 Good evening everyone and welcome to tonight's meeting Once we get the once we start the meeting I'd ask that the public not Come into the council floor. There's been other instances where people Like to go around and I'd ask that you please don't there is a room in the municipal code. It's just does not permit that Before we start the meeting. I'd like to read to today's quote by our city clerk madam Sue Richards Coming together is a beginning keeping together is progress Working together is success I'll call the 20th regular meeting of the common council order madam clerk, which please call the roll Bowman D-Berg Eberg Serda Davis Graf Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Racky Segali Stefan Susha Van Akron and Vanderweel 16 present Guarans present I'd ask mr. Joe blend our scout master and his troop to lead us and reciting a pledge of legions I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands One nation under God Indivisible with liberty and justice for all Thank You mr. Blend our here we go Next item on the agenda approve of the minutes all the man graph You honor I move that we approve the minutes of the previous common council meeting in the same stand approved has entered on There's motion the second to approve the minutes under discussion There being on all those in favor state I any oppose motion carries minutes stand approved Mayor's appointments Thank You honor stated today's date to the honorable members of the common council pursuant to the requirements of section 7 3-0 of the Wisconsin statutes I herewith submit for your approval the list of nominations for election inspectors for all elections in 2006 The aforementioned section of the law stipulates the manner in which election officials shall be chosen And I tender my appointments as follows to retain as much seniority and experiences as possible while complying with the state law Respectfully submitted Juan Perez mayor and attached I believe all the alderman have Haven't gotten copies of this, but there's a laundry list a long list of Whole workers that the mayor is appointing as As election workers and these appointments are Pursuant to M. City clerk Sue Richards recommendations She picked them all based on her experiences with all the poll workers And that will lie over and here I submit the following appointments for your consideration the joint municipal court advisory committee That mayor Perez Richard Gephardt a representative of the village of Kohler and Municipal judge and municipal court clerk both the ex officio non voting members for terms Expiring 430 06 signed by the mayor I Ask for motion to confirm There's a motion a second under discussion all those in favor state I Any opposed motion carries appointments are confirmed and Sue Dennis to be considered for appointment to the library board to fill the unexpired term of Franchard Barnard whose term expires 430 07 signed by the mayor Thank You turn McLean and this appointment again is an appointment that is made by the school district the school district is The school district is entitled to one representative of the school district And it generally is a superintendent of schools or his or her designee and in this case This is the appointment that the superintendent recommended. I'd ask for motion to confirm There's motion a second under discussion all those in favor state I Any opposed motion carries the appointment is confirmed Thank You attorney McLean Public forum, Madam City Clerk Hey first on the public forum will be Jeff Schucho Jeff if you could come up to the mic and give me your phone address, please And you will have five minutes sir So in citizens and the mayor in regards to bringing in the USS Edson to Sheboygan and Also in regard to some comments that were made on local radio stations WHBL the beacon and the Sheboygan press The draft of the ship from what I understand now will not be too deep for our harbor and if some dredging is required It will not be at the city's expense In fact from what I've heard there will be no expense to the city at all Which I view as a good is a very good thing a win-win situation for the city whose taxpayers have a substantial investment in blue Harbor Concerns were raised about restricted areas and narrow passageways being too hazardous To anyone who hasn't toured the sub-coby on Manitowoc, which is very popular to this day Submarines are the most tight-quartered vessels in the Navy in Comparison a destroyer is spacious Concerns raised about navigation and fog have been addressed and solved even for someone navigating blind into the harbor As a former coast guard auxiliary member, I would endorse having a bow diverter to prevent head-on collisions in fog Maintenance is provided for and this ship just came out of dry dock, which means it is in pristine condition in Fresh water a 20-year hull integrity is not overly optimistic in Conclusion we need to develop our tourism at our lakefront, and I believe it'd be wise for the council to go ahead with this project In so far as that from what I heard at a committee meeting earlier this evening We'd like more information on this project and by voting for it tonight You're not giving a green light go ahead to the whole thing what we're doing is Allowing the people that are looking into this for us To get more information for us Secondly this evening I Gave so I handed out some passouts for a degradation permit to all the common council members the mayor and the city Attorney, which is in regard to some bird problems that we're having in at the lakefront at the land park and also where the kids are playing football at Kiwanis Park and That information is I've received directly from Ben Ben Nelson of the USDA and What that's just to let everyone know is that since I had offered to do this for free for the city now I've got a stick to my promise So we're gonna work out With your permission will work out Some non-lethal tactics that we can employ to rid the city of these birds where they're in problem areas right now And I from what I understand it is getting to be quite a mess. Thank you very much. Thank you, Joe Next on the list would be Jim van Akron Mr. Van Akron could I have your home address, please? 432 Lincoln Avenue Lincoln Avenue. Yes, and you will have five minutes, sir Thank you. Thank you, Mayor Perez and council members for this opportunity to speak I come to you tonight to speak about the library board. I wish to be clear I'm not here to criticize your concerns about Sharon Winkle's contract. I want to talk to you about your relationship with the library board As some of you know my wife Cindy is a board member. I watch with interest your deliberations almost two weeks ago I was struck by the lack of communication between you and the library board. I Think it is important for you to know and for those who have worked with library board members and their families in the past be reminded of Who these individuals are on the library board? The six board members you asked to resign have at least 36 years of experience as volunteers to the library But they have contributed to the community far beyond this Many are lifelong residents of this community all our long-term residents Besides volunteering to serve on the library board these people and their families have worked literally side-by-side With many with you and many community activities They have worked in our schools through our PTO The Sheboygan Public Education Foundation and other school voluntary activities They are volunteers at the John Michael Kohler Art Center the Literacy Council Altruza the Boys and Girls Club Meals on Wheels the Sheboygan Theater Company the Sheboygan Concert Association Theater for Young Audience Maywood and the Salvation Army They are active in their churches serving the needy and shut-ins in our community In short, they are part of the moral ethical and cultural backbone of our community As with you they see community and public service as the honorable and right thing to do Simply speaking these people help make Sheboygan a better place to live by their volunteer activities. I Don't know how many of you were struck as I was by the irony found in the addition of the Sheboygan press The day your action calling for the resignation of the six library members was reported In that same addition a press editorial called for community volunteerism Mayor Perez began the last meeting on January 3rd with this quote If one looks for the best one finds it if one seeks the worst this becomes reality These six individuals you have asked to resign are some of the best Sheboygan has to offer You would do well to rescind your action calling for their resignation and Begin a dialogue with the library board to work cooperatively for the betterment of our community Thank you Thank you, sir Next on the list would be Ernestem Kepler Mr. Kepler, could you give me your home address, please? Yes, 2533 Lakeshore Drive And you will have five minutes. Thank