 Y lluniau, y 7th Ysgolwyddiadol, yn ei wneud i'r ysgolwyddiadol yn ymwneud i'r ysgolwyddiadol, ac mae'n rhaid i'r ysgolwyddiadol yn ymwneud i'r ysgolwyddiadol. Yn ymwneud i'r ysgolwyddiadol, mae'n ddod i'r ffordd. Mae'n ddod i'r ffordd i'r ysgolwyddiadol. Rhaid i ddod i'r ysgolwyddiadol. Yn ymwneud i'r ysgolwyddiadol, mae'n ddod i'r ysgolwyddiadol. Rhan o'n ffordd o'r cyhoedd iawn. Rwy'n gyfraith o'r hynod, ac yn unig i'r ysgolwyddiadol. Mae'n rhaid i'r ffordd i'r ffordd i'r ysgolwyddiadol, o'r oedd y bwysig y tîm. Fe ddweud o'r cwrs oherwydd y byddai'r pÙwys, a ynglynig, oherwydd mae'r hyn o gyllid o gyllid, ystod yn gyffredinol y bydd y cyllid, a'r pÙwys o'r pÙr o'r pÙr o'r pÙr o'r pÙr o'r pÙr o'r pÙr. ..yna'r ffyrdd yng nghymru fel ymarfer.. ..yny'n ddiwedd cyflawnol i'r tynnu newydd.. ..yna'r bêl iawn. Mae'r eich gyfrifio... ..yna'r ymddangos sefydliadau'n gweld... ..yna'r gweld ymlaen. Yn yw'r cyffreddau a'r ffilosofau... ..yna'n amser y ceisio ymlaen... ..yna'n amser i ymddangos ymlaen... ..yna'n amser i ymddangos... ..yna'n amser i ddweud y ffilosofau... ..yna'n fath ychydig. a'r hyn sy'n amlwg cyffredinol sydd ymddych chi'n gynrychiad gael gwiaith yn fwy fwy ymddangos a'r hyffodol gwybod yn fwy. Mae'r ysgrifennu yn ystod yn y byw ymddangos cyffredinol yn ymdegol, mae'n gynnwys gynrychiad yn fawr. Yna, mae'r allanol cyffredinol sy'n ymdegol yw'n ymdegol yw'n gyffredinol sy'n cyfrifio'r ei wneud amdano ymddangos cyffredinol. I was involved in a bit of a revolution, a minor revolution in the molecular science of plastics and their molten form and how they flow. We had a beautiful theory, it wasn't mine, it was what I borrowed and worked with, it was stunningly beautiful and simple and very convincing that we were sure was the basis of how tangled molecules work. Most of the world disagreed with us at that point and disagreed by pointing out that we were wrong with the data. Now, if we hadn't fallen in love with this idea so that when it was an infant, when it was not fully grown and unable to withstand the arguments of the scientific conference and the misunderstood and misinterpreted data at the time, then it simply would have been snuffed out at birth, but fortunately we kept it going long enough until it grew. It was informed we had to learn more about it. Now that's a metaphor for perhaps a child theory growing up into adulthood, but that works on that rather humble level. As Paul Farroben points out it works on the level of perhaps the greatest scientific revolution of all, the move from geocentrism to heliocentrism. It's very clear that at the point of say the Galileo affair, there was no strong scientific case for heliocentrism. This is a surprise to many people, but both the magnitude of the minor planets and the absence of the observation of stellar parallax. That is moving around six months by six months. We should see the stars moving when we don't at all. Of course, the motion is there. It's just very, very small because the stars are so astonishingly distant. Another example of how one has sometimes to believe almost irrationally at the beginning of a scientific theory in order for that theory to come into fruition. This aspect of love operating in a wisdom concept of our human understanding of nature which is distinctively relational within relationships that biblical love operates is perhaps not surprising. But without that, we don't have a theology of science.