 Hvala, sreči, tako je. Je Stefano Maestrič, sreči manager Vetter Radette. Sreči je, da sem tudi o čat, gbt in Sonu, ne bo, da sem sreči manager, ne bo, da sem počutila AI v skolju. V skolju, da sem tudi o Neuronetvore, v universiji in sovom. Kaj sem, sem zelo, v nekaj zelo, nekaj nekaj. Zato počekaj, kaj je generativ AI. To je definitivna, definitivna, ki sem zelo, v OpenAI in vzelo, da je počkaj in zlepljajte je ozvorega AI. Zelo sem da ga se vzela rešel, nekaj sem pričačen za kajte, da sem tudi način. Zelo sem, da se kajte in odradi, da je biti še bude zelo, ker sem odradi doko ozvorega in basically that is learning patterns from existing data. In z njega generača in unika vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega kreativnosti. To je vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega vsega. Gdje ineče je šezjo stran, na kratu na Jainstein? Viktor Mosov z Vajstvim ztačil, da je to vedno srednje izgleda po vsego vsega pri universtубu v Bernice. Tato da je pa vse je otčal, je tudi do klaserju, nimi ne bi se pošlivati, ne zrtišite po mojči kurs. Tudi mojč i srednji in zelo je obilitet, da je zrtišit. I zelo se, da je inšljena tako, da je inšljena na srečice. Iz nekaj, da so je inovečniko, da je iz Vesika z inštručnimi in tačno in však z učitih, zelo, da je nekaj nekaj nekaj, iz nekaj nekaj neki, da je iz inštručnje, da je nekaj nekaj neki, da je iz inštručnje, da je inštručnje, T levneh je, da ima inšljevac, da počo nekaj nekaj ne bo jo. To je, da kaj posledo da postavil tem viša včivljena. Tudi pa včivljena v sniperi, zelo je ni, ne jour. Išljevac nekaj posleda nad vso postavljena, na nekaj, na kaj smo nače zeptali, tako, nekaj, nekaj, se počutimo, na nekaj smo nače izprovati, nekaj nekaj nekaj, nače izprovati, nekaj, taj nekaj, nekaj, nače izprovati, generativno, nače izprovati, nače izprovati, je to očetne izprovati, ... And it's great. And it's great. Ajask at the generative A.I. to generate for me art. Fitate case, Ajasked for a poster cyberpong landscape. Ajasked also to don't include the skyscrapers, probably it didn't understand very well, but anyway, this is the landscape generated. And in the second case Ajasked we generally generate nekaj, da je galaxija. To je in originalne imeče. To je in realne galaxije. To je generačne imeče z AI. To je prejt opresivno. Prejt nekaj. Zdaj mi je kaj art. Zdaj je artist, v medeljih, prijevših sentori, ko je Lucho Fontana. To je z Argantina in v Italiji. Je vse, vsega, spasijalna art. Spasijalna art je, da se vsega, vsega, in nekaj, nekaj, nekaj je nekaj, prijevših art. Fontana, da je, vsega, kaj vsega, vsega, Westan. Da je, vsega, mašč Shorners. Ne, ne, dashke. Ne, neiašš. Ne, je. Ne, ne! Ne, ne da se kaj, kako je nekaj bilo, a čak je bilo, da je izgleda kaj je kaj je izgleda, ker v ene odmaženju, naredu smo prvej imegi z spasem. Prvej imegi z spasem je tega. A kaj je ni izgleda, ki se povrati in svej, kako se da svej, zato ngladi naredite. V sej vse. To je pravda z galakvama, o kaj sem jazil je od njih in saj sem jazil, pa pa ne zelo, nekaj zelo, dokega taj zelo, kar bi ta zelo podal vse, nekaj nekaj, nekaj nekaj, skoncent je nezavršen, in v tem različi art, ali nezavršen science, nezavršen, nezavršen, kako želimo povoljati, kako če je človek. In početno, da imaš ideja, če je zelo, zato in patečnja, kar všeč je vsego in istotne tegovorja in imeli kako jih ima. In je jezda ne ne izkonečno in istotne in jezda. To je tukaj uveček skončni, ki je lahko izvih, da lahko vsi poznili, ne ko so, da je to vsi izvih. Prvo, še sliko, v midelju ležkega objuščaja, potkaj doličj, ki je ima mladja vkupke zilj, je stavil smoup, maska, fin z soprati z težina trafnoga poštjova. Zelo bo 15 km dobro, objuščaj ne je sem poštjava, ne zelo sebe vozlата s jelosti, ne zelo težni. Ka to je izlačiti? Kaj bi se sk Alienarko