 So, I welcome you all once again to my channel Explore Education, I am Dr. Rashmi Singh, Assistant Professor of the Department of Education, S.S. Khanna Girls 2D College, University of Allahabad. And in the series of discussing various philosophies, that is naturalism, idealism, pragmatism, realism, this time I am going to discuss educational implications of idealism and naturalism. So, let's start. Even though we study a lot of different philosophies in the educational philosophy, since we are a discipline of education, we don't want to be influenced by education, so we have to know the educational implications of every philosophy. Without that, we are not the students of the Department of Education, that we will study and our work will be done. So, we have to know what the education has given to the students of the Department of Education. What are the changes in the educational implications of this education? So, we have talked about idealism and naturalism, but in those videos, I did not cover educational implications. So, in this method, if I am covering it here, then your philosophy will be completely completed and you will understand better. So, we have talked about idealism, it will not be about idealism, now its educational implications will be talked about. Still, everyone will know what idealism is, it is a principle. It has a principle of evolution, it is principle of evolution, it is principle of evolution, it is principle of evolution, everything is over. So, this ism, this isma, this isma, this isma, this isma, what is the lesson given to the students. So, let's see. An idealist's concept of education is something which deals one to the highest The deepest spiritual insight, that is, the idealistic vision, is that according to this education, the moral conduct of the human being, the genetic behavior of the human being, becomes very good. And in that, from the deepest, from the inner group, you get the spiritual insight. Such a education is considered idealistic. This means that the idealistic vision strengthens the education of the human being, so that the moral conduct and the deepest spiritual insight can be developed. It is believed that only through education, a man led to realize the truth, beauty and goodness, the value for life. This means that according to the idealist, the values are truth, beauty and goodness. That is, in the true Shivam Sundaram, it is said that it is believed that only through education, a man can realize the truths, truths and goodness of his life. This means that this kind of education should take place. This means that the idealist keeps learning this way. Then according to Ross, the function of education is to help us in our exploration of the ultimate universal value, so that the truth of the universe may become our truth and give power to our life. This means that the function of education is that we are the ultimate universal values, that is the truth and beauty and goodness, which can be found in our ultimate, universal values. So he mentioned that education is expected to enlarge the boundaries of the spiritual realm. This means that education is expected to enlarge the boundaries of our spiritual realm. This means that education is expected to enlarge the boundaries of our spiritual realm. This means that education is expected to enlarge the boundaries of the spiritual realm. Because you know that the Quran is a promise, so it gives power to spiritualism and moral conduct. So you can also ask the same question. What is the relevance of idealism in present day context? You can also say that because there are so many values in the society, if we adopt the idealism, then we will definitely get the help of the idols. So you can also understand this. In the words of idealists, man's nature is spiritual and divine. They are saying that in the words of idealists, the nature of a person is spiritual and divine. Man can realize himself only through education. Man can recognize his spiritual power only through education. But the social aspect of education is not all together neglected by the idealists. Idealists do not have a complete understanding of the social aspect of education. Their regard and education is a social necessity as well. That means that the idealists believe in the social aspect of education. Such a projection should reflect the good of the society. This means that they talk about the good of the society. You can also say that this is a balancing act between individual aim of education and social aim of education. This is also a good thing. Then, idealistic education involves depth of learning, a holistic approach that involves teaching the whole rather than its part. That is, the idealists believe in the depth of learning. This means that we have to know the depth of learning from the inside, from the inside, from a deep, holistic approach. This is a holistic approach that involves teaching the whole rather than its part. The best method of learning for Plato was the dialectic approach where ideas are put into battle against each other with the most significant idea being the battle. Plato is one of the idealists of Western philosophy and Western society. According to Plato, the main method of teaching in education is dialectic. What happens in dialectics? It is said that dialectics is a type of practice. It is a battle of