekaj se nekaj, nekaj se nekaj, nekaj se nekaj, nekaj se nekaj, nekaj se nekaj, nekaj se nekaj se nispečnico in kom PerryVI, nekaj se cables, slepaj res linkelo, din delovanje ki se v tryinge groundwater ;) Itd.ождijo v albumi VR 2, bovali z kazunati, vska fade z little gob. In v tvoj konzertivnih vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih. Značijo prančno. To je metodologia. In je vseh menej cognizati problematičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih. Ta tudi se Čestno izgovorila, kako smo tudi vstajali čenštrijeh vrtičnih vrtičnih vrtičnih. In, called by the event, we found that 90% is being collected with the system so it is really important. Dogevno came out secondary, and I finished it out, so it is just like in each other when you are in the region where there is nothing here to be collected. Of course charts is very popular. zato je tako zelo da je zelo vsečnico, da je to vsečnico, ta je država, ta je način, tako je ta, to je opeško, to je način, to je dobro, to je zelo način, to je nekaj doprest, in je bilo potrebno izgledati smata in informacijne značenje, zelo se nimi predetavno biti. Zato da smo počučati. Zato smo počučati na samim tabu, in se počučati na zi, tako, zelo, zelo, zelo, zelo, zelo, zelo, zelo. Kako igra boja z vsega trak,? Včasno se našli, da si to je izelo obradi, da je mladec, kx je, našli počet, da vedno je našli, da je izelo obradi, da je, kater je zelo obradi, da je izelo obradi. Včasno se našli... To snakesa, to je, to je... Oli, ei. tudi pa mačno, in pa časno. In tukaj lepo, ki sem prišla všeho, je tukaj, da so prišli na to, da se počkala osebo, da se počkala osebo, nič nekaj, nič nekaj. Tukaj počkala osebo, nič nekaj. Future categories, bo se lahko sešte categories. V total there was like seven letters, so seven in eight boxes are quite a lot for single questionnaires. So we did not put into details more time. And all these basic questionnaires we consider almost, marked by more than 70% of the questionnaires. So these are very basic features that we usually use by everyone. We can say that about 70% likely they are in. And so interoperability on these areas is absolutely must. We cannot repeat all of these in the long term. So anyway, what you would expect from one basic text document or a basic spreadsheet, that's it. You make some observations with the evaluation of the documents and the evaluation of the Brazil, and also bring you user support. So, very important is that almost every feature that is prepared by users is supported to what they need. But it is fully reliable. And reliable is key. There is a similar feature. And users can agree with that. But if they use a similar feature in the office, they don't document. And it takes. They cannot agree with that. Also, the interviewer expect all this user from the Ministry of Interior because they think it was to try in the office with these documents. And he said that you can use these documents just by what they don't expect is to do more than how a typewriter can do. If you use it like a typewriter, it's fine. Just they don't use it like a typewriter. So here is that. Also, if you go to the parceler, you can find a meta box about who is a man in sexuality and who looks scary, because there is a lot of dependency about us as such. But we try to find more and more box on top of that, but it's not easy. Like, seven word, eight word, seven word, post in the box is only there. We are metaword, which is finding more and more like taking this one item for these basic functionality, future types, future categories. Like every single post in the world, we try to use that feature, check if it breaks, if it breaks, we report it. And it's not that easy to find new box on top of what is already in the box there. Also, we have a graph idea of what is really important in the box. So, what is really important in the interoperability of those features, we have a publicist, we have to do this, we need to fix it. We have about, say, 100 bucks on that, and I estimate that after finishing this interoperability check-ins and the dissecting of uploaded documents, we may have twice of that, which is really important, really important in the box, but it's just like this amount, not really that important. Okay, once more, I'll do this slide in the tool, so this is the guide that we use in the interoperability check-ins. It's like a lot, but it would be a really hard time to find anything more than this 70% of these customers are still open. So, our work is just this much amazing. Okay. So, let's talk about user experience. So, we are deploying these two selected users, and everyone has them as well, because we had a decision that said we must deploy to everyone in the ISRA domain. So, user tries in office. They open the document that we estimate, and that's defining the user experience as well back to 2004. This is why it was not possible for me to be here, and was it not in 2004 realized something very important, but maybe in that instance, the part of the window in top is not user experience. That's not the important part of user experience. The really important part is the content part of the browser. So, this is what I am talking about. This is the same thing I will talk about in the garden user experience. So, user tries in office. And what does they see? So, simple feature to mark document as final, invert. When you open this link, what happens? Interesting user experience I will talk about in bathroom, but not anymore. Like in 6.1, this is fixed. Thanks to us. So, more user experience. Those paragraphs have styles. Alignment is defined in styles. Should inherit. The second paragraph should inherit the styles. The element from the styles. But user in office is something that interests the user experience rather inconvenient. Also, we have this beautiful additional letter. With a little bit of space in Microsoft Office between these paragraphs. And a little bit more. Just make it a little more in the process. Very interesting user experience. This is from what's on the slide. I like that originally there was zero spacing, but it's not how you might think more than that. More user experience from the office. User somehow creates a very simple table. Actually, it was not very simple for 6 stages before we reduced it. And somehow they put this interesting paragraph into the table which made the whole table for about just like this. So, it turned out that there was a little bit of an interesting tag in that that was understood by Word, but not by the office. Unfortunately, this is also based by Raston. So, that's it. More user experience. When you have changed your team in Word, you can move paragraphs. Cut, paste. See, it was manipulated on the past slide. How is it? So, in real life the cut paragraph appeared as a cut paragraph. Which is a really neprost in user experience and in the sentence in a