 Science and censorship are in fact incompatible. The reason is that the scientific enterprise proceeds and makes progress and moves forward by conjecture and refutation, by generating a hypothesis and doing a study to potentially refute the hypothesis. It has to be an ongoing open conversation where debate or novel perspectives, where challenges to orthodoxy or conventional thinking are not only permitted but welcomed and then tested against the empirical evidence. That's how science proceeds. So trying to fixate whatever the current consensus happens to be and lock it in in law is something that cannot be challenged by physicians. We'll stifle the progress of science.