 So, good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. I hope you had an enjoyable lunch and that you are ready for the next part of our blueprint presentation. As you heard, I have the task of presenting you with a few different areas related but not completely the same. So I will try to just take them one by one and see where that leads us. The first one is linked to tackling water pollution. You have heard already this morning several times and even if you couldn't see all the graphs from the back that Peter Gamble showed you, you will have seen that when it comes to chemical status there is actually a difficulty in establishing a clear baseline. We don't really know for about 40% of the water what is the status and we have already discussed how and why that is a problem. So we have seen that monitoring is insufficient in many member states and therefore the blueprint is proposed or is proposing that we have to enforce better the water framework directive monitoring requirements. So this is a pretty straightforward proposal and probably not coming as a surprise to you. So the commission intends to continue our enforcement efforts on this particular and of course also the other issues. Secondly, we have seen also in the assessment of the blueprint or leading up to the blueprint that the implementation of some of all the directives relevant for the blueprint, the urban wastewater directive, the nitrates directive and the industrial emissions directive has progressed a lot. But we also see that the absence of full compliance with these directives actually prevents the achievement of the environmental objectives of the water framework directive. The foods pollution are significant pressures in 38% of the water bodies and point source pollution in 22%. So what we are looking at in the blueprint is to see how we can extend the nitrate vulnerable zones and actually to reinforce the action programs under the nitrates directive. For the urban wastewater treatment directive, we look at our other possibilities. So we would like to see how we can help member states to ensure that there is an appropriate long-term investment planning. So that goes both for the EU funds that we spent on implementing, building wastewater treatment plans, but it also goes for the European investment banks when giving loans to the countries. So in order to ensure that all of this is happening in the appropriate way, we are going to, our countries are going to prepare implementation plans to a greater extent that has been done before. For the industrial emissions, we reinforce that the permits really need to be improved in order to take into account the emission limit values, best available technologies and all the relevant water objectives. Then the third and last slide on water pollution is a number of other things that you will hear comments from the speakers in a little while. We have suggested in the blueprint to add the directive and sustainable use of pesticide to cross-compliance under the cap. We have, we reinforce that there is a proposal for an environmental quality standards directive and that the commission's proposal for amendments should be adopted. This would help strengthen the water framework directive role in identifying and improving monitoring. For pharmaceuticals, we acknowledge and you've seen maybe in the blueprint that there's a lot of documentation on that this is an emerging issue. And we have committed in the blueprint to present a report on the pharmaceuticals and their fate in the environment in 2013. And based on that, we will come up with an assessment of whether amendments to legislation is needed or how we can tackle this problem better in the future. Then coming to the second topic on sustainable water infrastructure. We have examined as part of the preparation for the blueprint, we've examined leakage in a number of case studies, seven across the EU member states and we've seen that the actual leakage rates vary in the case studies that we've seen between 10 and 74 percent. These are of course impressive numbers, especially the last one. We have also seen that while we want these numbers to go down across Europe, there is really a need to tackle them on a case-by-case basis and to make sure that what we achieve in terms of environmental and economic benefits are actually appropriate compared to the problems that we're trying to solve. We have looked into a methodology that is called the SELL, Sustainable Economic Level of Leakage Methodology. And for us that seems to be a promising tool that can help water companies and help in general to assess whether the leakages, how and how much the leakage should be reduced to get to a sustainable level. So we're going to work with the water industry and with all relevant stakeholders to see how we can further develop and integrate this methodology into the work. Then we're also going to work with these stakeholders to see how we can develop a vision for the future of water infrastructure and to see how we can become more resilient and adapt to climate change. To just dwell for a little moment on this sustainable economic level of leakage, become very clear in the blueprint assessments is that it does not make sense to look at issues such as leakage or other issues in isolation. Of course there is a role for the water service providers to operate efficiently, but they can only do so if the water resources are also managed properly at the basin level. So we have to protect the water resources and manage them properly at the basin level before we start taking individual steps in individual sectors for reduction. So that is leading us to what we've already talked about this morning as well that we need to understand better at the basin or water body level what the water balances are and we need to make sure that the allocation mechanisms are matching the actual water availability. And then also there is a link to what we heard earlier on the water pricing and the cost recovery as long as these are not appropriately implemented it is very difficult to achieve incentive to reduce leakages to the level where they need to be. Then coming to the third topic on water reuse. We've said for a long time that we should look at demand side measures before increasing water supply, but you can see this as a sort of softening of that position because we have actually assessed in the blueprint preparation a number of different alternative water supply options and we have considered or we've seen that the reuse of water seems to actually have or does actually have a lower environmental impact than other alternative water supplies. So we are going to consider and see how we can best possibly in the best possible way encourage water reuse at the EU level. We see that there is a lack of common standards so that needs to be fixed and we see also that there could be potential obstacles to the free movement of agricultural products related or irrigated with reuse waters. So we are going to look further into that and come up with a proposal for how to address it further on. So this was the end of my very short presentation and that should leave us a lot of time for discussion here are the questions that we have put forward for discussion and I give the word back to our Chairman.