 Okay, so thanks everybody and welcome back. We resume the session and the last session of the day. So this is the regional and sectoral information outreach lab. This is not a cloud, not a code. That is an expert in outreach and science dissemination. She was also working with us during the IPCC and giving us a lot of useful hints for dissemination and also how to speak and present our result. So during the lab there will be two, three people online. Not two, two, and plus nada, so three talks. And maybe Sara you will give the information about the application later at the end. Yes, so because they were asking online the people about the information too. So, okay, so then I leave first the word to nada and then now it's working. So thank you. I'm, I'm not that cool. Outreach manager. Yes, so I'm a communications manager at climate research lab LSE at IPSL and I worked as the outreach manager for working group one for two years. In 2021 and 2022. And we developed a new outreach product regional sectoral fact sheets. So I will present what we have done. Our audience, the content that we wanted to highlight. And so, as it's for the working group one we focused on the physical climate variables and during the two next talks. The colleagues from working group three and two will present their own fact sheets about mitigation and adaptation and impacts. And then Sarah will present two other new products summary for actuaries and the summary for all. So, which audience we actually the audience that we targeted. So we have several audiences. First of all, the high level policymakers and stakeholders. So they don't have a lot of time they need very brief and robust notes, and they may have no scientific background so we need to avoid jargon. For instance, is the practitioners and engineers in companies and the in climate services for instance. So they need more technical information and sometimes they need to access. They need to access to the physical climate data to run their own impact models, for instance. So we have also the scientists who need also to access the data and to the literature. So to know this audience we conducted several surveys. So this, these are some results of one of the surveys. We conducted before preparing the sectoral fact sheets so we had almost 400 participants. There was 30% from the public sector, including 20, more or less 20% from governments. We had 21% from private sector 8% from consultancy 9% from NGOs and 40% from research and more than 180 provided their emails to be contacted for further consultations so we invited them at several steps of the co design of this those fact sheets. To get their feedback. So during this survey we asked them about their needs in terms of climate information climate data. So we have in our assessment report, the list of CDs that are relevant per sector based on the literature but we also asked those participants to select the CDs that they find relevant. So we asked also about the preferred time and special skill, which scenarios do they prefer climate statistics, etc. And so the panel that we had 291 participants were interested in all the sectors and represented all the regions. So here are very brief results I don't show everything because otherwise it would be too long. So they preferred slightly the to present the information by global warming levels, then by time horizon, and then by SSPs for the time scale of interest, the near term was the most preferred one. So we asked also about statistics. They were interested in both mean values and extreme values. The most of them needed the information about uncertainty. And we asked also some questions about how do they wanted to the information to be presented in two page in two pages. Most of them preferred the bullet points instead of paragraphs, and they wanted maps, figures, and also tables. So which content we saw usually the users focus mainly on the summary for policymakers, which is very good. But we wanted them to dig further and to to read the information that is available in the technical summary and the reports that could be useful for their region or for their sector. For instance, we have this table in the technical summary. You showed a similar table in chapter 12 where we have CDs per region and per sub region. We have the observation, the projections, the attribution, the confidence level, etc. We have this table in chapter 12 that represents that you showed as well that represent the CDs that are relevant for sectors. So, the challenge was to select information in only two pages to guide the users through the. So, from the SPM to the technical summary to the chapters to the 40,000 publications that were used to the assessment to, to help them find the information and also we wanted to highlight the interactive Atlas which is a wonderful tool to visualize the data. So, to do this, we wanted to have a co construction process and to be inclusive and to make a large consultation so a lot of authors participated colleagues from the technical support unit and the the Bureau as well. So, working closely with them was important to ensure accuracy and robustness to ensure the traceability to the report. So, some of them are here in the room so I think them, because it was really precious. We have their contributions. We also had a lot of interaction with the stakeholders and practitioners. So we organize several surveys to check the usefulness and the relevance of the information that we selected to check the clarity. We organize its meetings with them per sector. And we had several meetings of the development of the fact sheets, and we had several meetings with colleagues from working group two and three to check the consistency for the working groups. And we had several choices to get an organized set of fact sheets so that the users grab the coherence and so that they find the same information at the same place, but with some flexibility because to respect the specificities of each fact sheet. I will show very briefly on the website. Where what do we can find so you can find on this link, the regional factory so if I show the one dedicated to Africa. So we decided to present first the information that is the same for the whole region for the whole Africa. So these are mostly high confidence statements. And then we decided to present several maps for three global warming levels. So the possibility was up to each region to select for variables that were the most relevant. We made links to the interactive atlas so if you select one of the maps and you click on it so you will open the interactive atlas with the good parameters and then you can select another scenario or to get a specific information to have more information. And so tomorrow, my alien and Lena will show more in details the interactive atlas and you will play with with it, but you can also have information about the data, etc. So these are some functionalities that you could see tomorrow. And so yeah. So this is the first page of the regional fact sheet so you can have the links for further details and the technical summary and the chapters. To get more information and on the second page we, we had, we have boxes per sub region with the two three or four main regional information for each region. And we have so for the regional fact sheets, the continents but also some specific topologies like mountains, oceans, small islands for the region urban areas, etc. And you can also find the list of contributors. If you want to get the names of the specialists who participated in this development of the fact sheets. You can find the fact sheets that are relevant for sectors so here we don't talk about impacts about