 We are a competitive, intermediate, speech-invading team, which means we're much like an athletic team. We travel around the state and country, meeting against other schools, colleges, universities, and public speaking events. Some of them are very similar, the ones that you do in your classes. So you'll see ways and opportunities, but some of them are much different. I'm going to see a couple of those students at this event and to expose you to what we do and hopefully encourage you to think about possibly participating on a speech-invading team while you're here at CFU Chico. And so be sure to get in touch with your instructor. Let them know. They know how to get in touch with me. And I'll be sure to get the information to you on how to take the class using a rolling unit. The university IRA program paid for us to travel. So all of your travel costs are paid for when you're a part of the team. We have a levy of coaching opportunities that you can look to experts who have competed in speech-invading in the past, who will coach you through and getting ready for competition. And we have a long history of being very successful in most of the state and the national level in speech-invading. I graduated from CFU Chico in 1998. I was part of the speech-invading team here at Chico State. Angel, which is if you're interested in going graduate or law school, speech-invade, participating in speech-invading while you're here at CFU Chico. She would step above everyone who doesn't do that. She might do with some skills that will make you successful in education. But more importantly, it provides you with a lot of networking opportunities. We have alumni who are successful attorneys all across the nation now who are part of the speech-invade program when they were here at CFU Chico. We have alumni who teach in many universities across the nation now. And we have alumni who are successful business people, successful journalists, successful screenwriters, anything that you are interested in involved in. Because people who do speech-invading college go on to do really amazing things when they get done with their schooling. So I would encourage you to check into it. Since it's something that you've been interested in, you don't have to do it for all four years. You don't have to have to be an experienced. We have a lot of people. I did not have to be an experienced when I started doing it in college. It was something that you can get into while you're in college, even if you don't have to be an experienced. And if you have to be an experienced, you really want to know what it is. Because you already know what your difference is. And tonight you'll see a variety of events performed from the team members. Many of these events are going to be have been successful at the regional level. They've won awards, many first place awards, second place awards, third place awards. And you'll see a auditor tonight who's going to be competing, representing CFU Chico at the national competition this year. So you guys are getting a great exposure to what it needs to do speech-invade. I hope you'll consider doing it while you're here at CFU Chico. And telling your friends about it. Even if you're not interested, you might know someone who's interested. So make sure to spread the word. So without further ado, I'm going to let the students go on the support. And I think you're done. Thank you so much. Thank you. Each night it is with my great pleasure to present to you Roxana Ramos. She's the first-year member of CFU Chico University. A junior here at Chico State University. She could be both the best of a comp, you average, like this. And tonight she will be representing CFU Chico State University on the ratification of the United Nations Convention of America. We're going to talk a little bit about it. We're not only going to go on and on, but we're going to talk a little bit about it. According to the United States Department's National Report on the Union Rights Act, Chigola, a relatively small 80,000 in my last language, and only 30% of the individuals were able to make a benefit to a quite a certain group, such as rehabilitation, training, counseling, and response. Only 90,000 of the school's 500,000 people in Chigola is helping the state. According to the report, China, the world's most popular country, has roughly 85 million disabled people. And one fourth, or 21 million of the people living in extreme poverty, and these little people don't help you. Because of the situation like this, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children with Disabilities was adopted by the United Nations on March 13, 2006, and was opened for signature on December 30, 2007. The convention is the United Nations effort to provide an international standard of life in order to promote, protect, and ensure the full and equal employment of all human rights and fundamental freedom by all participants available. And to develop respect for their challenges, I am going to discuss the denial of rights and lack of accessibility to the process of reaching this table before. Why this violation of human rights exists, and how we as the nations are going to be in the house with international freedom of change, by ratifying the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children. Probably can be