thoughts. Because thoughts are the main thing. It is said that a war is going on in which thoughts are fighting each other. So the most significant idea, the most important thought, is to win. It is said that idealism has done the work of increasing our thinking and rationality. Idealist teaching methods should encourage learners to enlarge their horizons. It is said that these types of teaching methods are given to idealistic people. They help learners to enlarge their horizons. This is a part of our mind. Stimulate reflective thinking. This is how we stimulate our thinking. Encourage personal moral choices. Our magnetic choices encourage them. Provide skills in logical thinking. Why are we so capable of thinking? Because everything is dependent on ideas. That is why logical thinking is also important. Provide opportunities to apply knowledge to moral and social problems. Stimulate interest in the subject content. Encourage learners to accept the values of human civilization. See, there are so many good things in this teaching. We have been given the advantage in education. Our horizon is getting enlarged. We are getting the stimulation of reflective thinking. Our moral choices are getting encouraged. We are getting skilled in logical thinking. We are getting opportunities to apply knowledge to the subject content. We are getting interest in the subject content. And we are accepting the values of human civilization. So, there are not so many good things in this teaching. Then, learning for idealists is an exercise in stretching the mind to its fullest so that it can absorb and handle ideas. This is a exercise for idealists. This is an exercise in which we can spread our mind to the fullest. So that it can absorb and handle ideas. So, the more you spread your mind, the more you can absorb and handle ideas. Then, idealists have stressed the importance of mind over matter. This has been discussed by idealism many times. The importance of mind is not the importance of matter. They do not believe in materialistic society. They believe in thought. Idealists conceive of people as thinking beings who have minds capable of seeking truth through reasoning. They say that people believe that we are the thought people. The person who has the ability to think has the ability to take out the truth through reasoning. Idealist philosophers put great emphasis on individuals in terms of their intellectual development. That is why, people who are idealists use their minds over matter. So, in one way or another, what did we teach in education? We taught that intellectual development is necessary. You should know how to answer such questions. You should be clear on points. Idealism considers students as individuals with inner potentials. Education should help these students to realize these potentials. Idealism considers them as individuals who have potentials. They have the strength and the ability to do something. We have to take out those potentials from education. The teacher should impart essentials of knowledge and access to develop moral and aesthetic values. So, what we have to do with education? We have to provide knowledge to the teacher. We have to provide assistance to the teacher so that the teacher can have a healthy and healthy mind. Idealism says that education is the focus of the country. The preservation, enrichment and transmission of our culture should be done. We should keep our culture safe. We should increase it. We should also strengthen it. Education must contribute to the development of overall culture. This is the responsibility of the culture's development. Idealism in education means to develop a good relationship between students. This is very important in the present context. It is important that students do not respect the teacher. The relationship between students is distorted. So, if we accept idealism, or if we say that idealism has given the teacher a good relationship between the teacher and the teacher. There are so many points. But, where will you write? You will have to limit yourself. This is the nature of the nature. Let us look at the nature. So, what is the nature? We know that nature is the nature of nature. Nature is supreme. Naturalism is the ideology that separates nature from God, subordinates spirit to matter and establishes unchanging laws as paramount. Right? It is James Ward. James Ward said that the nature of nature is the one that separates nature from God. Subordinates spirit to matter. What was there? What was in naturalism? It was the foundation of mind. And matter was after that. And here, it is bringing matter up. It is bringing spirit down. And he says that unchanging laws as paramount. James Ward said that. Then, naturalism, like other ideas as influence education, like many other philosophies, has influenced the teacher a lot. Everything is good when it comes from the hands of the author of nature. Rousseau, which is a very popular topic, says that everything that we get from nature is right. But everything degenerates when it comes from the hands of man. But everything is destroyed in the hands of man. Naturalism and applied through education means putting the child at the centre of all educational processes. The natural laws will be the teacher to teach the child according to his own nature. He says that when we bring naturalism in the hands of the child, we