you I'm not here to be Jim unfortunately. I have a different view I am here tonight as president of the Sheboygan County Taxpayers Alliance on Tuesday December 27 2005 our organization made a formal presentation to Mayor Perez Regarding the alleged legal contract for the meet public library director Which was approved by a six to four vote by the meet public library board of trustees We are all aware the issue was brought to this Common Council on January 3 2006 and that the council passed a resolution Asking for the resignation of the six library trustees who voted in favor of granting the contract submitted by the meet public library director Furthermore, there was a new news conference held last week Thursday, January 12 2006 in this very chamber By the mayor and the library director The news conference did not address the issue of voluntary Resignations or ultimate dismissal of the six meet public library board of trustees who voted in favor of said contract the conference Did not sway public opinion the Sheboygan County Taxpayers Alliance the news media and the citizens of Sheboygan Requiring you the Common Council to take appropriate action to remove library board Trustees from office that have acted inappropriately This issue will not go away. Thank you Thank you, sir And last on the list would be Carter Paul us Carter, could you give me your home address, please? Yes 414 Erie Avenue, and you will have five minutes, sir Thank you, and thank you your honor for the opportunity to speak tonight January 12th events at City Hall while enlightening Have not solved the initial problem of accountability and fiscal responsibility of the liberty of the library trustees as A friend said it doesn't pass the smell test The day's events only showed the fiscally Irresponsible at the library just blinked first to open up an alleged illegal contract pursuant to state statute Does not correct the issue What part of the word illegal does anyone not understand and Why after a month do we not have a definitive answer from our city attorney? What are we paying him almost $90,000 a year for are there any other questions? 1 Decades of apparent legally incorrect appointments of library trustees Leading to invalid decisions to questions of legally required visits of finance by the library trustees three questions of legal financial reporting by the library trustees for Questions of legal reporting to and through the city clerk by the library trustees five questions of the library trustees not seeing to it the finance director's office actually sees Verifies approves and pays the bills called for in law if there were a Prosecutor and or grand jury assembling this information the litany of potential charges might grow more the accountability of this entire issue With the library trustees will not go away Until the citizens are being served properly the windstorm of suspicion is running wild and With a fresh start the bright sunshine of truth and clarity of purpose can take over completely The Common Council has taken only the first step in asking for resignations with 25 candidates running for office the largest ever To satisfaction of performance by most in this government is Reaching new highs We're sick and tired of gutless responses It is time for another house cleaning and you can start with the library trustee board Thank you very much. Thank you, sir Catch my breath there a little bit On another note, we're gonna move on I'd like to inform the council and the public of a couple of initiatives that I am bringing forth One is the clean city initiative that the shabuagan press got a little bit ahead of me Saturday and Announce that I was going to unveil a plan Well, I'm not prepared yet to unveil the plan But I am prepared to tell you what we're looking into and what we're looking into is trying to address the Problem of garbage that keeps popping up in our main corridors and in other areas of our community And it's become a problem that to the point where more and more people are calling my office and I believe more and more people are calling the the older persons and Voicing their concerns. So it's a it's at a point now where we need to take a look at this problem and deal with it head-on and By all means I intend to do that one of the steps that we're going to take for us is to Analyze the existing ordinance. That's an effect that we have been enforcing I Believe the ordinance needs to be looked at a little bit carefully to see if there's other things that we can do in conjunction with the ordinance and the approach it will be taken is formulating and enforcing more of Internal policy than an ordinance and do it in conjunction with that ordinance that is in existence the people who will be involved of course is the mayor's office inspections and Public Works Department and I believe in some instances as we discussed this morning during my staff meeting The police department and the fire department. I also have been assured by some members of the Landlords Association that I have their support and they believe in the same things we believe in and that is to keep our city clean and So that people can enjoy Their homes and their neighborhoods. It's a it's a it's a problem I think that it's going to make a lot of people upset with me I understand that when I became mayor eight and a half months ago You believe I was going to say eight and a half nine years ago Months ago feels that way When I became mayor, I was I was kingly aware I was kingly aware that my critics my political enemies and sometimes the chronic complainers We're going to come after me and scrutinize everything I did and I tell you what I expect that because that keeps me strong It keeps me online and keeps me up on top of things So when I come up with this plan and introduce it to the council further review It may not be necessarily for your pool, but so that you can be a prize of it I hope that I have your support because you will have people that are going to be calling you and telling you City is being unfair and they're sending me a five hundred dollar bill or six hundred dollar bill all for just one Couch that I had on the curb or one couch. I had next to my door But the policy is going to be implemented and put together is going to be very clear very specific Very procedural and Pete there's not going to be any room for somebody to misunderstand that Along with that there's going to be a either a 60-day or a 90-day grace period We will let the public know via the paper and radio and however else we are able to perhaps the Our website and let people know this is a policy This is what's expected of you and in three months if you haven't cleaned up your act We're going to implement it and I think most of the public will support us in that effort So I asked for for your support also What we've done since Friday is the complaint form for anyone who would like to file a complaint against a neighbor That has garbage or someone that has garbage in their yard has been there for a long time They are able to access that complaint form on our website if they hit the inspections department So that that form is available now okay Moving along with the city with the county city cost savings initiative. This is a again an effort to bring together the counterparts and the city and the county and we're also thinking of inviting Kohler Plymouth Sheboygan Falls so that they can meet together and we're thinking of doing it in the form of a Forum where they can meet together for several hours just the counterparts and talk about what it is that they exactly do every day Talk about efficiency cost effectiveness talk about job titles job Responsibilities, what is it that they do every day that benefits us the taxpayers? But that perhaps we could be doing a little bit different and look for opportunity to improve that service and perhaps save money to the taxpayer and that's a whole thrust behind this county city initiative it takes Shared services a little further now one of the things we're going to find out is that we're already doing a lot of Sharing of services and a lot of sharing of the cost We're going to find that out. I'm pretty I'm pretty confident of that But when I shared it with our staff meeting today I also understood that there's some areas that already being worked on there weren't been worked on before that perhaps now This might create a little bit more of an impetus to get it going in that direction And I really believe we're going to find areas old pockets And what we do that perhaps we should be zeroing in and looking at a little bit closer to see if we can save the taxpayer money so again, I'd ask for for your support and you will probably hear a little bit about this in The community and if there's any questions just direct them to my office or if you feel comfortable in answering the questions, please do Thank you The next item on the agenda is we have four hearings Number one for the proposed