stated that the restriction in child rights involves lack of accessibility for disabled people in the development world. The United Nations defines disabled artists those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairment, which an interact with various attitudes or environmental barriers hinders their full and effective access to society on an equal basis with them. Disabled people across the world are being discriminated against as we do with it. An editorial in the LA Times published on December 25, 2013. They said, in many places, discrimination is the disabled discrimination. This means that although disabled people are prior minorities, the number of people around the world to throw, and as they throw a number, still doesn't discriminate. For the very few of us that do not know how many disabilities exist in our lives, you may be asking yourself, how this issue between that, if we have the American Disability Act, that's specifically for individuals committing discrimination with disabilities. Janice LaFoye is an arm of life and a mother of two sons who both have autism. As I argue, Janice has the right to uproot a new threat family whenever our family needs time. Janice LaFoye wrote for the Rohingya Tribunal on September 14, 2013, and she described the problems she faced as the result of unequal access to proper accommodations for the children who are old and weak. Given the international shortcomings, Janice was the same in the United States while her husband was not for over 60 years. Janice was born 30-month-old children and many others just like that are one of many to be discriminated with the international community stand on this list. Despite the fact that as Americans, we have equal access for the disabled, this is nothing to provide for Americans that study for travel abroad. The lack of equal access to buildings, workplaces, programs, and many other public accommodations affect us. Brian Mark Walker, the senior vice president of Greenberg and Scanners, for the three more electronic communications, spoke on the policy reasons of the impact of the CREP on the international accessibility system in the Senate on June 5, 2013. Brian Mark Walker said he thought that 130 million smartphones could be shipped in the new west this year, about 900 million worldwide. So making accessible products and creating accessible options opens up markets. Companies open up to get access to broader markets to harmonize efforts like the CREP. Making our technology accessible to everyone would only benefit the app by expanding our markets and providing more. Now that we have established a point of issue, we can look at the cost. The discrimination against people worldwide has been due in part to the renewal of adopting a common law or international form that protects disabled people. Disabled people are the common target for discrimination, and so they are underrepresented in opportunities for older lives. On October 21, 2013, the Immigration Policy Center published a recipe that reported that since 2000 to 2009, the United States Association has billed on $25,000, which has 72,000 recipes per year. A recipe is the final of the recipe that was unable or unwilling to return to the CREP. Because of a well-founded sphere of participation, new rates, membership in a particular group, political opinion, or national award, there are countless laws and international programs such as these that protect certain groups of people. But none is recognized to protect the people. Because of this international and radicality, countless of the disabled people are new ones. In addition to our lack of the global law of protecting the people of people, the United States was used to ratify the CREP for fear of losing our sovereignty. Our sovereignty is used as an excuse for the lack of adoption of an international law. In ratifying the CREP, we are held accountable to the United Nations Convention and a small number of Congress members feel that this means we are surrendering our sovereignty to an international community, something that we would never want. Michael Rainey, director of communications and research of a non-profit organization called Correct the Rights from October 8, 2013 claims that if the United States ratified the CREP we would be ending over our sovereignty. Because I believe in the right state, the committee can set its own interpretation of the binding law, therefore leading to the surrender of our sovereignty to the United Nations. Now that we have discussed the possible problems, here's what we can do in order to be avoid the change and make sure the United States ratified the United Nations Convention on Rights. The federal level of resolution is clear. We need to ratify the CREP. The United States ratification of the CREP will only play out a greater foundation for the rest of the world. On an individual level, the solution to these problems is becoming better educated on a lack from a lack of inclusion of policies to save the people's rights throughout the world and through human rights. We need to inform others and bring awareness to the global problem. We need to contact our representatives and inform them of where we stand on this issue. We can also volunteer or donate to organizations such as the United States International Transform