 Good morning, Karen. You can leave your camera off at the moment if you like, but we should probably test your sound Oh, there you are. Hi, Kimberly. Good morning. No technical difficulties today. Yay Okay, I'm gonna take a look down our list of panelists for the morning. I want to maybe do some sound checks Let's see here. We have Jeff O'Crepkey this morning. Good morning. Good morning And then we have Karen Weeks who we already said hi to We have Jesus Mckig. You check your sound Jesus. No, I could not unmute, but here I am. Good morning. Okay. Good morning And then Kristen A Kimberly, are we gonna be ready to go at nine? Do you think I think so? Yeah, we've got our feet all set up The YouTube beat is all set up Should be fine Laura, can we test your sound for a moment? Good morning. Good morning And then Kristen A she might have been distracted for a moment, but let's go ahead and see if Kristen A can test her sound Karen, I'm gonna go ahead and take this opening slide down. I'm gonna put the agenda up so everybody can see that Okay, and then are we ready to go? Do you think? Yeah, I think so Hopefully Kristen A will. Oh, there she is Yeah, great. Okay. Okay, so With that I will if everybody's ready I will go ahead and Call the August 18th meeting of the subdivision committee of the city of Santa Rosa to order And I'd like to make the following statement Due to the provisions of the governor's executive orders and 25 and dash 25 dash 20 and then dash 29 dash 20 Which is spend certain requirements of the Brown Act the subdivision committee will be conducting today's meetings in A virtual setting using zoom webinar The committee chair and staff are participating from remote Locations and are practicing appropriate social distancing Members of the public may view and listen to the meeting as noted on the city's website and as noted on the agenda Members of the public wishing to speak during public comment or during our public hearing items Will be able to do so by raising their hand in the zoom meeting and will be given the ability to address the committee And I would also like to introduce commissioner Jeff O'Crapkey Who will be taking over as chair of the subdivision committee with the next meeting? So with that I will go ahead and open the public comment period this meeting This is for items that are not on the agenda today and if you wish to make a comment Please choose the raised hand feature on zoom and make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so If you're dialing in via telephone, please dial star 9 to raise your hand Is there do we See anybody I Okay So with that I will go ahead and close the public hearing. I mean the public comment period. Sorry And then we'll move on to 3.1 public hearing 613 all of street Santa Rosa 9 5407 and Ms. Tumians will Provide the overview Thank you Bear weeks and members of the subdivision committee. This is all of commons. It's a tentative minor tentative map At 613 all of street The project has an approved minor use permit to allow for a small lot subdivision which will allow the division of One lot into two lots and a remainder in order to develop to develop two single family attached units The zoning administrator approved that minor use permit Here is the project site. It's it's a fairly long Long lot in the r318 zoning district Plan designation is medium density residential and as you can see there's a mixture of housing types around the project site It's also in the Roseland specific plan area and That small lot Provision It It's allowed in the multifamily residential district and that's why the zoning administrator approved The small lot subdivision and so the alkan is now asking for the subdivision committee to approve The tentative map here is the site plan showing All the street on the right right side of your screen That front piece where the parking area is is the remainder it will be used for Parking for the units and for guest parking and then the two residential attached units are shown towards the left side of your screen here is the Plot plan for the tentative map as you can see you have lot one lot two those would be the single family attached units and parcel a would be the remainder for Common area for parking the proposed Subdivision is exempt from sequa because it's urban infill and it's also consistent with the roseland specific plan and staff has received the exhibit a from engineering and My understanding is both planning and engineering are agreeable to the conditions and because of that planning and economic development department recommends that The subdivision committee approve the tentative map Staff is available for any comments or questions You may have thank you. That's pretty straightforward Mr. McKee or miss ponds do you have anything you'd like to add to the to this? um Hello I would just want to add one small item And that's that instead of a remainder parcel. It's actually a Common area parcel in the in the front there. It's it's a small technicality That probably i'm the only one that noticed but just want to make that small clarification Thank you. Thank you very much miss ponds. Do you have any? I do not. Thank you. Thank you um Are the do the applicants have any comments? Do you know miss two means? I think they are here. They're available. Yeah, mic robertson the engineer has a okay Mr robertson if you could just state your name for the record and who you're with that would be great Good morning. I'm mic robertson project engineer for all of commons Are you able to hear me? Okay. Yes, we are not sure why my video isn't coming across but It is on um I also asus did pick up on the issue on the comment about not being a remainder that has a different implication on subdivisions And the common area. I just wanted to make one additional comment We certainly have no