 his innocence, although he has painfully accepted the conviction. The family of the accused says that they have been stigmatized, faced a lot of stigmatization and financial drain in form of legal cause. That they are expressing empathy for the family of the deceased and pray that the perpetrators will be found. And finally, they pray for leniency in sentence. From the community point of view, the probation officer interviewed senior chief of free area location, Dr. Samuel Macharia, who described the accused person as being well-mannered, respectful, and was not a threat to the community. That the community is shocked by the charge that was preferred against him and subsequent conviction. That they vote for his good character, social standing, as they have known him to be a respectable youth committed to charge activities. Bishop Shadrach, a law of Agape, sanctuary charge, says that the accused person is a member of his charge. He is steadfast in faith, relays well with fellow Christians, and at the time of his arrest, he was a choir master in the charge. He pleaded for leniency. The investigating officer, Mr. Maxwell Otieno, is indicated in the report as having described the accused person as an extremely dangerous person, but violent in nature, as demonstrated by the fact that he was involved in an assault case with one Rogers at club 1824 when he was out on bond in this matter. And that the reason why the case did not go forward is because the complainant with the drew the complaint. And the investigating officer called for the maximum sentence provided for under. The community from where the victim hails from in Fika described the victim as a person who had a promising future, they were shocked at her death, and they called for a strident sentence, the family of the victim. The family of the victim reported and the pre-sentence report to have stated that following the demise of the victim, the death occasioned them monumental psychological impact and they're still to cope with the said offense and death. And other than the father of the deceased who has received psychological counseling, none of the other family members have had the benefit of the same. It is indicated that at the time the probation officer was interviewing the mother of the victim. She broke down severely and wailed, forcing him to stop the interview to allow her to come down. She is said to have indicated that she does not understand what would cause anyone to brutally murder her only daughter who was her confidant and a very close friend. It is reported that following the death of the victim and the deceased, she suffered prolonged depression and consequently suffered stroke. According to her, the inappropriate sentence is death. The father of the deceased is reported to have indicated that the extensive media coverage impeded the emotional healing. The younger brother of the victim is reported to have ceased watching news, stopped trusting people, limit his movement. A voice going to public places and only does online drops. It is reported following the death of the deceased. As already indicated in the submissions of the victim, having been the managing director of the family business in South Sudan, the business collapsed, the family became drained financially and they were not able to meet their day-to-day needs as that was the main source of their income. In a nutshell, the family of the deceased hold the view that the maximum sentence provided by the funder should be pronounced and they acknowledge that whatever the case is, even that particular sentence will not console them or arrest their pay. Finally, the probation officer and again ordered that the first accused person before this court, being Joseph, Korya, Erungu, Alaa's Joey, shall suffer death as provided for the offense of madam under section 204 of the Pino Code of Kenya.