disability, the National Disability Rights Network and many more organizations just like the Germans to help give the people the technology growing each and every human being. Social networks can become one of the easiest and most effective ways of doing community justice. The leadership of civil human rights has started with our students to inform people about the CREP. By using the hashtag like CREP or disability we can reach and inform the people of what they updated ourselves. Today, I hope I have made you aware of the violation of human rights that the disabled people are on the wrong path. The lack of global standards that is a cause for this problem and how we can help to gain the dignity and quality and inclusion of the people on a global level. No more should 1 billion disabled people have to face and be accepted to the world. But instead, they should work like an individual. That's why I need to keep being with the CREP. I'm going to start with 10 seconds. 30 seconds used. Minute used. 30 used. Joe, how many of you have seen the Star Wars Prequests? Most of us, right? Keep your hands up. How many of you are black when you saw the Star Wars prequests? Really? I thought they were a disaster, I was a huge Star Wars fan, I was really important Star Wars prequels and when they came out it was just a disaster. In fact I think everything George Lucas has come out with in the past several years has just been terrible, horrible decisions and this leads me to my quotation Our ability to create has outreached our ability to use wisely the products of our invention I'm interpreting this to mean the importance of wise decisions George Lucas made unwise decisions by making good use of them I'm going to explore this theme in three different examples I'm going to be talking about the recent nuclear disaster in Japan I'm going to discuss work fiction, Jurassic Park I'm going to discuss the current problem of overpopulation So first, the recent nuclear disaster in Japan It happened a couple years ago, back in 2011 There was an earthquake and a tsunami And it damaged this nuclear reactor in Japan And it couldn't fix it in time, released some radiation A bunch of people died, a bunch of people got sick Now at the time, building that reactor probably seemed like a good idea Japan, they don't have a lot of native natural resources They have to use the import, a lot of what they use So nuclear reactor may have seemed like a way to inculcate energy independent So they did, and they built the reactor then Something else about Japan, you know, is it's right next to a fault line And that causes a lot of earthquakes, a lot of tsunamis It happened lots of times throughout Japan's history So when the whole earthquake, tsunami happens Nuclear reactor breaks, a bunch of people die Unwise decisions And that's the emotion score, the Jurassic Park Excellent movie, better book If you ever read it, I'll read the book Now what happens in this story is Scientists discover a way to take Frog DNA, and we found some dinosaur DNA And on a seato in December They squish it together For some other deeply implausible process And they made dinosaurs, they called them dinosaurs Right? So they called me dinosaurs And they stick them all together in a park And they think, hey, we're going to make a lot of money on this river To have rides, to have kids come over here It's going to be a great time But what happens? They're wild animals First chance they get, they break free They start eating people And the guy on the employ, what are you going to do about it? You're going to do an experiment It was a disaster Unwise decisions One of the themes of the movie is that Our ability to make wise decisions outpaces Our ability of scientific innovation Finally, I'm going to discuss Why decision making prove overpopulation If you have, maybe I've seen What does overpopulation have to do with wise decision making? Well, where do people come from? That's right So, and making people Making people feels really, really good And, how do I know this? It feels so good that people will do it Even when we can't meet the people that are already here People will make more people Even if they can't be part of already here So we have seven billion someone on the planet And it keeps growing And still there are thousands and thousands of people That are starving to that today Because people can't get enough to make it more people Alright, so I'm going to close this up here Today I have discussed The topic of why decision making I have discussed this through looking at the examples Of the Fukushima nuclear disaster About the decision to build a nuclear reactor Next to a fault line in a very, very recent place I've explored this through more fiction Jurassic Park The decision to combine Dino, DNA And make dinosaurs And then make dinosaurs for a month And finally, I've discussed it through The issue of overpopulation Now, even if it's not a great idea to make more people People will continue to make more people So, in light of knowing that Of people's ability to make more decisions Like our friend George Lucas Next time, Bergen Lucas says Okay, another Star Wars movie Maybe you won't hold your breath But we'll see you in a second She'll be doing a post Her speech is about a woman's journey As her neighbor built the fence So it's