 And about a year ago, I did a video called You're Wrong About SCP-173. And then more recently, maybe six months ago, I don't remember when exactly, I did You're Still Wrong About SCP-173, where I addressed a couple of misconceptions that were being repeated in the comments of the first video. I was looking at my analytics lately, and I was noticing that You're Wrong About SCP-173 is getting almost as many views as my primary uploads every day. So I thought I would revisit You're Still Still Wrong About SCP-173. I might have to come up with a better name than that. There's nothing wrong with continuing to deliver the kind of content to the audience that they want to see more of. What I'm going to do is I'm definitely going to go through comments for both videos and respond to anything that I find particularly anything that I think will have a particularly interesting response. Let's put it that way. Let's start with the very first one. Actually, we're going to go cover a couple of comments at the same time. Let's see if we can find the other one. Didn't SCP-173 get redesigned after it in canon was put inside SCP-914? And I thought I should mention this. There's this guy on YouTube that's called SCP Illustrated, and he actually remade SCP-173. I thought that it looked pretty good. What I know for sure is that SCP Illustrated has indeed done a couple of different versions of SCP-173, and there are a couple of other versions of SCP-173 floating around the internet at this point. I believe the Unity version of Containment Breach includes a redesigned 173. Specifically so that it, I mean, I'm not saying that they want to use it in a commercial way, but they could if they wanted to as long as it's redesigned properly. The important thing to recall is that it's just the original images of the statue are not under the site's basic license because they plagiarized it. That's the problem. You can't plagiarize an image like that and then be like, oh yeah, it's ours now forever. Or I'm sorry, it's the people's now. That's not how private property works. So that's probably why it was changed in the Unity version. Yeah, pretty much. Just to clarify, oh, this is an interesting one, because this is actually the full canonical version of the Weeping Angels, which predate SCP-173 by about a week and a half to two weeks, roughly. Just to clarify, the story goes that Steven Moffat, yes, I'm aware he wasn't the showrunner yet, but he wrote Blink, which is the one that features the Weeping Angels, which premiered, as I said, a couple weeks before 173. 173's first iteration was posted to the Internet. Got the idea when he was walking through a graveyard and saw a statue with chains, then he walked back to that location in the graveyard later on and it was gone. Found this interesting and later used the idea of a statue that moves when you're not looking at it. I'm not saying he came up with the idea, he'd likely seen it somewhere in folklore before, hence why this possibility stuck out to him. But the idea that Steven Moffat knows what SPC is now is a little bit on the unlikely side that it's probable. Well, I don't know, you'd be surprised. The SCP Foundation has, I mean, it's not like super well known or even mainstream, but it is seeping into Hollywood a little bit. Every once in a while you'll, I've watched a, I couldn't off the top of my head link you anything, but there's a variety of videos I've watched where I've seen either hints that somebody is talking about the SCP Foundation or just outright mentions it. So it's not completely unknown, but it is still kind of, you know. I get the inclination that it's probably decidedly considered a, like an inferior form or an inferior forum for writing, but still it's known. And would have absolutely impossible with the time and position. We have to remember that Blank aired in 2007. Yes, we end up, you know, what's interesting is that this person is telling this story here, most of which, the broad strokes of it at least, were in the video as though he's, what is he clarifying? I don't, things not moving while you are looking at them have existed for so long because it's a smart thing to do in nature. It's very easy for animals and most life to see moving objects. So you move when you think whatever it is, isn't looking at you. Just take any mountain lion in real life. It'll be watching you and you turn your back, then look back at it. And it'll be right behind you. Well, that's because an ambush predator, its instinct is if you turn your back to it, to attack, but yeah, that's not here nor there. Not just mountain lions either. It's most, most big cats are ambush predators and they operate exactly this way. Not all, but most. It doesn't matter how well you know them. That's the reason why lion tamers and stuff like that, if it can eventually get mauled, it doesn't matter how well you know them, how friendly they are. If you turn your back to them, instincts tend to take over. Sometimes the instincts don't fully, like I'm saying, like it's, it's, it's something they can fight. And sometimes they do, but eventually you're going to get yourself mauled because it's just how their brains work. Ooh, first person I ever see address the blatant image theft around the entirety of the SDP community. Oh my God, as an artist who is constantly afraid of