 All right, I've got a bunch of super chat questions. I just want to, I'll do this topic quickly, I think. I posted, let me see if I can find that. I posted something on Twitter that relates to this. It has to do with just the attitudes that we see out there today that exists on all sides today. So if I condemn the police for what they did, and if I imply that there might be racism among the police, and there might even be some institutions that have historically been racist and they're still real damaged from it, so that when I don't completely, completely offhand dismiss the idea of systemic racism, I'm gonna say, well, it's something that needs to be valued and I did a show on that a couple of days ago. But if I complain about police brutality, let's say against blacks, then I'm immediately put into the frame of I'm a leftist and I support the rioters and I support destruction of property. And I'm obviously a bad guy because I believe in this one thing that if you're on the so-called right, you can't believe it. Now, I'm not on the right, I've said this many times, I don't believe the right, left, I think those terms have lost their traditional meaning and we need to move away from them. They're not terms that are worth defending. I'm neither right nor left. I'm a supporter of individual rights and capitalism which today is neither right nor left because neither right nor left support that or even are close to that. The right has completely, completely abandoned those ideas. So if I'm anti-racism in any form and by anybody, well, I must be a rightist. If I'm anti-police brutality and abuse, well, I must be a racist. If I'm anti-Trump, sorry, if I'm anti-police brutality and abuse, I must be a leftist. Anti-racism must be a leftist. If I'm anti-Trump, I must be a leftist. If I'm anti the militarization of police, which we've seen, I must be a leftist. If I'm anti bringing in the, you know, the Marines or the US Army onto the streets of America, I must be a leftist. But then again, if I'm anti Black Lives Matter and their agenda, I must be on the right. And if I'm anti riots, I must not care about human life. I must be a racist and on the right. You can't win. I've told you this many times. People seem to think in twos, there's a left and a right. That's it. And here are the ideas that are associated with the left. And here are the ideas associated with the right. And you have to fit into those boxes, those tribal boxes, and that's it. They can't think of somebody who is actually anti-racism in any form and by anybody. Anti-police brutality and abuse, anti Black Lives Matter and their agenda, anti-Trump, anti-militarization and protest riots, anti-riots, anti bringing in the military. They can't imagine somebody who has all those views that their mind blows up when they think about it. Wait a minute, you have to be in this bucket. You can't have these views. And of course, what unites all of those? What does unite all of those? Anti-racism, anti-police brutality, anti-BLM, anti-Trump, anti-militarization, anti-rights. What unites them all? What is the positive that unites them all? I'm just pro-individual rights. All of those are direct implications of being pro-individual rights, but even on the side of the pro, if you frame these things and are positive, they can't hold it, right? So can you be pro-demonstrators who honestly want to fight racism? And at the same time, be pro-the police who act to protect our rights? Well, you can't be both. The demonstrators that demonstrated the police, so you can't be pro-police. Can you be pro-freedom and capitalism as the ultimate solution to racism and pro-reforms that eliminate victimless crimes? And be pro-the police, the ones who act to protect our rights and pro-demonstrators who honestly want to fight racism? Can you hold all that at the same time? Can we please get away from right versus left and focus on truth? On principle, on justice, on individual rights. Individual rights no longer belong to the right or to the left, they never did, really. Iron man pointed this out. They each wanted to violate individual rights in different ways. Now they're uniting. They both wanted to violate individual rights in almost all ways. There is nobody protecting individual rights in the economic sphere. There's nobody protecting individual rights in the speech sphere. It used to be the left, no more. So, no. So, again, tribal thinking is not thinking. It's being unthinking. It's lacking independence, lacking rationality. It's tribal collectivistic. Gotta step away from that. Gotta step away from that. All right. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, whims, or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of despair, cynicism, and impotence and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist growth. Using the super chat, and I noticed yesterday when I appealed for support for the show, many of you stepped forward and actually supported the show for the first time. So, I'll do it again. Maybe we'll get some more today. If you like what you're hearing, if you appreciate what I'm doing, then I appreciate your support. Those of you who don't yet support the show, please take this opportunity, go to uranbrookshow.com slash support or go to subscribestar.com uranbrookshow and make a kind of a monthly contribution to keep this going. I'm not sure when the next...