almost in the middle of her driveway The story reveals a heart prince about life About how things would be different If we just looked at the life of others around them But I'm just telling you what It'll be right along the company line You asked me to understand That you didn't ask And that the property line just happened To take over my house And he built a six-foot common wall Right there Right with each landowner I wouldn't be able to talk to them Not without making decisions I'll have six hundred and twenty feet away We often come out of whatever I do We're so focused on our own needs So we're blind watched with that That a friend, family, a neighbor Bidding to a lot of community A lot of understanding And a lot of fear We need to be set back In a really good setting And understand And start to do that If I let you It seems often I And it's so close to our house We've always had a few walls We'll still let you be loaded We will be loaded It's going to be a big change So that is a problem The real problem is that I won't be able to talk In front of our house So here's the part I don't open my head When I think about Binding the house Having a warm survey Binding the survey line Threatening to drive away Of your neighbors And then telling them We're going to build a fence It's all a fence Right there You know nothing About the reasons why It might matter to us To be able to talk In front of our own door We hire a lawyer It's just possible That we have friends We place them We want you to build it On the structure All the way there We also need A similar note Behind our very backs In the news We don't want the students To look like kids Want you to allow us To be able to talk In front of my door I'm in charge of that We only hired a lawyer To give me a predominant You made it seem So official You're responsible for this And you say I have every right To vet the fence On my own house There's several ways To identify that You're made That we can We have a right But we're made If you think Right side of the issue is On the drain You build the fence Damned in front Of a bright red line Right The thing flies up So if someone says One foot One foot right there I'm going to put out On the porch With the shotgun And shoot the light off It's a step To that dam But there's a conversation That hasn't happened It's just In the deep Out He isn't quite Treating it like a person He isn't quite In the future He might be Getting here Something He is He is exactly Like he is With that Down on the face When he's going around Out of life All the time If I like you I would Give you A collection I want to Spend you In that harsh Correctly Tell of you A brother to child I want to make You see The way they are The way they should be I want to Give you Some sort of But If I like you I would Invite you in You don't know What to do You don't know anything About that You don't know Why we care Together again Like why I'm mad at you For that Dammit Right there In your life Make it Comfortable Why do you Do this You should do that I'm sure That you must have Been hurt Very badly I wouldn't Have that Matter I'm sure That you Are really Excavating Experiencing Because you've never Sealed I'm sure It would seem That you've Sealed That you've not Sealed that It's been too much Dammit Dammit Too much It reminds me That I couldn't Sealed That It's a terrible thing To sell yourself To a child I know That you know What you I didn't Caught the one Who you should be I know You have a wife I'm sorry I know That you I mean One doctor Both about taking my breath But I said I don't give a shit About my breath Just do Whatever Make it Stuff I sometimes think When I'm gone Dammit I'm right You should Welcome I mean I can make it So dearly Stand behind Exactly what I was thinking To say To you Who else Is what the brain I said to you Would you All Other Authentic Long ago That Obviously was But It's kind of A bit about us In our lives It wouldn't Ask The way you did It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't It wouldn't What Don't It would Did It Would It Would I If you did move that fence, just a damn foot. She has recently qualified for National Center for Completed, and tonight she will be doing Reinformative for you on Universe to Teach and Education. Without further ado, welcome. If you're not stuck in a conversation with someone who doesn't speak your language, find yourself speaking slower as a battle-helper-understander. You can start using those coded baseball hand signals that are somehow supposed to get your message across as precisely situations like that continue to fuel the race towards creating a universal speech translation device. Currently available speech translations with technology fall short in a number of important areas. But with companies like Google and Microsoft on board, and a device like Signal popping up, we might soon witness technology once preserved for its science fiction genre enter into reality. Today, we will begin by first understanding why previous attempts at perfecting speech translation have failed. Then we will explore the emergence of new technologies before, finally, concerns and implications both positive and negative. So what exactly is speech translation? Speech translation is a process by which conversational spoken phrases are