 I'd like to call the 24th regular meeting of the 2016 2017 Common Council to order It's great to see so many people here. First of all, we do not allow any signs in council chambers So please do not display any signs during the meeting. That means you and back Please put the sign down and keep it there You know, we we want to have a good frank exchange tonight and we thank everybody for your attendance and your interest in the agenda this evening Next I'd like to turn it over to our city clerk for the quote of the day. Thank you mayor teamwork Cooperation or combined effort of a group of persons working together as a team for a common cause Thank you very much for that. Next. We'll take the roll call. There are 15 present Alderman Rose Mary Trester is missing and is excused Next move on to the Pledge of Allegiance, please stand and join me Next move on to approval of the minutes from our previous council meeting other person Donahue Thank you mayor. I move approval of the minutes second. Thank you for that motion in support. Is there any discussion on those minutes? See none All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye opposed motion passes There'd be no Resignations or mayor's appointments this evening next we'll move on to the public forum city clerk Yes, we have five people this evening first on the list is Rachel LeBord, is that correct? I'm sorry if I pronounced it wrong Okay, Rachel you want to come right up here to the podium, please? And if you want to get the mic so that people can hear you that would be great, okay, and then I just need your Home address, please Can I give it just to you or do I need to tell everybody you got to tell everybody? Sorry? That's fine. Don't forget To 440 Karmann Avenue, okay, and you will have five minutes, okay? Good evening. My name is attorney Rachel LeBord, and I am a local attorney in town with Kenny Cottle Pascua and associates I practice primarily in family law How are you have an interest in immigration law and I'm here tonight to? Base my opinion or state my opinion in regards to resolution 200 that has been put forth Based off of statements made to the media It's my understanding and I apologize if I mispronounce mispronounce your name wrong, but mr. Who say house ease motivation in proposing this resolution is In response to Donald Trump's executive order the threat to limit federal funding for sanctuary cities and That this resolution is simply directing local law enforcement to quote-unquote follow federal law First I think that this resolution is Unconstitutional and illegal for several reasons the Immigration and Nationalization Act 287 G specifically states that states are allowed to enter into Agreements with the United States Attorney General for immigration purposes or promoting immigration purposes But it also makes expressly clear that states are not required to enter into agreements or required to participate with federal government enforcing immigration policy Resolution directs resolution 200 directs at law enforcement have to obey federal law in relation to immigration detention This is in direct contradiction To the existing federal law Local and state agencies are not required to cooperate with federal immigration entities second President Trump's executive order Limiting federal funding for sanctuary cities is far from being actionable and it's not a real threat to our federal funding in shabuigan Similar to the Immigration and Naturalization Act 287 the 10th amendment bars the federal government from forcing not federal entities such as local law enforcement to Such as local law enforcement to do their bidding This was confirmed by the Supreme Court in its opinion striking down the Brady bill that sought to require local law enforcement Officials to oversee local gun sales such as registration and background checks on those sales In addition to the 10th amendment and the Immigration and Naturalization Act the INA the taxing and spending clause of the US Constitution sets forth a three-prong test Before the federal government government can even restrict funding the first being that the amount withheld must be reasonable and the Supreme Court has That precedent the 5% is a reasonable amount amount in previous cases Meaning that the federal government could not restrict more than 5% of related federal funding The second prong of the test requires that the threat To restrict funds must be germane to the condition The government is trying to exam to satisfy For example President Trump cannot restrict federal housing money to try to get states to enforce immigration laws as the two are not related matter of fact many legal analysis Analysts have stated that the only area that funds can be restricted from would be funds the law enforcement entities receive However, the executive order expressly states that federal funds directed to local law enforcement agencies Will not be restricted If non-compliance is exhibited third there has to be specific reference in To the restricted funding funding in legislation passed by Congress meaning executive order alone could not restrict funds Congress has to pass legislation restricting the funds Well, these are all issues with the executive order in and of itself The reality is we have to look at what exposure if any Sheboygan has From my perspective Sheboygan has zero risk of losing federal funding and this Resolution is a bling bling attempt to thrust our community into fear if we assume for a second that one Congress actually in max funding legislation that incorporates the executive order and To that the executive order is actually constitutional Sheboygan is not listed on any list as a sanctuary city The only counties in the state of Wisconsin that are considered sanctuary counties are Milwaukee and Madison and those Statuses are debatable So even if the executive order is enacted and enforced Sheboygan would not be at the risk of losing federal funding as it does not meet the requirements of being labeled a sanctuary city This resolution is seeking to solve a problem. We do not and will not have Further, Mr. Halsey has stated in the media interview that if you do nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about However, the resolution put forth does state the police should take into custody Anyone who cannot prove citizenship Or legal status that they encounter in their normal course of business. Excuse me, Rebecca. I'm sorry, Rachel Yep time is up. I'm sorry Well, can I finish my last sentence? Please go ahead. Okay By stating that it would be just in the normal course of business This undermines other immigration proposals that encourage undocumented individuals to come forward with information on crimes that give those individuals Given that those individuals will be fearful of detention every move is speaking with an officer at all Thank you for your time and asking for the comment Asking for our alderman and common counsel to vote no on resolution 200. Thank you, Rachel Excuse me next on the list is Jose Arrujo Jose can I get your home address, please? 2918 South 9th Street, and you will have five minutes. Thank you mayor of understeen council members Community members. I'm here to express my and what I believe to be most of our strong Opposition against resolution number 200 presented by alderman Jose to the public protection and safety comedian being presented to the common council tonight Can you pronounce my last name? I understand. I'm sorry. He has the floor The resolution presented by alderman Jose is not only unnecessary, but also responsible for the following reasons If safety is the main goal of the resolution, we will achieve exactly the opposite From the perspective of the of the police department This resolution will open the opportunity for allegations of racial profiling and discrimination claims from the community perspective If this resolution is approved people from minority groups will hesitate to report illegal activity and crimes Which in turn will increase illegal activity as perpetrators we quickly will quickly figure out Their their ability to commit crimes without consequences In either situation our police department will be presented with unnecessary Challenges and erase everything that they they have done to accomplish by them with their community policing strategy second Alderman who says asks the sheboygan police department to detain quote Undocumented individuals who cannot provide proof of citizenship. I would like to bring to your attention that there are hundreds if not thousands of Individuals living in sheboygan that contribute to our economy every day that are in this country legally, but are not us citizens This is the case of individuals that