the sectors impacts for the sectors or the mitigation. We focus on the climatic variables that are relevant. And that we provide the chapters in working group two and three. And we have the same principle of pointing to the interactive Atlas so here you have this representation that provides several information like several CDs that can be expanded in the interactive Atlas. And, and of course, we have the information about where to find more details to to complement the information. So, that's it from my side I. So if you have any question or information, if you want to. I don't know if you have already used the regional fact sheets or the sexual fact sheets if you have any comments comments feedbacks. I just want to augment a little bit I in doing the sectoral fact sheets. I think one of the things that was very fascinating was. So wait, which one, which one do you have on the screen here. Oh good it's agriculture that's what I helped with. So in the in the upper right there you'll see something that you know came from the interactive CID. And one of the fascinating things about doing that was selecting which CIDs we wanted to show and in that sense, the interactive Atlas is pre program to allow up to six different CIDs to be shown in this presentation. And one of the fascinating processes say okay if I can only show 60 IDs to give agricultural people an idea of what's happening in the world. What would they be, and I have to spit my eyes to remember exactly which ones I showed but it's listed right there underneath the hexagon. And it's going to be you know combinations of temperature and rainfall and rarity or drought probably, but we also wanted to make sure that we talked about carbon dioxide. We have them here. There you go. Can you, can you read them out to me what it's the ones. It's the key is on the left where the color hexagon is. We have mean surface temperature frost mean precipitation agricultural ecological drought and relative sea level atmospheric CO2 at surface. Yeah, so these are the types of things that you know if you want to know how agriculture is being affected in different parts of the world. This gives you a rundown so you'll notice that there's you know some hot some cold, some dry, some wet, you know the coastal flooding, you know things like that we're trying to understand more, but it's an interesting exercise if you if you could only show a certain number to your stakeholders what would you shop. Okay, so, otherwise I give the floor to the next talk. I don't have someone online would like to ask a question otherwise I will give the floor to my colleague from working group three. Thanks. Hi. Can you hear me okay. Yes. Sorry, go ahead. I just wanted to make sure you share your screen. Yeah, I'm going to share my screen here shortly. Just got to get the right application. Are you able to see that. Yes. Yeah. Great. Okay, cool. Hi lovely to meet you all. My name is Gourney Louge. You can call me SIGI. I was previously the comms manager for working group three climate mitigation working group at IPCC. So I was heavily involved with developing the sectoral fact sheets on behalf of working group three, as well as a colleague of mine who's actually on the call here, virtually. So I'm going to go through her seizure who's the was the IPCC working group three publications manager, and we've both moved on to different jobs but we remember the fact sheets very fondly. I'll try and go through this presentation relatively swiftly because I know that we're a little behind. So in the background the working the working group three fact sheets were always intended to be sectoral fact sheets based on the structure of our report. And they were the main outreach product for working group three in this assessment cycle at least for the six assessment report. Aside from some some other outreach that we did and some other products that were produced through the secretariat with the video editor or one of the comm specialists there so this was sort of our big project for for working group So as as some background why did we choose to do sectoral fact sheets, I think it's relatively straightforward actually the reasoning behind it. The working group three report if you're familiar with it, which I'm sure many of you are is structured around the sectoral chapters. It has the initial chapters of the report focus on the sort of history of emissions of greenhouse gas emissions there is a number of chapters that focus on the mitigation pathways and looking at those there's then a whole section in the middle of the report the bulk of the middle of the report that's focused on different sectors and mitigation options within those sectors, as well as other important points on not just about mitigation but previous emissions from within from within a sector and linkages with other parts of the report as well as the other working groups, and then finally the end of the report there is a section on things like international cooperation and policy linkages So as part of communicating the working group three report we actually saw the sectors as a really important and easy way to do this. In terms of other parts of the report we didn't get to cover the mitigation pathway section and that's where a lot of the attention of the working group three report already exists. So when we released the report there was significant interest in that topic from the media, as well as civil society, and the general public and so we wanted to focus, not just on that but also on the other important parts and the practical options that are within the report the mitigation options that are available now, and you know where, where further action is needed so that's a bit of background on why we chose the fact sheets. In terms of the, the audience for the working group three report as well I mean nada mentioned helpfully already that policymakers are a key audience for IPCC for working group three that also means policymakers working within particular areas so within particular sectors they might be working in cities. They might be helping to develop city plans or they may be city planners themselves. So basically across all the different sectors there are different types of policymakers, but also in business, and it's not just policymakers who read the reports that IPCC produces, although we do focus the SPM for policymakers it is other groups as well. So we wanted to consider that when we developed these fact sheets. And then we also have significant requests for outreach products and information based on the sectors as well. So in the middle we prepare a fact sheets. Some of them are on screen here. These are the, you can, you can see that, although they're based around the sectors one of our sectors is called demand, which looks at the demand side mitigation options and social aspects of mitigating climate change. And that was still an important topic that we wanted to cover, even though it was not technically a sector. So those are the first four, and then here are the other four as well and I mentioned why we haven't done mitigation pathways yet but I think that's something that could be considered for future outreach products. Maybe by someone else working within the IPCC, or even for the next assessment cycle as well because they're really complex and there's a lot of interest in them. But luckily we have some fantastic graphics already around the mitigation pathways that are in the reports. So there's a lot of outreach that already happens around those. So in terms of developing the fact sheets, this kind of goes along with what Nada was saying or a similar structure, we wanted to make sure that we were covering