assessments for resurfacing of high Avenue from South 7th Street to South 12th Street Second being for the proposed assessments for resurfacing of New Jersey Avenue from South 15th to the railroad and The third one for the proposed assessments for resurfacing of Union Avenue from South 11th Street to South Business Drive and The fourth one for the proposed assessments for repaving of North 8th Street from Michigan Avenue to Ontario Avenue There are four separate hearings on resurfacing and paving streets. Is there anyone that would like to address Council on any specific Hearing either be one two or three or four Is there anyone that would like to address the council? Is there anyone that would like to address the council? Madam, please And would you please tell us which one you're referring you will be addressing us? Hi, good evening. Thank you. You married a fellow councilman and elder woman and elder man I'm referencing actually two of them. Could you please excuse me? Could you give me your name, please? Sure? My name is Miriam Schner Miriam. It's mi r. I am Sgh and you are that's correct and your address Miriam. It's 44 17 Lafayette Drive And which two are you looking at? I'm looking at number two And I'm also looking at number three. Okay. Thank you my purpose of just coming here is I did get informed I did call some some of the staff members here from the city and I do understand that we do have to pay What's what we really owe to if we have to pay for our curbs and and our streets to maintain? I I own some of these properties that that are in this area The one thing that just does concern me is the amount I don't mind paying my taxes. I do know what it goes for. I was informed that most of our taxes go for like plowing Staff anything that really the city runs off of and I completely understand that my point is is when we have a section of our lot in front of it and you're measuring it off and I Don't have the sheet in front of me. Excuse me, but I believe it's like $40 per square foot a Lot of that with the curbs When we do a lot of snow plowing it does get a little bit damaged the one in particular I'm really looking at as New Jersey Avenue, for example a lot of heavy traffic goes on there There we have the malt factory in front and we have Probably about two three blocks full of good good amount of residential If you ever sit out there, which I did in several occasions There's a lot of heavy trucks that go down there from the city There's a lot of heavy equipment that goes down there all constantly My point is is that I don't mind paying for it, but I guess on the scope of it's a very busy street It's not your regular street of like Clara Avenue. It's not your regular street of I Don't know Kentucky. I used to live on Kentucky Avenue. We had no really huge significant traffic The other one that I'm addressing here is Union Avenue. They're two very busy streets grant that I'm gonna admit my My property levels. I mean that the amount that it could probably be worth is not a whole lot because it's not A really busy street, and then I look at my taxes not bad. I'm not gonna complain, but then I look at this. Well It's a little hard to swallow when you look at your taxes. How much you really, you know, how much your property is worth I guess maybe I just want to know why it's not really maybe divided out I mean amongst a lot of people we all use these roads. They're very busy heavy traffic roads and I guess that's really the only question I do have is Could we split it up a little bit more? Is there any other options? I did see three options on there can have it rolled onto your tax bill You can make payments or you can make it in one lump sum and I guess I just maybe want to be a little bit more informed That's why I came tonight Thank you Tom is there anything you'd like do you need to address now or can we address that later? It's up to you That the city already picks up half the cost of the resurfacing or reconstruction Proper one side pays for one fourth on the across the street pays for one fourth the city pays for half So half the costs are being Spread out to the rest of the city to take into consideration that the traffic on the streets Well, then if something's done new for the first time, that's a hundred percent Property owner cost after that for any maintenance Reservicing or reconstruction that's split 50-50 with the property owners in the city Okay Thank you. Is there anyone else that would like to address? Yes, sir Please tell us which one you're addressing 16 to 16 Bell Avenue Which hearing are you? I don't have a hearing. Oh, I'm just about the streets. I heard about the streets No, this is where we're having four hearings that are being resurfaced. Yeah, that's the problem. I'm having over there Pardon me. That's the problem. I'm having over there. I called the city development and I haven't come over and check out the streets Is Tom is this part of the what is your address against on Bell Avenue? Yeah Okay, this is not this is not part of the hearings that we're discussing right now Okay, if you'd like to come up though at the next council meeting you could speak at the public forum that would be wonderful Okay Is there anyone else that would like to address a council? Is there anyone else that would like to address the council on those four hearings? Is there anyone else that would like to address the council? There being no more All in the graph. Thank you, Your Honor. I'd move that the hearings be closed There's a motion to close hearings. Is there a second second any discussion? There being none all those in favor state I any opposed motion carries hearings are closed I Don't mind bird Yes, thank you, Your Honor. What I'd like to do now is pull 2064 from the marina and harbor committee That's the document that deals with Establish a contingency lease between the city and the Windsor group USS Edson, I'd also like to move to open the floor to Captain Caswell and His assorted group should any questions come from council floor I think we need a motion to either accept and adopt or first before Accept the report a committee and put the resolution on a second. Okay under discussion Good. It's under discussion We've I think had a two input sessions And a very active group tonight I think it's of interest that when you polled the Individuals who were there no one came out as being patently opposed to the Edson being docked if there were issues that were Brought forward it was more a matter of not all questions had been answered at this time And I think a reasonable proportion of the group that also felt that time was somewhat of the essence So that we should move ahead with the lease passage at this time Essentially takes the form of a handshake between Windsor at the city It does not bind Windsor to produce a boat in the harbor by a certain time Nor does it bind the city unconditionally to take it or leave it terms of the lease will Negotiate many of those areas yet to be determined From listening to the line of questioning it appeared that many of the questions were valid But could not legitimately be answered because that would require Windsor to spend money and They are reluctant to spend money unless they have some kind of assurance that we are involved in a process of negotiation I guess if I were to characterize this it's like negotiating a prenuptial Relationship or a prenuptial agreement our ability to Negotiate successfully the prenuptial agreement may or may not end up in a marriage and I think to some degree That's the state at which we're at a lot of comments were had I think The comments that I've received some of them were answerable. I think you find that people who are for it Look to the economic benefit that we will enjoy from tourism The individuals who are in the middle are really looking for more information And the people at that call were against it have I think a concern I really can't answer a lot of people think old naval vessels are just ugly And I don't think there's much of anything that we can do to deal with that perception of something being ugly or not But with that in mind the feeling of the committee was to recommend it to the council for passage Thank you. Thank you on burn all of them on the segali Thank You mr. Mayor But the comment on you old naval ships looking ugly. I have to say again that I got the opportunity To look at the Turner joy in brampton, Washington. Let me tell you that ship was gorgeous I mean that was just such an eye-opener when you went down to their lakefront And that ship was there if you couldn't be more prouder of being in America and have been in the United States of America And of the United States Navy, let me tell you there's nothing like it that ship was absolutely beautiful And I think that the answer will be just as beautiful in the city of Sheboygan That's just how I feel. Thank you. Thank you all miss a galley all of them on retake Thank You mr. Mayor I would