hold permanent residency That are here on work visas refugees international students and so forth I Ask how are these individuals able to prove their citizenship status if they don't have one Farthermore How is it that a us citizen proof their citizenship status? This can only be done by showing either a birth certificate a passport or a naturalization certificate I ask you do we carry those on a regular basis in our packets. I don't do you Again, this resolution has not considered these circumstances and is very narrow and in its narrative Number three the unemployment rate in Sheboygan County is under 4% Which is the lowest it has been in many many years Local companies the Sheboygan County Chamber of Commerce and the Sheboygan Economic Development Corporation Are working really hard and investing resources to bring people to Sheboygan to fill these jobs That are currently going on field And keeping our companies from growing and staying competitive in a global economy By even considering this resolution we risk putting all this work in jeopardy Progressive professionals and qualified individuals will view Sheboygan as an unwelcoming community Which we are not and We'll consider other communities as an option Again because of these three reasons and many more I Strongly opposed this resolution and I ask you to do the same. Thank you. Thank you, Jose Next on our list is Brett Would Brett be here, okay And applause is out of order. Please restrain yourself and Brett if you want to get the microphone so we can all hear you And I just need your home address Right there. That's good. That's good Home address 1221 North 4th Street, okay, and you will have five minutes. Okay, Miss Mayor I I would like to speak in favor of passing resolution 200 Right now I think there's a lot of Uncertainty in our community and we need to reassure immigrant population That our city will not be knocking on doors and checking papers But we will cooperate with federal law enforcement when required and abide by the pending state law That's working its way to the governor's desk right now assembly bill 127 prescribes Fines of up to five thousand dollars per day for cities that Don't participate and cooperate with law local law enforcement immigration. Assembly's already passed It is working its way through the Senate. I don't expect that it's gonna see much opposition given the current state of our government The president has said felons and not families criminals and not children The absence of clarity makes for speculation speculation often brings suspicion and fear If we don't tell our immigrant population that if they haven't committed a crime They have nothing to fear from our local local law enforcement Then we will see them driven further into the shadows and be victims of the very criminals that we all want to protect our community from We need to be clear to the chief and his officers what their duties are on this issue Otherwise we are putting them in the possible position of being at the center of a conflict with the federal or state governments Potentially jeopardizing the city's vital federal funding or incurring fines from the state Decisions with potentially this significant of a consequence should not be left to the interpretation and Certainly shouldn't be concerned of a beat officer even the chief provide some clarity on this issue That's all deference to the attorney who spoke earlier I'm old enough to remember when Wisconsin was the last state that had the 18 year old drinking age because Ronald Reagan Threatened to pull our federal funding from us on this on this highways So it can be done and it has been done and it works very effectively the bill let's see You know Miami-Dade County has passed resolutions like this You can hear from outside these people think we're gonna look in their own people up and you know ship them out That's not what this is about Criminals should be gone president Obama said it president Trump has said it and I think the city should be Thank you Brett next on the list is Anna de Sainte is that correct Anna I Thought I wasn't sure if there was an O at the end. Sorry And if you want to make sure the mic is okay for you before you start And I just hear your home address, please. Yeah, that's okay. All right home address, please 3807 South 14 straight in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Oh, okay, and let me stop the other one and let's get you started here All right, you will have five minutes. Good evening mayor Alderman and older women and common counsel My name is Anna de Santos and I stand here in front of you with my heart in my hands Which I place in yours I Am here to plead with you as a parent Not to pass or accept resolution 200. I Have personally been deeply affected by immigration In 1979 I became pregnant My unborn child's father had a great pain job at the caller company He was prepared To marry me to take care of us Unfortunately, he was not allowed to do that When she was six months old he was deported The ghost of not having her father Has caused her so much trauma So much emptiness so much pain My daughter turned to drugs To soothe herself. I am not saying That every child will go down that same road that she did If their parents are obtained and deported, you know, our families could be next we live in an uncertain world and No, just remember it takes two takes two parents to raise a child nowadays. I Just ask you Why? Why give that ripple effect more strength to carry on? It will only cause more trauma more pain more suffering for another family Is resolution 200 really necessary? Let's put Sheboygan on the map. Let's be united and truly live up to a campaign Sheboygan had many many years ago Which was it takes a village to raise a child If a child born in the United States of America is separated from their parents Just because their parents don't have the necessary documents Where are the rights of these poor innocent children? These are American citizens these children belong in the United States of America Let's wipe out the resolution 200 and find a solution in 2017 Only you are able capable of Not accepting resolution 200. I do hope and pray you are willing to do so Immigrations have always been in effect. They have never been enforced. There is a difference. I Have spoken to a few officer friends. They don't want to do this They are they understand that they are hard-working people That don't have a criminal record Do we really want our jails filled with speeders people driving without license? Let's put Sheboygan in the media having a solution in 2017 And thank you for your time and God bless each and every one of us. Thank you Anna Next on the list will be Bob hack Bob are you Bob would you come up to the front, please? Can I have your home address Bob 1720 Elma Avenue in Sheboygan and You will have hold on. I mean five minutes. Okay I've come here tonight to speak on a couple topics of fire of time The first one is a resolution 200 which I support. We are a nation of laws We may not like all the federal laws But that doesn't give us a right to ignore them and to disregard them and not to follow them Because if we do that Then what good are our laws? People who have come here illegally are breaking our laws This resolution doesn't talk about us seeking these people out actively and deporting them It simply says that if our police department comes into contact with an individual that is here illegally and they've committed a crime That they're held and turned over to federal authorities That's how I read it and I think that's what we should do. We should support federal law We don't have the option not to support federal voting laws for example City wouldn't get away with that There's a lot of laws that we may not like there are laws. I don't like But I recognize it in a nation of laws It is the laws that make us a civil society and simply because we don't like a law doesn't mean we should openly disregard it My next topic has to do a totally different topic has to do with the Chewbacca Armoury I've been to a council meeting regularly lately and The Chewbacca Armoury came up last time and there were nine aldermen here who voted Against seeking bids to tear the Armoury down The Armoury is an awful shape. I've grown up here. I know that the Army has historical value People have attachment to it But I think the ship is sailed folks Speaking to the aldermen. I think it's time to tear the Armoury down Several year a couple years ago the Boston store was in an abandoned building. It was vacant The city spent a million dollars according to an article in November of 2015 I read in the Chewbacca Press they spent a million dollars to buy the site tear down the Boston