instantly translated and spoken aloud in a second language. A universal device capable of this has been sought after for centuries, and it believes it holds the potential to completely revolutionize the way people communicate and do business. Now, the concept has been around for decades, but the technology we've seen has never quite measured up to the grandeur of what shows like Star Trek and Doctor Who's theorized being possible. One of the main reasons a Satoshi Nakamura and executive researcher for the National Institute of Information and Communications explained is because currently available speech translation technology and mobile applications continue to lack in one file area the distinction between phrase translation and speech translation. Phrase translation is a process by which conversational phrases are translated by definite words where speech translation necessitates the ability to understand a contextual meaning behind those individual words. Sneagle online in a national article published in September of 2015 explains that ambiguity and syntax remain a significant problem for automated translation tools. Translations that can be used may be comprehensible, though just very, with precisely visibility, to distinguish an contextual meaning individually defined word which emerging technologies aim to achieve in their products. The first no more of the attempt at perfecting speech translation came in the form of from the company known as Speech Gear, the instant translation company. But the problem with their technology was that it was limited to a computer-based interaction which meant it failed at being compact, convenient, and accessible for people to use. Another widely known attempt came in the form of a local application named known as Jubego. Jubego was created by Alex Wayfell, a communications language technology professor at Morrill University in 2009 and while that first only translated between Spanish and English, it eventually evolved to translate between 10 different language pairs. Now, technology like the two I've just stated are available and one similar like it as well, but these products have yet to gain mainstream integration or use in daily lives. So now that we understand a little bit more about the currently lacking technologies behind speech translation, we can consider how companies like Google, Microsoft, and Sigma plan to evolve them. Of course, with the previously science people online international article titled Google's Quest to End the Language Barrier, under the guidance of computer scientists from Germany, Franz Joseph Roth, the company is making significant progress toward the universal translation point. Google is taking a new approach to universal translation and defining dictionary and developing grammatical structures and all the rules that are normally fed into programs trying to mimic humans are a thing of the past. Instead, Google uses existing online translation tools to find matching phrases that already exist that it computes how to best support the new sentence based on the information, when we can expect to see the product remain unclear, but offer first the company's products, progress, and that of a quantum leap for protecting real-time speech translation. But still, Google faces a serious challenge for the competitors of Microsoft. And according to an October of 2013 extreme tech article, the Web Resource for Technology Reviewers, Microsoft research has just unveiled a product that translates your spoken word into that of another while preserving the accent, timbre, and intonation of your actual voice. Most translation technologies require those speaking to take turns speaking into a single device and that really speech and emotion is voice. Microsoft hopes to change this while preserving the voice of the speaker and other patterns of speech which are considered the integral to product communication. The product remains the demo phase, but the release of a YouTube video prompted quite a bit of attention from the public. The device currently works with what Microsoft has found to be the 26th most widely used languages across the globe. But perhaps the most intriguing device to come out of 2013 is a product known as SIGMO. SIGMO is a voice translating tool that rushes its $15,000 in ego vocal by securing more than $250,000 worth of funding prior to its release. According to Gizmag, in August of 2013, SIGMO is a compact square device that can easily harness to either a necklace or a wristwatch. SIGMO uses existing online translation tools to translate from one language back to another and into the original language in real time. It's designed to be the middle man of the equation, but won't require you to interact with your phone to use it. Simply press a button on SIGMO, speak and listen to the translation of speech for you and the person you're trying to communicate with. The compactness and convenience of the device is unparalleled and the first shipment of pre-order devices are set to sale for the end of this year. So now that we know a little bit more about the emerging technologies, let's consider the implications both on positive level and the negative level. Language barriers are often seen as the biggest challenge to communication and to potentially eliminate those in good news for global