both the style side and the content side, in terms of producing appealing fact sheets that people would want to look at. So they had to be engaging and enjoyable to look at and you'll see that they're very very different to the way that IPCC products are typically produced. They follow our branding guidelines, but they don't look like a report. You can you could pull it out and you could read it by itself and hopefully understand majority of what's in the fact sheet without needing to have background on the report. We wanted them to be useful for more practical reasons we wanted to be able to repurpose the material for social media for presentations to be able to pull bits out and visually represent key messages from the report. So that's one reason why we've developed them in the way we have. And then we also wanted consistency across the fact sheets. So if you read one, you would understand the structure and be able to read the next one in a similar sort of manner. So you'll see that there are consistent content across the fact sheets as well as the type of style that we've used and the sort of tones that we've used and some of the imagery and visuals as well. So in terms of getting the content together. This was this was tricky because we, we had to pull it out of the chapters and cells, you know the IPCC reports each chapter is many pages in length. So we had to distill the messages from each chapter. And that really helped us to identify the structure for the fact sheets and the common elements across the chapters as well as what was different and where we needed to build in, you know, design ideas for each chapter on the fact sheet. And then we also wanted to have a have a clear narrative for each fact sheet on where the emissions are coming from and what the mitigation options are and that's reflected in the fact sheet which I'm going to break down here in a sec. If you'd like to download them there. They're on the working group three microsite and the link is there. So this is the buildings fact sheets. So just as an example, we highlighted a key message from each from each chapter so that you could sort of get the big picture in one sentence or two sentences is probably more appropriate. And then we had sort of a background on what the share of emissions was for that sector, and what it would look like in terms of getting to net zero or what the sub message was for the chapter so for example for the, for the cities and urban areas chapter that was actually different it wasn't about getting to net zero emissions and cities, it was more sweet of options so really it depended on on the chapter and what the content was. So that we have the mitigation options and there's, there's a visual representation of what those mitigation options are, because we wanted to present a cohesive picture that these things work together. So, yeah, so this is probably one of the more appealing parts of the fact sheet and I think it really nicely demonstrates the different aspects that work together and you can see at the top there. In particular, we've actually demonstrated options in buildings from the design stage to the disposal stage. So it actually reflects the content of the report doesn't just fill this sort of structured boxes that, you know, it doesn't work for a scientific report. And then on the reverse side we had some mitigation options that just don't fit in that happens. We also have across the chapters, typically some common factors around what enables certain mitigation factors to be in mitigation options to be implemented as well as things that are preventing those options from being implemented. And we explore those on the back of the fact sheet. And then finally importantly we have the linkages to other parts of the report, as well as the working group to report so many of the mitigation options had a crossovers in terms of delivering benefits in terms of adaptation as well. So we wanted to highlight those on the on the fact sheet. In terms of the preparation process. I sort of talked a bit about this already. We did a review of the of the chapters to identify the common elements and then we received some feedback from stakeholders, business stakeholders from the International Chamber of Commerce. So we released a an internal survey to their membership base, who provided feedback and these were typically people like chief sustainability officers, people working within corporates, helping to work on mitigation, their mitigation pathways and their decarbonization strategies so they were familiar with the IPCC reports, but perhaps they were trying to communicate what what the options were internally as well as just learning about this information themselves. So there's that factor to consider as well. And that helped us to determine the sort of tone and style of the fact sheets, as well as what we would cover in them so we did pose those questions to them. I haven't included details here because it's very, it's very detailed. But if you have questions about that, you can email me or or poor them. And then finally we had to find skilled designers graphic designers who could work with really complex content and we're really comfortable and motivated to prepare visuals that reflected the feedback of the IPCC and its many authors who were involved in this process, because having accurate visuals that don't misrepresent a topic or a sector or mitigation option is really important. So in terms of the preparation, we pulled those, those key messages out to fit within the sort of structure that we had decided on based on the stakeholder feedback, and our initial drafts are really long many pages in length. But we spent a lot of time approval and I shortening them to make them a digestible. So we had a mood boarding stage with the graphic designers to sort of identify what color options would be appealing and in line with the VCMI branding, as well as what kind of visual elements were best represented each particular topic and how they worked together to develop these things like environments as you can see at the bottom of the demand fact sheet. So the, the section at the bottom was easily the hardest to develop because it was had more interlocking parts and requires more feedback and sort of identifying what would be an accurate representation for the chapter I suppose is the best way to put it. We didn't want to make any little mistakes and you know the reports, the SPM is approved line by line so it's important that the fact sheets itself reflects what is what is signed off in the report. And then finally we provided some design prompts to the graphics team to make sure that you know it reflected that intention and those messages. So with how we prepared them that they were reviewed by all of the authors at the TSU the technical support unit in the IPCC working group three reviewed them for clarity and clarity in terms of the visuals and the text as well. And a lot of the intricacies and language issues were picked up by the authors, and that was an essential part of reviewing the fact sheets as having the authors review them and look at them and make sure that they're, they're okay for public consumption. And finally in terms of distribution, we actually launched them at COP26 in Egypt. We had printed copies but a very limited amount, because we don't need to print off too much stuff now we have the internet, but they were helpful for a lot of the events that we run and they supported a lot of the sectoral events at COP26. They were picked up by a real wide variety of people. And they're now housed on the working group three website which you can, sorry, microsite which you can take a