will keep the child at the centre. And education will be taught according to the nature of the child. Or it will be directed to him. So what was naturalism? It was the idea of idealism, humanism and formalism which insisted on bookish knowledge to be enforced in the community of the child from outside. That is, this is how it was. Idealism, humanism and formalism. They used to say that when you want to put bookish knowledge in it, the nature of the child uses bookish knowledge. Then naturalism is always a proponent of science and experimentation. So naturalism is based on knowledge and use. He says that science can solve the mysteries of nature and only knowledge acquired from science is true. And he says that what we are getting from knowledge is true. This ideology rejects the concept of spirituality. Idealism is the opposite of naturalism. Idealism says that spiritual realm is divine. We need to enhance spirituality. And Dukrati Badi says that they rejected spirituality as a concept. What does this school say? This school of thought holds that the mind and its processes may be examined by means of the senses only. And what was idealism? That the mind has thoughts, the mind has thoughts. They say that the mind can be examined by the senses. Naturalism is a philosophy that rejects the existence of preconceived and predetermined life. Idealism has already the universal values and beauty goodness. Dukrati Badi says that the pre-conceived and predetermined life is based on the existence of the mind. He says that the mind determines the values of life through his interactions with reality. He says that the mind will listen to the reality when it is interrelated with reality. When it is interrelated with the mind and according to the demands of the mind. This is a practical philosophy. You might say that Dukrati Badi has given a practical approach. The naturalist school strives for children's present and future happiness. Dukrati Badi says that the mind is the present and future of the child. They reject the preconceived, predetermined values. Idealism emphasizes self-realization as the goal of education. Naturalist philosophy emphasizes self-expression and self-preservation. What Adarsh Badi said was that the person has potential, divine and spiritual realm. Self-realization was his goal. Naturalist philosophy is a comparison of self-expression and self-preservation. After idealism, naturalism is generally in the society. There is a reaction against idealism. This is why the opposite is happening. Darshan says that self-expression emphasizes the individual. Self-expression and self-preservation should be aimed at education. Then naturalism considers the child as a gift of natural potentiality and says that the child is a gift of nature. There is a lot of potential to achieve its natural growth. The growth processes must be natural and real without any interference from outside. The child has a child-centered education. It says that let the child study naturally in a real context. Don't bring any interference from outside. Don't let the child interfere. The child should get the freedom to interact with nature in his or her own view. The child should be able to interact with nature in his or her own way. Make the child involved in physical activities by estimulating sensory experiences with nature. Naturalism says that there is a lot of sense because nature interacts with nature and it will do the same. Even besides learning by doing what is the method of naturalism? Learning by doing is often a strict discipline. It always forbids strict discipline and stops naturalism. The child should be allowed to face the natural consequences of this. His actions and self-discipline would be developed. Nature will teach you and it will punish you. Nature will teach you and it will teach you self-discipline. It will teach you and it will punish you. It will teach you self-discipline. The tagline is follow nature. All these laws of learning are followed by nature. The naturalist method is to gather direct experiences from nature, men and thieves. The teaching method is to let the child learn from experience. Learning by doing, learning by experience. You should be taught by experience. Don't teach him anything verbally. All knowledge must emerge out of actual life situations and experience. Life experiences and experiences will be obtained. What else are you saying? Don't impose anything on the child. They want the children to acquire everything with their own efforts. They want to teach the child their own efforts. Who is the naturalist? They are against progressive education. They are progressive, liberal. They want to give freedom to the child. They want to teach the child their own instinct. They want to teach the child their own personal things. Then there is the sense of knowledge. Education is very effective when it comes to sensory channels. What else did the naturalism teach us? We were taught to use self-expression. We were taught to follow nature. We were taught to follow nature. We were taught to teach the child our own self-education. We were taught to teach the child our own self-education. Our only profession is the main predominant characteristics of modern education. Which the nature taught us So thank you and don't forget to like and subscribe my channel, Explore Education. I have done for myself.