 Hi and welcome to another Philo-impro, philosophical improvisation. Today we will talk about light. So light has been considered a form of absolute since Einstein's discovery. And this is interesting because already in Plato's myth of the cave, there is this idea that light serves as the ultimate metaphor. And even today, many aspects of our intellectual discoveries that are supposedly based only on abstract thinking, that in fact might be dependent on a worldview that in order to separate objects analytically is implicitly referring to the capacity of light to distinguish or to help us distinguish objects instead of considering just flows or a hole that would be vibrating in different frequencies. So in my book, being a nearness, which is just out this bounds, I'm engaged into a thought experiment. What if light and sight were not our dominant ways of considering the world? What if it was the art of listening that would give us access to a better understanding of things? Or another sense or a combination of senses that we are not yet aware of, that we are not yet trained to develop in the sense of a tool to manifest an interpretation of the world? So we are perhaps confusingly aware that there are other things than objects around us, but we do not yet know necessarily what is the understanding that might help us to articulate this new perceptions into a narrative. That's it for today. I've been already longer than in the previous two improvisations. So see you tomorrow. Bye.