 Don't stop. We've taken an awful chance. I might launch into reciting the cremation of Sam McGee. Thank you all very much. We made a good start. I think we were, as I said last night, building on American strength and allied unity and we restored military and economic situation and while we went there with a sense of realism, I don't think any of us expected to see that there were going to be any fundamental changes in Soviet philosophy and there weren't. But I thought that we'd start out and clear up some misunderstandings, narrow differences and in the first meeting, we were the hosts and we had called for 15 minutes that he and I would have together before we went into the plenary meeting and the 15 minutes turned into an hour, but I had an opportunity to tell him and I thought that I had some, that he accepted this and wanted to proceed and on that same wavelength and that was where I said that I didn't think we could ever get things done like arms control or anything else unless we set out to eliminate the mistrust and the suspicions that existed between our peoples. To go into an arms negotiation there, if both sides are still suspicious then you know that both sides are still trying to protect any advantage they can. If you can really eliminate the suspicions, you're both going to the meeting seeing no particular need for maintaining this great military strength. And as I said, I think he accepted that. We had a real dialogue, had to do one for an hour and it was supposed to be about 15 minutes. Out of the 15 minutes the timekeepers here have suggested that the 15 hours, I should say, of total meetings that more than five of them were taken up just in one-on-ones between us. And I think a great deal was accomplished there. We covered all the topics, arms control, security issues, human rights, regional conflicts and the bilateral issues and nothing was papered over or did anyone try to pretend that we had done better than we had on some where we just could not quite come together. And so as I asked last night, where do we go from here? Well, he'll come to Washington next year and I've accepted his invitation to visit Moscow in 87. We have a lot of work in the meantime. We've cleared the air and I think we have a sense of the common ground. But one of the first things I told him, and I think we have agreed on, that words are not going to be enough. It will take deeds to eliminate the suspicions and the mistrust on each other's part. But I know his closing words to me when we parted, where that we didn't just say goodbye and then meet together again sometime next year, here in the United States. I got his plea then to, that we keep in touch and we keep in contact on issues in the interim. So I have to believe that there at least they share with us in the desire to get something done and to get things straightened out. And if so, that is a plus that we haven't had in previous meetings. But now, there's a lot still to be done. I think I shall call on George here for a report to all of you. Mr. President, Robert Schott said yesterday that if the U.S. goes ahead with SDI, that the Soviets will respond and all restraint will be blown to the wind. Well, we discussed that very thoroughly and whether they do, I told him that I hope they would respond going forward with their own research and that I felt that we should come to an agreement that whichever of one of us or if both of us could come up with a defensive system, then let's share it so we can get rid of the nuclear weapons. But he was talking about another arms race, sorry. Did you see any softening at all? None of that issue, no. Okay, thanks. You had a good session. Thank you.