move that we refer these documents to the plan commission the redevelopment authority Transcendent finance so we can study these a little bit more. I'm not saying yes. I'm not saying no Two weeks is not going to stall the process that much It's just a matter of this there's much more information that I'd like to know Will this fit into the plans of the South pier district? I mean those are answers that would come from those authorities across the street Excuse me is there a second to them excuse me Alderman Racky. Could you please list the committees again for me? Planning transit and finance. Thank you And the reasoning being transit could take a look at the parking issues down there There's 80 parking stalls down there in the circle And those parking stalls in the summertime are many times filled up with fishermen that come to Sheboygan the same thing in Mind from out of the city to stay here spend their dollars here and go fishing here off the South breakwall Now we have to take a look at where's the nearest public parking lot which is three blocks away from that How is that going to impact they're talking about trolley service and things? Let's take a look at that What's see what's gonna happen there would transit need to start running extra buses and things down there? These are all questions that need to be answered before I think we should start entering into any type of agreement to go Any further with this until we know are we prepared to take something like this on thank you Thank you. Just as a reminder of the motion refer Takes precedence. It is debatable requires a majority vote Alderman D. Burr. Thank you your honor Do anything we're doing tonight is? Giving permission to start negotiating now the hands of the council aren't tied that if during the negotiations It doesn't look good for the city. We just stopped negotiations and Alderman Ratke was talking about maybe the depth of the harbor and things like that one thing during negotiations if they could maybe Bring up the idea of making us moving that Ship over to the north pier where the water is deeper where you wouldn't have to worry about dredging at all Thank you. Thank you. Oh, Albert Alderman graph Thank You your honor As was pointed out, but what this document asks for is permission to start negotiating to be able to With Winster accomplish or having a winster accomplish the following completing a successful feasibility study of the Sheboygan site securing all requirement governmental approvals and raising all required funds to do this now We can still send this document back to those various committees But I think tonight we have to give the go-ahead to this group to look at these things and to start their planning Because as many of you read in the paper There is another community looking at this and if this community gets the approval There's a time frame of six months Which we the city of Sheboygan if we want to still do anything with this and if winster still wants to do something with it they have six months to look at this and Do whatever they need to in order to get this ship here if you don't want the ship here then Don't vote for this, but I think the majority of us want the ship here And I think we need to take a baby step forward as many times we talk about and I'm and start this negotiation Thank you old one drop old man sushi Thank You mr. Mayor I'm part of the marina committee and The wins a group I believe first approached the marina committee. I believe it was last August So we've heard multiple presentations from this organization in regards to bringing the boat in and I think one of the key pieces of Information that they failed to convey to us up until very recently was how close this other city of Michigan the Sagan off Slash Bay City area how close they are to actually securing their boat they have been working on bringing a boat to that area for the past nine years and They are one signature away from from the Navy the Navy just has to sign off on this and then That will give a six month window where any other city in the country that be interested in docking this boat they can submit an application and They're just one signature away. We don't have council approval. We don't have DNR approval We don't have a lot of approvals they're missing and my concern here is that number one that they weren't honest and truthful and up front I don't like this because I feel that we're at a point now where it's being hurry up rush it through It's kind of being shoved down our throat like we must move on because we're in competition And that's the word that was used in the written definition from this group is that we are in competition with Saginaw for this particular vessel Now in their defense they have a maritime museum and they have a history of a community They have five companies in the past that have built boats of this nature So you can see that it would be a nice fit for them to have this type of vessel docked in their city and The way it looks to me is that we're trying to steal this away from them and I don't think that's fair For for us to do that to them because they've worked on this actually longer than we are I if we're going to bring a vessel and I think that perhaps it should be a different one The purpose of passing this resolution and this was brought up in the marina committee tonight was it's There was a situation given where if we give them the green light tonight and they meet all of the Parameters that are listed and they are pretty restrictive parameters that they have to meet And then it comes back to the committee and then at that time if we say no, we're not interested Well now we've wasted a lot of their time a lot of our time and a lot of their money that they have to raise So really the question on this there is a lot of weight on this resolution that's in front of us and the question really is is are we seriously interested in this project and I have to agree with alderman Radke that this needs to be referred to the redevelopment authority Because one of the things that came out of today's meeting is that at parts of this boat are going to be six stories high and If somebody came to the redevelopment authority and said I want to build a structure That's going to be you know three four five six stories high right along the south pier and I wanted to run for 400 feet Do you think that's a good idea? I have a feeling the redevelopment authority would probably shoot them down saying that's not in Their master plan. I mean six stories I mean that's as big as the the largest skyscraper we have in town And now you're going to put it right on the lakefront and obstruct the view from a lot of Constituents in my district who have been calling and saying that they don't want this So that is a definite concern of mine A couple other things that came up that don't quite add up One of them being the 80,000 Tourists that they believe they can track attract They will only be open primarily full-time during the during the summer months Then only weekends probably during the winter months and when you look at you know an eight-hour day How many tourists would that be? I was doing some math and I come up with the projection of 336 tourists a day which would be 42 people an hour for every single hour of the year that they would be open and As we were just talking about the limited number of parking spots that are in that circular area at the end of south pier You know I am concerned about the fishermen the people that actually are paying the taxes in this community How where are they going to park and things like that well the answer that we're being given is that? the Windsor group would shuttle people from the remote lots that are on the south pier and Shuttle them over so they can tour the boat Well my question is is what if the fishermen want to go fishing and they've got all their gear and their fishing rods You know are we supposed to tell them to go park in a remote lot to get on a shuttle bus? So then they can be shuttled to the south pier so they can go fishing and then vice versa What happens with all the dead fish that they want to take on the shuttle? I mean some of these ideas just are not meshing and I Think that we need to send this to parking in transit so they can seriously look at the parking Issues down there and if this would be a feasible feasible situation Because if we have issues with the parking or with the height of this vessel we need to give them This information we can't just green-stamp this because they're talking about raising about a hundred and twenty five to two hundred thousand dollars Just to get this initial process rolling and it's not fair to them to mislead them and by postponing it two weeks Just so we can gather a little more information. I don't think he's going to hurt anybody unless We're trying to just you know jam this down the throats of the citizens, and I don't think that's what we are intending on doing Thank