store rehab the site They then sold it for $20 to the folks that are building the apartments The reason the Common Council did that is they didn't want a blighted building downtown Well, we currently have a blighted building on the corner of Broughton Drive and Penn Avenue and it's time to tear it down And it's time to raise it and put something else there because there's nothing left folks based on what I've heard That's we're saving inside. It's just going to get moldy and gross and awful So and and closing our eyes and putting it off isn't going to make it better So I would hope that in the future. We we've got to do something down there It's a wonderful piece of property We could do a lot of wonderful things down there and I hope that we can find something great to do down there But we can do that in a brand-new building because all that's really left on there are the four walls the roof is shot There's water all over. I don't know how you save anything on the inside there So those are the two matters I wanted to address I appreciate your time. Thank you very much Thank You Bob That's it for public forum Thank you very much Next I'd like to bring forward Item 6.6 if there's no objection from the council All the person wolf Thank you mayor. I'd like to make a motion to file second Okay, we have a motion in a second to file under discussion all the person Jose Thank You mr. Mayor I'd like to make a motion I'd like to amend the The six point six. I'd like to make a motion to pass the resolution That's not on the floor. I'm sorry. You can't do that Motion's already on the floor. You can't make another motion. Well, then I want to make have clarification What happens if if we vote if a vote of yes on this is to do nothing Does a vote of no pass the resolution? I'll defer to our assistant city attorney rose Simon Silva Alderman Jose the motion and the second was to file this Document so the discussion right now is relating to whether to file the document if that Motion fails there could be an additional then a motion could be brought Is that correct? Yes, but at this point the discussion is whether to file or whether or not to okay That's fine. I have some discussion then First I want to clarify a few things The first media person I was contacted by last Thursday tried to put a spin on this I heard it called the hate resolution I want to first point out that I have Latino heritage On my father's side one third of my cousins are of Mexican heritage on my mother's side One third of my cousins are of Mexican heritage When this meeting opened, I was the only person here that said the Pledge of Allegiance in Spanish And in fact my father changed his name from an Irish sounding name By hyphenated it and add an E on the end. He changed it be pronounced Jose and in fact That was the name of his business corporation J. O. S. E. Jose incorporated This resolution is not unlike the resolution that Alderman Bellinger brought forth and we passed as a council last year sanctioning the county board when they brought forth a county sales tax Which went all those shabuigan citizens pay 50% of the tax? We are only going to get back 9% That resolution was a statement. It has no actual weight in And any effect on what the county board has done and their ability to pass the county sales tax This resolution is simply a clarification statement to the police Asking them to do what they're already expected to do and that is to follow the law We are not the resolution does not ask them to go door to door It's simply asked them when the normal performance of their duties They come across somebody that can't provide identification and as they go down that that process They cannot prove that they are here Legally either as a citizen or on a work visa or something of that nature That they hold that person and follow federal law and turn them over to immigration or homeland security any alderman of a yes vote tonight is to follow the public protection and safety committee's recommendation and to file this resolution a No vote would be to not take the recommendation and then The motion could be brought forth to pass the resolution Let me make it clear. There are three things you are doing as an alderman and and to the public listening at home Let me make it clear If an alderman votes yes To pass the recommendation of the public protection and safety committee and just file this The that alder person is doing three things first They're saying that federal grant money doesn't concern them That if we lose our federal grant money, they're okay if the city has to raise fees and taxes in One manner or another in order to replace that federal money If they vote no, pardon me if they vote yes and take the public protection committee's Recommendation and file this resolution instead of us having the ability to pass it They're saying they don't care if they have to raise your taxes and fees Any alder person that votes yes to just file this resolution rather than passing it Is saying that they do not have any respect for the law? As mr. Heck said during his presentation is time to speak. We are a nation of laws The opposite of law and order is chaos It a vote of yes to simply file this Means you do not respect the law And finally a vote of yes to file this resolution versus have given us the ability to pass it means that You as an alder person do not have any respect for your friends and family that did things the right way and Came here legally that filed the papers that waited out the time and when the time came took their citizenship exam and Lawfully and legally through the right channels time and procedure became citizens of the United States If you vote yes to file this resolution Versus giving us the opportunity to vote and pass the resolution Then you are saying that you have a low opinion of your friends and family that did it the right way Thank you for those comments all the person wolf and just so you know that the board wasn't Working, so if you buzzed in before please buzz in again Thank You mayor Although I don't agree with all of Older person Jose's comments. It's nice to actually hear how he feels that we believe that we're Voting and how we how we believe in things I don't believe that this is this the The council's need to actually pass To pass this because we have a great police department. We have a great Chief that follows the state and federal Rules and there is no reason for us to have to tell the police department how to do what they already do a very good job At it's not our place. It shouldn't be our place and I recommend that we vote To file this. Thank you. Thank you for your comments all the person Donna here Thank You mayor Well, there's been a fair number of things here that have greatly upset me Alderman Jose your Imputation of my understanding of the law my duty as a citizen as a citizen of this country My duty to this city to make sure that we are not in violation of federal laws is so far off base I don't even know where to start, but here's where I am going to start. I am deeply disturbed that this resolution Brings our city council into partisan politics now I'm going to be starting my sixth year on the council next April and Really never in that time Have we on this council talked about partisan politics or involved ourself now? I know even though I've not asked any of you Explicitly about how you vote or what your political thoughts are I have a sense, you know over the years is you know We talked back and forth, but never have we involved the city in partisan political activity and Alderman Jose has done that with his resolution So right now what I am suggesting is that the primary reason to file this is because it involves the city improperly in partisan politics if This resolution does not say anything about sanctuary cities We aren't going to become a sanctuary city if we don't pass this resolution This is a fractured world these days But in the city council we get together and we talk about city business and we do a good job of it now We are not and one of the things that I'm going to ask if if chief Domogoski is here that we open up the The floor to him to explain police practices and so forth We are not in violation of federal law We are not taking steps to have our federal funding cut That is just simply not true and for people to come foot for Alderman Jose to come forward With these kinds of matters is really deeply disturbing his resolution is not as Neutral as he might make it seem for example, I don't know if any of you ever travel in a foreign country If we have tourists here who get involved in a car accident They get picked up and they get taken to the police station because they can't prove that they are US