look at if you're interested, and we distributed them as well. Through our newsletter in terms of the distribution of these I think the picture on the right is from Twitter and that kind of reflects what we were really trying to achieve which is the adjustable content that reflects the messages of the report having text on a tweet which is, you know, pretty typical of a lot of the report content that we share. In terms of what we learned for next time, this was a really long process and we would probably aim to build in more review time if we can. We also found that having the design inputs and the final version of the copy the text and the inputs, the information that we're giving to the designers was really important to have in this final version as possible to avoid confusion. So that's more that's more a process lessons learned. And then something else that we might consider which we didn't get round to achieving is considering the interactive aspects would we want to animate some of these in future, which could make even you know social media content or shareable content, and would we like to make the PDFs interactive it's one step we didn't quite get to but if we'd inbuilt it it might have been more cheap. And then finally surveying more audiences I know that nada did this with a bunch of the with the policymakers and I think that's something that we would look into doing next time if we were to do it again. I say we but I don't work for the IPCC anymore so the next working group three people. Thank you so much. You have questions just shoot us an email or find us on LinkedIn. Thanks. Thank you very much. It was very interesting other questions and yes. Okay, thank you for your presentation. I would like to know what the difference between the fact sheets that you produce and policy brief. In that specific case, did you also produce policy brief as communication material. Thank you. Thank you. Go ahead and answer. Thank you for your question. I think that this is quite different to a policy brief it may contain some of the same content but typically a policy brief is written for a group of policymakers that have a particular interest. So IPCC as an organization as a intergovernmental organization works within the UNF triple C process which means majority of the formal presentations that we give up to the national level policymaking teams. So those are through, you know, the official routes like the cop and the subster where we were invited to present the content of the report. So maybe that would be the content of those would be closer to policy brief, and you can find those are those presentations on the UNF triple C website. They're very difficult to find so if you can't find them. Let me know. And in terms of the more sort of national level policymakers I know that many of the authors do outreach with national level policymakers and are required to write policy briefs based on their personal experience as academics and their field but also from the perspective of being an IPCC author and they'll have to pull content out from these reports. So they may use content that would would cross over with the fact sheets. I don't think they're quite detailed enough to be considered a policy brief. So for example if you were speaking to a city level policymaker or a city planner or a group of city planners you would probably need to pull out information that is more relevant to that group and their national or local circumstances and what they're looking to do. So one thing we did in in this assessment cycle is provide some training to to the authors across all of the working groups on engaging with policymakers and they could to they could arrive those policy briefs but in terms of writing them ourselves within the working groups, the TSU's don't do that or haven't done that before. Yeah, I hope that's helpful. Thanks, we have another question. Hi, I want to know if these fact sheets are only in English or if they are in other languages also. Thanks for that question. Currently the fact sheets are only in English. I think it would be certainly possible to have them translated into the official UN languages. And it's something that we were looking at doing. Unfortunately, one of the, one of the things that happens when IPCC cycles and is the technical support unit disappears from one cycle to the next so there's not actually anyone to carry over that work. But it's certainly feedback that I can provide to the secretariat if there's interest. Now for the working group on factories there are some unofficial translations in French for instance, but the translations need. It's a lot of by the authors, the co chairs, etc. Yeah, the translations take a long time to be approved because the people who have the expertise to approve them are incredibly busy already. So if they're coming they will take a while to arrive. So it's a new product. So it wasn't planned to to translate them. So maybe next cycle. If it's included in the official products. We have a question on the online can the fact sheet be used as a tool for prescription of strategies for climate sustainability. Yeah, I'm not sure I'm not sure the fact sheets are prescribing what to do to achieve climate sustainability I think they're providing options for the, the policymakers and the businesses can consider. They provide a holistic sort of overview of the working group three report I think in terms of developing the strategies and the policies and the actions themselves they probably require a bit more consideration, but it gives you a good idea of what is out there and what is available. That's what I would say about it. Yeah. Actually it's an entry point to the report. So we highlight main messages, either by regional bisector and then we invite the users to declare them. Any other more questions. I should be moved to the next talk. Thank you very much. The floor is yours. Hi everyone, and thanks for the introduction nada. It's a pleasure to be joining you. I'm Camilla and a beaver. I'm working as a communications manager with the working group to of the IPCC. And I'll give you a short presentation about our fact sheets. As soon as I find a way to share my presentation here it is. Can you see it well. I don't hear. Yes, we see it. Okay great thanks. So, yes. I will not be speaking that much about the process of designing our fact sheets because in many ways it was similar to the processes that were presented by the working group one and working group three. We didn't enable extensive surveys or focal points, but we benefited a lot from the results of the service and focal focal points that the working group one did. So, what I will show you in my short presentation is what kind of fact sheets you can find what structure and content our target audience and I'll show you a couple of examples from our fact sheets. So just as a quick introduction the working group to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems biodiversity and human communities and assesses also vulnerabilities and capacities of the natural world and human societies to adapt to climate change. Our fact sheets were designed as also as an outreach product just as it was the case in the working one and working group three. And it is a fully traceable to the working group to report on impacts adaptation and vulnerability. And as we designed the fact sheets. We decided to focus on non scientific audience, which is policymakers practitioners civil society media and education representatives. We figured out based on the feedback that we received later that it was actually that fact sheets were actually very useful also for scientific audiences and our authors are using