 Stogati wants our 500 000 from Nota Beloii for defamation. Top hip-hop music executive and trends influencer Nota N. Lomulo Beloii seemed unfazed by the defamation lawsuit filed against him by rapper and businessman Boatumolo Molcain, popularly known by his stage name Stogati, after Beloii allegedly called the veteran lyricist a woman basher on social media. According to court papers filed at the Johannesburg High Court, dated November 25, Molcain is demanding our 500 000 and proclaims that the comments made by Beloii on his Twitter page caused irreversible reputational harm to his brand. However, Beloii said that in his tweets, published on October 3, he merely pointed out that Molcain tried to punch him but missed, instead of hitting an unsuspecting woman behind him on the jaw at a lavish eatery in Santon. He said, I have not received the summons, but it's strange because he was the one who tried to assault me. I have everything on camera and there are a lot of witnesses and his lawsuit has no legs. I am not even going to instruct my attorney to defend this. I want to do it myself. Beloii made a name for himself during his tenure as the business manager of rapper Senso Quest de Vilacasi. He is also married to Afropop sensation Gugula Tecumalo, known by her stage name Berita. According to Molcain's combined summons, the tweets read I confronted at Tumi Molcain weeks after a scuffle with a friend defending my honor two weeks ago. Stogati struck a black woman's jaw with a clenched fist in the ensuing chaos. I saw him hiding in the corner, walked up, and said I heard you're looking for me he swung and missed. Moral of the story, he missed me and only hits black women. Fortunately, I was able to drag him to the ground by his extended arm and his collar. His fist punched the titled sick floor as he hit the ground face first, where enamel met ceramic. I hope at level 3 Vanu has CCTV footage. The papers further alluded that the tweets portrayed Molcain as having no regard for gender-based violence. The allegations contained in these social media posts are not only false and hurtful but deliberately intended to humiliate and label the plaintiff unfavorably and to destroy his good name and reputation among his peers in the industry and his fans. The papers said that Beloyai's comments were regless and could jeopardize Molcain's ability to secure gigs and generate an income. The plaintiff was defamed and his reputation in the esteem of the reasonable listener of the general public was gravely lowered, and he suffered damages in the amount of R500000. They also lamented that Beloyai refused to retract the statements upon being served with a letter of demand. Molcain did not respond to a written inquiry and his phone rang unanswered.