citizens Under Alderman Jose's resolution So you need to look carefully at that very broad poorly drafted unclear and yet terrifying language That would assert that anybody visiting here is Subject to police stop and search and proof of citizenship. I have a passport. I'm lucky I don't carry it with me every day because I don't want to lose it But right now Chief Domogoski, I can't prove that I'm a citizen of the United States which I could but I can't if I were in a Traffic accident. I'm sorry. I can't prove who I am now Well, how would I get even more suspect if my face were a little darker or if I wore a hajib or Some other matter that set me apart from being just like everybody else So what I am saying is that the proper action is to file I hope we do it Expeditiously and that we extend and keep extending a warm welcome to immigrants To documented and undocumented people who come here seeking a better life and who struggle and want to keep their Families together. You are welcome. You are a part of our community and our the fabric of our community and I Just want to say that as a council we can do this We're better than this and I I urge us to file with that mayor I'm wondering if if we could suspend the rules and ask that there's no objection. I'd ask Chief police to Chris Domogoski to come forward Good evening I'm the only comments that I would make Essentially is that none of our federal funding is in in any jeopardy We currently follow and cooperate with federal officials and really the concern that I have about the resolution Is it's not based in reality the way that it's written? I Can answer questions if you're interested in that next is the other person Belanger Thank You mayor. I Take exception with with Alderman Jose dragging my name into this saying that some legislation that I previously Introduced to the council is very much similar to this. It is not. It's in no way shape or form I don't endorse this legislation. I'm gonna vote to file In and in I regret that my name was you know being dragged into this in that fashion In doing so I've got great respect for the chief for our police department For our sheriff department our law enforcement our immigration officials I've got great love for my family who however they got here originally. I'm not sure but I'm thankful they did and and I appreciate that and I am very pleased to see the support that the people here that are showing an opposition to this It's a great grassroots effort. It's Obviously something they feel very passionate about and threatened by and it's not something that we should be you know doing We shouldn't be threatening our citizens With with rounding them up in in you know deporting them or turning them over to ice or or to the sheriff or to whatever You know, it's I find that this be you know unfortunate as far as the publicity. It's being shed on this Community, this is not you know what this community is about This is a great community a welcoming community in an inclusive community and I regret that we have this before us and In that my name got dragged into this. So, thank you. Thank you for those comments all their personally Wendalski. I Just want to say that I will be voting to file this and I feel that it is unfair It is in that one group of people and I'm sure of all of the alderman in this room right now If the police would stop us we could not prove that we are here legally I do not carry a copy of my birth certificate around with me And we're aiming with this resolution to pick out a certain group of people and some of these people are here legally Some were born in this country Some have come here and become US citizens and we're going to be harassing them under this ordinance if it passes and I just want to say that I'm glad that all of these people are here tonight And I hope that they will take a more active Interest in city government in the future because they are an important part of this city. Thank you Thank you for your comment other person Jose Thank you again, mr. Mayor First of all, so that I have two questions quick questions for the chief and then I have some points I want to respond to First of all cheap. How long have you been the chief? Seven years seven years in that time. How many undocumented individuals has the joy police come across? I have no idea. Okay. I would suspect probably single digits. I Have no idea. You don't you're the chief and you don't know how many how many I Have no idea how many undocumented or illegal immigrants. We've come across in the past seven years okay, well my point is I suspect it's a very low number and Again, this is just this is a resolution is not asking the police to change their method of policing in any way or The step up their efforts of policing. It's just to follow federal law, which I would imagine they are doing anyway We are again the objection that I would have is that it's not based in reality And so what I mean by that is that the federal law is very complicated and nuanced. It's not simple. There's criminal violations There's civil violations right now the federal government has approximately the capacity to detain about 30,000 illegal immigrants and there's about 12 million in the country So to follow the or the resolution as written here would suggest that that we would round them all up and Detain them all I can call ice right now. They're not coming. I Know I just I disagree the resolution does not call for you to round people up And as I think it was the third person that spoke tonight. Mr. Drew's as he indicated One positive thing of passing this resolution is so that they can be safe Safe safe that they can be safe in their thoughts that there is not going to be the shabuagan police going door-to-door Because the resolution clearly says in the normal Way you believe police things Again in the normal way that that you're suggesting if we come across somebody on a traffic stop for instance Very seldom would would ice respond or come when we would check with them They don't have the capacity to operate in the in the way you're suggesting by the resolution that we should operate Responding to all their person wolf I disagree with him. He said that the the police would Would are following law the law and that is my belief in hope But mrs. I think de la Santos was the one she said she has talked to at least two police officers that said they will not Follow federal law and detain people that they come across that are illegal aliens Going to all the person Mary Lynn Donahue She's the person that made this partisan all I Was pushing to pass is a resolution that seeks to follow the law and nothing more and nothing less She brought up a whole other a whole bunch of Different comments one way and the other and made the issue very partisan One thing I want to let people know is if you've noticed that our current president He's not bluffing He said he was he said he's going to do certain things and he got into office And he started doing everything that he said he's going to do You may not believe that he would cut funding. I believe that he would cut funding Again a vote to just simply file this resolution Any all the person that does that is saying they don't care if the city should well you can lose his federal money The suggestion that anybody visiting would just be rounded up is ridiculous Again, you have to be doing something that brings you Within the purview of the police you have to do something that makes you then pull you over or be in a Domestic situation that calls them to your residence or to somebody else's residence or somebody's place of business Nobody is threatened or inhibited from visiting all you have to do is obey the law And I would say it's not threatening threatening somebody with having to obey the law That's not a threat. That's your civic duty to obey the law. And if you don't want to obey the laws, you should leave finally, I Disagree with all their Malin do it Lewandowski's characterization Nowhere in this resolution is race mentioned and he said it seeks to seek out one group It doesn't matter if you're Latino or Canadian or African or you come from Asia This applies to anybody that's here illegally. It's not just one group of people Okay, next is all their person whole shoe. Thank you, mr. Mayor I when this came to committee I made the motion to file this document and I stand by that and I hope that I the support of my fellow councilman The job of the police department and the fire department is not governed by this body It is governed by the police and fire commission and we should not be doing the business of that commission I believe that our police chief and our sheriff are doing what they need to do I don't think we have any