them a lot. Teaching students and young scientists find them extremely helpful. And the idea of the fact sheets is to give an easy access to the key findings distilled from the relevant chapters cross chapter papers, technical summary and the global to regional atlas. So we had the same challenge that mentioned by my colleagues already that the report of the working group to was reviewing about 34,000 scientific papers it has about 3000 pages. So we wanted to make sure that there is a product that gives a very easy access and a snapshot of the key findings. To particular topics. We also decided to make them very short two to three pages and focus on about 10 key messages or key findings for each fact sheet. And in terms of structure they follow the narrative of the summary for policymakers. They do have the same three segments, which include climate change impacts and risks adaptation options and various and climate resilient development, which is a concept, which the working group to is examining and assessing in detail in the report. And I've mentioned that the fact sheets were distilled from from the report, and we launched most of them before or during the approval session together, not not during but after following the approval session together with a final approved report. And after the copy editing and publication, we've reviewed fact sheets and so some of these statements were brought in line with the SPM so it's actually it's taking the bottom text. Pretty much identical to the text in the finally approved and copy edited report. And this slide shows you where you can find it so if you go all mini all three mini sites of the IPCC six assessment report. They are actually pretty identical so if you go to the mini side of our working group to report, you can find it under about, or if you scroll down you can find it here. And this slide shows you the list of the fact sheets that you can find there. So we've produced all together 14 fact sheets. On the website you can find an introduction, which I highly recommend to read before reading the fact sheets because it gives you a very useful information on what kind of information can be found in the fact sheets and introduces the key concepts and terms that the report deals with. And you can also find a list of contributors, the authors and reviewers that were involved in the process. The working group to launched two sets of the reports of the fact sheets. Sorry. One set is regional fact sheets. Those are seven fact sheets that are based on the regional chapters of the working group to report. They include Africa, Asia, Australasia, Central South America, Europe, North America and small islands. And we also produced cross cutting fact sheets, which do not stem from chapters with similar names but rather span over different chapters and cross chapter papers some of the concepts and topics that are relevant. Such as human settlements, biodiversity, mountains, food and water and health. Now let me show you a couple of examples of information that can be found there. So this is the introduction fact sheet. As I said, it introduces the regions that we're dealing with the process of the how the fact sheets were prepared. It shows you the references and how you can work with the references in the fact sheets. Some of the key terms and definitions from our glossary which is the terms that come up very often in the report itself and in the fact sheets, such as climate resilient development, adaptation limits, vulnerability, and we also present very briefly the key scenarios that we are dealing with, such as RCPs and SSPs. This slide shows you an example of a regional fact sheet in this case that Central and South America. And as you can see, it has three main elements that follow the SPM narrative that is climate change impacts and risks adaptation options and barriers and climate and resilient development. So our fact sheet is something that should give you, as I said, very easy access. That's why we try to also use icons and make sure that topics that a practitioner or a civil society representative or a journalist is looking for can easily find. And that's why we use icons and sub topics such as ecosystems, water, food and agriculture in each of the fact sheets that makes it easier to navigate the information that is presented there. And this slide shows you an example of a cross cutting fact sheet. It also has three main elements that I mentioned before, but subtitles are different here. Just because, as I said, the fact sheet is not based on one chapter, but it actually uses information that is mentioned in different chapters and cross chapter papers and pulls out the key information and key findings. Okay, and that's the last slide that you can find more information of course on the mini side that I showed you before. As I'm not working for the IPCC anymore. I do answer questions now. But I guess if you have some follow up questions. It's better to contact the technical support unit or the comms department of the working group to to ask questions. But I'm here to answer them. Thank you very much. Good afternoon. It's afternoon in Nigeria. I don't know if I'm audible. Yes, you are. Okay, thank you very much. Please. I'm looking at it this way. If I want to maybe want to prepare a fact sheet for maybe a short presentation for the government, if one is being asked to do that. I will be preferable to pick up the conclusion and then expand shading with some key points in the body of the project and and presented that way. Would that go for it. I'm not sure I got your question. So, you want to prepare a fact sheet based on the IPCC fact sheets or is it a general question about fact sheet. It's a general question about the fact sheet and not not IPCC fact sheet. Yeah, so so what I was trying to say is that if one is being asked maybe to get a fact sheet prepared for maybe like a presentation for a for government to implement a policy can one just pick up a conclusion from a project and expand that including the key points from the paper. Can that go. That's a good question but I think I'm a wrong person to answer it. And I think in this case you should really think of the target audience which is in your case policy makers and then consider what exactly you want to achieve and then with this fact sheet and either ask them before. Or depending on what you want to achieve just to make. Make it to give it a try and implemented the way you want to do it and then show it and see if it works. Thank you, thank you. Thank you very much. Other questions. Yeah, Alex. Maybe just as a as a follow up have you been able to track these fact sheets and see if they're being downloaded or if you know if they're on bulletin boards at universities or anything like that and he any goes across all the working groups have. Have you been able to measure their success. And that's a very good question. I'm not sure that we do have such statistics. I would have to double check with colleagues because, as I said, I'm not working for the IPCC anymore. But I know of the oral positive feedback from our authors and from the partner organizations that we've been working with. So in terms of the statistics that would be a good, a good thing to look into the same for working group one had some feedback or feedback but we didn't conduct surveys, but we can ask, maybe the colleagues from the it to provide us the attendance figures to look into the reports and see how many person attended those our fact sheets pages. There's another question. I have seen a hand. No. Okay, so, so thank you very much. We can give the floor to Sarah will present other new products. Can everyone hear