you Berg Eberg. Yes, this is on The refer Personally, I think it's a good idea now I think it will probably continue to be a good idea in two weeks and I am amazed at your optimism that in government things like this can be done in two weeks. I had the problem I have is How long do we keep? If you would put pushing things like this off and you can I think we can Look to have assurances for the protection of the city and the taxpayers What you've asked for can certainly be done and should be done and needs to be done as part of the agreement Anytime we do a development Agreement we certainly will be talking to redevelopment authority in order to answer many of the questions My expectation is that the Windsor group will not have the answers on the tip of their fingers They will have to go to the marketplace and pay for those kinds of answers I think they made the point then in order for them to begin fund raising They at least need to have the decision of this council to begin the negotiation processes So I think if we begin negotiations I think that again we can put in those kinds of safeguards that will protect the city and Allow the process to go forward through the governmental approval authority Thank you all my bird all the money drop thank you, and again regarding the The motion to send this to the four committees If you look at the document there again, it says completing a successful feasibility study Feasibility study part of that is talking to the various committees and getting the various government approvals We the city of Sheboygan the Common Council here the mayor's office and so forth are the government They have to get our approval for this too. So some of that can be done while we're negotiating this contract So I will not support sending it to various committees until after we get it approved Thank you all my girl all women at the second time on referral. Thank you, your honor Maybe attorney McClain you can explain this to me maybe a little bit better. It sounds to me like what we're doing here Is we're opening up and saying go for it feasibility study. You've got to do it What about a feasibility study for the city of Sheboygan all too often this city and this council's has said to the people We're gonna do this and we don't care that's happened too often Then we said no we're not going to do things what's two weeks going to hurt anybody and during the two-week period Is it possible if we pass this ordinance? Can we still negotiate? Well the committees have these in hand to take a look at this the committees are there to do our homework We're not here in this council floor to do the work here tonight The committees are set up to do that work just you know So none of us have to go to all these different places and get this answers They all have their areas of expertise to report back to us So why not let them have their shot and can you negotiate while they're doing that attorney McClain? Turn the clean I Believe the the intent here is the way I read it the result of the negotiations will be a lease subject to accomplishing the following so We're talking about authorizing negotiations Which you know, there's a lot of issues that I see you know if If I draft the lease I want to know what what the term of the lease is how long it is What the costs are you know, there's a lot of things that aren't addressed here that will need to be addressed, but that's What the document is? Authorizing is the start of that process Not the end of the process It authorizes negotiations the result will be a lease that In the be it further resolved says any agreement negotiated is contingent upon approval by the Common Council, so This this lease that's Negotiated would be a draft that would have to come back to the council and through the council process to get approved That approval there is and that lease is still going to be subject to This group accomplishing all the require raising the required funds and so forth. So I see it is still a pretty long way out before both parties are to the point where We've got a lease that no longer has any contingencies So, you know, I think it's up to the council obviously as to how you want to proceed with the process And I I don't know if that answers your question or not. Oh well this this Piece of paper in front of us says the result of negotiations will be at least subject to wins Accomplishing the following completing a successful feasibility study securing all required government approvals raising all required funds There's nothing in here about the city side of it so can we amend this to say Also, the city accomplishing the approval of all the various committees needed to so we have ourselves And out of this they have a feasibility study if it doesn't work out there out But there's nothing you're in that says the city can't get out of it Well, if you're asking me the question this does not Authorize someone to sign any anything this doesn't sign it authorize a lease to be executed It just authorizes a lease to be negotiated and drafted and brought back to the council That how can we how can we negotiate a lease? With a group of people when we ourselves don't have all the answers to this thing And this gives them an easy out if they're they're successful. They don't successfully complete a feasibility study That's for them. What about us? There's nothing in here that addresses the city of Sheboygan What can we put in here that would address the city of Sheboygan's interest in this negotiation? Well, you can put anything you want in here You could put that the result on a negotiation will be a five-year lease be a ten-year lease be a hundred-year lease it'll be No cost to the city. There's there's a lot of things you could put in here If that's what the council wishes to do I'd like to see something in here that allows the city if it's not feasible on our right after these four committees I'd like it to go through says this is not a good fit for the city that we can just cut the whole project right there That's what I'm looking for Because they have an easy out again. We have nothing in here We're getting to that. Yes Referrals amendable. Yes, it is referral is amendable your point of order relates to I didn't read the document that closely and I just pulled the Minutes of the marina committee. I would add that the marina committee minutes from January 4th Are have not been approved by the marina committee, but I think to address Alderman Radke's concerns I have a Renee sushi move John roadie seconded that to amend the resolution is followed a second be it resolved to be added to read Be it further resolved any agreement negotiated is contingent upon approval by the common council that motion passed unanimously And somewhere in the typing that did not It's it is it is Yes It's the last year for the resolved old man bird Thank you all one bird. We've got Alman rec you were here done sir. Yes, sir. It was second time on the referral We have all of the sushi next Second time. Thank you, mr. Mayor I just forgot to mention before in regards to why this should be sent over to the finance committee You know, we always say that this is coming in and there won't be any cost to the city Well, there was a cost identified and the question went on answered at the public input session Right now we're trying to authorize that there be an attorney involved in drafting a lease and the question came up Who will pay the attorney fees for the lease that's going to be negotiated if you remember the blue Harbor situation we wound up with a bill of approximately three hundred fifty thousand dollars and I think this is something that we need to look at Before we move ahead because we can't be spending money when we were told that this is going to cost us nothing That means zero so I think we need to tow the line on this one And that's why I think it should be referred to finance for discussion of how we're going to pay for the lease Thank you Thank you, and I was going to follow up the point of order from Alderman bird Regarding the substitute of the resolution, which is what we're acting on which is asked to be referred Excuse me right now has the bottom line in there of any agreement negotiated is contingent upon approval by the Common Council So it's in there what? Alvin Matthews looking at that point addresses his concern that the city wasn't being involved But the referral the motion to refer still stands And I if we're going to call the role I just like to say that I I took the approach with this venture As a neutral person. I wasn't either for it and I wasn't either against it I was willing to give everybody the opportunity to have their say so I Don't feel everybody has had the opportunity to have their say so I did not realize that this thing was going to come To a head on and say you need to approve it tonight to move on That turns me off. We've made mistakes before when we rushed through things Comes back and bites us. It's the