business getting involved in this and I'm going to be continuing my vote to file this this Resolution I also want to say that this is not a Republican or a Democratic point of view I'm an American first and There's nothing to do with any other politics and kind of resent the fact that that's brought into the arena So with that being said I'm not certain I'm within the right authority, but I would like to call the question second Thank you for that motion. Is there any objection to calling the question seeing none with a clerk? Please call the roll Okay, everybody know what they're voting would you say it again make it clear Right now we have a motion on the floor to file the documents and I vote would be to file a no vote would be to not file Everybody got it Yes, would you explain to the people here what file means? It's kind of a government term exactly what happens if we file, please It's done at this point this document tonight the one that's in front of you if it's To file is to it'll be done Okay, thank you Okay, everybody got it. Okay. I don't have any but oh there we go never mind 14 eyes one no Motion passes I'd like to thank everyone for their courtesy and respect tonight Everybody had a chance to express their point of view and and I think the best decision was made this evening Take a five-minute recess Everyone please take their seats Okay, the next item on the agenda is presentations Chad Pellecek is here to talk about the update on the city's 2016 sustainability Initiatives Chad the floor is yours. Thank you. So a document in the consent agenda There's actually two documents that will approve the city's green tier submittal So the city is part of the green tier Charter you can go next slide The green tier Charter which is a collaboration of up to 15 Communities on the sustainable initiatives and a lot of what I'm going to talk about today is the annual report of the items that have been completed in 2016 and a lot of it is based on the success of the Sheboygan Sustainable Task Force so in 2014 the city of Sheboygan joined the green tier Charter and the Charter is a network of Wisconsin communities and counties working collaboratively on community sustainable initiatives currently there's 15 cities and counties as part of the Charter and it's Hosted by the state of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources the Wisconsin Counties Association and League of Wisconsin municipalities Each year an annual report needs to be submitted reporting the success from the previous year next slide So in 2014 the Common Council accepted the city's sustainability plan Which is really a five-year guide as to how we're going to implement sustainable initiatives and how we operate on a day-to-day basis Each of those each year similar to the strategic plan. There's initiatives and actions that are to be implemented and are really the gear for what the Sustainable Task Force has been working on so if you go to the next slide so in 2015 the Sustainable Task Force and a couple of you are members Came up with four goals that they were going to focus their Workgroups on the first goal is composting neighborhood composting the second goal is creating a dedicated website for sustainable issues The third goal is Implementing a rain barrel process where people could buy rain barrels and have rain barrels on their private properties And the second one is recycling at the fourth one is the recycling education So the next slide the farmers market was a place where they did a number of composting Composting exercises so they got to Talk to about 250 people about the benefits of backyard composting So this is kind of a double-edged sword in and Dave Bevel's mind We would like to see the compost come out of the Houses and be composted and reused But we would also like to see it if you have a garbage disposal that you would send the stuff down the garbage Disposal because it helps out with solids that are wastewater treatment plant So it's kind of a balance as to what we look at But about 20% of the waste collected in Cheboygan is food waste next slide So there is a group that worked on a Thanks to Alderman drawn On a website to dedicate to these initiatives as well as education to other people So that was really the honest of having a separate sustainable website related to Cheboygan issues So if you're interested sustained Cheboygan Com is the website address and it's got a lot of resources on there both locally and other kind of national resources The next slide the rain barrels Program so the task force held a number of open-house events at Maywood They purchased kits and barrels were donated by the Old Wisconsin sausage and rock line industries They put together kits and sold them to interested parties and they will continue to do that this year So if anyone is interested in the rain barrel to collect water from your downspouts to water your garden or your flower garden or whatever the Rain bear they sold about 50. I think or so rain barrels, which is Kind of it cuts down on water conservation and it's a good it was a good task And there's be one set up here shortly in City Hall to show people the benefits of the rain barrel system Recycling education so we know that We cook our waste management collects our garb we send our garbage to waste management and recycling is free So under the contract the more recycling we can do and get people to do Across the city the less we have in tipping costs So there's a group at the task force that has gone has gone going out and educating students on recycling And I know this sounds rudimentary But when recycling first came out everybody was doing it and then we slowly migrated into where we're just throwing it all In the garbage because that's easier if we whatever we can pull out is savings on the city side So they decided to go and really participate with the schools and the elementary schools so they've been to Educating about 1200 students thus far in the Sheboygan area school district and plan to hit all of the elementary school Students by the end of the year and talk about recycling and why it's important to recycle at home Hoping that they would go home and recycle Next slide Last year we started a blue bag campaign. So we had ordered 5,000 blue bags We continue to use those for education outreach in the schools and then this little Thing you see on the screen this little graphic is part of the blue bag process and educating people over what can go in blue bags So the recycling in Sheboygan is really about putting it into the blue bag versus your garbage This is you know kind of a interactive approach as to what can be in that bag and it's been very Educational and good for people next slide So the council had adopted a resolution accepting $25,500 from the Fund for Lake Michigan, which is a foundation out of Milwaukee last year that money was used in partnership with the Sheboygan County YMCA to Train all third and seventh graders and bring them to the lakefront So the the grant was used to bus third and seventh graders from the Sheboygan area school district to the lakefront and have Them participate in two programs and adopt a beach and adopt a habitat of the about 3,000 Students that participated in this two and a half month Program 15% of them have said they've never been to the lakefront before which is amazing to me that they live in a Community where we're right on the lake and we've got a beach and a lot of them in the grant school district If you know where that is on the north side a lot of them were in grant school and said that they've never been to the lake before So this was a good exposure and we're hoping to move that program forward in other years really just to expose people to what's happening on our lakefront the next slide the another activity was the continuation of LED street lights so in 2016 202 Poles were converted to LED 168 of those lights were based on a grant that the city received from the state for 75,000 along Kohler Memorial Drive, so all of the lights from 14th Street to Taylor that were high-pressure sodium or that orange light We're converted to LED and there was some other lights on North Avenue This is about 70 200 a year and energy savings just these two projects So it's it's got some impact and we continue to work on LED conversions throughout the city As you know we've got two housing projects underway for downtown density So this idea of trying to maximize our space in the downtown and creating additional housing opportunities with 136 apartments currently under construction Last year we had run a trolley that we purchased from the City of Green Bay So this is now called the Metro trolley and runs the route in the Fall in the summer