me okay. Is it okay. And online people hear me okay. Yes, great thank you. Hi everyone. Let me just put this on full screen. So I realized I'm the last talk before you guys get to go home this evening so I'll try and not be super long, and hopefully it'll be a bit engaging for you as well. Yeah, so I'm going to talk, not about fact sheets, but I wanted to highlight a couple of new summaries that we did in this cycle, which were tailored to specific audiences. And I thought it would be nice to kind of present it to you like some lessons learned from my perspective and hopefully give you some tips and guidelines if you want to develop. So I'm never trying to summarize your your research or your work to non academic and things you can think about when I'm when trying to do that. So, this is just showing the reports that came out from the sixth assessment cycle and the two summaries that I'm going to show you is is just focused on the working group one report so that's the physical science basis that, you know, the extreme extreme events, you know, human attribution of global temperature these kinds of top parts of climate change. And so here's the front covers of the two reports so the two summaries we that I was helping with with a summary for actuaries so these are like the insurance industry the reinsurance industry. They are particularly interested in things that cause damage and might affect how they have to evaluate insurances like links to like costs and these kinds of aspects. And then there is the climate change summary for all where we tried to do this aimed at non scientists so people who would be interested in climate change, but do not have like necessarily a scientific background. So, Monday, I think you have your microphone. Is it possible to mute yourself. No, I can do it. Sorry Monday. Okay, sorry about that. So now, so from my, my experiences of doing this, my tips for you when you're wanting to communicate your research is. So we were talking a lot about knowing your audience understanding your audience. I would actually say if you can don't just know your audience like actually design some way to ask them questions and get feedback because that's really valuable for under for you to be able to understand what they're understanding what they find really interesting. Yeah, and they might want to know more details about specific things. If you're planning to do like a summary of your research or trying to present it to someone who may not be in your research field. I would also suggest if it's a written written document to try and include iterations or reviews of your document and getting your audience to be able to provide feedback in that review, because it can be in really enlightening and it will definitely enhance your final product it will be better if you can get them to give you feedback than if you have not been able to ask them for feedback. I would also suggest that you have a mixture of both text communication and display of your, your key messages and visuals because people are different learners you can have visual learners you can have people who just prefer reading and understanding. Some people will purely take messages just from visuals so it's, it's really good to have like a complimentary show of of your results in that sense. Let's go through the three tips and just apply them to the two summary examples that we that I was talking about the summary for actuaries and the summary for all summary for actuaries is always on the top left and summary for all is always in the bottom. So, for the summary for actuaries the IPCC got in contact with an actuarial association, so they're an international, the international association of the association of actuaries, which is a ridiculous name but it's because they are an international group organization that links to national association of actuaries so they are international but links to national ones so there's there's loads of different national level actuary associations, and they have this sort of network that covers across many different regions of the world. So strategically it's a really good organization to engage with because they can disseminate products very widely over a different to different regions. And so, fortunately, they got in contact with us and we decided to do this project with them together. And then for the summary for all. We just wanted to. We wanted to talk to audiences that are interested in science and interesting climate change but don't necessarily have the training. And this came about because we were talking to members in our technical support unit from the operations side, so our incredible well organized human beings that completely make the process runs smoothly, but don't necessarily have information and training about about science. And at the end of the process of working about five years with these people, some of them were saying, we don't actually understand what you're talking about. It was a bit of an eye opener for me to be like well I thought I communicated quite well but if people who I'm working with who work in climate change, don't sort of understand some of the key messages. Then we need to think of a way to help help them understand so we wanted to make sure we could develop something together with them to make it easier to understand. So when it comes to reviewing and if you can get people you know all like the people you know they're in your audience to give you feedback, it will it will really improve your your documents. So I've got a couple of we did. I think it was two reviews for for both of the summaries. We've got some quotes from some of the reviewers from the summary for actuaries on the left and a quote from someone, my cousin from the summary for all on the right. And so we found that the summary for actuaries they were really, they need to know a lot more about like definitions we were taking it for granted that we knew they we thought they, we thought they understood our terminology and we realized actually through this review we were speaking very different languages, and we were using technical acronyms jargon that they were like well what do you mean by that define what that is and, and after one of the reviews we we decided to put in a glossary to try and help them understand. And there was also it was a really good opportunity for them to say this bit we're really interested in can you tell us more do you have more data on this. And this bit. Okay, but it's not it's not the priority for us. And so we were able to then like, change the like the over the overview of the, and like the distribution of the information for the summary for actuaries. So we tailored it and we made it more useful for them to use, which is good for us because it means they're going to disseminate it and tell the people tell their their networks about the IPCC more. And then for the summary for all. We really wanted to do an open call to get more more people involved but we ended up not having enough time so we. We just basically tried to find friends and family members that were not scientists who we knew would give us honest feedback. And this is an example from my cousin that shows if you will definitely get feedback from people who love you, and you know people like teenagers for example. So my friend my cousin said to be honest, if I hadn't committed you committed to you that I would read and provide feedback I'm not sure I would have got past the first page so that helped give me a good rethink about how we should communicate the product. So it really really recommend having some kind of like review or a chance to have feedback. And in terms of how you communicate