only thing that I'm concerned about is that perhaps we're rushing through things a little bit too fast And when that happens need to stop slow down take another look at it The council wants to proceed you're free to do that. I will not support that But if you want to do that you can do so by a majority vote, but you're not gonna have my vote I'll tell you that Please call the road for referral only. This is referral to the four committees. Yes. Yes Please okay I'm sorry So all of them you need to ask for the floor are you asking for the forward where I take a vote Yeah, all of her. Did you need a clarification just explain? We're voting on right now is we're voting on the referral The motion to refer to city plan redevelopment finance and transit. That's what we're voting on right now And I vote would be to refer Bowman Dberg Eberg Serta Davis Graf Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Segali Excuse me Stefan Susha Van Akron I'm sorry. Thank you and Vander wheel Mm-hmm Four eyes 12 nose ocean fells the motion on the floor now is to put the resolution upon its passage and pass the substitute resolution Was there any further discussion on that? Otherwise, we will call the roll This is to pass the substitute resolution Dberg Excuse me Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Segali Stefan Susha Van Akron Vander wheel and bowman 12 eyes four nose motion carries going back to consent agenda by items 21 20 dash 1 to do 20 24 all we drop Thank you your honor, I would move that All those RO's in 20 20 dash 1 to 20 dash 24 Be accepted and placed on file or we are seized be accepted and adopted We pass the resolutions and the general ordinance sir second Motion being made and seconded all women Segali Thank You mr. Mayor. I would like 20 dash 0 3 to be pulled and referred to law and licensing committee please. That's fine. We will do that element. Thank you very much anything else Okay, it'll be items 20 dash 1 20 dash 24 except 20 dash 3 referred back Please call Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Segali I Stefan Susha Van Akron Vander wheel Bowman and D. Berg 16 eyes motion carries communications and petitions 2025 through 20 27 to be referred report of officers to 2028 through 2044 to be referred Resolutions introduced three 2045 by Alderman Bowman authorizing the mayor's international committee to apply for and obtain a temporary restaurant permit for the committee sponsored taste of Sheboygan County Schedule for March 5th 206 at the Armory Alderman Bowman I thank you, your honor. I've moved that the resolution be put upon its passage There's a motion to second under discussion sir under discussion your honor We do recoup 100% of this license fee and it's from the participating vendors that anyone wishes to know Any further discussion? There being on please call the roll Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Segali Stefan Susha Van Akron Vander wheel Bowman D. Berg and Eberg 16 eyes motion carries 2046 by Alderman Bowman authorizing executing an agreement with the American transmission company LLC for relocation of certain Utility facilities Alderman Bowman. We need a motion to suspend first. Thank you again, your honor. I'd move for suspension of the rules, please There's a motion and second any discussion on that. Otherwise, we'll take a vote all those in favor state I Any opposed, please proceed. I thank you again. I'd move then that the resolution be put upon its passage There's a motion the second under discussion Alderman Segali Thank You mr. Mayor if Alderman Bowman just could explain a little bit what this is concerning relocation of certain utility Facilities if we could just have some type of explanation. Oh my Bowman. Can you or should we ask somebody else to permit everything I get? Okay, mr. Holton, would you please address council? Thank you That's for relocating a power pole on Washington Avenue and Green Wing Drive as part of the Walmart Project and that's the funds Walmart is reimbursing us for this work Transparency we only go do an agreement with us till we go back to Walmart then to get reimbursed Any other questions for mr. Holton Thank you Please call the roll Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemayor Radke Segali Stefan Susha and Akron van der wheel Bowman D-Berg E-Berg Serda 16 eyes motion carries 2047 by Alderman Montemayor authorizing accepting the offer to purchase an addendum on the butane side of North Avenue and Main Avenue Alderman Montemayor, we need a motion to suspend first. Yes. Thank you your honor. I need a motion to I mean I'm making a motion to suspend the rules Motion to second any discussion on that all those in favor state I Any opposed please proceed. I move the resolution we put upon its passage There's a motion to second put the resolution upon his passage under discussion There being none, please call the roll graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemayor Radke Segali Stefan Susha van Akron van der wheel Bowman D-Berg E-Berg Serda and Davis 16 eyes motion carries 2048 through 2052 lies over except 2051 I'd ask for a motion to suspend and a motion to put the Resolution upon its passage Alderman Graf. Thank you. Your honor. I would move for suspension There's a motion second to suspend all any discussion on that all those in favor state I I any opposed please proceed And your honor would move that the resolution be put upon its passage Is there a second? There's a motion to second under discussion Alderman Graf. Thank you your honor under discussion the reason this is being done is because This is for the purchase of the the canine dog and the training for it will start shortly and therefore we need to Move this through as quickly as possible. Thank you all the man graph Alderman Susha Thank You mr. Mayor I Understand that the dog is going to cost on sixty four hundred dollars And that would leave about eighty six hundred dollars left to train the handler And I'm wondering if perhaps chief Kirk could explain what that eighty four hundred dollars would include exactly how much is used for room and board Because that seems like an awful lot. I believe it's only two weeks of training Would you like for me to call Chief Kirk to the podium, please? Yes Chief Kirk Please address us or did you understand the question? Yes? The sixty four hundred dollars includes the dog the handlers feed the hotel and things of that nature the Request for the fifteen thousand dollars was to make sure to ensure that the dollars were there So that when the the purchase was made that we didn't have to come back and ask for additional money Any additional dollars that are left will be used for additional expenses and whatever is left was certainly be justified in return Follow up question. You're on Could you be a little rise? Please rise a little more specific, please? I mean that's eight thousand dollars I mean what could you be a little more specific on what that's for? No, we ask for fifteen thousand dollars The expenses are sixty four hundred dollars. We found we did not know what the expenses were when we made the initial request in it Lieutenant Jeff Johnson was the one who dealt with the canine school and That's what the expenses are sixty four hundred dollars And whatever's left when we put the good news you bet all the men wrecked in Thank you your honor so chief Kirk is telling us the expense here sixty four thousand or sixty four hundred dollars is what you're telling us Yes, okay, then why don't we amend this to sixty four hundred dollars me because there's no reason to go for fifteen thousand the cost of sixty four hundred dollars home and ready I Under discussion I would ask Not to do that. Let the chief take care of the training Whatever is left over. I'm sure that the chief will use very wisely We don't want to restrict the chief to a specific amount and find out he's short somewhere else I would I would ask please. Please don't Anything else? Thank you chief Please call the roll Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemayor Brett Radke Segali Stefan Sushia Van Akron Vanderwheel Bauman D. Berg Eberg Serta Davis and graph 14 eyes to nose motion carries 2053 to 2056 to be referred Reporter committees six 2057 by finance recommended filing documents submitting a communication from Carol and Randy Lutz Co-directors of the Rockets for schools requesting the use of three of the city's days Allocated at the Blue Harbor Conference Center for use during their program on May 11th through the 13th 06 and approving the request All the rock. Thank you. I would move that the RCB Excuse me the accepted and adopted There's a motion to second to accept an adopted our reporter committee under discussion There being on please call the roll Manny Meyer Montemayor Radke Segali Stefan Sushia Van Akron Vanderwheel Bauman D. Berg Eberg Serta Davis graph and Kittleson 16 eyes motion carries 2058 by public protection and safety recommended filing