to connect the downtown in the lakefront and the south pier, so it's a 2600 participants Realist ironically we bought these three trolleys from the City of Green Bay for $8,000 and two ran one did not run and Derek just sold the one that didn't run to Kenosha for $5,000 so these two trolleys that run cost us $1,500 each So we are pretty proud of our purchase The last project on here is the Taylor Drive multi-use trail opening and I had to put a picture of Mayor Ryan riding his bicycle as part of the Riding his bicycle as part of the grand opening I just want to preface and the reason I put this in here is that I've I continue to hear a lot of comments from the people that They think it's a city-funded project It is not a city-funded project is a project that was funded under the non-motorized Transportation program with the county and yes, it was federal grant dollars And yes, it was initiative of our federal tax dollars, but it was not city-funded and there's no city funds in that project The last project is to highlight is the LED bus light conversion So Derek and the transit identified that the shoreline Metro buses The they have a problem with headlights in lighting spacing and stuff So they converted all of the bus lights of 52 buses to the new LED Lights to give them better visibility in the nighttime and this was Supported with a grant from our insurance provider CIVMIC to assist in the cost of the conversion So in a nutshell that's it There's some other ones in the documents that are in there, but we look forward to you Proving the annual report as we move sorry forward and sorry mayor Thanks for that presentation Chad Next we're moving on to some hearings The first one is item 2.1 hearing number 17 of 1617 regarding an ordinance repealing and recreating section 15.915 of the city zoning ordinance as to remove the duties of the Housing rehabilitation loan program from the Historic Preservation Commission. Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard all the person down here? Thank you mayor. I would move to close the hearing second Thank you for that motion and support all those in favor. Please signify by saying aye. I Opposed motion passes the other hearings. I'd like to take as one group It's a hearing number 18 19 20 21 and 22 of 16 17 for confirming and the exercise of police power and making an assessment to those Benefited properties wish assessments are proposed for parking assessment districts number one 24 and five is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard other person Lee Wendalski? I just want to ask for the people who are watching at home What parking areas are these? These are generally parking lots that are in the downtown area where we have the merchants Pay an assessment and they share the cost of operating those lots so we'll spend money to operate the lots and the revenues are Offsetting those and then the remainder is assessed to those merchants Jed But the mayor said is absolutely correct I'll just clarify that parking assessment number one is the downtown and a street Parking assessment number two. I believe is south pier or riverfront and number four is the South pier and number five is heritage square Okay, did you catch that so number one is downtown number two is the riverfront number three is here Number four is we don't have a three number four is heritage square number five is the downtown and what we do is We assess as the mayor said for maintenance. So the parking utility work that they do that's Build out to the business owners as part of a assessment each year Okay, is there anyone wishing to be heard is there anyone wishing to be heard is there anyone wishing to be heard? All the person down here. Thank you mayor. I move to close the hearings back Thank you for their motion and support all those in favor, please signify by saying aye aye opposed motion passes Next we'll move on to the consent agenda That'll include items three point two through three point one seven all the person down here Thank you mayor I moved to accept and file all reports of officers Accept and adopt all reports of committees and pass all resolutions and ordinances second Thank for that motion and support those items are before us under discussion all their person Bellinger Thank you mayor. I would like to pull three point one six I'm not sure how this got in the consent agenda to begin with but I'd like to pull that and but first I would like to ask Rose a clarification question and Please proceed that would be in a previous discussion. I had this morning with attorney Adams he explained to me that Later on in the agenda items number six point three and six point nine if those were to be past Accepted in past as they are that nothing could be done with those specific resolutions until 3.16 was dealt with do you concur with that? attorney Adams discussed this briefly with me today and So your question and I just want to put this in layman's terms so that we all understand is relating to Flat fee approach that that public works is intending to take as far as assessments or fee per footage approach and You're just wondering if three point one six conflicts with either six point three and six point nine Is that correct? No, what's what I would like to do the goal of mine is to eliminate special assessments for roads altogether and if I Take three point six I would like to refer that to committee of the whole because I think there is a substantial discussion that needs to be made And and bring all the other alderman up to speed as to the history of special assessments You know what we've gone out our current funding sources for roads in and so on and so forth that in the reasons Why I believe that it's not a fair or equitable way to fund roads in the future. So what I want to do is Send that to the committee the whole and but knowing that if Six point three and six point nine are past that that in fact does not give us the right to Assess without first dealing with six point or with three point one six And that's the way it was explained to me by turning Adams, right? And I believe attorney Adams position is that these are not mutually exclusive that you can refer 3.16 to committee of the whole and still Past six point three and six point nine and there will be no action taken on assessments if those are past until 3.16 is dealt with well, I would I would direct that question mr. Bebel Is it I mean, I guess it would depend on what DPW's position would be as to moving forward With six point three and six point nine David's coming to the front Because I can't make those promises Yeah, our position is we're gonna wait until the council makes a decision one way or the other But we need to at least have that document ready to go With all that document if we don't have it ready to go If you make a decision to pass or not to pass the So the document that you're referring to six point three and six point nine correct But three three point the one that authorizes the preliminary assessments to be Start the hearing process and submit that is basically following the ordinance as it is today So if the decision at some point is not to assess for roads We would not proceed with that But if the council so desires to continue street assessments We need that document so that we can start publishing the hearing and publishing the preliminary assessment notices Okay, so yeah, we It kind of all go together as part of the decision process We're just trying to make sure that one way or the other that it doesn't delay our ability to get the project And we're going out to bids This week it's a two-week process for contractors to bid open bids Come back to council with them So there it will be about I would say about anywhere from the three to four week process then that Resolution of the preliminary assessment then we would be ready to move on it Okay, so you're not gonna unilaterally just go off and start setting out assessments. You know, that's true Thank you. I appreciate that Okay, so then what I would like to do is I would like to pull 3.16 and I guess I would like To have that referred to committee of the whole Okay, 3.16 then the chair will refer that to the committee of the whole so that would dispense with item 3.16 And then just for clarification 6.3 of the way in 6.9 the way it was one is a resolution and One is a general ordinance and it refers to a schedule of how we would if we were to assess What the fee schedule would be and how we would do that. So that's they're basically the same thing and that's what that is Okay, we'll do rest those later in the agenda right now. We're talking to you're welcome items 3.2 through 3.17 minus 3.16 is there any discussion any of the other items before