your, your key messages and using a mixture of texts and visuals can be very useful. This is an example of some of the figures and tables that are in the summary for actuaries you can see here that there are a variety of figures so the one on the left is actually from the summary for policymakers. They found it very useful because it was talking about extreme weather events and how often they occur at one 1.5 degrees warming to degrees warming. So they were really interested in a sort of probability extreme weather event kind of information. But then they actually wanted a lot more detailed and information that wasn't necessarily in the summary for policymakers. So then we started digging out information from other parts of the report that was specifically useful for them. So we have this table actually not a show this a bit it's from the technical summary it's looking at CIDs across different regions they were really interested in these kinds of changes. And in part of the review, they said we want to know more about like storms and extreme like cyclones and these kinds of things and we are we have a figure about that in one of the chapters. So they put in this one halfway through because they were particularly interested in this, this, this phenomena. So it's a wide range of tables and figures that were useful for the for these audiences. And then when it came. Oh yeah, sorry just in terms of other types of information actuaries are very like data driven and they were really interested in the interactive atlas and being giving access to the data. And so we ended up including a lot of information about how you can access data, we gave them a guide of like how to use the interactive atlas. But particularly because that was something that we're interested of. Usually this figure goes around and you can see the data, but it's frozen. And then when it comes to the summary for all, you know, giving these kinds of information to someone who's not a non scientist may not be the best way for them to have take home messages from from climate change. And so we try to balance the figures a bit more. And we in the working group one we have this series of frequently asked questions you can get on the website. And so we use and these are much more about them more educational about giving overviews of what's happening what's changing, and it's explaining why a lot more than just giving like core numerical results. And so we ended up using a lot of the frequently asked question figures in this because it helped us educate and explain why things are happening not just this this is happening by how much. And then we also committed that with him, you will have seen some of these. Veterans talk yesterday, where we tried to be a bit more. Sorry Monday I'm going to meet you again. Do you have a question. Yeah, we then tried to complement it was some with some cartoons that were drawn by Catherine light so who gave a presentation yesterday and you'll see some of the similar similar cartoons that she was showing as well. And it's not just to be a little bit like hearted and it's trying to be a bit engaging but it's also trying to show a bit of a message so this is showing this cat wants to go into the future and see what the world's going to be like so he's found himself a time machine that's that's great. He's like I want to go to 2020 50, 2050 please. And then the scientists cats going well which 2050 is going to depend on the options you're choosing right depends on the actions that we do now and in the coming decades. So you can't just go to 2050 2050, it depends on what you want to do now. So that was the idea behind that. And then actually this comes from a question earlier that was about translations and we've been very fortunate enough to have some volunteers to translate this summary into many different languages, because it's shorter and because it's a bit more clearly simply written it's a bit more easy to understand language and it's been translated into eight languages so far, and so including Arabic Chinese we've got Spanish French, and we also have Hindi and bargain Bengali the first drafts have just come through but that's not uploaded yet. And we're really hoping this will then help to to educate and get more people interested in understanding some of the key facts of climate change. And we might get Ukrainian and we also might get South Korea and if anyone else speaks other languages and you want to help translate you're very welcome to contact me. I think it would be really useful if we could get many many as many languages as possible. Oh, and that's it. If you want to actually read them you can go on the IPCC website go on like the resources tab, and, and then you can, you can download them and see them. But yeah, thank you very much for having me. If you have any questions, we, I guess, otherwise I can do the other just quick comments since you showed the languages first of all super impressive I didn't know is all the way up to eight languages with two more coming. When we wrote up our climatic impact drivers paper one fun thing we did is we we use the IPCC team and asked everybody to define that term in their own language, because it's a very subtle and kind of technical term. I don't have the table right in front of me but you know if you're French the person who wrote that is Robert Votard he's coming tonight. So you can ask him about how he talks about climatic impact drivers in French. And we tried at one point to put like a basic English retranslation like you know you put something into Google translate and then you bring it back and you learn things about how the language is constructed. And it is interesting to see how people have have approached it in in different places in terms of emphasizing, you know impact emphasizing climatic, you know, touch points or whatever it might be so. Yeah, that process of translation is far too often overlooked, and a good translation really really helps. No more questions. Oh, is there anything. Oh God is 10. Sorry. Oh, someone is offering the Turkish that'd be great. And we can email later. Okay. Monday I'll reply to you in the chat after. Yeah, that'd be great. Now if anyone is interested in helping with translation. Just let me know. The only thing is we might need to have a couple of the authors that also speak that language because we have to get it checked by by the scientists as well. But yeah, it would be good. Okay, so maybe we close and then I can just do a couple of things about how to be an author, but I don't maybe Sigi and Camilla don't need to. Okay, so I'll just show you now. So to become an IPCC author. It's quite a structured process. And so essentially you need to be nominated you have to put forward your application through the either your country's focal point. And so you can find your country's focal point on the IPCC website. Yes, I'll just show you. And so if you. Okay, so just type in focal point they're like the contact point, like where any information that the IPCC wants to send out, we have this contact point the focal point and then they're supposed to disseminate it through their networks in that country. So you can find them easily by Googling, and then you can go and it says for a full list available then you can click and it will give the country, the name, and then a contact information almost certainly there is an email. I think there's always an email. There will. There will be a call for nominations or nominations for a specific report, and then there'll be a deadline where country focal points have to submit a list of authors that they nominate and then it gets, they get selected by the IPCC bureau. Another