documents submitted a communication from Job Jose regarding issues with the police department in dealing with an accident that happened at the crosswalk of North 25th Street in Coral Memorial Drive when his father was hit by a vehicle while in the crosswalk and stating that the committee is unable to handle the situation all in a sushi Thank You. Mr. Mayor. I move that the communication be placed be accepted in place them file There's a motion to accept an adopt under discussion There being on please call the roll Meyer Montemayor Radke Segali Stefan Sushia Van Akron Vanderwheel Bauman D. Berg Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittleson and Manny 16 eyes motion carries 20 59 to be referred Report of committees 8 20 60 by public works recommended establishing Eisner Avenue as a priority capital improvement project in 07 Alderman Bauman Again, thank you, your honor. I'd move that Document number 20 dash 60 be accepted and adopted and the report a committee we put upon as passage There's a motion. Is there a second? Second under discussion Alderman Eberg. Yes. Thank you again your honor under discussion This is I asked that this be pulled from consent for a couple of reasons one to let the neighbors along Eisner Avenue Know that they haven't been forgotten And also to highlight a couple of things that we talk about intergovernmental cooperation And I think this represents a model of that. Thanks to Dan Hyde and the town supervisors in the town of Sheboygan They have been very supportive of this supervisor Connie Gilligan who represents that area has been working to see if we can Utilize some trail money to connect the Pigeon River corridor with the late-front trail and also State Senator Joel Ivan had in the past some budgeted money to assist in the development of Eisner Avenue So although we cannot legitimately bind the capital improvements program Commission to approve this I wanted to have this come forward and be on record that this be a top priority project for 2007 number one to inform the neighbors in the Eisner Avenue area But also to provide copies of this resolution to the town board and to the county and also to the state and hope that we will Be able to put something together and leverage our joint dollars to minimize The cost to all the taxpayers. Thank you. Thank you. Alderman Berg Alderman Stefan Thank you your honor first having served on the county board. I think Supervisor Connie Ziegelbauer would appreciate your thoughts not Gilligan And I just guess that was my question we're calling this a priority Having said on capital improvements, does that mean we're directing the staff to you know, they market their priorities one through five Are we directing the capital improvements committee or are we just telling them? Yeah, we think it's important, but It doesn't really say, you know, my copy doesn't say top priority It just says as a priority capital improvement project and I just wonder Is there any I mean we just stating that it's like a feel-good thing, but we're not really there's no actual Direction in this my correct in that my understanding would be all of them Stefan that there is no actual direction the capital improvements And does have a rating system. This is An extent of an extent of support I believe for for that project Alderman Cigali Thank You mr. Mayor Are you seeing that the county and that is involved in the project in Iser Avenue? Because then if this is what is happening what is happening to the project That's supposed to take place on Whedon Creek and okay There there is supposed to be monies there etc etc now all of a sudden Iser Avenue has become a priority Would you like for Alderman Burke to respond to that? Yes, please? Thank you Alderman Alderman Cigali I shuttered to even predict the action in this body much less the county board So I really can't I can't say I do know that Discussion has taken place between on the staff level between Shadden Hayden and and Tom Holton to look to put together The Iser Avenue corridor as being eligible for some staff for some of the trail money That is coming our way and that comes with the support and encouragement of supervisor Connie Zigglebauer I can't speak to any other project But in terms of this particular project that represents from what I understand the preliminary work that has been going on also that As part of a plan I understand that the engineering work is already being done For Iser Avenue in terms of looking at costing out some of the options and doing some of the basic design work Thank you, Alderman Burke Alderman Cigali does address your concern Okay Thank you, then we will Call a roll Montemay or Radke Cigali Stefan Susha van Akron van der wheel Bowman D. Berg e-Berg Serta Davis Graf Kittlesen Manny and Meyer 16 eyes motion carries we have items 2061 to 63 by finance committee authorizing a transfer Appropriations in the 05 budget Alderman Graf would you like to take all those three? Yes, your honor on that and and 2065 also yes, there's also a transfer of funds in the in the 2005 Budget I would move that all our C's be accepted and and adopted and all the resolutions we put upon their passage There's a motion the second to accept and adopt all the reporter committees and that the resolutions we put upon their passage that includes 2061 2062 2063 and 2065 Is there any discussion? Alderman Susha Thank You mr. Mayor 2063 relates to an anonymous donation $5,050 for police taser guns I'm strongly opposed to taser guns But I will support this because if the city is going to buy taser guns I'd rather see the money come from a private individual rather than from the taxpayers. Thank you No, Susha any further discussion? There being on please call the roll Ratki Segali Stefan Susha van Akron van der wheel Bowman D. Berg Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer and Montemay or 16 eyes motion carries Ordinances introduced 10 2066 through 2067 lies over 2068 to be referred Matters laid over 11 1936 our own number four seven five oh five oh six I'm in a communication from the shabuigan press Steady stating that it as a public service to extend important civic information to citizens in shabuigan They will begin to post all our legal notices to an aggregated state website at no cost to the city all of them graph Thank You here, and I would move that the arrow be accepted and filed There's a motion to second to accept and file under discussion Being on all those in favor state I any opposed motion carries 1937 oral number four seven six oh five oh six by the city clerk submitting a communication from Fred and mural cross Thanking all the person Meyer for her effort it for her efforts as their older person Alderman Meyer motion to accept and file Yes, please There's a motion to accept and file is our second Second under discussion All those in favor state I any opposed motion carries 19-40 resolution number 220506 by Alderman Berg Requesting that the Meade Library Board of Trustees move to reopen contract negotiations with the director of meet public library Alderman e-bird. Thank you, your honor. I moved that the resolution be put upon as passage There's a motion in a second under discussion under the discussion I think we've talked a good deal about the library contract before I developed this resolution I had the opportunity to speak with several of the library board members on both sides of the issue also Met with library director Sharon Winkle and mayor Perez and I guess The reason that I developed the resolution is at that time. I felt optimistic that The contract was a key issue that could be revisited and History, I guess if we look back has proved my optimism correct And I would hope that we continue to encourage the library board to sit with the library director and revisit the contract Thank you. Thank you. I will add that Alderman e-bird did play a part I thank you for that for the Canada discussions and talking about the possibility of handling this Serious situation a little differently. So thank you Alderman Berg Any further discussion? Alderman Stafflin Thank you, your honor. I Guess all I heard was a motion to approve the resolution. Is that what we're voting? There's a motion to pass the resolution I guess I would you know, I question that I think You guys have already done it. You've gone back to the Renegotiated and seems like the majority of the people are happy present company excluded I Don't see a need for this, you know, and I guess I just moved to file. I Think it's already been done. I think like you said it was a successful renegotiation Everybody gave a little took a little and I mean, I know there's people in the community It's starting happy with the salary, but you know, that's just the way it is I mean, you know, I'm sure they're not gonna be happy when they you know other salaries come up But is there a second to the motion to file? There's a second any discussion on the file There being none, please call the roll