business. According to infographic tool vision to be in March of 2013, business risks and challenges associated with language barriers will continue to grow as domestic populations become more culturally diverse and global markets become more tightly integrated. Most Americans speak only English and this becomes a significant business problem for companies trying to remain competitive in an increasingly international market place. Speech translation technology is significant in alleviating some of these concerns because it enables speakers of different languages to erase the language by business and cross-cultural exchange, ultimately enhancing mutual understanding, making it that much easier to seal a deal. Now while communication will be simplified on its global scale, it also simplifies communication on a global scale. Sigma was easily transported anywhere, anywhere one needs to go and it's perfect for those who love to travel but keeping on communicating when they have so. Now the concept is incredibly appealing, but it takes a little bit of criticism to understand the negative interpretation. Currently, the most effective way to communicate with someone in a different language is to learn that very language. But what happens when this is no longer the case? The magazine, November 2012, considers this a downfall to universal translation when it is explained that externalizing so much of what we do mentally with computers is making us shallower, cognitively speaking. What happens when we outsource our brains with listening? When a universal translator renders language instruction off sweet, why, if you could clip something onto your shirt, Star Trek style, would you rather actually learn a second language than a computer could take the effort? And in an interview with Jaree Sullivan at CAC Avail, the president of the National Network for Early Language Learning, she references a 2007 Harvard-Axustion study which shows that students who study a foreign language throughout their school days outperform those students who don't study a foreign language in every other subject. This research upholds the notion that learning a second language is in fact an exercise in cognitive problem solving. And we must understand these negative implications because deciding a universal translation tool is something we like to call it. So today, we first explored what exactly a universal speech translation is, then we considered a few emerging technologies before finally exploring the implications of both positive and negative. The coming universal translation tool will forever change the perception that language barriers are at all a problem for communication. So you can stop speaking slowly for those who speak different languages. Please leave the baseball hand signals to the professionals because I promise you look good like this. Or as they call me in America, stop. It has been on the speech and debate team competing for individual events for a conjoined ten-year-old, three and a half years. The list has competed in extemporary ideas in front of your program or in publication and after the speaking of which he present to present tonight. After the speaking is an informative or persuasive speech given with the purpose of entertaining. His speech is on zero weight. This is our list on board. Just the other day, I was taking out the trash when a man with a beard and only one nostril was digging through my trash can. So I ran over to him and he stopped and stared at me. A stare that could be one of two things. First, he was scared to see me. Or two. He was in. Then I noticed his name tag which stated Ragnar. Ragnar Smith. It makes you wonder what one of those names he got accustomed to. So I was like, hey man, get out of my trash can. There we are at the abs. I reached into the receptacle, grabbed at a large, felt like some object that became, started to run towards me. It was then that I said to myself, oh, he's definitely in. Or should I say he did about, as he handed me the article of garbage, last access for Ragnar Smith, a representative of the website, ThinkQuest. I really connected with him. 2016, 2013, which states that Americans on average waste 4.6 pounds of trash per American per day, which only a quarter of which is recycled, which the rest is incinerated with the power of a thousand burning witches, buried with the dead, are thrown in a bin labeled artist. It's all going to be. This issue is consistently addressed by our Do Nothing Congress, to which they do nothing. So today we're going to go over the problems. Congress has some solutions to this detrimental waste issue in America. Quite frankly, I'm tired of wasting American people's time. And as the anti-trash coalition wasted back, wasted back. So I know what you guys are saying. Oh my God, another environmental speech from a state student. I've got to be like, some benefit is like free. That's all right. But the matter is here. I walked up to Ragnar and I was like, I don't think the problem is with me throwing away an apple for it into the trash can. And he's over there leaning up against some fence proceedings and really pretentious group like a pair. It's like the answer is twofold. First, our lands are highly ineffective. Second, there's generally only one waste but all the waste on campus or