us Seeing none will the clerk, please call the roll for passage 15 eyes motion passes Next we'll move on to reports of officers Item 4.1 is an is our own number 247 of 1617 by the city Planning Commission to whom was referred general ordinance number 44 of 1617 by Alderperson Bellinger and Wolf and our own number 235 of 1617 by the city clerk for a petition for direct annexation by unanimous approval for the property located in the town of Sheboygan at 3009 North 15th Street and recommends that the ordinance be approved Alderperson Bellinger Thank You mayor This property is located like on 15th Street and for those of you familiar with Manning's Irish pub It's direct directly to the south of that this gentleman the property owner came to the Planning Commission in petitioned Apparently, he's got a well that's gone bad and would like to annex into the city For the access to the city water So that's the reason behind that and with that I would move to accept and file and pass the ordinance Thank you for that motion and support under discussion city administrator. Yeah requesting a clarification as part of the motion Does it include? requesting the property owner to reimburse the city for State statute required payments to the town of Sheboygan Yes, that was that was addressed at the meeting and It's an unfortunate Ordinance or state statute that the towns put in place to try to limit annexation But the homeowner or the property owner did agree to Take care of that Okay, the motion is before us. Is there any other discussion seeing now will the clerk, please call the roll 15 eyes Motion passes items 4.2 through and fourth point three will lie over till April 5th Items 4.4 through 4.12 will be referred to various committees under resolutions Items 5.1 through 5.10 will again be referred to various committees Under reports of committees item 6.1 is RC number 353 of 1617 by the law and licensing committee tumors refer to our own number 223 of 1617 by the city clerk submitting various license applications and recommends denying taxicab driver license Application 1142 based upon his failure to accurate reveal all relevant convictions on his application his record of violations Related to the license activity his record is a repeat law offender and his failure to cooperate with the committee all the person whole shoe Thank You mr. Mayor. I asked that the report of committee Be accepted and adopted second. Thank you for that motion and support under discussion is Oscar Berenda Fernandez He was invited to our committee on two different occasions and did not show up to explain his very extensive Record so the committee all voted to deny his license Thank you for those comments. Is there any other discussion? Seeing none will the clerk please call the roll for passage 14 eyes 1 no Motion passes Item 6.2 is RC number 359 of 1617 by the law and licensing committee to whom will vote To who voted to recommend to the common counsel to grant alcohol beverage license number 2317 for Parker John's barbecue and pizza An extension until June 12th of 2017 to open their business all the person holds you Thank You mr. Mayor. They came before us and they're not quite finished With the building and we have given them the six month period which is about to expire So we have given them an extension a little longer than they've requested But I think it's going to be a great restaurant when it's open. So we ask that you all agree Thank you for those comments. Is there any other discussion? Thank You mayor Alderman whole shoe is that the Establishment that's going up where the monkey duck used to be it certainly is thank you any other discussion With the clerk please call the roll 15 eyes Motion passes Item 6.3 is RC number 360 of 1617 by public works to whom was referred resolution Number 188 of 1617 by Alderperson Bellinger bidders foreign pursuant to section 110 dash 37 parentheses 3 of the shabuigan missham code establishing a schedule Flat fees per foot to be levied his assessments for street improvements for the year 2017 recommends that the attached substitute resolution be passed all the person Bellinger Thank You mayor with assistant city attorney Rolls-silva Simon Or Simon Silva, I'm sorry, excuse me. I would like to take 6.3 and 6.9 together I Was told from attorney Adams that I could take these together You can include those in your motion. Okay, sure. Okay. Thank you So 6.3 I would like to accept adopt and pass a substitute resolution and 6.9 accept and adopt and pass the ordinance Thank you for that motion and support under discussion Alderperson Jose Thank You mr. Mayor. I actually agree with Alderman Bellinger So this it seems like this will be a fairer way to do this. I do have one question The people that were assessed the last year or two that made some pretty heavy assessments for the street we're We're are they going to be given any break in this or are they going to immediately start paying what everybody paid her or if that's the case could we amend this to To the first few years give them a kind of a break because they've all paid huge assessments All the person was a that would be discussion that we should have at the committee the whole meeting when we address the earlier document and Decide how we want to implement Stopping assessments if that's what we decide to do. Is there any other discussion? Yes, I Guess I Would like to I would like to make a motion to Grant those those people that paid assessments the last year or two some kind of compensation I Don't believe that's germane to this issue So we really can't address that as part of these two documents. Is there any other discussion? Alderperson Wolf Thank You mayor My only question was If there could be some clarity on exactly if there's what the change is from what we've done in the past to what's being voted on right now David did you want to David be able to come forward In terms of street assessments what we've done in the past is we've waited to bids come in Look at what the costs were of the actual bids of this year And then we would recalculate this the street assessments based on those costs of bids what we're doing With this proposal is looking at last year's costs as well as projecting and coming up with Basically a rate and it's it's based on engineering and construction bids But what we're trying to do is get that rate Published in well in advance instead of waiting for actual costs every year So it's it's still the the rate is very similar to what it was last year In fact, it's based on last year's cost with a little bit of inflation added to it so it's If we're going to continue to assess this will be an established rate and what we can do is get that information to residents much earlier So that we're able to give them advanced notice on these three projects so they can plan accordingly for the finances of this Thank you for those comments all their person Belanger Thank You mayor David if you just could stay there and just you know Correct me if I'm wrong but in the pet isn't this an effort to streamline the process and in the past wasn't it the fact that we We estimated what the what we thought they were they were going to be we estimated high We sent out letters and when the people got the letters and when they were through with their shell shock and the projects went through and they went through the You know the process the job would get let things would go through you would get all the costing on the job The job would then come back you would go back and look and say what did it actually cost then a final letter would go out And that would be the bill in and so this is believe it's streamlining cutting it down Correct eliminating that process and so we're going to have a published set of Fees based on previous years and projected on oil pricing and you know all sorts of other things that would be taken into account Correct correct. We're going to take all those factors involved and you're right And that's really what this is about is streamlining the process especially now with the Additional funding that we're getting to really put an emphasis on Fixing the infrastructure in our street network with that that's that's added You know we're tripling the size of the program and for our engineering department and getting this workout The assessment process as it currently is today is quite burdensome because we do have the we send out Preliminary assessment and that preliminary assessment is based on an estimate Then we'll have a hearing will the public that has the streets that are identified that are that are in this preliminary Resolution for street assessments. They will all be invited to council Do you know have a hearing on that and go through those