Sigali Stefan Susha Then Akron Vander wheel Balman D. Berg Eberg Serda Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or and Ratke Four eyes 12 nose motion fells going back to the original motion to put the resolution upon its passage old McGrath Do you have discussion on that sir? Right? Yes, your honor. Thank you. I just wanted to say I don't know if it's all been Renegotiated and so forth and one one thing that has to happen is the library board is going to open this up and correct that contract and And send it back to us for approval That's correct all the McGrath the meeting hasn't occurred yet All of them have a thank you, your honor. I guess the last time we spoke concerning this matter I was under the impression that we were still waiting for some feedback from the League of Municipalities and If we're still pursuing those needs and the Attorney General that we still might get more information concerning this contract And it could be a teaching tool in the future Thank you Further discussion Please call the rule Stefan Susha Ben Akron Vanderwheel Balman D. Berg Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Ratke and Segali 16 eyes motion passes 1931 general ordinance number 506 by Alderman Berg reestablished in the salary for the position of all the persons of the city of Sherbrooke and Allerman E. Bird. Yes, I would move that the ordinance be placed upon its passage There's a motion a second under discussion no discussion basically the ordinance mirrors the previous discussion of the council and establishes the council of or the salary for Alderman to 2008 for four thousand Six hundred and sixty eight dollars, which is what it currently is and I guess as a personal Testament, I'd I've been doing this for nine months and it's the best art alone paying job in the city. Thank you Thank you, Alderman Berg Alderman Susha Thank you, and I agree with Alderman Aldenberg I would like to amend this document So that in 2008 the aldermanic pay is five thousand one hundred and in two thousand seven the aldermanic pay is five thousand dollars Is there a second there's a second under discussion? Thank you What I'm doing is I'm looking at the document that salary engravens I believe used when they were analyzing the city attorney and the city clerk's Salary and I use the same methodology. I believe that The chairman of Salary and grievance used and I looked at all of the the cities 15 cities that pay Their alderman and I added it up and I divided it by 15 and I found that the average for cities of similar size to Sheboygan in 2005 the average pay for an alderman was five thousand one hundred dollars and I'm not saying that today. We should be making the average I'm saying that in 2008 the alderman that are elected at that point in time Which is most likely not going to be any of us that are even here today That they be brought up to what the alderman and other communities are averaging in their pay today So that's why I'm saying that in 2008 Alderman should be paid five thousand one hundred dollars and in two thousand seven It should be five thousand and then next year it'll continue to the same rate that it's been at for the last Number of years, which is four thousand six hundred and sixty eight. Thank you Any further discussion on the amendment? Would you please call the roll? Let me just clarify alderman Susha 2008 would be fifty one hundred and two thousand and seven would be five thousand and 2006 is already set at two at four six six eight. Okay, Susha Ben Akron van der wheel Bowman D-Berg E-Berg Serta Davis graph Kittlesen Manny Meyer Montemayor Radke Segali and Stefan five eyes eleven nose Motion fails going back to the original motion to put the resolution upon its passage. Please call the roll Van Akron Hi So that was an eye, thank you. Thank you Van der wheel Bowman D-Berg Wait wait wait one burger at a time Eberg Serta Davis graph Kittlesen Manny Meyer Montemayor I'm sorry. Thank you. Radke Segali Stefan and Susha 14 eyes two nose Motion carries 1818 resolution number four six two five oh six by the city plan commission annexing territory from the town of Wilson to the city of Sheboygan situated between South Business Drive and Manning Drive all of them want to mail up Thank you, your honor. I moved to accept and file the report of officer and pass the resolution two oh five Oh five oh six and ordinance sixty seven oh five oh six Motion is second under discussion under discussion your honor. I'd like to make an amendment I'd like to amend to add the following section five in accordance with section 66.0217 14 of the Wisconsin statutes the city of Sheboygan Hereby agrees to pay annually to the town of Wilson for five years an amount equal to the amount of property Taxes that the town of Wilson levied on the annex territory described in section one above as Shown by the tax roll under section 70.65 of the Wisconsin statutes in the year in which the annexation is final I think this is a legality. We have to add to this Is there a second to that amendment? Under discussion it is my statute that we have to do that Any discussion on the amendment only please call the roll Vander wheel. This is on the amendment Balmain D. Berg E. Berg Serta Davis Graf Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Sigali Stefan Sushia and van Akron 16 eyes Motion amendment passes not in motion of Put except in file is amended There's a motion second under discussion Please call the roll Balmain D. Berg E. Berg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemay or Radke Sigali Stefan Sushia van Akron and Vander wheel 16 eyes Motion carries other matters authorized by law 2069 an arrow by the city clerk submitted a private well permit application for David carries 1628 North 36th Street and asked for a motion to accept and file old man graph I Would move that we accept and file the arrow Motion the second any discussion there being non old and favorite state I Any opposed motion carries 2070 will be referred to city plan Commission 2071 to be referred to city plan Commission 2072 an RC by public protection and safety recommended amendment the two-hour parking limits So as to delete two-hour limits along the north side of Indiana Avenue from South 16th Street West to the existing no parking zone That zone remains for the right turn straight lane at north 17th Street and pass the substitute ordinance alderman Sushia Thank you. I move that the RC be accepted and adopted And substitute ordinance be passed. Yes, and there's a second under discussion There be a none. Please call the roll D. Berg E. Berg Serta Davis graph Kittleson Manny Meyer Montemayor Ratke Sigali Stefan Sushia Van Akron Vander wheel and bowman 16 eyes motion carries 2073 lies over 2074 will be referred to risk management other matters attorney McLean 2075 is a resolution authorized to transfer of appropriations in the 2006 budget That lies over 2076 is an ordinance relating to adding various no parking between driveway signs along the south side of Washington Avenue West from the West Curve line It's out 12th Street that lies over 2077 is an ordinance relating to adding a no parking to driveway sign along the south side of Washington Avenue West from the West Curve line It's out 12th Street that lies over 2078 is an ordinance relating to adding a no parking anytime sign along the south side of Washington Avenue West from the west curb line of South 12th Street. That also lies over. 2079 is an ordinance relating to adding no parking between driveway signs on the west side of North 10th Street, north from the north curb line of School Avenue in various locations. Lies over. 2080 is an ordinance relating to adding a no parking south to driveway sign along the west side of North 10th Street, north from the north curb line of School Avenue with the arrow pointing south 170 feet north from School Avenue. That lies over. 2081 is an ordinance relating to adding a right turn-only sign along the east curb line of North 10th Street between the sidewalk and curb, 85 feet north of the north curb line of School Avenue Extended, right turn-only sign facing west to driveway exit. That lies over also. 2082 is an ordinance relating to adding a right turn-only sign along the west side of North 10th Street north from the north curb line of School Avenue between the sidewalk and curb, facing the parking lot, 72 feet north from School Avenue. That lies over. 2083 is an ordinance relating to adding various no parking anytime signs along the west side of North 10th Street north from the north curb line of School Avenue at various locations. That lies over. 2084 is a communication from Carter-Paulis regarding issues with accountability and fiscal responsibility of the Library Board of Trustees. That lies over. 2085 is a communication from Alderperson-Serta regarding the reopening of North 21st Street. That lies over. There's a second. Motion to second. All those in favor, state aye. Motion carries. Stand aground.