anywhere. First, according to the Do Something but Wrong Something Congress in 1976, they passed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which completely altered how we dispose of waste today in America. In fact, it paved the way for taking holes in the earth, filling it with waste and layering it with clay or plastic but simply the worst way to dispose of things. You see, Arizona State University published a finding. I know. You surprised me too. They were actually able to go through landfills and find perfectly preserved hot dogs, grapes and even corn of the cob all dating upwards of 25 years ago. Additionally, they were able to find newspapers perfectly legible dating 50 years ago which I'm sure had headlines along the lines of heritage burned at the stake. They're saying organic waste wouldn't bring down a landfills. Second, there's generally only one option to dispose of our waste. But luckily here in Calypso we have three bins so we're going to see just how effective Chico State students are with disposing of things in the right bin. A ruffle bag which is actually just dental waste can which can be recycled for like five cents. And then a holey. I mean excuse me. So I threw an entire banana. It reminds me of the speech I gave four years ago. The fact that the matter is the fact that the matter is that this stuff could be more recycled. But it isn't. It's like a really tart one. Chico State students and faculty. You guys didn't do it. So, you know what really stinks after digging through the trash bin? I'm like, no. But your fingernails. Especially if you don't flip them. Come on Ragnar, what do I look like? I look like I'm wearing a strap like stiff and random body parts like my nipples. So honestly it does depend on how often I flip them. Odds is attributed to first, a design thing can be thrown away. And second, there's little to no incentive to recycle. First, according to the New York Times article, lunch, landfills and what I toss. Not to be confused with the San Francisco community. Those items, especially food items, are designed with the singleness mentality. I think even when you're leaving a drive, you're bound to leave with a paper bag and wax cartons and cups which do not break down in a comfortable cycle. Plastic knives, forks and spoons, that families say, yeah, you shouldn't have ordered those chicken nuggets. Second, there's little to no incentive. See, here in America, it's cool to hate things like wax, gays, to Muslims. Oh, and if you're a black Muslim, a lot. Okay. You have to go out and talk about it. Oh my god. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Oh my god. The only way this current system would ever work is that two-thirds of the strips drove ourselves to the beach and walked right in. You know, we'd have all occupations on it, like a bunch of plumbers. Like, plumb that pipe's better than 66% of those other guys with the wrenches in your pockets and just walked right in. So, yeah, a bunch of other after-dinner speakers, comedians, you know, tumblers and plums, not enough housemakers. It's kicking a can, like, oh, maybe this was funny enough. That's when Raph and I grabbed my face, pulled me in, straight in my eyes, and he said, zero waste. I just don't flatter me. I'm more like a dirty witness. That's the whole idea where nothing is destroyed in every single year he is. First governmental and second societal. First governmental. We can adopt nation-wide a program on the California Reduction Value, what we do with our hands and models. In fact, in fact, according to their website, it states that they have over a 100% reclamation rate. Over 100%, you think they'd be asking? Yes, because bordering states are coming in and taking advantage of it. I know what you're saying. When the hell did Mexico do this mistake? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Second, we can do what Chad W. Bush, very difficult white guy named states, in his article, paying with plastic. We can do what China's doing right now. We can pay out frankly the plastic bottles or cans, which is a marked up improvement over their last program. We can pay for your water bill. We can do this too. Lastly, we can do what the campus is doing right now and have separate bins for compostable recyclables in general ways. Lastly, since I'm not asking you guys to do anything crazy or impossible or change the world. I'm already on my third trial at Rosetta's of Spanish. I am asking for a personal responsibility to throw away things that can't be thrown away or recycled. When it's going to the landfill, we're going to throw away our water, including our land. That's what we thought it would be. So, today we want to follow the cause and the solution to the deconventional ways to do in America. Look, it can't be done overnight, but I'm hoping that you guys can take this knowledge and share it with others. And it means taking that extra step of the problem that can with that bottle or looking on the other side of plastic art and seeing if they are impact recyclable. So, as I held the ragdoll and gathered his things, Police car pulled up and he has promptly arrested for trespassing. A new conduct. Now, even though the story made me a sad one, let's have some good information to be given. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you.