 Now, I'd like to ask my colleague from WIDA to load the presentation that has been pre-recorded by our colleague, Finoreo Castigo, who is representing the Mozambique team. My name is Finoreo Castigo, I'm a member of the National Mozamo team. This presentation uses Mozamo to make a simulation model for Mozambique, to estimate the impact of spreading the bulk social subset program BSSP to reach more eligible households on poverty and inequality. And this poll's brief was drawn up by experts from various institutions, including the National Institute of Statistics, the National Institute of Social Action, and the Ministry of Economy and Finance. The database used for this simulation is the I of 2014. Here are the main points we'll try to cover in this presentation. What I want to do in this presentation, or in this poll's brief, we'll work on that, is to reach 28% of the vulnerable population is a target set in the government's five year programs, PQG 2020 and 2044. So the BSSP covers 404,246, that is mean 16% of all households covered by social protection in Mozambique. So BSSP and the Puritive Social Action Program passed, and the Red Social Program passed, these three programs, the current covers rate 2022 in by social protection program is 22%. So our assumption for reaching 28% of households who is poverty is spending, you'll be the special of the main base social protection program BSSP. This program, BSSP has been implemented in Mozambique since 1995, is a long-term cash transfer for labor constrained households, and for the people eligible is the people living in extreme poverty, and the household in the following situation are eligible if that household have the help of people, disabled people or people with current or generative disease, which should be between zero and two years of age, who are more large, and they have already had by children all with orphaned and vulnerable children. The table shows the current amounts that the beneficiary received and the purpose presented be the National Institute for Social Action, the amounts to be received depends on the number of female members in the household, where a household with a single member receives 500 and 40 meter cash, and if there are five members in the household, they currently receive 1,000 meter cash, and that is the current amounts, and we have how the Enash proposes for, for, to receive the new amount to receive the household with poor poverty. So we simulated in this pulse brief four scenarios. The first one, to reaching the 20% of household living below of the poverty line, we expand the bay SSP with the current amount of transfer, and in scenario two, we try reaching the 20% of household living below the poverty line, by expanding the bay SSP with transfer amounts adjusted to Enash proposes for the year 2022. To scenario three, we try to reach the 100% of eligible households, regardless of whether they are below the poverty line or not, but by expanding the bay SSP with the current transfer amounts. For scenario four, we try to reach the 100% of eligible households, regardless of whether they are below the poverty line or not, by expanding the bay SSP with the transfer amounts adjusted to Enash proposes for 2022. Our works, they give that results. To reach 28% of households in scenario one, the government will need an additional 1,306 thousand 530 net cash, which would bring with it a 0.23% reduction in poverty, and 0.19% of contribution in the levels of inequality measured by gene index. For scenario two, the increase in the subside couplets with the expansion in the number of beneficiaries would require one increase of 2,882,909 net cash on the part of the government, and in terms of the impact on poverty and inequality, a reduction of 0.25% and 0.44% respectively. In scenario three, the government require a fortune of 8 million net cash to reduce poverty and inequality around 1.5% and 1.25% respectively. The scenario four shows that an increase of near 12 million net cash is needed, with the potential to reduce poverty by 2.4% and inequality by 1.8% of all. The expansion of the programmer in different scenarios has an impact on cheap policies and the most vulnerable households, especially those located in the 20th and 40th percentiles in scenario two. The average monthly per capita consumption in the 20th percentile is 7,464 points on tent metacal, while in the 40th percentile, it is 7,646 tents metacals below the counter-poverty line, 50,111 metacal per month. It should be not tartan in scenario four, there is a significant increase in the level of consumption of 8% and 40% respectively, 20th and 40th percentiles, demonstrating the favorable ability of implementing this scenario in terms of nominal impacts on the level of consumption. In terms of nominal impacts on the level of consumption of the most vulnerable households. Our finding, expanding the BSSP to cover the target of 28% of households below poverty line between 24, as defined in the packaging, has the potential to reduce the poverty rate to be up to 0.5% in the simulated scenarios. Expanding the BSSP to cover all eligibility households has a higher potential impact on poverty reduction, potentially reducing it by up to 2.4% in the simulated scenarios. So we conclude that an investment above current values and extending the coverage of the base BSSP drastically reduce poverty. So that's all I want to bring for today, so muito obrigado, thank you.