 Hi guys, so I'm back with my NCA strategy series and this is subject number 2. The first I discussed was Consti you can find the link in the description box and Now I'm going to discuss foundation because I received some people's messages suggesting I should do foundation because sub-collect their foundation is tough. However, it is not that tough It is just like any other exam. Just that it is more theory and it is more concept more theory and more of less of Iraq's and more of writing part. So I think that's the Click about it, but I'm going to share the tips and tricks which helped me pass the foundation exam Foundation cuz syllabus has also been revised and so that's why I'm making it on the latest syllabus I've gone through it read about it and last year I also spoke to somebody this year also spoke to somebody and I'm well-versed with the syllabus So I'm going to give you some latest tips and tricks which but the approach remains the same which I used in 2018 so yeah, let's go look at it before that is Stars only background Kalehi up make a like subscribe and share the dough thumbs up the dough and I'll also be very much Encouraged to make such blocks for you. So now I'm going to talk about foundation law. Let's go And she doesn't really let's understand that what is foundation law So foundation law basically our good India-Bhagya-San-Bhagya-San-Jet's law made by the king that is jurisprudence if you have studied and you know about it Jurisprudence is I can just go jurisprudence. We are gonna. I'm supposed to go to that where law is going to so jurisprudence is very important It talks about theories concepts nature sources. How is all was made by law was made Pehle kya otta tha up kya otta and all the processes and All the all the theories just the based on so jurisprudence is what? foundation of Canadian law is and You just need they just need you to know that what are the theories on which Canadian law was involved? so if If you ask me if you understand the concepts and the theories then this paper becomes relatively easy Because I'll go theory-based cargo question I got to walk a theory concept check Agar up cookies based question I got to be what I'm co-application of these theories Peggy test So it is very important that you need to know that From what is foundation law? So as I told you foundation law can be equivalent to jurisprudence in our countries So next let's talk about What is the syllabus and how do we go about the syllabus such a well as scope of Course you have to study So they have mentioned that what they want is and what they're looking for in guarantee applicants is that you guys know That the what are the concepts of what are the concepts of the constitution? What are the concepts of the what are the nature and sources of the foundation law, but Syllables they keep a good one. I know I know what's a lot of articles and but I think I'm running in because it is very much doable I'm sick of it. We look at it after but we look at it So you have to just be very realistic in this whole paper the approach is realistic The concepts are realistic and the syllabus was also very realistic It is nothing that you can't do first of all you have to keep this in mind Then do not its limits cold day if you're opening it on the computer. Do not start clicking on the articles Do not do that. I'm done job. Yeah, but what can now because articles? How would love if you came or yes, are a very limited articles and do not go into that right now first of all Give the syllabus a glimpse like a bird eye view like I always say I said in constitution also I say for this exam also that give it a bird eye view now when you've given it a bird eye view You will see that what are they actually testing you for they're actually testing you for The concept of the foundations and what are the pillars of just the Canadian law So what are the pillars that you know, this are the strength and spine of this content of their Constitution and of their rule of law So all of us are relversed with rule of laws and and we know we had some boring curse It was very it was a boring lecture back in law day whereby the It was about to the concept positivism natural thinking sources of law Pelleckings would they own keep out money to the then divine rights how they came in so all the all these articles all these Theories in the form of articles are given under topic one So yeah, which I think I'm gonna put up Then which I think I'm gonna put all that Canada is still under the queen So there are prerogatives of the queen and their prerogatives of the federal government So how does that constitutional principle work? Then you know Canada is a democracy Then you will know that his key parliament may pretty sorry rights in which are as same as the rights which we had back home and Which other democracies? Parliaments might be having about prerogation powers and what are the other powers? So all these powers could only discuss caravane then very important topic is separation of power So then they have discussed separation of power that executive legislature judiciary separated This baby on a punch article is up to you. But you do not have to panic and Jovey on a case to a You go up on a new case can lead to a key open Definitely, because I got a new okay, but I mean just me but I thought it's a good question You're back up to a question paper. I'm near a girl. Okay, okay? This question I just want to put on the gun so I remember Jim and a paper the other day I question to the judge me and I was a that the queen is making some kind of notes and some notes making power your husband stopped and some kind of emergency is there in Canada, so what is your prerogative going to happen? So you need to know that separation of power's doctrine was to be applied, or whatever XYZ doctrine was to be applied, the facts of the question are exactly the same. But they gave you a situational-based question and you had to apply these principles. So if your principles, your concepts, your theories are clear, you can always apply them. So don't worry about it. Okay, next let's talk about how to answer the foundation paper. I know you, as you mentioned that you cannot answer in the form of IRAX, and IRAX is the only method of you learned in American JD. But, other than IRAX, also there are options, there is CRAC, that is Conclusion Rule Analysis Conclusion. A typical memorandum, if you've ever prepared, or if you know, is prepared in that way. You write a short conclusion, definitely, what is prime FSI you can see from the question. So short conclusion is basically a paraphrase, you just have an introduction, a paraphrase to question koi. So you do that in the short conclusion, then you write the rule. What is the rule? The rule talks about whatever law you are referring to, whatever doctrine you are referring to. So you have to mention that. Analysis is the theory part, you open the exam, you will write exactly what is relevant, do not write non-relevant things, write what is relevant because that