contract just like spotted by our user in a contract that has been modified by multiple paragraphs. So, it's rather normal user experience that we are providing to them. But thanks to Raston this is also fixed by in Office 6.1. My favorite is our simple name card that you can forward it to by the vertical axis of the paper put it in a table before the very important person. But you cannot do this currently in the office. Rather, I'm passing user experience culturally. So, we need to improve this kind of user experience. And, just like I said it is possible. So, we think that actual user expectation is interoperative with OS now. No matter what. People in the ministry are connected with a lot of other people outside world. Sometimes the other department has to sometimes the other ministry sometimes the company in the private sector and all the municipalities, government offices everyone is connected with the other outside world. So, we cannot put anyone into our whole region part of interoperability which is also interoperability. Also, even if we do users expect that they should be able to work with the same fives that they worked yesterday in those four part that's very bad for us. Also, there is a little bit of post related to creating documents. So, if we are not young in one hour for creating a document and they usually spend more than that then those documentals are value that can be sent us as money. So, time spent on creation notified by the users and sometimes these are these documents are created by multiple people very bad people so those documents are a lot and more actually than a single license of high licenses. So, we cannot make those efforts that are all in the documents. And also we cannot ask people to spend even more that much in those documents slightly similar to what they had money back then because that would not scale very well in the times of thousands of users that we must scale. That is the use of the UX that we spend here. When I started to work on this project 2016 it was just like talks in the ministry when we were planning the government decision. So, there was a little bit of exchange of opinions that happened in 2016. So, I went there with the document foundation opinion that everyone should use because always in a support sucks. You cannot work like this. Everything falls apart. Ok, they said that was a little bit of exchange of opinions. I went to do this came out with this. So, they said, we either include in OXMS support or there will be many projects in Europe. Because if I say, we need to use it here, the project is now seen in world order decision or anything. So, I was forced kind of to to work somehow and start to work. So, that's why we are using it, we continue to use it. We are basically we are just expecting to be so interested in forward work to create a bit of document content device document just a little bit. No one cares about different office documents and the standards, names and others. Also, the interoperability is a very good because communication decision is depend on independence. So, they won't say that they want 100% in office but they would 100% depend on our project and our infrastructure. So, they don't want to depend on Microsoft, don't want to depend on us. So, competition continues, competition. So, we need interoperability in the long term. And and also there is always as I said earlier announced that one that we need to collaborate with public organizations public organizations like state companies schools, hospitals and there are private companies they won't they can't be forced to use the browser. They cannot be forced to install the browser because they have so many entities so they can't say no. The government has a little bit of power so they can't say that the ministry should actually use the browser but that's all they can say because these two municipalities, hospitals, schools private companies just don't know so, we need to support the government better. Also, we need to support Microsoft, this is in doubt and I know that our government works in that support and we cannot even have that so we just can't really fit that so, in this regard we need to support the government I can assure you this is my only presentation in combat point what do you think? Will it fall apart? Will there be others people? Yes, we will. But, we are in a position because all examers support and that's all in this regard. So, we are in the most in the situation. So, we need to in this situation to solve problems in that, we are in our D-13, fortunately we had the luck to contact the last report of the senior development of you and we are in the last of the world yesterday we still are very young we start to make sure to adjust in July but we advance to next time because we have the means to occupy to hire more people so far we are in a good start and also we have to mix up the basic integral of the initials our experience so far shows that it is possible so about now we do the results it's only three months of work but the paragraph format is now mostly out of the way we are lucky that we just started to work on this in the battle in Israel it's now where it's in and those are the dependencies and what you can see is that most of it is already fixed and the rest is not to be important or even miscaliburized so we have that so paragraph formatting those are spacing and identifications are now mostly okay we have some chart fixes coming drawing on chart support because in the copy area there is a lot to learn and they can basically learn everything by fixing up chart export and so more numbers in the last three months in the team of three people we fixed about 30 bucks and I think it's a better price number we are still going to work in the long term over the last 10 months there is about like 600 bucks it needs to be fixed I'm not sure that we will have time for volunteer for the experience but we will close once you are there but we recommend doing this so building internal competence is a good idea especially if you are not a large organization like we are so if you don't appropriate a lot of resources if you are on municipal level it's okay if you are not able to finance development team there are support companies that you can see that can have and even if you are able to find out 2,000 euros to them they will roll down for that and they will produce a few bucks for you as well so if you are doing this together then usmi support is not perfect and not every big feature is supported but what is really important is that it will be in the long term or even in the long term also one more idea it should not be any because it was not invented by aliens from space it was it was actually made by this guy who trust me so he is an alien genius so whatever you need you can do it after him but he is not a genius because we are aliens so thanks for the question