way of being nominated just in case if your focal point is not so responsive or you worry they might not select you for whatever reason, and you can also get nominated through observable organizations. And then if you click on the tab here you can find this there's hundreds of observable organizations. And so if you know one that's like maybe more local to your region or you have contacts with then you can maybe get nominated through through them as well. And then in terms of timing. The IPCC AR six is basically coming to an end in at the end of July. The new AR seven will start basically at the end of July. And they will have a meeting to design which which reports they will do for the next cycle at the end of this year. And once that gets published on the IPCC website you'll know more about the timeline of what reports are going to happen when they're going to happen. And so from that timeline you'll know okay authors are going to be selected roughly this these months. And so then you'll see a call for nominations and that's when you know it's time to try and get yourselves nominated. But yeah some some countries don't do any filtering process they'll just be like oh you've applied will will just submit your application. Other countries do filtering processes you don't actually know if you get submitted or not, but it's up to the individual country. I hope I didn't miss you saying this but a couple of the things you know there's going to be elections for the IPCC are seven leaders around that same July timeframe so there's a lot kind of waiting for the elections to happen. That will be the highest level of IPCC chair and the secretariat and all or the or the vice chairs and things like that, but then also the working groups and one of their earliest task is going to be to lay out whether, and how many special reports there are going to be nominated for nomination to the working groups or if there's some radical restructuring coming on. We will love we will know them but usually when you're nominated you're not nominated for IPCC broadly you're nominated for a specific report or a specific named role that would would be elected. If you're trying to get nominated for one of those very high roles, you probably already needed to talk to your country but as an author team, you know, when you hear that a special report is announced. That's when there might be calls for author submissions. When you when you submit you sort of say oh I'd really like to be for this report I would like to be on chapter one or something because you'll have like an outline of the report. And so you can you nominate to a specific chapter and then you can say do I want to be a coordinating lead author which is like the, there's like only two or three of them per chapter and they're like the big coordinators it's a huge amount of responsibility Alex can tell you. There's a lead author which is known for involved with like coordinating just a section of a chapter and other and some other things as well, but yeah so it's different different roles you can apply for as well. There's also review editors where you don't actually write the report you get involved in looking at the review comments and helping the tapped with responding to that as well. And but they'll basically when it when there's a call you'll get this form and you have to fill it out and show your publications and your expertise. And also if you have more than one nationality and some countries get loads and loads of nominations and other countries don't like if you're from Europe, there's always so many nominations from Europe, but if you have another nationality like I don't know from a different country it's good to be submitted, either through both of them, or from the less represented country, because it actually helps you improve your chances because we have to have a good regional diversity, diversity and regional balance and across the regions of for all the authors. Because, you know, it, no one's going to listen to a report if it's going to be written by or by like American men, like the report has to be written by people from all over the world and represent and have make sure it's a it's more strong and robust then. So, yeah, so that's one of the reasons. I think it would be interesting to also say something about the TSC role. Don't you think you want to know I thought you could be interested we talk about the communication we talk. So maybe being involved is not just the author or the daughter I mean there is a huge amount of roles also in the TSU so I was just thinking maybe it could be interesting to know more. I would be interested to know more. Yeah, I don't know. Well, in terms of the TSU. So, Alex was talking about there's going to be elections for the that we call them the bureau but they're like this. What is TSU technical support unit, it's when Nader and I work and Catherine and Lena and so they are the technical support to help produce, they normally support a working group. And so yeah Alex was saying that they have these elections of the bureau which are like the scientific steering committee at the beginning of every cycle. There's always an author like for the work for each working group, they have two co chairs. There's always one that's from a developed country and there's always one from a developing country, and the developed country co chair has to provide funding funding for the technical support unit. So it's always in the place where the developed country co chair is located. And that's why it always stops at the end of a cycle, because the co chair changes and then it can move to a different place afterwards. And, and so these, these are contracts that run, you know, it can be a couple of years you can be eight years you're working there. And there's a variety of different roles, there's like a normally a science side, where you're helping project manage and do a lot of checking of the, of the reports you're helping to design the process of the, of the chapters, and of the of the entire report you're doing a lot of oversight of, of issues across the report and helping to think about how you're going to build up messages for summary for policymakers is a really interesting role is quite busy. There's an operation side where you're like doing the more logistical side of setting up the meetings, making sure everything's going to run smoothly. And there's also like a sort of communications outreach side, which, which is about yeah, what are these developing these fact sheets working with authors on media training working with authors on developing their key messages. Yeah, all kinds of roles there. I've been working here in the technical spring it for about six and a half years. It's always, it's normally short term contracts but it is the only role in the IPCC where you were actually paid for the work. All the authors of which is mad, but but yeah all the other authors and and everyone else the bureau they're all doing this voluntarily. You'll get your travel and provided for you to go to IPCC meetings but you never get actually a wage to be involved with the IPCC unless you're in the, the TSU and the secretariat because we're full time staff. Yeah, hopefully that's helpful. Maybe we finish now, or any other question. Thank you. So I think that brings us to a close this afternoon. And in that sense I think we're free to go, and we'll be back here tomorrow morning at nine o'clock and who's closer to the agenda and can tell me what what we will be focusing on. I think it's health, right. Health I believe is next so yep enjoy your evening it's it's beautiful out and we'll be back tomorrow morning. Thank you. Yes, thanks madam.