 All right, thank you. So it seems as though many of the really exciting objectivist solutions to world problems that you've put out there on your shows in the past would require really a radical reformation. I think someone once called it a free market revolution. So for example, you discussed the idea that if roads were privatized, then the road owners would have an incentive to enforce rules of the road. And you discussed the idea that if health care were deregulated, then innovations such as healthcare for life once you're born, those types of policies would emerge. But things like large amounts of privatized roads and really just a deregulated healthcare system just seem highly unlikely. So does that mean that objectivist answers to problems in many cases will likely always be only theoretical? Well, no, because I don't think it's highly unlikely. That is highly unlikely in our lifetime maybe, but I don't think they're highly unlikely in the future. I think reality and truth and justice and what works and what's model actually went out and it might take 30 years, it might take 50 years, it probably will take 100 years or longer, but I do think roads will be privatized one day and healthcare will be completely privatized one day. So I do believe that that world will come about. Now, does that mean we have nothing to contribute to contribute to the debate today? In a sense, it does mean that we have nothing to contribute. If the argument is between statists, how much to regulate product acts, I don't have much to contribute to that and I don't have much influence on that debate, but if what we're trying to aim for is changing the minds of people in terms of how they live and in terms of their values and in terms of the way they approach the world so that they can become as individuals better off and that one day there'll be enough of those individuals to have a political impact, then I think we have a lot to contribute. That is, I think what we really have to contribute is to the lives of individuals. We have little to contribute to the actual solutions politically that are realistic today and we have a lot of to contribute to the lives of individuals, but we do that partially by offering these radical solutions to the problems of the day and stimulating people into thinking about these issues and hopefully getting them therefore to read Ayn Rand and to take their ethics and to take the other ideas seriously and to change their own lives in terms of how they live their lives. So, if Donald Trump called me tomorrow and said, you're on, what should I do? Well, beyond telling him to resign, there's no practical immediate advice I have in terms of what to do, right? Yeah, deregulate more, everything move towards economic liberty, but in that sense, I wouldn't sound that much different than a certain economic conservatives or certain economic libertarians. In terms of my radical solutions, I mean, nobody wants them, nobody, they're not in play, they're not on the table, they're not options from which to select, right? So in that sense, you're right, they're not gonna happen, not anytime soon anyway. Okay. Does that answer the question? It does, it's helpful, thank you. Jennifer?