 So, let me just begin the discussion and feel free to jump in and disagree with each other and that sort of thing. I want to begin with Reynolds here to ask him because his president, Mr. Macron, has made a thing of being the Trump whisperer. He's the person who seems to be the only world leader who can get along with Trump. And I guess the question is how has he managed to do that, but also what has he got back from Mr. Trump in return for his attitude towards the United States? And this particular aspect of Trump's personality can have nefarious consequences. We saw it during a telephone conversation that he had on October 6, last year with President Erdogan, where the Turkish president managed to get a green light from him to invade the north of Syria. But with Macron, I think it's working. I think that at the start, obviously, it's a bit of a mess, but we can't, of course, change completely Trump's convictions, which have always been very, very strong. So it didn't work on the climate. It didn't work at the start on the JCPOA, on Iran, on the nuclear agreement on Iran. Macron didn't manage to get Trump back, but on the other hand, I think that now this personal relationship, which didn't start on the Eiffel Tower, has had a fairly important role. And we saw it with Bjarith, for example. Bjarith, he did an incredible maneuver, that is to say that he managed to completely isolate Trump from his ministers. It wasn't planned. He took it away. He, Bolton, was more than 200 meters away. And, without an interpreter, he talked to him for two hours. And that's where, obviously, he trusted him. He asked him, do you see an inconvenience to what I invite Zarif, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Iranian, to discuss with him. This is where, obviously, Trump gave him a green light. A green light, which was normal. We can't have a conference where the American president is there and he was asked to invite him, which could be an enemy. And so it worked. And Macron didn't manage to make the meeting he tried to make in New York between President Rouhani and President Trump, the Iranian President. But it doesn't matter. Why didn't it work? Because Rouhani isn't the leader of Iran. He's the head of the regime. But he isn't the leader of Iran. The leader of Iran is Ayatollah Ramanei. And Ramanei didn't give the authorization to Rouhani to make this meeting with Trump. But we can't criticize Macron on this, even if he played because indisputably, indisputably, the cause of the peace in the Persian Gulf has progressed after Biyaritz. No one can deny it. Another, I think, favorable element of Macron's policy in the eyes of Trump is on Russia. I think he speaks with Russia. Macron has tried, or tried at the moment, to bring Russia closer to the international community in the discussion. I think Macron understood that it was a madness to want to throw the Russians in the arms of the Chinese. And we'll see if it works. He holds on to Trump's current course, because it's very important. There was the dinner of Brégançon. How are we going to have the meeting in Paris of the Normandy format, that is to say with the German-French-Ukrainian-Russian director who should arrive, I think, in November or maybe in December? Are we going to advance on the Donbass file? It's possible, since we have a new gift with the Ukrainian president Zelensky. It's quite possible. And if we advance on this Donbass field, that is to say that if we regulate the Donbass, we advance to a Donbass regulation, which is a solution that is not quite easy, amnesty, cultural autonomy, but not political autonomy of the Donbass. That's what the deal is. If we manage to advance on this, we might be able to make a discussion between the Europeans, the Americans, and especially the Europeans and the Russians on the Middle East. We have the Syrian deal. We show that we need a cooperation between the Russians and the Russians. So, to conclude, what is the situation in America today? The situation in America is that Biden is dead. His candidature is dead. Everyone understood it because of the Hunter of his son. So Elizabeth Warren is going up. Not everybody would agree with that. I give my interpretation, and next year, you can tell me that I was wrong. I give my interpretation. Elizabeth Warren is going up, but as she has very left-wing ideas, especially I think she recently proposed to remove the body of the border guards in a way that is American, it will be quite easy for Trump to make a campaign against her and there is no more than that, which will be Pongkaotas. Pongkaotas is what he calls it. Pongkaotas wants to transform America into a passport. It can work. And so what I'm saying here is that I think that Trump can be elected to be elected president again. In this case, I think that Macron had reason to anticipate and because if we still have four years of Trump, Macron will be there, because I think he also has a very strong chance to be elected himself. Macron will be there to do what we call, and that will be my only word in English of this session, to do what we call in English four years of damage control. So as you see it, as you see it, no negative consequences for Macron in the sense that Trump's famous for throwing his friends under the bus. So I mean, you know, there's been no negative consequences. No, I don't think so. I don't think it's negative at all. I don't think it's negative at all. There are people who mock him. He tried to go to New York, he waited in a hotel, etc. And then, the cause of the pain was not superior. I don't think we can reproach him at all. He did everything. It would be very serious if there was a fourth war in the Persian Gulf. We saw the catastrophic consequences of the American war in Iraq in 2003. So I think that Macron did everything to find a deal between Iran and America. The deal, it's like Ukraine. We know very well what the deal is. The deal is the abandonment of what we call the Sunset Closers in English. That is to say Iran never gave up nuclear weapons. But obviously the Americans let him his ax in the Arab capitals he conquered. That is Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut and Sana'a. Maybe the Iranians but the Yemenians because it's not very interesting for them. We will call it a common market. We will find a softer name. But that's the deal. The deal is ready. And Macron thinks that this deal can be reached and he is trying to reach it with Trump. And he is perfectly right. And anyway, before that, Macron has made progress with the Persian Gulf. It's absolutely indeniable.