is what they are looking for. And then write your detailed conclusion. So conclusion in the end is also very important. Short conclusion, Rule Analysis Conclusion, CRAC methods, if you feel like you can't use IRAX because you can't identify an issue, then you do CRAC. Also what I used to do is I used to write introduction and then introduction is a must. Like I used to write introduction in everything and introduction I just used to paraphrase and rephrase the whole question that they have given me. So I used to do that and then I used to write some heading of the main thing and then another heading and then talk about it. So headings of headings, I used to write my answer in a very organized manner. So I think that really helped and I also suggested this to so many people after I cleared my exam and it helped for them as well. So I think it should help you guys also and CRAC and introduction and normal with the body like a proper answer can be there. Do not write content which is you know you're just filling it. Don't do that. Write relevant content, write relevant case law, mention relevant content and also there are articles to refer to you. You have to make sure if you're quoting something from the article do it in inverted commas. You like you should know that you are quoting something. So you just go inverted commas means root a lo and you also write that you're referring to this particular article because if you don't do that they might just scantle your paper and tell you that you can't copy paste and you can't do that plagiarism. So you can't plagiarize. You have to give the credits to the person you're referring to. Also if you're doing this from the judgment then you should write justice Hopkins said just in glamour said just in justice whatever just give you a judgment quote. But if your concept is clear then you can also write that in your language. It is not that difficult. So we've discussed the first topic now I'm going to go to the second topic topic I have the syllabus with me and the second topic is indigenous people and the law. So indigenous people as I told you Aboriginals is a very important community here a very important part of Canada. So you need to write your own kid your own kid your title rights and your national land rights is up to your cases to be based on our versus Marshall our versus Bernard there are some relevant cases which are also given in the syllabus can lead is the again the source that you have to refer to and I'll be you have time right so if you have time why don't you go and open up the judgment and just read the main gist of it can only has already has short judgment so you should go and refer it for sure up articles if you believe I'm just meant to pursue cases key or they go as I mean that you have to start with first topic or second topic or third topic pick up whatever topic you like I don't think in foundation one topic is related to another however obviously the whole crux is that they're all sources and the backbone of the Canadian law but you can pick up any topic and you can start reading it I started with the like I started the men a price you do get it coffee boring look at our theory base look at her so I started with the fundamental principles of Canadian legal system that is the four topic because rule of law constitutional supremacy is the one I'm happy to be proud of and in my log degree federalism separation of power to use up some cake now new new so I was just like that okay I just have to go and read this and I will somehow have that idea it never it never done and it's major cases they're saying versus Canada so you can see you know if you open the syllabus you will see saying versus Canada citation TV on a case key and they're mentioned page number 13 to 44 so page number 13 to 44 is relevant for you now why don't you open go and open the judgment and read the pages because I got a good element there so I'm just going to relate to power get this topic civil relevant so Jesse I'm just going to talk about it clearly I'm similar to the judgment myth of the topic he covered up so I'm just going to put them down then you have parliament and it's component parliament and it's component make a parliament make on come on the same eight house of commons all of you can keep up with me which make my topic the third topic is sources of Canadian law okay you're going to come and get the French government it's not important to French important to keep the law sure because it was a European side European law started with a offer common law can be based on a baby but I'm a baby but I'm a baby but I'm a baby but I'm sure the common law is based on precedence and equity so equity but a question I just want you should go and check that out and definitely give your notes a thorough read read the rule because reading a good go and read your notes and classes if you want but notes are very important so I know people are giving out their notes and stuff which is very good for lyrin so I think you can go and buy some good notes and then start with the subject and notes are sufficient when I I do not think honestly what you do is just open the article while sleeping at night and you you just going random reading only do that then parliament and it's component obviously you understand the functions of parliament is again very important or it's big cases the man on the team child and a little bit required reading here you know what put up cases put up your topic done mainly your foundation give out in a topic so some good so much out there mainly do you want to go to the concept theory be a lot of clear energy you should know that what are they asking sometimes the question with which comes and specially the ones the sample exam may be judea over here is like keep what are they actually asking you so what are you going to do you can only decide that once you know when you are well read with your material but what the question is saying and what subject to write because this is a theory based paper it's me I'm going to do not leave it because if you leave it then I think you are losing on to some numbers which you might just get so you should take that approach because I also remember I think but that's all about it last two type topics and nine or ten more admin loss a bit related next log madman looking binaries so you will have some tips and tricks to do there admin law admin lockup or my mind it's here to me a couple of bird eye view put up a syllabus cut on your top admin law sure gonna it'll be really helpful for you so all these are practical tips I hope you like them and yeah please keep commenting and keep asking me I'm very I'm very much free I'm just going to and I should say good night to you guys right now because you have paid it's late and bye guys so do well study well and stay home say inside the same thing I'm a lockdown extent johreh extend ho chukhi ha mare bhi I'm sure up ke bhi so just stay home and use this time as much as you can because you're not getting this time back right bye