 I think, you know, I heard all three of you talk about trust, right? And right now, when you think about blockchain or when blockchain is mentioned, obviously the negative impact of the mining of proof of work. Blockchains keeps coming up, right? And it's very hard to talk about the positives of blockchains sometimes in regards to implementation. So when you are talking to your customers and even your internal executive teams, right, about how blockchain enables it. Can you tell us a little bit, maybe start with you, Doug, on the trust factor, right? Why is it important to be able to go down to the mining at the mining level in regards to the data that you're capturing it? And how do you go about doing that? Yeah, so if you imagine an artisanal mindset in the Congo and a car manufacturer in the United States, there's obviously not only a geographical difference, but enormous asymmetry in terms of their capabilities, and also many steps to the supply chain between them. So from mine site via refiners in China, battery manufacturers who could be traditionally in China, but increasing in Europe and also in the United States, two to an EV, can be seven tiers of a supply chain. And enormously different levels of capability. And so in such a genuinely distributed real world environment, to try and gather data and to notarize that data so that history can't be rewritten if it subsequently proves to be inconvenient, is a near perfect use case, in my view, for a distributed ledger. That bit of the argument is easy. I often get asked the question about energy use. Thankfully, that's one of the reasons why we picked a blockchain protocol that didn't have those concerns. And my view was that hyperledger fabric was the closest to an enterprise standard when we started our business sort of five years ago. And I think probably it still is. There are now, of course, different ways of achieving consensus on other blockchain protocols, but they're not quite as well established in the minds of sometimes quite traditional corporations that are still concerned about how their data is managed. Particularly if they're providing data into an environment where, by definition, you are sharing a proportion of it to create transparency. Yeah, absolutely. So security and transparency as well. About you, Andreas, I know that you've tackled some of these issues as well. Yeah, no doubt some blockchain technologies are still linked to high energy consumption, but we also have to thank the community that really helps tremendously to change technology, particularly in the Ethereum context. And of course, there's a plethora of technologies that doesn't use proof of work in the first place. For us, we try to avoid, well, let's say for me, I try to avoid calling things blockchain so much. I call it trust. First of all, it's a much broader term, or trust technologies. It's a broader term. Not everything is necessarily a blockchain. You can use a different mix of technologies that are typically used in the context of blockchain and assemble them in a different way. So it's a more neutral term that really points out, yeah, we've solved the trust issue rather than we want to use blockchain. So that sometimes, I think in the past, it was too technology driven, I think. Okay, yeah, and we'll dig into that a little bit in a bit. And also the fact that you're really onboarding different levels of people with expertise and resources into these consortiums or into these blockchain networks as well. Alex, tell us a little bit about why, from a Web3 perspective, the work that SEAL Storage and Filecoin is doing is really important from a climate perspective. Absolutely, so part of the value that you get from using a distributed ledger, and particularly Filecoin as a blockchain, is what we've talked about a bunch here, which is that trustless factor. So people can look at that and say this data has an absolute value to it. It's not something that somebody's making up. I think the big application here, one of the big applications is with greenwashing. For those of you who don't know what greenwashing is, it's when a company submits some form of misleading data, false data, or potentially delay different statistics in order to present a better outcome to the public in terms of what their environmental impact is. So I think if you actually have an accurate record of up-to-date information, but what your mission standards are, what your environmental impact standards are, you can create that system where people can actually look into that and see for themselves whether you're truthful in that sense. And I think right now, greenwashing is a significant problem, and it's not something that necessarily has an easy answer. But I think blockchain really does have a very good solution for that. And another element that was discussed here from a supply chain perspective is it really helps people in the manufacturing side of things or our client side of things measure their scope to in three emissions, which is essentially in a very simplistic way. It's your downstream or broader emissions. So not exactly what you create manufacturing. For example, when we buy different hardware or different other elements that the company needs to function, that type of manufacturer can look at our specific data and say, when I'm measuring my scope too, this is what my boxes or my hardware or my compute is being used, and this is the energy associated with that, which can create a more accurate system for them to present to their overall stakeholders. And from a customer perspective, you can actually see, where is my data going? What type of impact is that having? So even somebody who's doing really good work from a climate perspective, they don't necessarily want to put it in a provider that has a high usage of coal or in an area that has something that's particularly negative for the environment. So it really allows different stakeholders to look and say, what am I getting into from an environmental perspective? What is the emission impact that I'm willing to digest by working with this potential vendor or customer? And in the broader ESG landscape, not necessarily environmental, but I think it's really good for a misinformation discussion. So we were very excited to be selected for the project with the Shoah Foundation and Starling Labs, which for those of you who don't know, is a project to document 55,000 videos from Holocaust survivors. So we've got the testimonials being uploaded into the Filecoin ecosystem as a way for further generations to look back and say, here's all these different facts and stories and prove that for the future. And I also think that applies to misinformation regarding environmental standards, as well as other people's historicals when it comes to their previous environmental impacts.