več? To je začačno. Povden je, da je vsebiti kakščo, lahko všečljaja počkečače, da je poč The boy also realized that he had gone bankrupt and started a loafing. I asked Chat of GPT I ask Chat of GPT and those are the answers. I go quickly. No, I have time, I think. In the first case, you remember the Schuba man in the forest? I ask him. And basically the answer is Svaj, je to zdaj, da je vseč režal, z njegi, jaz tukaj dobro všakaj, je biti pomečenje. Zelo jaz, je zelo in jaz tega jaz sezaj otvarila z chatu GPT, da se je zdaj, da je bi bilo vseč, da sem vseč na skuba, v skuba način. in legalne aktivitve. Legalne aktivitve. Zelo, da je bilo data, je bilo legalne aktivitve. Zelo, da je bilo. Zelo, da je bilo legalne aktivitve. Zelo, da je bilo legalne aktivitve. Prank, in art instalacije na vrste, Skuba men, da je art instalacije. Zelo, danes, please note that these are only conjunctures based on limited information provided. Without further details or context it's challenging to provide an accurate explanation. Thank you. But it gave us something and if you didn't know the answer maybe you are a bit closer now. It is not completely wrong what it told us. The second one is doing better, better but not getting the result, but much better for us. In this scenario the additional information provided helps clarify the situation. Here is a possible interpretation. A man is pushing his car with just one finger, indicating that the car is a toy or a miniature version. The fact that he pushes the car with such ease suggests that it is not a real car, but a small scale model. Maybe, maybe. When the man reaches in front of the hotel he realizes he has gone bankrupt. This implies that he had been playing or pretending to be a wealthy person. But the reality of his financial situation downs on him at that moment. However, it doesn't bother him too much indicating that he may have been indulging in a fantasy or living beyond his means. Something. The boys who were watching email without helping realized that he has gone bankrupt as well and started laughing. This suggests that they were aware of this pretence of exaggerated lifestyle or find humor in his sudden realization and change of fortune. Overall, this appeared to be a playful or symbolic sheen illustrating a personal or financial downfall in a light-herded manner. Not bad, not bad. Very close to the answer. Anyone knows now the answer of the two questions? The second? A bit easier. Is a bit more easy than that. A bit more lateral thinking. Those are the solutions. The first one is the aeroplane getting the water to stop fire and got also the scuba. Pretty unlucky. And the second one is the very famous game. And I'm sure there is also a car. A small red car. But again now we have a very little time but analyzing the answers from chatGPT we can get to the solution easier than starting from nothing. So what? Why use generative AI and not overuse it? It's an excellent thinking partner. As I demonstrated to you is a thinking partner. Is fastest getting more and more precise would help a lot on better understanding complex patterns which may not be clear to us at the moment. This is a very important point. Because the first and the last one because is important to understand that there is pattern that we have and we don't understand in old care for example we don't understand the patterns of cancers but maybe there is patterns need help to understand those complex patterns and this is an excellent help. Why not overuse it? Disruptive thinking is needed for real progress. There is no progress with disruptive thinking. We cannot base our progress only on what we know until now otherwise we don't progress. And real creativity needs some craziness. All of them are cool and mad sometimes. But they are all genius. That's it.