costs then we go into the construction season? We get the actual cost and then after the project's done We recalculate and send out the final bill what we're trying to do is this is the established rate This is what your cost is and it's not going to change. So there's some certainty in it and it gets to the public basically some some Ability to plan accordingly right now. There's some uncertainty in it and that that causes some confusion as well through this process Thank you All the person height of men. Thank you, mayor David what happens if the the costs go down and we have this flat fee established Does is there a mechanism within that resolution that says you're going to get the lower cost or is it just information the The way the assessments work. We don't charge the residents the full cost of the job We the way the way the ordinance is set now the residents pay 50% of the cost of the street improvement and then that 50% is split between each side So one side of the street your property you paid basically it boils down to you pay 25% your neighbor across the street pays 25% that's the 50% in the city picks up the additional cost and so the the overall cost of The cost of the project the property owners cost is Much more reduced than the overall cost of the project. So in terms of adjusting they're still getting a Reduced price at that 25% so we don't anticipate much fluctuation from year-to-year with this new flat rate Okay, and I understand it but in 2019 Things change and the cost of oil the cost of doing your comes down. Are we going to be? Is this resolution with it's in place with these numbers is that going to say that's the flat fate that's every year We're going to be coming with a new resolution Establishing the flat fee rates for the upcoming construction season Our goal is going to be when we have the flat rates is already this fall Ideally in September October at the latest is part of the budget process. These are going to be the flat rates for 2018 So everybody that has a street improvement project for 2018 will already know their their assessment rate this September Alder prison-born Thank You mayor when I talked to you earlier today mayor. You mentioned something you had an idea about An additional corner lock credit or something like that. Well, we brought that up at the public works committee meeting it seems like Several of the people that we had at the hearings were people who had the long side of their lots being paved And if we would find a way to give them at least part of that that corner credit that they could get Eventually when the other side would be paved When they do have the long side, I think that will alleviate some of our issues with the residents So I think that needs to be looked at when one would be David one would be an appropriate time to look at that And that's at the committee the borderline not related to what we have on the agenda Maybe that would be something that you'd want to add to the discussion for committee of the whole Okay Okay, any other discussion? Okay, thank you, David with a clerk, please call the roll for passage on 3.6 and 3.9 6.3 and 6.9 close Slexia yeah 14 eyes 1 no motion passes Item 6.4 is RC number 361 of 1617 by the finance committee to whom was referred resolution number 1 97 of 1617 by all the part person wolf Donahue Bellinger and Schneider authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2017 budget to establish Estimated revenue and appropriation for contracted services park facilities and street improvements in the community Development block grant funds recommends that the resolution be passed all the person will Thank you mayor. I make a motion to accept and adopt and pass resolution second Thank you for that motion in support under discussion So you know discussion with a clerk, please call the roll 14 eyes 1 no motion passes Item 6.5 is RC number 362 of 1617 by the public protection and safety committee whom is referred resolution number 199 of 1617 by all the person feel authorizing entering into a contact for architectural engineering services associated with The reconstruction of fire station number two roof structure and recommends the resolution be passed all the person feel Thank You mayor make a motion to accept and adopt and pass the resolution We have a motion on the floor. Is there any discussion? Yep, we have a motion on the floor. Is there any discussion seen on or the clerk, please call the roll 15 eyes Motion passes Item 6.7 is RC number 365 of 1617 by the finance committee who was referred resolution number two one two of 1617 by all the person will authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2017 budget to establish an appropriation In it for an advance of funds to the redevelopment authority for land acquisition The funds will be repaid with interest and recommends that the resolution be passed all the person wolf Thank You mayor. I make a motion to accept and adopt and pass resolution Thank you for that motion in support. Is there any discussion on the motion? Hearing none will the clerk, please call the roll for passage 14 eyes one no motion passes Item 6.8 is RC number 366 of 1617 by the finance committee to whom was referred resolution number 213 of 1617 by all the person wolf authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2017 budget to establish an appropriation for development loan to the founders club and recommends that the resolution be passed All the person wolf Thank You mayor. I make a motion to accept and adopt and pass resolution Thank for that motion in support. Is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none will the clerk call the roll 14 eyes one no motion passes Item 6.10 is RC number 371 of 1617 by the finance committee to whom is referred a copy of general ordinance number 44 of 1617 by all the person bellinger and wolf and a copy of our own number 235 of 1617 by the city clerk annexing territory to the city of shabuagan all the person wolf Thank You mayor I make a motion Action there really isn't any because we've already passed it. So it's a copy of okay, so we can just accept that Please accept file Yeah, we have a motion to accept in file. Is there a second second? We have a second all those in favor of accepting and filing. Please signify by saying aye. Aye opposed motion passes under matters laid over 7.1 is our own number 229 of 1617 by the city planning commission to whom is referred general ordinance number 41 of 1617 by all the person Donahue wolf feel Bellinger and whole shoe for in ordinance healing and recreating section 15.915 of the city zoning ordinance as So as to remove the duties of the housing rehabilitation loan program from the historic preservation Commission and recommends that the ordinance be passed all the person bellinger Thank You mayor. I moved to accept and file and pass your ordinance second. Thank you for that motion in support Is there any discussion? See none, please call the roll 15 eyes Motion passes item 7.2 is resolution resolution number 211 of 1617 by all the person wolf authorizing entering into a contract for the purchase of Delivery of 40 concrete planters for the downtown businesses in the district district corridor all the person wolf Thank You mayor. I make a motion to pass resolution second. Thank you for that motion in support. Is there any discussion? See none with a clerk. Please call the roll 12 eyes To knows and one not present Tomorrow did you mean to vote? Yes? Okay Okay motion passes Next move on to other matters received after the agenda was published the city attorney The first is resolution number 232 16 dash 17 by older person bellinger Resolution authorizing entering into contract with the play sales to purchase downtown Christmas decorations. They'll be referred to the public works committee Resolution number 233 dash 16 dash 17 by elder person wolf a resolution authorizing accepting a grant from The tony hawk foundation in the amount of $5,000 to be used towards the skate park project. That'll be referred to the finance committee Resolution number 234 dash 16 17 by elder person wolf Resolution to authorize a transfer of appropriations in the 2017 budget for salaries and benefits in the city clerk department That'll be referred to the finance committee Resolution our own number 261 dash 16 dash 17 by the city clerk Submitting various license applications for the period ending December 31st 2017 June 30th 2017 and June 30th 2018 That'll be referred to the law and licensing committee All the person down here. Thank you mayor. I move to adjourn second take for that motion in support Favor of adjourning, please signify by saying aye. I opposed we stand adjourned. Thank you for your time this evening