problems with the With the conditions of approval that have been established but on the exhibit that Chris may put up initially It showed a little sort of a a little eyeball landscape area right in the front middle behind the sidewalk And that was an original plan That did get modified as a result of referring this over to the fire department That was going to be a complication with a landscape that wouldn't allow the Fire truck to enter into the property sufficient to pull their 150-foot hose length to the back of the back unit So they asked that We eliminate that and we had filed. I think it was last February a A revised tentative map that eliminated that little circular or half circle That was intended to be a landscape strip In order to meet the fire safety requirements And fire did confirm back to engineering that they were satisfied with that and um, and I think asus included that in One of the conditions that they had acknowledged that so just um Just a clarification for the committee But thank you. Mr. Robertson. Yes, I believe that that is um condition 66. Is that correct? Let me double check that Sorry again that is correct. That is correct. Okay, great. Thank you very much. Mr. Robertson Okay, so with that um, if there are I will go ahead and open the public hearing on this item If there's anybody who would like to speak on this item, please Raise your hand in zoom and make sure to unmute yourself when asked to do so If you're dialing and be a telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand Doesn't look like there's anybody so I will go ahead and close the public hearing on this item Ms. Hopper did we receive any public comments? I didn't receive any and uh, we can check with Kristen a to see if she received any also Ms. Chumans, did we receive any public comment? Yes, so um under attachments there was public correspondence And um, this was sent when it was going to the zoning administrator for a small lot subdivision So so nothing on this item that we're seeing today. Okay. Great. Thank you so with that we'll go ahead and Call for a vote on this so Mr. McKee I vote I Um, Ms. Chumans I vote I And I vote I so that passes with three eyes And then we'll move on to the next item which is also a public hearing item 3.2 It is um 1434 Peterson Lane in Santa Rosa And once again, Ms. Chumans, you're up Thank you chair weeks. Um, you you may recall that um seeing this at planning commission Several weeks ago. This is um 1434 Peterson Lane They're requesting a parcel map waiver and the planning commission recently voted to recommend by resolution that the city council rezone this residential lot From r19 to r16 to allow for a future Two lot minor subdivision and that would allow the development of a single family residence on each lot This is the parcel located on Peterson Lane And as you can see there's a mixture of parcel sizes the the Zoning district that they requested was compatible with the general plan designation This parcel map waiver Would allow them to subdivide the property into two and it's contingent on the city council adopting an ordinance to Rezone the property to r16 So if if for whatever reason that the city council fails to adopt that ordinance They would no longer be eligible for this parcel map waiver if if it passes so the The If the applicant is successful in securing the rezoning it would allow for lots at six approximately six thousand square feet and this is their proposed Site plan showing two lots over six thousand square feet with covered parking and accessory dwelling units that are attached the rear the project is exempt from sequa It's a urban infill and it's consistent with the general plan Um The rezoning is scheduled in september and Once that secure the applicant can Can complete their certificate of compliance to complete the parcel map waiver. Thank you. Um, Mr. McKee, Ms. Ponds. Do you have any comments on this item? I don't I don't thank you Mm-hmm. Um, I believe the applicant is here if I'm not sure if he has any questions or comments that he'd like to make Uh, if you do mr. Eger, if you could raise your hand You assume Okay, there. I see it Hello, can you hear me? Yes, we can. Thank you, mr. Eger Okay. Um, no, I don't I don't have any special comments. Okay. Thank you So with that, I will go ahead and open the public hearing on this item Um, if you wish to make a comment Please choose to raise hand feature on zoom and make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so If you're dialing and be a telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand So Don't see anybody So with that I will close the public hearing Um and bring it back to the committee Ms. Cummings, could you explain again? And I'm sorry to ask you to do this How the action that planning commission took a couple weeks ago Interacts with this action and why it what couldn't have why it wasn't all done at once so, um, maybe maybe Jesus or Laura could chime in but It's my understanding that a parcel map waiver process is a lot easier to go through than a tentative map And the applicant was interested in pursuing a parcel map waiver rather than a tentative map and with When the um, when the rezoning is final It would make the parcel eligible for a parcel map waiver And I I think it's a parcel map waiver process is a lot easier and less expensive and less time consuming. So correct Okay, thank thank you for that so, um with that unless there are any other comments from the committee will go ahead and um Do the vote On this item. Uh, so miss tummings. How do you vote? I vote I And miss ponds. I think you're on this for a vote I vote I thank you and I vote I So that passes with three eyes and um With that Uh, we will go ahead and adjourn the meeting of the subdivision committee Uh until next time Thank you. Thank you so much everybody