theft, I hate the SDP, but I also love it. I still wish we'd educate people more about rights content creators have on their own creations. It's really nice to see they respected the creator's request though. That's a nice outcome. Well, you know, they got real close to getting sued. They just got, because there was no way to contact them, which is a lesson they learned eventually. But image plagiarization on the SDP Wiki is still a problem because there's a lot of really big named articles that still have, that still have plagiarized images. And that's just how it is. The SDP Wiki is, SDP Wiki was founded on plagiarism. There's nothing we can do about that, except to try to fix it now. Its grip is like concrete. Try and break concrete with your bare hands. Come on, I am waiting. What the hell? I mean, okay. It says the grip is unbreakable. It doesn't say unbreakable by human hands. That's the thing about like SDP articles. That's something that you learn as you go when you write them. And if anyone is new here, I have written like 117 articles on the SDP Wiki. So when people are like, you just, there's also comments in here. I haven't seen any yet because I'm just looking at the most recent comments. But there definitely were comments in here that's like, you're just talking about, you're saying 173 is poorly written because you couldn't do something like that. I'm like, well, I don't have anything quite that popular, but I've got stuff up on the Wiki. What the hell are you talking about? Yeah, it's a very common comment that if it doesn't say unbreakable by human hands, which is not something you would want to say in an article, you would probably say something along. You just define the hardness of it. If it's non-anomalous concrete, like it just is as strong as concrete, tell me the thickness of it, then that's enough information. It's actually, it's reinforced concrete because there's rebar in it. So I don't know. Also, it's pretty clear if you look at the image that's made out of wood, but that's not, that's neither here nor there. Why do your titles have to be so obnoxiously presumptuous? Here's another thing. I get a lot of comments and they're on this video. It's, it's not necessarily related to the 173, but these comments do exist. So, along the lines of, I'm not wrong about it. Therefore, this title is incorrect, but you know what I'm saying? No one considers the fact that there are other people in the world besides them. So they just like, I'm not wrong, and therefore your title makes no sense. Well, there's 7 billion other people in the world. And for the average video of mine anywhere between 5 to 50,000 views, it kind of depends. Like a video about SCP 173 is usually going to get higher view counts. I think my, you're still wrong about 173, get like 20,000, but the original one's like 500,000? Let me just look real quick. Let me look at them there, analytics. Yep, 550, right now, 555,000, which, you know, it ain't bad. Actually, you can't be wrong on SCP just because there is no creator behind them. It's a lot of them. You can be one as well. So you can't be wrong. Fuck you. Okay. All right, let's look at the comments on the other video. You're still wrong about SCP 173. Let's get a couple of those in there. Why don't I just put some pistons in there to push it over? I think he can get up. Oh, Ash. Ash Williams says, let's get one thing straight out of the gate. The sculpture was not stolen. The image of the sculpture was. The artist himself is, however, given the SCP community, his permission to continue use of said picture, as long as no one makes money off of it. Super cool of him to do, by the way. What, what do you mean? Let's get one. I say that in the video. No one says that. Oh, and talking about the guy who was complaining that we, that Izumi Kato should be thankful that we stole his image and plagiarized it for the SCP wiki. Man, that one guy said sounds like, hey, I stole your fortune and left you homeless, invested it and was able to feed an entire hungry family. You should be grateful. I, I feel like you may have lost your metaphor here. I'm not really sure even which side of the argument you're on, but you do you, man. Anyway, that's it. Thank you very much for watching. I was going to do a video on how Siren Head isn't like, I know the Siren Head isn't an SCP meme, it's getting a little old, but I was going to do a little bit more detailed in-depth analysis. I had an outstanding email to the creator of the art Trevor Henderson, who hasn't responded yet. And I thought I would give it another week before I gave up on it and just made the video anyway. So that video is put on hold for another week, but you're going to see it next Thursday. In the meantime, I was looking through the comments on the 50,000 update video. And it looks like there really weren't a lot of super popular suggestions for the video. I'm going to do, so I'm probably just going to pick something I'd like to do on Tuesday, unless I hear a lot of outcry from people else wise. We'll see what we come up with. Thank you very much for watching. If you enjoyed the video, please scroll down and hit the subscribe button. And then the notification bell next to that so you're notified when I upload new videos. And then head on over to patreon.com. And I'll see you all again on Tuesday.